Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    USDOT policy statement on bike/ped accommodation regulations and recommendations

    I don't know if the actual link to the government policy statement had been made here yet.


    United States Department of Transportation Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian accommodation regulations and recommendations

    some excerpts....

    "The establishment of well-connected walking and bicycling networks is an important component for livable communities.........Walking and bicycling foster safer, more livable, family-friendly communities; promote physical activity and health; and reduce vehicle emissions and fuel use. ......... Transportation programs and facilities should accommodate people of all ages and abilities, including people too young to drive, people who cannot drive, and people who choose not to drive......."

    and from its its conclusion


    "Increased commitment to and investment in bicycle facilities and walking networks can help meet goals for cleaner, healthier air; less congested roadways; and more livable, safe, cost-efficient communities. Walking and bicycling provide low-cost mobility options that place fewer demands on local roads and highways. DOT recognizes that safe and convenient walking and bicycling facilities may look different depending on the context — appropriate facilities in a rural community may be different from a dense, urban area. However, regardless of regional, climate, and population density differences, it is important that pedestrian and bicycle facilities be integrated into transportation systems...."


    I know the LaHood announcement had been discussed in bike forums earlier. I wanted to post some quotes from the actual policy statement.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  2. #2
    Senior Member bbeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    GallatinTn
    My Bikes
    2008 Specialized Sequoia Elite
    Posts
    510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    there is plenty of good info there. now what will they do with it?
    Brandon Gallatin, Tn.
    http://www.strava.com/athletes/bwbeck

  3. #3
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    good question, but interesting policy shift. looks like mandatory incusion of bicycle facilities on bridge reworks that get federal funds for one.
    Last edited by Bekologist; 04-15-10 at 11:37 PM.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  4. #4
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,731
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, that stated a lot of nothing.

    -Kurt

  5. #5
    Seņior Member ItsJustMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    My Bikes
    Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
    Posts
    11,555
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It'll be taken to heart by communities that would have done something similar anyway, and mocked and ignored by those that choose to remain car-centric. IOW, I expect it to make virtually no difference.
    Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •