Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-10, 06:40 PM   #1
roadrider65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Westford Mass. US
Bikes: 2008 Specialized Roubaix
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Two-abreast back to single-file - opinions, please

(also posting this on Road Cycling Forum)

Here's the scenario: Two-lane country road (one each direction), fairly level. Two riders sharing a route and a sunny day, cruising along at 14 or 15. Hardly any traffic. Second rider pulls up abreast and to left of first rider so they can chat while riding. They become aware that a motor vehicle (piloted by a civilized human) is overtaking them from behind.

Question: What should be done?

Option A: Cyclists remain two-abreast until motorist honks. (Downside of this: Motorist may have sidearm and short temper.)

Option B: Second rider (nearer center of road and on the left of first) speeds up and pulls in ahead of first rider, making a single file again. (Downside of this: The lead has changed.)

Option C: First rider speeds up so that second rider can tuck in behind him. (Downside of this: First rider must be aware of the "threat" and voluntarily accelerate.)

Option D: First rider maintains speed and second rider slows and then gets back behind first where he was previously. (Downside of this: You're slowing in front of the car you're blocking.)

Option E: Other. (Tactics involving one-finger salutes not acceptable.)

What's the Forum's consensus on the appropriate tactic here -- safety-wise and etiquette-wise?
roadrider65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 06:52 PM   #2
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 407 Post(s)
Option normal: Motorist overtakes cyclists easily as there is little traffic.
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 07:05 PM   #3
2manybikes
Dog is my co-pilot
 
2manybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes: 2 many
Posts: 15,765
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
If one choses to ride two abreast communicate before there is a car and decide who is going to go forward/back whatever. It's not essential but it is nice. I usually plan for the faster rider to go forward and depending on how far away the car is the other rider can soft pedal or coast a little. Also, if the other rider does not have a mirror I put myself closer to the center of the road as I can see a car a long way off in my mirror and react early if needed.
2manybikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 07:14 PM   #4
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,322
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
OP, with little traffic, why is it so much harder (or impossible as you present) for the motorist to move into the oncoming lane and quickly pass 2 cyclist (same as the motorist would do for a slow tractor on the road)?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 07:40 PM   #5
dorse
dirt merchant
 
dorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fraser Valley
Bikes: Heckler / Nomad / Blur LT
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What should be done, is change the law, and educate cagers. That two abreast should be allowed. So, the passing vehicle slows changes lanes and proceeds to pass the two abreast cyclists. If two abreast is not allowed, Cyclist form single line in some fashion??? and stay in the middle of the lane until the wanting to pass cager slows, Then and only then is it safe to pull over into the gutter and let the cager pass. or the cager can slow, change lanes as before, and pass. Remember you do not have to ride in the gutter all the time. You only have to let faster vehicles pass when you feel it is safe. Unless there is a bike lane. Which is just funneling cyclists into the kill zone.

I case you have not guessed, bike lanes are not for bikes. The main reason for bike lanes is so auto traffic can speed by you while ignoring you.
dorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 07:43 PM   #6
dorse
dirt merchant
 
dorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fraser Valley
Bikes: Heckler / Nomad / Blur LT
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
OP, with little traffic, why is it so much harder (or impossible as you present) for the motorist to move into the oncoming lane and quickly pass 2 cyclist (same as the motorist would do for a slow tractor on the road)?
This is my point.
dorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 07:51 PM   #7
Pedaleur
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Back. Here.
Bikes:
Posts: 2,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
OP, with little traffic, why is it so much harder (or impossible as you present) for the motorist to move into the oncoming lane and quickly pass 2 cyclist (same as the motorist would do for a slow tractor on the road)?
This becomes even more of an issue when there are, say, eight riders. VA law basically requires the cyclists to ride single-file, FRAP when a vehicle approaches from behind. It doesn't take long, however, to realize that it's a lot easier for a car to pass 4 x 2 than 8 x 1.
Pedaleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 07:55 PM   #8
2manybikes
Dog is my co-pilot
 
2manybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes: 2 many
Posts: 15,765
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
In my state it is illegal to continue to ride two abreast when there is a car following. I don't have the time or the motivation to try and change the law. Way too much work.
Of course if there is a good reason to stay in the lane and keep the lane then do it single file (where I live). Going from two abreast to two in line is no effort or trouble.
2manybikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-10, 08:00 PM   #9
SBRDude
Godfather of Soul
 
SBRDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: 2002 Litespeed Vortex, 2010 Specialized Tricross Expert,2008 Gary Fischer Hi Fi Carbon, 2002 Specialized S-Works hard tail, 1990 Kestrel KM 40
Posts: 1,517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm surprised this is even a question. Without a doubt, the right thing to do is for the cyclists to make room for the car and then return to their two abreast when convenient. I'm not talking about what is legal or not, but what is courteous and responsible as a civilized human being. You want motorists to give bikes respect, start by showing some respect for motorists.
SBRDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 12:46 AM   #10
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 407 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBRDude View Post
I'm surprised this is even a question. Without a doubt, the right thing to do is for the cyclists to make room for the car and then return to their two abreast when convenient. I'm not talking about what is legal or not, but what is courteous and responsible as a civilized human being. You want motorists to give bikes respect, start by showing some respect for motorists.
Why do they have to make any more room if there is a full lane available with zero on coming traffic? How does 1.7 lanes help more than 1.5 when 1.0 is there already?
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 02:46 AM   #11
rogwilco
snob
 
rogwilco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vienna
Bikes:
Posts: 1,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Imo, B or C would be corteous and probably also safest. All other options are dangerous.
rogwilco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 02:59 AM   #12
009jim
Senior Member
 
009jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Bikes: Giant CRX3, Trek 7100
Posts: 1,288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Courtesy must be shown by all. If you simply ride casually along in two-abreast fashion, there is an implied statement to the motorist that he/she is a piece of dung. If the motorist passes too closely or rides on your backside too closely, there is similarly an implicit statement. It's important to behave like the intelligent species we supposedly are.
009jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 03:02 AM   #13
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Option B because, Option A is just downright dangerous and, the way Options C n' D are done, it is like shuffling a deck of cards.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 11:47 AM   #14
crhilton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Bikes: '07 Trek 1500, '08 Surly Cross Check, '09 Masi Speciale Sprint custom build
Posts: 4,568
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Low traffic? They can wait (as if there will be a wait) for the oncoming lane to clear.

Traffic, so they've had to slow and wait? You yell "single file" (if it's more than two) and the rider currently shielding the cross wind goes ahead (I think). No cross wind, I'd say right goes forward left goes back.
crhilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 11:49 AM   #15
crhilton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Bikes: '07 Trek 1500, '08 Surly Cross Check, '09 Masi Speciale Sprint custom build
Posts: 4,568
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2manybikes View Post
In my state it is illegal to continue to ride two abreast when there is a car following. I don't have the time or the motivation to try and change the law. Way too much work.
Of course if there is a good reason to stay in the lane and keep the lane then do it single file (where I live). Going from two abreast to two in line is no effort or trouble.
Lucky you. In my state it's just illegal. Not that it's ever enforced.
crhilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 11:55 AM   #16
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 407 Post(s)
In the time it takes to go from double to single file the passing motor vehicle will be long gone.
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 12:50 PM   #17
dorse
dirt merchant
 
dorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fraser Valley
Bikes: Heckler / Nomad / Blur LT
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBRDude View Post
I'm surprised this is even a question. Without a doubt, the right thing to do is for the cyclists to make room for the car and then return to their two abreast when convenient. I'm not talking about what is legal or not, but what is courteous and responsible as a civilized human being. You want motorists to give bikes respect, start by showing some respect for motorists.
The chance of getting even noticed, let alone respect, by cagers around here, is slim. Besides, cagers turn off the polite switch, as soon as they get behind the wheel. By the way how is your SUV. Texas Aeeeee…

But seriously, getting folks on bicycles respecting 2000lb 4 wheeled monsters is not that tough. The return respect goes something like this. ...........GET OFF THE ROAD YOU MORON!
dorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 01:23 PM   #18
SCROUDS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The appropiate response is to wave (WITH ALL FINGERS) as the car passes in the other lane, traffic permitting. Only if its busy and there's room should the cyclists be considering singling up to allow a share.
SCROUDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 01:33 PM   #19
sggoodri
Senior Member
 
sggoodri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Bikes: 1983 Trek, 2001 Lemond, 2000 Gary Fisher
Posts: 3,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I thing the onus belongs on the leftmost cyclist to decide what he or she wants to do. The rightmost cyclist shouldn't need to do much of anything. (In those states where cyclists are expected to operate as far right as practicable within a lane, the rightmost cyclist is probably already there.)

If the leftmost cyclist believes that it's helpful to drop to single file, then the leftmost cyclist would normally reduce speed and drop behind the rightmost cyclist, as is if they were rotating off a paceline.

The leftmost cyclist may decide that the lane is too narrow to facilitate same-lane passing, but that a single file formation will improve sight lines for the driver preparing to pass. In this case the leftmost cyclist could drop back but not move all the way to the right in the lane - just far enough to improve sight lines.
sggoodri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 12:57 AM   #20
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
D:

Outside rider feathers brakes to tuck behind is usually the smoothest.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 08:05 AM   #21
SBRDude
Godfather of Soul
 
SBRDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: 2002 Litespeed Vortex, 2010 Specialized Tricross Expert,2008 Gary Fischer Hi Fi Carbon, 2002 Specialized S-Works hard tail, 1990 Kestrel KM 40
Posts: 1,517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
Why do they have to make any more room if there is a full lane available with zero on coming traffic? How does 1.7 lanes help more than 1.5 when 1.0 is there already?
Because we're all sharing the road and moving aside to let a motorist pass, even if you don't have to and even if you believe it is unnecessary, is good manners and communicates to the motorists that cyclists actually care about them.

I do the same thing as a pedestrian when I'm crossing the street - if there is a car waiting for me, even though I have the right to take my sweet time, I always make an effort to show the motorist that I'm trying to get across quickly. That does't mean I have to run, but it's easy to walk at a brisk pace or otherwise demonstrate to others that you are aware of their presence.
SBRDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 08:29 AM   #22
sggoodri
Senior Member
 
sggoodri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cary, NC
Bikes: 1983 Trek, 2001 Lemond, 2000 Gary Fisher
Posts: 3,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBRDude View Post
Because we're all sharing the road and moving aside to let a motorist pass, even if you don't have to and even if you believe it is unnecessary, is good manners and communicates to the motorists that cyclists actually care about them.

I do the same thing as a pedestrian when I'm crossing the street - if there is a car waiting for me, even though I have the right to take my sweet time, I always make an effort to show the motorist that I'm trying to get across quickly. That does't mean I have to run, but it's easy to walk at a brisk pace or otherwise demonstrate to others that you are aware of their presence.
I believe that polite society follows a pragmatic approach to the golden rule: If the effort that must be expended is equal to or less than the effort you would save the other person, you make the effort. If the effort required by you is obviously, substantially greater than that, both parties recognize that it would be silly to bother. Unless, of course, your ultimate objective involves getting into the other person's pants.

I apply this metric when deciding whether to hold a door open for another person (always do so for my wife) or deciding to pull to the right. If I'm still making the calculation after the other driver has already changed lanes, then it obviously wasn't even worth the CPU cycles.
sggoodri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 08:55 AM   #23
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 407 Post(s)
If the lane is wide enough for lane sharing then I'd expect the cyclists to be aware of traffic approaching and the inside rider will pull behind the outside one when they see an approaching vehicle (perhaps waiting for a sign they have been noticed). It should be timed such that the approaching driver would not need to considerably slow down. If the riders have waited until the approaching driver is at their speed they have already failed at being considerate.

However in this particular case there is little traffic and most importantly the OP indicated that the driver had already started overtaking. So the cyclists should do nothing but hold their line side by side as the overtaking driver will be soon past them.
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 11:17 AM   #24
dorse
dirt merchant
 
dorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fraser Valley
Bikes: Heckler / Nomad / Blur LT
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
If the lane is wide enough for lane sharing then I'd expect the cyclists to be aware of traffic approaching and the inside rider will pull behind the outside one when they see an approaching vehicle (perhaps waiting for a sign they have been noticed). It should be timed such that the approaching driver would not need to considerably slow down. If the riders have waited until the approaching driver is at their speed they have already failed at being considerate.
This is wrong. Moving over, before causing the vehicle to slow down, allows them to pass you at an unsafe speed. Putting the cyclist in serious risk. The law does not say you have to ride in the gutter. It says you must let faster traffic pass. But please let them pass after they have slowed to a reasonable speed. If they wish to change lanes and speed by There is nothing you can do about that.
dorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 11:23 AM   #25
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 407 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dorse View Post
This is wrong. Moving over, before causing the vehicle to slow down, allows them to pass you at an unsafe speed. Putting the cyclist in serious risk. The law does not say you have to ride in the gutter. It says you must let faster traffic pass. But please let them pass after they have slowed to a reasonable speed. If they wish to change lanes and speed by There is nothing you can do about that.
Note the word 'considerably' and note my parenthetical comment before the sentence of mine you bolded. You agreed with me which is puzzling as you said I was wrong. Read more carefully before you rant on.
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.