Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Shouldn't there be a law that requires bicycle manufacturers...

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Shouldn't there be a law that requires bicycle manufacturers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-10, 01:47 PM
  #76  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
I'
I would be all in favor of such a law. It's a double-standard,
So, in the spirit of vehicle equality, you would favor laws requiring bicycle air bags, ABS braking systems, yearly safety checks, yearly smog checks, side impact bars, bumpers, electrical turn signals, 3 mirrors, collapsable steering columns, etc.

To really be fair, areas with bicycle helmet laws should require motorist to also wear helmets
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 01:50 PM
  #77  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
And to be fair to truckers, cyclist should be required to stop at vehicle weigh stations.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 01:57 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 6,955

Bikes: 2009 Chris Boedeker custom; 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 2021 Bill Davidson custom gravel bike; 2022 Specialized Turbo Vado e-bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
And to be fair to truckers, cyclist should be required to stop at vehicle weigh stations.
My fat a@@ would break the scales.
BengeBoy is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 02:16 PM
  #79  
vol
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
lights have mounting problems? u must be kidding
Originally Posted by mikeybikes
Its hard to mount lights? I must be amazing as I have never any problems.
Just take a look at the customer reviews of the bike lights. I see more than half of the negative comments are about the mounting brackets. A large number of review titles have the words like "good light, horrible mounting bracket".

An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.

Originally Posted by BengeBoy
My fat a@@ would break the scales.
Then you are breaking the law.
vol is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 02:24 PM
  #80  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by vol
Just take a look at the customer reviews of the bike lights. I see more than half of the negative comments are about the mounting brackets. A large number of review titles have the words like "good light, horrible mounting bracket".

An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
If you can read the reviews, then why are you not capable of selecting the light that is reviewed as a good light with secure, easy mounting?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 03:16 PM
  #81  
Senior Member
 
mikeybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edgewater, CO
Posts: 3,213

Bikes: Tons

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vol
Just take a look at the customer reviews of the bike lights. I see more than half of the negative comments are about the mounting brackets. A large number of review titles have the words like "good light, horrible mounting bracket".

An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
So you're just reading reviews made by idiots who can't understand a simple mounting bracket? Or is this the result of you actually trying out mounting a light?
mikeybikes is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 04:36 PM
  #82  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
So, in the spirit of vehicle equality, you would favor laws requiring bicycle air bags, ABS braking systems, yearly safety checks, yearly smog checks, side impact bars, bumpers, electrical turn signals, 3 mirrors, collapsable steering columns, etc.

To really be fair, areas with bicycle helmet laws should require motorist to also wear helmets
You are being extremely disingenuous and you know it. You took a single (partial) line out of context from the rest of the post.

I made more thought-out arguments than just "cuz carz do 2", so it isn't really fair to try and portray my comment that way.

Congratulations, you won the internet.
sudo bike is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 04:46 PM
  #83  
Mud, Gore & Guts
 
eddubal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 497

Bikes: 2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by vol
Just take a look at the customer reviews of the bike lights. I see more than half of the negative comments are about the mounting brackets. A large number of review titles have the words like "good light, horrible mounting bracket".
Always take customer reviews with a grain of salt. If someone is satisfied with the product they will usually go along their merry way. If they don't, that's when they complain. Esp. in reviews. You also have to really figure out WHAT a person is saying in the review. Not an easy prospect.

I find that it's best to keep politicians and lawyers out of safety issues. They both screw up the best intentions and turn a safety issue into a fascist law that only benefits themselves and their cronies. This is an across the board thing, not just us cyclists.

The laws are already clear: If you ride at night, have a light. If you don't, we don't want to make things any more expensive than they already are.

Before any thought of mandating bicycle lights, I would like to see a study on the percentage of cyclists that ride at night vs those that ride during the day only. I doubt that it's going to change current perceptions. When bicycle commuting becomes popular, it might be a different matter, but now?!?! While we're doing that we should see how many cyclists have taken their reflectors off their bike, or had them break and fall off. That should tell you what a good idea mandating extra equipment is.
eddubal is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 05:28 PM
  #84  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
can some one who wants an integrated light describe how these are integrated in a way you desire?
noisebeam is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 05:32 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
degnaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Are pedals required by law?
I thought this was an awesome point, so I'm quoting it.

However, I feel if pedals weren't included on most bikes, people would just go to walmart, buy the cheapest plastic pedals, and cross thread them when they got home.
degnaw is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 05:38 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
OP, I think you should quit putting stupid ideas in the political nannies' heads.

I have 3 lights on mine, total cost about $60; a multi-mode LED tail, a 3W LED flashlight with fabbed mount, and a 60-LED grid (make sure I'm SEEN!). NOWHERE would a manufacturer come up with a deal like that.

And what about those of us who like (in my case, DEMAND) to build up their own? What part of the bike would have the lights integrated?

Bad idea that needs to die.
DX-MAN is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 05:50 PM
  #87  
Badger Biker
 
ctyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Beloit, Wisconsin
Posts: 974

Bikes: Cannondale Saeco CAD-3, Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Just what we need, more government regulation and involvement. Get over it!
ctyler is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 05:59 PM
  #88  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
You are being extremely disingenuous and you know it. You took a single (partial) line out of context from the rest of the post.

I made more thought-out arguments than just "cuz carz do 2", so it isn't really fair to try and portray my comment that way.

Congratulations, you won the internet.
I pulled the key idea of your post and pointed out how flawed that line of thought is.

There is nothing disingenuous about that.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 07:17 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
jputnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Posts: 1,260

Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by vol
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
Or you could just buy your light at a bike shop and make sure it fits before you ride.

The existing requirement is trivially easy to meet, you don't need to buy a bicycle-specific light to meet it -- a bungee cord and a flashlight will do.

If you're really having that much trouble with it, seriously, go to a bike shop, that's what they're there for.
jputnam is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 07:57 PM
  #90  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dumb idea. As I am sure it has been expressed in this thread already, lights are only needed if riding after dark. I would say most cyclists do NOT ride after dark. And if they do (like myself) they happily invest in appropriate lighting.

That would be akin to every car coming with mandatory child seats. Yes they are required for children. But not every person buying a car has children. So it is more appropriate to purchase them only when necessary.

-D
derath is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 08:34 PM
  #91  
Two H's!!! TWO!!!!!
 
chephy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 4,267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Why would you want to pay extra for crappy lights? Or, jeez, mandatory dynamo lights? Dynamo lights on track bikes? On downhill bikes? On Walmart bike-shaped-objects which cost less than a decent dynamo set up? Many bikes sold are not ridden on public roads EVER, let alone at night.

The reflector requirement is stupid enough.
chephy is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 08:40 PM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
It would give me yet another reason to continue to build my own bikes.
DataJunkie is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 08:47 PM
  #93  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by DataJunkie
It would give me yet another reason to continue to build my own bikes.
All stems sold in US must have integrated headlight. It will be illegal to build a bike using an non compliant stem.
noisebeam is offline  
Old 11-06-10, 08:58 PM
  #94  
vol
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
If you can read the reviews, then why are you not capable of selecting the light that is reviewed as a good light with secure, easy mounting?
Not many.

Originally Posted by mikeybikes
So you're just reading reviews made by idiots who can't understand a simple mounting bracket? Or is this the result of you actually trying out mounting a light?
Both.
vol is offline  
Old 11-07-10, 12:40 AM
  #95  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
I pulled the key idea of your post and pointed out how flawed that line of thought is.
Too bad that wasn't the "key idea" of my post.

There is nothing disingenuous about that.
Were that what my argument boiled down to, then no. Fortunately for me, it doesn't.

If you'd like to discuss the actual points involved, I have no problem with that. I don't even have a problem with disagreement. What I have a problem with is you misrepresenting my position (especially as the VC chant of "As cars go, so go the cycling nation").

Last edited by sudo bike; 11-07-10 at 12:54 AM.
sudo bike is offline  
Old 11-07-10, 12:49 AM
  #96  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by derath
Dumb idea. As I am sure it has been expressed in this thread already, lights are only needed if riding after dark. I would say most cyclists do NOT ride after dark. And if they do (like myself) they happily invest in appropriate lighting.
Then why all the talk on A&S about the epidemic of ninja cyclists?

Seriously though - from personal experience (I ride to work in the dead of night), not a whole lot of cyclists at night are lit (well... some may be lit, but not like that ). I have no doubt some, I dare say most, aren't even aware of the fact lights are required by law.

That would be akin to every car coming with mandatory child seats. Yes they are required for children. But not every person buying a car has children. So it is more appropriate to purchase them only when necessary.

-D
Not really, because a child seat has very little to do with safety in regards to interaction with other traffic. It's the same reason I'm in favor of mandatory lights, but not helmets. One is a danger to the rider and other people, one is purely the cyclist's own risk (in all but the most abstract sense).

EDIT: Also, FWIW, I'm not pushing for this law or anything. I think there are a whole helluva lot more important things to worry about at this point. Just saying I'd support it if the time came.

Last edited by sudo bike; 11-07-10 at 01:08 AM.
sudo bike is offline  
Old 11-07-10, 08:40 AM
  #97  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
All stems sold in US must have integrated headlight. It will be illegal to build a bike using an non compliant stem.
In that case I will order it from probikekit or smuggle them in from canada.
DataJunkie is offline  
Old 11-07-10, 02:39 PM
  #98  
Senior Member
 
CbadRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If comments start getting political, this thread will get moved to P&R.
__________________
Originally Posted by Xerum 525
Now get on your cheap bike and give me a double century. You walking can of Crisco!!

Forum Guidelines *click here*
CbadRider is offline  
Old 11-07-10, 02:57 PM
  #99  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Kid's bikes sold at Toys R Us in Germany have dyno setups.

They're basic bolt-on lights just like anything else. Probably worth $15-20 if sold separately. No big deal to put nicer lights on.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 11-07-10, 03:14 PM
  #100  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stupid idea.
OC Noob Rider is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.