Cop hits cyclist- not "really serious"
#1
But on the road more
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 864
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe '07
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cop hits cyclist- not "really serious"
From The Philadelphia Inquirer, 4/22/10:
Lower Merion cruiser injures bicyclist
By Bonnie L. Cook
Inquirer Staff Writer
A bicyclist was struck and injured Wednesday morning by a Lower Merion police cruiser on East Lancaster Avenue in Ardmore.
The cruiser, headed to an emergency, was pulling out of a parking place in front of the Toyota dealership near where Chatham Road meets East Lancaster when it hit the westbound cyclist just before 9 a.m., said Sgt. Gene Pasternak of the Lower Merion police traffic safety unit.
Brad Paul, owner of the dealership, said the man on the bike was a Toyota employee but he would not identify him because his family had not yet been notified.
The man was flown to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, but his condition was not known. Pasternak said he did not believe the injuries were life-threatening.
The Lower Merion department is investigating. Police were trying to determine whether any surveillance cameras had captured the accident, Pasternak said.
The officer involved, whose name was not released, was not removed from patrol duty.
"We wouldn't take an officer off the street unless it was something really serious," Pasternak said.
Great attitude, there. Explains a lot about most cops' reactions to bike crashes.
Lower Merion cruiser injures bicyclist
By Bonnie L. Cook
Inquirer Staff Writer
A bicyclist was struck and injured Wednesday morning by a Lower Merion police cruiser on East Lancaster Avenue in Ardmore.
The cruiser, headed to an emergency, was pulling out of a parking place in front of the Toyota dealership near where Chatham Road meets East Lancaster when it hit the westbound cyclist just before 9 a.m., said Sgt. Gene Pasternak of the Lower Merion police traffic safety unit.
Brad Paul, owner of the dealership, said the man on the bike was a Toyota employee but he would not identify him because his family had not yet been notified.
The man was flown to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, but his condition was not known. Pasternak said he did not believe the injuries were life-threatening.
The Lower Merion department is investigating. Police were trying to determine whether any surveillance cameras had captured the accident, Pasternak said.
The officer involved, whose name was not released, was not removed from patrol duty.
"We wouldn't take an officer off the street unless it was something really serious," Pasternak said.
Great attitude, there. Explains a lot about most cops' reactions to bike crashes.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
My guess is that what they probably meant by "[not] something really serious" is that the officer obviously didn't intend to hit the cyclist. Mistakes can and will happen, and some negligence may even have been involved - or may not. We really don't know at this point. The officer was on his or her way to some emergency situation and likely in a hurry. Possibly even a bit distracted merging into traffic. And was the cause of an accident.
Contrast this with the NYPD officer whose trial began this week, for assaulting a moving cyclist, knocking him off his bike, and then framing the man for a crime he didn't commit. That puts questions about things that are serious enough to remove a police officer from active duty in a whole new light, and makes the quote a lot more understandable.
Contrast this with the NYPD officer whose trial began this week, for assaulting a moving cyclist, knocking him off his bike, and then framing the man for a crime he didn't commit. That puts questions about things that are serious enough to remove a police officer from active duty in a whole new light, and makes the quote a lot more understandable.
#3
But on the road more
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 864
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe '07
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree that this hardly rises to the same level of the NYC incident, but it does reveal a certain attitude.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,582 Times
in
2,343 Posts
curious what the "emergency" was ...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Have you ever had a traffic collision of sort? How would you like it if you were sent home (and not permitted to do your job) until the investigation was complete about who was at fault?
If the cyclist was killed, perhaps, but he wasn't ...
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 162
Bikes: 1972 Raleigh Super Course - Green
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wait ... you want the officer put on desk duty because he was involved in a traffic collision?
Have you ever had a traffic collision of sort? How would you like it if you were sent home (and not permitted to do your job) until the investigation was complete about who was at fault?
If the cyclist was killed, perhaps, but he wasn't ...
Have you ever had a traffic collision of sort? How would you like it if you were sent home (and not permitted to do your job) until the investigation was complete about who was at fault?
If the cyclist was killed, perhaps, but he wasn't ...
How would you like it if you were run into by a cop that could have been taken off the street the FIRST time he did it. The door swings both ways.
I feel he should ride a desk or ride shotgun with someone until the investigation either clears him, or has him repeat cop driving education again.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
So if the cop hits you, you should be taken off the street too. (Let's assume that your job involves driving or riding somehow -- a messenger, delivery person, etc. It doesn't really matter if the vehicle is bike or car, the rules ought to be the same. Though really, this could be extended to all drivers/riders, whether they drive/ride as a part of their work or not -- you lose your right to drive/ride until the investigation is over after any accident [or perhaps only accidents where somebody was hurt].)
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
According to thsi source (which may or might not require registration) https://dailyme.com/story/20100421000...t-ardmore.html
The crusier was not responding to an emergency. It also indicates the cruiser was facing North and the cyclist was facing west.
So it seems this is a situation where the parking is where the cars (normally) face the curb. If I have things right this means either the officer was backing out or the cyclist was going against traffic.
I personally would avoid that kind of street if possible, it is an accident waiting to happen. But the cyclist was an employee of the dealership so he woul dpretty much have to, at least for a little while.
It does raise a good chance that the car was not going very fast and the injuries could turn out to be minor.
The crusier was not responding to an emergency. It also indicates the cruiser was facing North and the cyclist was facing west.
So it seems this is a situation where the parking is where the cars (normally) face the curb. If I have things right this means either the officer was backing out or the cyclist was going against traffic.
I personally would avoid that kind of street if possible, it is an accident waiting to happen. But the cyclist was an employee of the dealership so he woul dpretty much have to, at least for a little while.
It does raise a good chance that the car was not going very fast and the injuries could turn out to be minor.
#13
Cycle Year Round
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...02285&t=k&z=18
Based on the discription (cyclist headed westbound) and aerial photo, looks like the cyclist was riding on the proper side of the road. Cop had to be backed into the parking space if his car was facing north.
Based on the discription (cyclist headed westbound) and aerial photo, looks like the cyclist was riding on the proper side of the road. Cop had to be backed into the parking space if his car was facing north.
Last edited by CB HI; 04-22-10 at 03:50 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, if that door is opened, it should swing both ways.
So if the cop hits you, you should be taken off the street too. (Let's assume that your job involves driving or riding somehow -- a messenger, delivery person, etc. It doesn't really matter if the vehicle is bike or car, the rules ought to be the same. Though really, this could be extended to all drivers/riders, whether they drive/ride as a part of their work or not -- you lose your right to drive/ride until the investigation is over after any accident [or perhaps only accidents where somebody was hurt].)
So if the cop hits you, you should be taken off the street too. (Let's assume that your job involves driving or riding somehow -- a messenger, delivery person, etc. It doesn't really matter if the vehicle is bike or car, the rules ought to be the same. Though really, this could be extended to all drivers/riders, whether they drive/ride as a part of their work or not -- you lose your right to drive/ride until the investigation is over after any accident [or perhaps only accidents where somebody was hurt].)
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...02285&t=k&z=18
Based on the discription (cyclist headed westbound) and aerial photo, looks like the cyclist was riding on the proper side of the road. Cop had to be backed into the parking space if his car was facing north.
Based on the discription (cyclist headed westbound) and aerial photo, looks like the cyclist was riding on the proper side of the road. Cop had to be backed into the parking space if his car was facing north.
But it does clear things up, immediate blame seems to fall clearly on the cop. (excluding possibly the instance of a cyclist who is flying and runs into a partially backed out car). But there is plenty of blame left for whoever designed that parking.
EDIT:
Oops as others have pointed out the cyclist was going the wrong way. Blame is now clearly on the cyclist.
Last edited by Keith99; 04-26-10 at 10:34 AM. Reason: I'm wrong
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Yeah, having seen the satellite map, it does seem that the accident was the officer's fault. But again, if the injuries are minor, and this was simply a bad move on the officer's part, ie a momentary lack of common sense, rather than outright malice, I think removing the guy from active duty is a bit extreme, and I don't think "not really serious" is an offensive way for the police to have put it ( or for the newspaper to have rendered the quote ).
And again I'll point to the NYC case. The cyclist was deliberately attacked, and would be in jail right now for it if some bystander hadn't caught the whole thing on video. That's "really serious" and reminds me a bit of Rodney King, who was also saved by a video camera. This is a case of stupidity, and likely a little bit of negligence to boot. But we've all done something stupid at some point; to err is human.
Poetic justice would be to have the cop spend the next year on bike duty, though.
And again I'll point to the NYC case. The cyclist was deliberately attacked, and would be in jail right now for it if some bystander hadn't caught the whole thing on video. That's "really serious" and reminds me a bit of Rodney King, who was also saved by a video camera. This is a case of stupidity, and likely a little bit of negligence to boot. But we've all done something stupid at some point; to err is human.
Poetic justice would be to have the cop spend the next year on bike duty, though.
#17
Senior Member
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...02285&t=k&z=18
Based on the discription (cyclist headed westbound) and aerial photo, looks like the cyclist was riding on the proper side of the road. Cop had to be backed into the parking space if his car was facing north.
Based on the discription (cyclist headed westbound) and aerial photo, looks like the cyclist was riding on the proper side of the road. Cop had to be backed into the parking space if his car was facing north.
#18
Cycle Year Round
Actually, since the parking is across from the dealer, the officer either hit the cyclist across four lanes of traffic as he was pulling onto the street to head west, or the officer was pulling out of his parking space and the cyclist, heading west, would have been riding against the direction of traffic.
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...,124.5,,0,9.29
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 249
Bikes: Roadmaster 26 Men's Mountain Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
Young Fred
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The police officer quoted worded his comment in an unfortunate way, and it would be nice if someone pointed that out to him, but the department acted correctly. There is no evidence of malice, or even negligence. We'll wait and see, but unless I see something more, I'm siding with the police officer on this one.
#21
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
I'm guessing the cyclist was not riding in the roadway, and was somewhere right of the white line, possibly very close to the cars. While this doesn't absolve the policeman, it makes an extremely dangerous situation worse for cyclists. Add to that the likely presence of vans and suvs blocking the view, and it's almost impossible to pull out of those parking spaces safely. My thought is that head-in parking just isn't worth it and I give parked cars a wide berth in that situation. Evidence suggests that most cyclists are cowed into riding closer to the cars than their safety requires.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For the record, I understand you position Seattle. The police risk life and limb protecting us. And yes, bike duty or walking a beat would be very poetic. But I'm only talking about how long it takes to conclude an investigation and meter out any needed corrective action. That shouldn't take more then a week. And if the cyclist was at fault, they just send him back out.
#23
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
Sorry about the beaten deceased horse, but did anyone see a follow up to this? I haven't read or heard anything since it happened and I'd really like to know what the investigation found.
#24
You gonna eat that?
I thought maybe the Hot Donuts sign went on at Krispy Kreme
#25
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
Krispy Kreme tried expanding here and got their posteriors handed to them. Dunkin Donuts sent them packing in about 2 years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beachgrad05
Southern California
5
07-02-13 08:09 PM
genec
Advocacy & Safety
74
01-26-12 03:01 PM