Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-13-13, 10:32 AM   #201
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Only time I've been hit by a car was when they hit me head on. This was shining straight at them and they still "didn't see me"


I suppose as a precaution high vis and lights help, but you can never account for people who simply can't drive.
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 10:43 AM   #202
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertFalfa View Post
I question whether visibility is the most important factor in safety. ....
Around here in the northeast US, most roads have no shoulder and you're riding where cars routinely travel. If you were invisible, you'd get hit by the first or second car that happened by. The only reason you don't get is they see you and slow or move over so as not to hit you. Being seen is absolutely essential to surviving more than a few minutes on the road. Of course you can't be invisible and no matter what you wear, they will likely see you. It's just the more conspicuous your outfit, the more likely it is they will see you, and the further away the will see you giving them time to respond appropriately.
Looigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:11 PM   #203
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,996
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
Just as curiosity, how many of you (us) believe that 90% of the drivers that claim to have not seen a cyclist are just out and out lying, as if claiming you did not see them give a free pass to running them over? Or perhaps its a self delusion to to protect the driver from internally accepting they just killed or almost killed someone? Or if not 90%, what percentage of "did not see them" are just flat out lies?
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:19 PM   #204
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
Just as curiosity, how many of you (us) believe that 90% of the drivers that claim to have not seen a cyclist are just out and out lying, as if claiming you did not see them give a free pass to running them over? Or perhaps its a self delusion to to protect the driver from internally accepting they just killed or almost killed someone? Or if not 90%, what percentage of "did not see them" are just flat out lies?
Some are lying. I genuinely believe when I got hit that she did not see me. Scary.

We're not all perfect, but I've said it before. I don't think most accidents are accidental and with attentive driving they could be prevented.

As most typical Americans live 50km apart from everything and drive 20% over the limit on straightline high speed roads, after a couple of miles this kind of throws attentiveness out the window though as your brain sets into auto-pilot.
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:24 PM   #205
GrouchoWretch
Slob
 
GrouchoWretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmv2 View Post
Only time I've been hit by a car was when they hit me head on. This was shining straight at them and they still "didn't see me"


I suppose as a precaution high vis and lights help, but you can never account for people who simply can't drive.
Maybe the driver thought you were a raccoon with a dive light.
GrouchoWretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:35 PM   #206
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by daredevil View Post
that's always been my mantra as well....my family will own anybody in court that says they didn't see me.
That's mostly my thought as well. I know hi vis clothing won't help against those motorists most likely to hit a bicycle, i.e. the inattentive ones, but I would like to remove that excuse as much as possible.

I recently won a case against a driver for running me over on my motorcycle, while I was stopped at a stop sign. My motorcycle was large and white, with the headlight on, and I was wearing bright yellow gear. It didn't go all the way to court, just to an arbitrator, but when the other guy said he didn't see me, the look on the arbitrator's face was pretty amusing.
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:43 PM   #207
marqueemoon
or tarckeemoon, depending
 
marqueemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
Posts: 7,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
From my personal experience I find that it does help a little to wear a hi viz jacket in winter morning/evening commuting conditions which often involve rain and low light/fog.

Hardly a scientific test, but drivers seem to acknowledge me/react a little more quickly than when I wear a black jacket (running the same lights in either scenario).

No passive or active visibility measures are a substitute for good judgement though. I try to make myself visible but ride as if I am not.
marqueemoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:50 PM   #208
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrouchoWretch View Post
Maybe the driver thought you were a raccoon with a dive light.
ah ****, that's why those toothless guys in the beatup dodge Ram and wearing only overalls were trying to shovel me off the road into their pickup bed. Giggling to themselves and muttering about supper.
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 10:52 PM   #209
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by marqueemoon View Post
From my personal experience I find that it does help a little to wear a hi viz jacket in winter morning/evening commuting conditions which often involve rain and low light/fog.
That is why, I got this hi-vis jacket: http://www.performancebike.com/bikes...400070__400070

And these gloves: http://www.amazon.com/Pearl-Izumi-Th...cycling+gloves

to hopefully help with being more visible. Red(flashing light) on yellow(hi-vis jacket), should amp up the visibility.

That is in addition to the red light I put on my back, that set to flash mode.

Last edited by Chris516; 02-16-13 at 09:13 AM.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 08:28 AM   #210
RobertFalfa
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Minnesota
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris516 View Post
That is in addition to the red light I put on my back, that set to flash mode.
From my experience driving, the flashers help with visibility. I'm less sure of the turn signal flashers. (They're in the short video in that article I posted earlier: http://www.recreati.com/2013/01/25/toward-a-safer-bike/) It's a cool DIY project, but would turn signals add to my safety? Really? I think if a motorist sees me, and I'm being cautious, the turn signal won't contribute that much.
RobertFalfa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 09:15 AM   #211
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg beastie-boys-intergalactic.jpg (96.3 KB, 11 views)
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-13, 07:01 AM   #212
smasha
Vegan on a bicycle
 
smasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
science! - http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...tudy-on-hi-viz
smasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-13, 07:43 AM   #213
daredevil
cyclepath
 
daredevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: "The Last Best Place"
Bikes: 2005 Trek Pilot 5.0, 2001 Specialized Sirrus Pro, Kona Lava Dome, Raleigh hardtail converted to commuter, 87 Takara steel road bike, 2008 Trek Soho
Posts: 3,550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by smasha View Post
how about a quick synopsis? I'm lazy.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
daredevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-13, 07:57 AM   #214
smasha
Vegan on a bicycle
 
smasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by daredevil View Post
how about a quick synopsis? I'm lazy.
hi-viz doesn't hurt, usually. there are some real-world situations where plain white or even plain black would actually make you more conspicuous than hi-viz.

edit:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg hi-viz-049.jpg (64.8 KB, 12 views)

Last edited by smasha; 02-15-13 at 08:10 AM.
smasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 08:27 AM   #215
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,670
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 222 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by smasha View Post
hi-viz doesn't hurt, usually. there are some real-world situations where plain white or even plain black would actually make you more conspicuous than hi-viz.

edit:


The photo shows a case where being distinguishable doesn't matter. That is, the person isn't less safe in this case.
njkayaker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 09:10 AM   #216
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertFalfa View Post
From my experience driving, the flashers help with visibility. I'm less sure of the turn signal flashers. (They're in the short video in that article I posted earlier: http://www.recreati.com/2013/01/25/toward-a-safer-bike/) It's a cool DIY project, but would turn signals add to my safety? Really? I think if a motorist sees me, and I'm being cautious, the turn signal won't contribute that much.
I definitely agree.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 03:31 PM   #217
jputnam
Senior Member
 
jputnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Posts: 1,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by smasha View Post
hi-viz doesn't hurt, usually. there are some real-world situations where plain white or even plain black would actually make you more conspicuous than hi-viz.

edit:

Surely hi-viz orange would be better than white or black for standing out against that background?
jputnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 04:12 PM   #218
smasha
Vegan on a bicycle
 
smasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jputnam View Post
Surely hi-viz orange would be better than white or black for standing out against that background?
maybe... but being visually conspicuous based on contrast with ones visual background is (a) observer dependant and (b) constantly changing in real-world conditions. you've seen orange vehicles, right? around here we've got lots of buses that are bright orange. what happens when you stand in front of an orange bus with orange hi-viz

the point isn't that some "hi-viz" works better than others in certain situations - the point is that ANY "hi-viz" can be rendered "invisible" under real-world circumstances. in many cases, the best hi-viz is "normal" clothes. hi-viz doesn't "make drivers see you".

riding into a beautiful sunset, orange hi-viz would render you "invisible" to observers from behind. safety-yellow can easily be camouflage when grass or trees are on the other side of you.
smasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 05:59 PM   #219
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,996
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
Perhaps the goal of wearing any kind of hi-viz clothing is not to increase visibility in all conceivable circumstances, but to make the odds the best they can be in most circumstances?
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 06:01 PM   #220
daredevil
cyclepath
 
daredevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: "The Last Best Place"
Bikes: 2005 Trek Pilot 5.0, 2001 Specialized Sirrus Pro, Kona Lava Dome, Raleigh hardtail converted to commuter, 87 Takara steel road bike, 2008 Trek Soho
Posts: 3,550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
Perhaps the goal of wearing any kind of hi-viz clothing is not to increase visibility in all conceivable circumstances, but to make the odds the best they can be in most circumstances?
There ya go!

Well said.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
daredevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 09:11 PM   #221
smasha
Vegan on a bicycle
 
smasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
Perhaps the goal of wearing any kind of hi-viz clothing is not to increase visibility in all conceivable circumstances, but to make the odds the best they can be in most circumstances?
it may be... but there are still real-world circumstances where hi-viz will make the person wearing it less conspicuous.

don't mis-read that as an attack against hi-viz, which i do think tends to effectively increase conspicuity under many real-world situations; read it as an argument against mandatory hi-viz, on the basis that it would force people to wear it when conditions are contra-indicative.
smasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 09:47 PM   #222
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,996
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
No I read that as a "I need to be right , no matter how infrequently the case where I am correct arises." But I too, am not in any way in favor of most any mandatory cycling safety/non-safety gear. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of all cyclists to determine the number and type of personal safety devises/gear they utilize based on their own evaluation of the risk and conditions. Some kind of light and reflector after dark excepted, I think those ought to be mandatory.
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 10:13 PM   #223
smasha
Vegan on a bicycle
 
smasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
No I read that as a "I need to be right , no matter how infrequently the case where I am correct arises."
when you read the full-text of the study i posted in the other thread, you might find that those infrequent edge cases aren't as infrequent as you think - http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...tudy-on-hi-viz

Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
But I too, am not in any way in favor of most any mandatory cycling safety/non-safety gear. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of all cyclists to determine the number and type of personal safety devises/gear they utilize based on their own evaluation of the risk and conditions. Some kind of light and reflector after dark excepted, I think those ought to be mandatory.
i think we'd mostly agree on that.
smasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-13, 07:16 AM   #224
pilate7004
Junior Member
 
pilate7004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
Just as curiosity, how many of you (us) believe that 90% of the drivers that claim to have not seen a cyclist are just out and out lying, as if claiming you did not see them give a free pass to running them over? Or perhaps its a self delusion to to protect the driver from internally accepting they just killed or almost killed someone? Or if not 90%, what percentage of "did not see them" are just flat out lies?
Another angle on this is that the human perception is very "plastic." Ever spent time looking for your keys, toured the whole house and eventually found them somewhere obvious that you could swear you looked over before? Stage magicians leverage this "plasticity" deliberately in their craft. It doesn't take much to draw somebody's attention this way or that so as to render things effectively invisible. Cyclists on the road are quite a bit more evident than a silk handkerchief poked into a magician's hand, but under the wrong random circumstances something like this is bound to occur.

I'm sure that you are also right howsteepisit, in that most drivers who hit a cyclist would do anything to avoid accepting their culpability for negligent driving (both for internal psychological reasons as well as legal ones). There is probably a whole raft of circumstances between "actually did not see" and "did see, but just decided to mow you down anyway" that constitute the bulk of the cases. For instance, I'm sure some people have trained themselves out of swerving into the adjacent lane to the extent that they can't actually do it when it's necessary to avoid a cyclist. Stuff like that.
pilate7004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-13, 06:16 PM   #225
hotbike
Senior Member
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike
Posts: 2,921
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Well, a reflective vest won't help you float if you fall off a pier, it's not a "flotation vest" .

Also, reflective vest is not fire-retardant. And it's not a "Bulletproof" vest either, so try to avoid getting shot at.

I say this somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but it's the truth.
hotbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.