Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South
    My Bikes
    Had a Surly Cross Check - was totaled in recent accident. Sadly now just a Fuji Crosstown as a backup bike.
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bicycles banned in a town. . . ? Hope this doesn't spread :P

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...8_bikes24.html

    Thought this would be an interesting link to discuss. . .

    http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt...OyA/weight.png



    "When men speak ill of thee, live so as nobody may believe them."

    -Plato

  2. #2
    Senior Member CrankyOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Comments aren't exactly bike friendly (and this is just the first of 16 pages of such):

    How can we get such an ordenance like this in Seattle?

    I LOVE IT!! RUN THIS RED LIGHT, SUCKAH!!

    Good for them!

    you don't actually expect spandex types to actually follow the laws, do you?

    ha ha. i detest cyclists on the roads. closest i ever get to road rage is seeing a cyclist going 10mph down the street where there is a perfectly good side walk 10 feet away. and don't bother with the racist, throwback or neaderthal comments. i really don't give a crap what you think about what i said.

    Good for them! I wish we could do that here, bicycles on the road cause nothing but problems! I know I'll get the thumbs down from all you self-righteous, I'm-better-than-you-because-I-ride-a-cycle people, but oh well! You're all a pain and all you do is cause more problems on our roads!

    What a great first step. if we could do that here along with enforcing illegal immagration laws. we would be moving in the right direction.

  3. #3
    Senior Member mikeybikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Edgewater, CO
    My Bikes
    Tons
    Posts
    3,214
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    *yawn* old news

    http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...-Hawk-Colorado

    http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-Blackhawk-CO

    Bicycle Colorado is working through the courts to get the law overturned as it may be unconstitutional in Colorado.
    My Bikes: 2010 Breezer Uptown EX | 1980 Miyata 610 | 1970 Hercules | 198? Miele ?
    Wife's Bike: 2008 Globe City 7

    My Blog, a mix of bicycling, tech, and family.

  4. #4
    Senior Member CrankyOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A few more...

    I enjoy passing bicyclists as closely as possible. I have a right to the road just like them. Especially when instead of using the bike lane they are inside the white line on the road, my side mirror will be a couple inches from their left hand.


    I'm really tired of the bicyclists here; they ride right down the middle of a one-lane road through the middle of town. They ride up the Fall City Road - speed limit 45, and on the pavement from Snoqualmie to North Bend - speed limit 50. Get them off the road. It's too dangerous for them. And, I don't want the after effects of running them over - which I may have to if it's my life or theirs (e.g., oncoming hay semi loaded, cyclist veers into my lane - normal reaction is to save one's own bootie).

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Lynchburg, VA
    My Bikes
    2008 Gary Fisher Marlin Disc with slicks until I get a road bike
    Posts
    98
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I may have not read this correctly but I don't think Colorado state law allows this.

    42-4-106 seems to indicate that local authorities can only limit access to highways if they are doing so temporarily and restricting vehicles based on weight restrictions because the road is in disrepair.

    http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext...42-4-106%27%5D

  6. #6
    Calamari to go cc_rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Falls Church, VA
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    3,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the towns on each side of Blackhawk would ban tour buses........

  7. #7
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,190
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We do need to fight this aggressively. My own argument is that we have an unalienable constitutional right to move about freely under our own power. In fact, I would argue that the right to walk or to ride a bicycle safely, efficiently, and conveniently from any given point A to any given point B is more fundamental than the privilege of driving a motor vehicle on the same route. Once again, our society has its priorities screwed up and backward.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  8. #8
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,554
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I feel like I'm watching Footloose.

    We just need Kevin bacon to throw a bicycle party there and all will be fine.

  9. #9
    Senior Member iforgotmename's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    1,545
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is a good comment from the page: Drivers routinely drive 5mph or more over the speed limit, talk on cell phones, fail to signal, fail to yield, fail to come to a complete stop, block crosswalks and intersections, and generally violate traffic laws DAILY, ALL THE TIME, EVERYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY. These are considered "small" infractions, hardly worthy of notice. They "don't really hurt anyone." The list of justifications for this kind of behavior is endless. And we simply tolerate it.

    When cyclists do the same kind of things - violate the law in "small" ways that don't hurt anybody and cause very little disruption - we hear a hew and cry from the driving community about how awful cyclists are, and how often they break the law.

    For every cyclists running a red (when no cars are coming, inconveniencing no one), there are 100 drivers gliding through a free right turn without stopping, forcing pedestrians to wait until they clear the crosswalk. There are 100 more talking on phones, not signaling, and driving 5 or 10 or more mph over the speed limit. There are 100 more doing something else illegal - probably something "small" that inconveniences no one and causes only momentary disruption, kind of like the bikers who run reds.

    Both sets of behavior are equally unjustifiable and dangerous. But one is tolerated while the other is seen as an afront to the rules of the road. Glaring double-standard.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,014
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bicycling advocates make bicycle rule that makes bicycling impossible. Ha HA

    It looks like the 3ft law has some problems.

    "The Legislature, at the prodding of cycling groups, passed a law in 2009 requiring that motorists give bikes 3 feet of space if passing. That would force traffic in parts of Black Hawk to veer into the wrong side of the road, Copp said."
    2000 Montague CX, I do not recommend it, but still ride it.
    Strida 3, I recommend it for rides < 10mi wo steep hills.
    2006 Rowbike 720 Sport, I recommend it as an exercise bike.
    1996 Birdy, Recommend.
    Wieleder CARiBIKE (folding), decent frame.

  11. #11
    -=Barry=- The Human Car's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
    Posts
    4,077
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cc_rider View Post
    If the towns on each side of Blackhawk would ban tour buses........
    ROFLMAO That would be so cool if the buses got a 45 mile dirt road detour.
    Cycling Advocate
    http://BaltimoreSpokes.org
    . . . o
    . . /L
    =()>()

  12. #12
    aka Phil Jungels Wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    Specialized Crosstrail, Specialized Sirrus
    Posts
    5,769
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's going to be interesting to see this one play out.......

    "Retirement is the best job I ever had!" Me, 2009


    Specialized Crosstrail Sport - '08
    Nishiki Sport - misappropriated from my youngest son (circa 1984)
    Marin Stinson - misappropriated by my youngest grandson - '01
    "The Beast" - 1990 Schwinn Airdyne (in the basement for winter torture)

  13. #13
    Senior Member bhop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Jamis Sputnik
    Posts
    1,893
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by iforgotmename View Post
    Here is a good comment from the page: Drivers routinely drive 5mph or more over the speed limit, talk on cell phones, fail to signal, fail to yield, fail to come to a complete stop, block crosswalks and intersections, and generally violate traffic laws DAILY, ALL THE TIME, EVERYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY. These are considered "small" infractions, hardly worthy of notice. They "don't really hurt anyone." The list of justifications for this kind of behavior is endless. And we simply tolerate it.

    When cyclists do the same kind of things - violate the law in "small" ways that don't hurt anybody and cause very little disruption - we hear a hew and cry from the driving community about how awful cyclists are, and how often they break the law.

    For every cyclists running a red (when no cars are coming, inconveniencing no one), there are 100 drivers gliding through a free right turn without stopping, forcing pedestrians to wait until they clear the crosswalk. There are 100 more talking on phones, not signaling, and driving 5 or 10 or more mph over the speed limit. There are 100 more doing something else illegal - probably something "small" that inconveniences no one and causes only momentary disruption, kind of like the bikers who run reds.

    Both sets of behavior are equally unjustifiable and dangerous. But one is tolerated while the other is seen as an afront to the rules of the road. Glaring double-standard.
    Yes, that's a good comment, but it's certain to be ignored completely by the bike haters.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Lynchburg, VA
    My Bikes
    2008 Gary Fisher Marlin Disc with slicks until I get a road bike
    Posts
    98
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by geo8rge View Post
    Bicycling advocates make bicycle rule that makes bicycling impossible. Ha HA
    Making a safe pass in the oncoming lane just like they would pass a horse and buggy or slow car is not impossible.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Seattle Forrest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    11,076
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
    Comments aren't exactly bike friendly (and this is just the first of 16 pages of such):

    How can we get such an ordenance like this in Seattle?
    you don't actually expect spandex types to actually follow the laws, do you?
    Speaking of, the people who moved in to the apartment above me have a dog, that howls from about 7 am until about midnight, every day. They're not bike people, but that's not the point. The point is, I need more than just good luck in getting this ordinance, which is already on the books, enforced. Animal Control is interested in a possibly neglected dog, but the actual police don't care about a noise law being broken every day for months on end.

    But yeah, those bike people and their law braking... Yawn.
    Don't believe everything you think.

  16. #16
    Crankenstein bmclaughlin807's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane
    My Bikes
    Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
    Posts
    4,038
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First court hearing involving the ban starting: http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...gin&p=11359614
    "There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson

  17. #17
    Senior Member mustachiod's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    didn't read the article. but i'm sick of cars telling me to get off the road.


    Quote Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
    Animal Control is interested in a possibly neglected dog, but the actual police don't care about a noise law being broken every day for months on end..
    in a similar situation. the police are frustrated with my frequent calls. they have said "it's a dog, dogs bark" to me a few times. almost everyone has a dog around here, but only one that barks all day and night.
    Quote Originally Posted by powers2b View Post
    BF does not have the answer to what you will be happy with.

  18. #18
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,972
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mustachiod View Post
    i'm sick of cars telling me to get off the road.
    If that started to happen to me I'd go see a Dr.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,570
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    The only alternative route in Black Hawk is to either ride a gravel road or a 46-mile paved detour over the Continental Divide.
    Why do they list the mileage (46 miles) for the "paved detour" but not the gravel road???

    I think the only road where the ban is is Gregory Street (about 1 mile). It looks like, maybe, the "gravel road" is Chase Street to the north (about 2 miles).

    Are people actually complaining about a 2 mile detour (on a gravel road)?

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,570
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by asforme View Post
    I may have not read this correctly but I don't think Colorado state law allows this.

    42-4-106 seems to indicate that local authorities can only limit access to highways if they are doing so temporarily and restricting vehicles based on weight restrictions because the road is in disrepair.

    http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext...42-4-106%27%5D
    That law is talking about imposing weight restrictions.

    (1) Local authorities with respect to highways under their jurisdiction may by ordinance or resolution prohibit the operation of vehicles upon any such highway or impose restrictions as to the weight of vehicles to be operated upon any such highway, for a total period of not to exceed ninety days in any one calendar year, whenever any said highway by reason of deterioration, rain, snow, or other climatic conditions will be seriously damaged or destroyed unless the use of vehicles thereon is prohibited or the permissible weights thereof reduced.
    This allows for restriction by weight but it does not limit it to just by weight.

    Since one would not reasonably be able to restrict bicycles by weight, this law is not relevant.

    =========================

    It would seem it's somewhere in the following that allows the restriction of bicycles.

    http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext...e1#JD_42-4-111

    If the road in-question was a "controlled-access roadway", this would allow it:

    (n) Prohibiting or regulating the use of controlled-access roadways by nonmotorized traffic or other kinds of traffic, consistent with the provisions of this article;
    The following allows for bicycle-specific "regulation" (that might include precluding them from using a particular road). Note the "Prohibiting or regulating" wording above implies that "regulating" does not include "prohibiting".

    (h) Regulating the operation of bicycles or electrical assisted bicycles and requiring the registration and licensing of same, including the requirement of a registration fee, consistent with the provisions of this article;
    Then, there's this, which seems to allow anything!

    (y) Regulating the local movement of traffic or the use of local streets where such is not provided for in this article
    Last edited by njkayaker; 08-26-10 at 05:00 PM.

  21. #21
    Senior Member mustachiod's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
    If that started to happen to me I'd go see a Dr.
    LOL, you should hear the things trees say. they think i can't hear 'em....
    Quote Originally Posted by powers2b View Post
    BF does not have the answer to what you will be happy with.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Seattle Forrest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    11,076
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mustachiod View Post
    in a similar situation. the police are frustrated with my frequent calls. they have said "it's a dog, dogs bark" to me a few times. almost everyone has a dog around here, but only one that barks all day and night.
    Call Animal Control. They're slow, but more specialized, and they're actually interested in this stuff as a result. They should help you somewhat.

    I don't want to pull this thread too off topic ( even for A&S ), but I did want to make the point that cyclists are far from the only scofflaws in America.
    Don't believe everything you think.

  23. #23
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,190
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    Why do they list the mileage (46 miles) for the "paved detour" but not the gravel road???

    I think the only road where the ban is is Gregory Street (about 1 mile). It looks like, maybe, the "gravel road" is Chase Street to the north (about 2 miles).

    Are people actually complaining about a 2 mile detour (on a gravel road)?
    1) There is a much bigger principle involved. 2) The ban applies to most streets in BH. 3) Riding 19mm or even 23mm tyres on gravel can be quite dangerous, and the gravel road may be a real mud mess during and after inclement weather. Also, I am sure it is not plowed following a snow event.

    We need to prevent a bunch of local yokels from violating the U.S. Constitution and from setting harmful precedents for others to follow.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  24. #24
    Senior Member Kurt Erlenbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Space Coast, Florida
    Posts
    2,423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Everyone interested in this issue should read the brief filed by the lawyers looking to have the law held unconstitutional. It is very good, and explains the statutes well.

  25. #25
    Senior Member degnaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellevue, WA
    Posts
    1,595
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not saying I agree with this law (I certainly do not), and it certainly sets a bad precedent. However, it may be difficult to fight the ban based on current statutes. If municipalities have the right to ban trucks, buses or single-driver automobiles from roads (i.e. a specific class of road user), why do they not have the right to do the same for bicycles?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •