Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Rides again HiYoSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    W. Sacramento Region, aka, Nut Tree
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR T, Trek SC
    Posts
    3,259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cyclist killed threads - is this the best you can do?

    I don't get it at all. What's the point of X being killed in a bicycle accident? How does this promote either bicycle advocacy or recognition among non-bikers of safety issues?

    Bicycle deaths and injuries are being tracked nationally. Data is being made available on the web. So what's the point of all these threads about deaths? News Flash- we all are going to die, period, no escape. There is enough pointless scare mongering that we don't really need another source of scare mongering.

    Do you really want to read 50 threads a month about a cyclist being killed? Are there better things to do with your time. Maybe getting off the computer and on the bike?

    Here's real data not sensationalism. [at least the most recent I could find]:
    http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd...02ovrfacts.pdf

    Highest number of Motor Vehicle x Bicycle deaths was in 1995, 833 deaths.
    Highest number of Motor Vehicle x Bicycle injuries was in 1993, 68,000 injuries.

    Deaths for 2002 were 662, and injuries were 48,000. So even with increased population bike injuries and deaths are down.

    See table 1 for more info.

    Huff

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Allen, TX
    My Bikes
    Look 585
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No one likes to think about cycling accidents, however they can serve a purpose if viewed correctly.

    They can be a reminder that cycling can be dangerous. That drivers and cyclists both make mistakes, but the cyclist will always be the bigger looser.

    If they are viewed in the terms of objectively reviewing what happened, and how to prevent a future accident, then they are are worth knowing about.

    I personally think it is time for cyclists to stop thinking about who has the right-of-way, etc., and start thinking in terms of defensive riding.

    Clint

  3. #3
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,687
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe getting off the computer and on the bike?
    Hey I am at the office.... this is as close as I can be to the bike and still be working!

  4. #4
    Rides again HiYoSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    W. Sacramento Region, aka, Nut Tree
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR T, Trek SC
    Posts
    3,259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikepro

    I personally think it is time for cyclists to stop thinking about who has the right-of-way, etc., and start thinking in terms of defensive riding.

    Clint

    AMEN
    I successfully motor cycled for 5 years with no accidents because when I started I subscribed to a Cycle magazine which provided a monthly article on Defensive Riding tactics and explored dangerous rider mind sets. It would be great to have regular threads on this subject started on the forum.

    The 2 biggest rules I learned are:

    1. The guy turning left will not see you. If you think he will, you're kidding yourself. "Looking him in the eye" only means you see him, it does NOT mean he sees you.

    2. In real life, right-of-way is determined by vehicle size and weight not by right-of-way laws. It is much better to give up right of way and avoid an accident, than insist on right of way and take a hard lump.

    Huff

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by huffypuffy
    I don't get it at all. What's the point of X being killed in a bicycle accident? How does this promote either bicycle advocacy or recognition among non-bikers of safety issues?

    Bicycle deaths and injuries are being tracked nationally. Data is being made available on the web. So what's the point of all these threads about deaths? News Flash- we all are going to die, period, no escape. There is enough pointless scare mongering that we don't really need another source of scare mongering.

    Do you really want to read 50 threads a month about a cyclist being killed? Are there better things to do with your time. Maybe getting off the computer and on the bike?

    Here's real data not sensationalism. [at least the most recent I could find]:
    http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd...02ovrfacts.pdf

    Highest number of Motor Vehicle x Bicycle deaths was in 1995, 833 deaths.
    Highest number of Motor Vehicle x Bicycle injuries was in 1993, 68,000 injuries.

    Deaths for 2002 were 662, and injuries were 48,000. So even with increased population bike injuries and deaths are down.

    See table 1 for more info.

    Huff
    Thanks for the statistics. I was looking at some of John Forester's statistics, and I could not find any "death" statistics. He estimated that there were about 100,000 accidents involving bikes and cars each year, but I couldn't figure out what that included. (Being brushed by a car, and being irritated, or a trip to the hospital...he was not clear on the word "accident".)

    Judging by newspaper reports, my area accounts for 30 or 40 vehicle/bike fatalities each year, so we certainly have done our share toward the national total.

    The statistics in the report you cited include some interesting points. Of the 662 cyclists killed in 2002, 89% were male. That means, only about 70 females were killed on a bike that year!! That might be fewer than the number of women killed that year by lightning. Maybe I need to study how my female friends ride, and adjust my riding accordingly.

    Among pedestrians killed by vehicles, 34% were intoxicated. No data give for cyclists...would a 34% figure for cyclists be surprising? Based on press reports, it seems that many/most cyclists killed in my city are killed between 10 p.m. and 3 a.m. Had some of them stopped for a drink, or three?

    John Forester's data indicated cyclists are killed at intersections. The cylists pulls out into the intersection, and is struck by a vehicle coming from the side. Or, a car pulls up behind the cyclist, and makes a right turn, over the cyclist. Or, a vehicle is driving toward the cyclist, and makes a left turn, over the cyclist.

    In Forester's opinion, if a bike rider understands those three situations, spots the vehicles in advance, and stays the heck out of their way...you don't get killed. Maybe women who ride bikes already had that figured out.
    Last edited by alanbikehouston; 10-21-04 at 05:10 PM.

  6. #6
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,958
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think we can learn alot from traffic incident forensics. In particular, we can identify safety-related trends which need to be addressed. If a cyclist is killed or seriously injured, I want to know who was at fault and what preventive or evasive action might have been possible.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •