Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

more of the same

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

more of the same

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-09, 06:06 PM
  #1  
-
Thread Starter
 
seeker333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,865

Bikes: yes!

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 36 Posts
more of the same

https://www.m-bike.org/blog/2009/10/1...e-1-cyclists-0

A little Saturday night irony for you.

-------------------------

Fuzzy Dice 1, Cyclists 0

Senate Bill 276, aka the Fuzzy Dice Bill, passed the Michigan Senate unanimously.

According to the Detroit News:

Fuzzy dice hanging from the rearview mirror would no longer be outlawed under a bill that won passage in the Senate today.

The chamber voted unanimously for a measure that strikes down a law that says items dangling from the rearview mirror are a no-no.

“We understand there are many distractions in cars, such as cell phones or GPS systems, but we did not feel that a rosary or air freshener was in the same league,” said Sen. Ron Jelinek, R-Three Oaks, sponsor of the bill. “This will help make it legal to do what thousands of Michigan residents already do — hang a memento from their mirror.”

Great job!

Now let’s look at some bicycle safety bills the Michigan Senate has not passed or voted on.

* Senate Bills 529 & 530 which “enhance penalties for moving violations causing physical injury or death to bicyclists and other vulnerable roadway users” according to the League of Michigan Bicyclists.

* Senate Bill 531 which stipulates that driver education “shall include information concerning the laws pertaining to bicycles and shall emphasize awareness of the operation of bicycles on the streets, roads, and highways of this state.”

Bicycle advocates in the state of Washington are also pursuing a Vulnerable User Bill. (Seattle PI via How We Drive)

Advocates for a new law argue that families of those killed or maimed deserve greater sense of justice than a traffic ticket brings. However, a conviction for negligent driving doesn’t carry much steeper punishment. Typically, a first-time offender gets probation or a deferred sentence.

“Do they need an automatic license suspension or do they need driver retraining. These are the questions that we should ask,” Hiller said. He noted that people who don’t control their vicious dogs face more criminal culpability than drivers for negligence behind the wheel.

We’re not sure if that last sentence is true in Michigan.

But, if the Michigan House and Governor follow the Senate’s lead, fuzzy dice will be safe again Michigan.
seeker333 is offline  
Old 10-17-09, 06:51 PM
  #2  
Domestic Domestique
 
UnsafeAlpine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,742

Bikes: Brand New Old Catamount! Schwinn Homegrown, Specialized FSR, Salsa Vaya, Salsa Chile Con Crosso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
It's important to hang things from mirrors.
UnsafeAlpine is offline  
Old 10-17-09, 10:21 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Commando303's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I find it laughable such a bill ever was being considered. Anything can be claimed to be a distraction: maybe any form of music in a vehicle, too, should be outlawed; and colorful interiors; and bobble-head dolls on the dashboard; and hookers in the back-seat — come on.
Commando303 is offline  
Old 10-17-09, 10:44 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Commando303
I find it laughable such a bill ever was being considered. Anything can be claimed to be a distraction: maybe any form of music in a vehicle, too, should be outlawed; and colorful interiors; and bobble-head dolls on the dashboard; and hookers in the back-seat — come on.
How about this, that 4" cube of plastic fuzz, blocking your view for an area sufficient that you don't see a speeding truck blowing a light, until it's too late to prevent a test of the side impact beams of your car, when 50,000lbs of truck hit them at 45MPH.
Wogster is offline  
Old 10-18-09, 05:05 PM
  #5  
"Per Ardua ad Surly"
 
nelson249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 1,416

Bikes: Bianchi Specialissima, Mongoose Hilltopper ATB, Surly Cross-Check, Norco City Glide

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
First thing I always did was remove things like that when I borrowed a vehicle. Anything that impairs my sight line gets 86'ed PDQ.
nelson249 is offline  
Old 10-18-09, 08:55 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Commando303's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
How about this, that 4" cube of plastic fuzz, blocking your view for an area sufficient that you don't see a speeding truck blowing a light, until it's too late to prevent a test of the side impact beams of your car, when 50,000lbs of truck hit them at 45MPH.
If it's a problem for the driver, he or she should ditch the item. If it isn't, the government shouldn't get into the car and throw it out for the person.
Commando303 is offline  
Old 10-18-09, 08:59 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Commando303
If it's a problem for the driver, he or she should ditch the item. If it isn't, the government shouldn't get into the car and throw it out for the person.
Often however it's not a problem, until the crash, getting destroyed by a truck is one thing, it a different thing if it's a pedestrian or a cyclist who is behind the accessory. People don't realize how big of an object can be behind an A pillar as well, but few drivers look around the pillar to see.
Wogster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.