Los Angeles Considers Bicyclist Anti-Harassment Ordinance
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Los Angeles Considers Bicyclist Anti-Harassment Ordinance
Today, a new prospective tool was introduced for bicyclists to defend themselves from harassment and assault. An anti-harassment ordinance, the motion to draft it being originally introduced by Council Member Bill Rosendahl, has been released today by the City Attorney’s Office. Pending council approval, bicyclists will be able to bring civil suit against drivers who assault them, harass them, threaten them, or intentionally distract them.
In the ordinance, the City recognizes not only that “people have a right to ride a bicycle in the City of Los Angeles”, but also that bicyclists are harassed and assaulted simply for being bicyclists – this ordinance gives bicyclists the right to go after offenders in court. The ordinance is now a public document, so you can read it yourself.
Full Story: https://ladotbikeblog.wordpress.com/...oon-to-be-law/
In the ordinance, the City recognizes not only that “people have a right to ride a bicycle in the City of Los Angeles”, but also that bicyclists are harassed and assaulted simply for being bicyclists – this ordinance gives bicyclists the right to go after offenders in court. The ordinance is now a public document, so you can read it yourself.
Full Story: https://ladotbikeblog.wordpress.com/...oon-to-be-law/
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 696
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Seems redundant ... i.e. isn't it already illegal to assault someone? Even in Los Angeles?
Seems like burden of proof would still be hard - i.e. "attempted assault" on a cyclist would still require a witness? Any California lawyers out there that can comment (we promise not to make fun of you .... or California ?
Maybe I'm a little spoiled, living where the worst road-rage is usually just verbal ...
Seems like burden of proof would still be hard - i.e. "attempted assault" on a cyclist would still require a witness? Any California lawyers out there that can comment (we promise not to make fun of you .... or California ?
Maybe I'm a little spoiled, living where the worst road-rage is usually just verbal ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zephyr Boy
Advocacy & Safety
52
02-22-11 01:07 PM
The Human Car
Advocacy & Safety
12
08-12-10 10:26 AM