Shouldn't there be a law that requires bicycle manufacturers...
#76
Cycle Year Round
So, in the spirit of vehicle equality, you would favor laws requiring bicycle air bags, ABS braking systems, yearly safety checks, yearly smog checks, side impact bars, bumpers, electrical turn signals, 3 mirrors, collapsable steering columns, etc.
To really be fair, areas with bicycle helmet laws should require motorist to also wear helmets
To really be fair, areas with bicycle helmet laws should require motorist to also wear helmets
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#77
Cycle Year Round
And to be fair to truckers, cyclist should be required to stop at vehicle weigh stations.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#78
Senior Member
My fat a@@ would break the scales.
#79
Senior Member
Thread Starter
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
Then you are breaking the law.
#80
Cycle Year Round
Just take a look at the customer reviews of the bike lights. I see more than half of the negative comments are about the mounting brackets. A large number of review titles have the words like "good light, horrible mounting bracket".
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edgewater, CO
Posts: 3,213
Bikes: Tons
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just take a look at the customer reviews of the bike lights. I see more than half of the negative comments are about the mounting brackets. A large number of review titles have the words like "good light, horrible mounting bracket".
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
#82
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So, in the spirit of vehicle equality, you would favor laws requiring bicycle air bags, ABS braking systems, yearly safety checks, yearly smog checks, side impact bars, bumpers, electrical turn signals, 3 mirrors, collapsable steering columns, etc.
To really be fair, areas with bicycle helmet laws should require motorist to also wear helmets
To really be fair, areas with bicycle helmet laws should require motorist to also wear helmets
I made more thought-out arguments than just "cuz carz do 2", so it isn't really fair to try and portray my comment that way.
Congratulations, you won the internet.
#83
Mud, Gore & Guts
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 497
Bikes: 2012 Van Dessel Gin & Trombones; 2011 Masi Speciale SSCX; '87 Peugeot Cannonball Express
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I find that it's best to keep politicians and lawyers out of safety issues. They both screw up the best intentions and turn a safety issue into a fascist law that only benefits themselves and their cronies. This is an across the board thing, not just us cyclists.
The laws are already clear: If you ride at night, have a light. If you don't, we don't want to make things any more expensive than they already are.
Before any thought of mandating bicycle lights, I would like to see a study on the percentage of cyclists that ride at night vs those that ride during the day only. I doubt that it's going to change current perceptions. When bicycle commuting becomes popular, it might be a different matter, but now?!?! While we're doing that we should see how many cyclists have taken their reflectors off their bike, or had them break and fall off. That should tell you what a good idea mandating extra equipment is.
#84
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
can some one who wants an integrated light describe how these are integrated in a way you desire?
#86
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
OP, I think you should quit putting stupid ideas in the political nannies' heads.
I have 3 lights on mine, total cost about $60; a multi-mode LED tail, a 3W LED flashlight with fabbed mount, and a 60-LED grid (make sure I'm SEEN!). NOWHERE would a manufacturer come up with a deal like that.
And what about those of us who like (in my case, DEMAND) to build up their own? What part of the bike would have the lights integrated?
Bad idea that needs to die.
I have 3 lights on mine, total cost about $60; a multi-mode LED tail, a 3W LED flashlight with fabbed mount, and a 60-LED grid (make sure I'm SEEN!). NOWHERE would a manufacturer come up with a deal like that.
And what about those of us who like (in my case, DEMAND) to build up their own? What part of the bike would have the lights integrated?
Bad idea that needs to die.
#88
Cycle Year Round
You are being extremely disingenuous and you know it. You took a single (partial) line out of context from the rest of the post.
I made more thought-out arguments than just "cuz carz do 2", so it isn't really fair to try and portray my comment that way.
Congratulations, you won the internet.
I made more thought-out arguments than just "cuz carz do 2", so it isn't really fair to try and portray my comment that way.
Congratulations, you won the internet.
There is nothing disingenuous about that.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Posts: 1,260
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
An alternative is to require the light manufacturers to label "bike light" only if the light meets certain requirement, such as visibility and mounting system. Anyway, we should not be required to meet a law requirement which is hard to meet due to the absence of requirement warranting the availability of what is needed in order to meet the requirement.
The existing requirement is trivially easy to meet, you don't need to buy a bicycle-specific light to meet it -- a bungee cord and a flashlight will do.
If you're really having that much trouble with it, seriously, go to a bike shop, that's what they're there for.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dumb idea. As I am sure it has been expressed in this thread already, lights are only needed if riding after dark. I would say most cyclists do NOT ride after dark. And if they do (like myself) they happily invest in appropriate lighting.
That would be akin to every car coming with mandatory child seats. Yes they are required for children. But not every person buying a car has children. So it is more appropriate to purchase them only when necessary.
-D
That would be akin to every car coming with mandatory child seats. Yes they are required for children. But not every person buying a car has children. So it is more appropriate to purchase them only when necessary.
-D
#91
Two H's!!! TWO!!!!!
Why would you want to pay extra for crappy lights? Or, jeez, mandatory dynamo lights? Dynamo lights on track bikes? On downhill bikes? On Walmart bike-shaped-objects which cost less than a decent dynamo set up? Many bikes sold are not ridden on public roads EVER, let alone at night.
The reflector requirement is stupid enough.
The reflector requirement is stupid enough.
#93
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
#94
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Both.
#95
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is nothing disingenuous about that.
If you'd like to discuss the actual points involved, I have no problem with that. I don't even have a problem with disagreement. What I have a problem with is you misrepresenting my position (especially as the VC chant of "As cars go, so go the cycling nation").
Last edited by sudo bike; 11-07-10 at 12:54 AM.
#96
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Seriously though - from personal experience (I ride to work in the dead of night), not a whole lot of cyclists at night are lit (well... some may be lit, but not like that ). I have no doubt some, I dare say most, aren't even aware of the fact lights are required by law.
That would be akin to every car coming with mandatory child seats. Yes they are required for children. But not every person buying a car has children. So it is more appropriate to purchase them only when necessary.
-D
-D
EDIT: Also, FWIW, I'm not pushing for this law or anything. I think there are a whole helluva lot more important things to worry about at this point. Just saying I'd support it if the time came.
Last edited by sudo bike; 11-07-10 at 01:08 AM.
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If comments start getting political, this thread will get moved to P&R.
#99
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
Kid's bikes sold at Toys R Us in Germany have dyno setups.
They're basic bolt-on lights just like anything else. Probably worth $15-20 if sold separately. No big deal to put nicer lights on.
They're basic bolt-on lights just like anything else. Probably worth $15-20 if sold separately. No big deal to put nicer lights on.