Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-11, 12:43 PM   #26
Brontide
DON'T PANIC!
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Capital District, NY
Bikes: Fuji Absolute 3.0
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
right. this video wasn't about helmets, it was about unjust enforcement in the crackdown of 2011 on bicyclists breaking the law in new york city.
Huh? How can it be unjust if they were breaking the law Bek?
Brontide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 01:06 PM   #27
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
oh, i'm not giving the rider a hard time, i think americans should be allowed to ride sans lid.

i find it HILARIOUS that the helmet obsessed at Bike Forums made this guys video into a discussion about helmets!


its not just the pro helmet people that are helmet obsessed.
With that characterization, you are saying you are 'helmet ignorant'.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 02:53 PM   #28
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brontide View Post
Huh? How can it be unjust if they were breaking the law Bek?
no bicyclist in any state is required to place themselves in danger to comply with a traffic law like mandatory bikelane use. if it isn't safe you can't operate a vehicle there, nor would any traffic code endanger said cyclist.

uneforceable, brontide. bicyclists are not required to endanger themselves, and can legally ride to avoid hazards in the bikelane in every state.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 03:07 PM   #29
exile
Senior Member
 
exile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes: 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 1999 Jamis Exile
Posts: 2,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Officer never told Neistat "he's not allowed to ride outside the bike lane". It was the filmmakers text that makes that statement. Neistat is the one with the agenda in this case. Parts of it are factual, but parts of it were made to get his point across.
exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 03:46 PM   #30
RazrSkutr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
right. this video wasn't about helmets, it was about unjust enforcement in the crackdown of 2011 on bicyclists breaking the law in new york city.

the NYPD needs bicycle awareness training. who's working on implementing this in NYC?
Bek all you need to do is read the comments and you'll see a good number of people arguing things like this guy:
Quote:
@raisinsunn you're dumb..hes not getting fined for not polluting..hes being fined for not being in the bike lane..and if he doesnt wear a helmet then how the **** can he complain about the bike lane not being safe..no **** it aint safe if you don't got a helmet on..bikers have a terrible attitude where they think they own the road..there are awful in Toronto and i can only assume its atleast 10 times worse in NYC
JacoblCanada 8 hours ago
Helmet use and bikelane use have a common motivation: fear.

Fear of riding in traffic, fear of riding full stop.

The promotion of bikelanes and bicycle helmets most likely serves to aid in reinforcing that fear and confirming to the non-cycling majority that bicycling is a foolhardy pursuit and that cyclists get what's coming to them when some numbnut not paying attention runs them down.

It's all part of FEAR. A fear which, sadly, many bike activists are busy spreading.
RazrSkutr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 03:50 PM   #31
RazrSkutr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
no bicyclist in any state is required to place themselves in danger to comply with a traffic law like mandatory bikelane use. if it isn't safe you can't operate a vehicle there, nor would any traffic code endanger said cyclist.

uneforceable, brontide. bicyclists are not required to endanger themselves, and can legally ride to avoid hazards in the bikelane in every state.
Several commentators on the YouTube video said something along the lines of: "OK, if the bikelane is blocked then you should get off your bicycle and walk it along the sidewalk until you can get back on." The cop can argue the same thing.

Once you've thrown away your _current_ right to the road by lobbying for bikelanes then you can be sure that we (cyclists) are going to get crap facilities with crap rules attached to them. That's what you bikelane lobbyists don't get: bicycling already has an _enviable_ position under the law and if you starting fugging around with it then, as a minority that is detested by other road users, we can expect to end up in a worse position.
RazrSkutr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 04:32 PM   #32
Brontide
DON'T PANIC!
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Capital District, NY
Bikes: Fuji Absolute 3.0
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
no bicyclist in any state is required to place themselves in danger to comply with a traffic law like mandatory bikelane use. if it isn't safe you can't operate a vehicle there, nor would any traffic code endanger said cyclist.
But FRAP doesn't require a cyclist to ride in a blocked or unsafe lane, so riding in the lane would be 100% legal, no? This is what you argue in other thread. This is an illegal crackdown on a legal behavior.
Brontide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 04:39 PM   #33
closetbiker
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 9,596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brontide View Post
... This is an illegal crackdown on a legal behavior.
just checked it out from NYC DoT:

http://home2.nyc.gov/html/dot/downlo...08_english.pdf

Quote:
§ 4-12 (p) – Bicycles
• Bicycle riders must use bike path/lane, if provided, except for access, safety, turns, etc.
maybe the cop was right?

(I still think bike lane compulsion is as silly as helmet compulsion)
closetbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 05:16 PM   #34
Brontide
DON'T PANIC!
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Capital District, NY
Bikes: Fuji Absolute 3.0
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Depending on where on the DOT site you look there are more verbose answers which make much more sense. This is also in line with New York VTL. Bike lanes are technically compulsory, but the statute give cyclist many exceptions under which travel in the lane is permissible.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/bic...ips.shtml#laws

Quote:

Cyclists in New York City must

Ride on the street, not on the sidewalks (unless rider is age 12 or younger and the bicycle's wheels are less than 26 inches in diameter).

Ride with traffic, not against it.

Obey all traffic signals, signs and pavement markings. Cyclists must come to a complete stop at red lights and stop signs. Cyclists are required by law to exercise due care to avoid colliding with pedestrians, motor vehicles or other cyclists.

Use marked bike lanes or paths when available, except when making turns or when it is unsafe to do so, etc. If the road is too narrow for a bicycle and a car to travel safely side by side, cyclists have the right to ride in the middle of the travel lane.

Bicycling is permitted on all main and local streets throughout the City even when no designated route exists.

Not ride on expressways, drives, highways, interstate routes and thruways unless authorized by signs.

Not wear more than one earphone attached to an aud io device (e.g. radio, ipod, walkman)

Use the following safety and visibility equipment:
* White headlight and red taillight must be used from dusk to dawn
* Bell or horn (not whistle)
* Working brakes
* Reflective tires or reflectors
* Helmets must be worn by children age 13 or younger, and helmets are strongly recommended for all others.
Brontide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 05:30 PM   #35
closetbiker
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 9,596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
agreed, but I would think the ticket would still stick.

A defendant would have to prove it's safer outside the lane than in, if he was caught outside of it, not making a turn, etc, etc.
closetbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 05:40 PM   #36
DeadheadSF
Senior Member
 
DeadheadSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced 3, Trek 520
Posts: 232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
We've had a number of threads here about people being "busted" for video taping the police and other security personal. While I/we agree that it should be legal to do so. Even in those areas where it is legal LEOs will still try to intimidate the photographer into deleting their video/pictures, confiscating their equipment or just generally harassing people until they (the LEOs) get what they want.

We've seen footage that later cleared innocents of the charges that LEOs have tried to press.
"If they're not doing anything wrong, they shouldn't have to worry about it".

This is why services like this one: http://qik.com/ are very handy. Even if the jackboot steals your phone/camera/other or forces you to delete content, it's still on the internet. Smile for the camera, piggies...

And another one: some folks have taken to adding a single frame to their camera the looks just like a normal LCD display saying "No Data" or some such... show the thug that frame only and he'll think you deleted evidence of his crimes when in reality, you still have it ready to send to the internet/media/etc...
DeadheadSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-11, 11:34 PM   #37
mike
Senior Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Snowy midwest
Bikes:
Posts: 5,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
I just cannot fathom that any city's PD would be foolish enough to set up such a deliberate sting operation that is so paper thin to even hold up in court.
Oh ya? Well, according to the OP, he paid the fine without contesting it!

That is exactly what many police do. I had a cop try to give me a ticket for speeding. I insisted that I was not speeding and he said, "oh really, do you want to see the radar?" To his surprise, I said "Yes". When he showed me, I noticed that the time on the radar "gun" showing the illegal speed was from nearly an hour earlier. When I pointed it out, he let me go, but it goes to show that some cops are out to write tickets with the expectation that you won't contest it and just pay the fine.

In some cities, cops get commissions and have quotas for writing fines.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 12:57 AM   #38
sharrn
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Response to above mentioned video. This is by one of my favorite 'You-tubers.'
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 01:42 AM   #39
kludgefudge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes: late 80's bianchi campion d'italia, early 90's trek 2100, early 90's shogun selectra, mid 90's aluminum marin xcMTB, dept. store grade but upgraded columbia double eagle tandem
Posts: 437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharrn View Post
Response to above mentioned video. This is by one of my favorite 'You-tubers.'
what the hell was the point of that video? There was zero information and literally nothing happened in it to warrant the label "response".
kludgefudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 02:04 AM   #40
sharrn
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
He's merely asking for what the opinions of subscribers think about the video and about how/where they ride if they do. May not be a direct reply, but hell, at least someone fairly well known took notice. It will make people think about cyclists a bit more. I'm sorry my reply wasn't spot on. I'm sorry I didn't give a 100% correct response. geez.

Last edited by sharrn; 06-11-11 at 02:10 AM. Reason: f'ed up typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 03:53 AM   #41
jjermzz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
NYC Sucks, they implement rules/laws to use it against you. WTF? This video is on Yahoo top news
jjermzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 08:50 AM   #42
closetbiker
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 9,596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kludgefudge View Post
what the hell was the point of that video? There was zero information and literally nothing happened in it to warrant the label "response".
he did say that the cyclist was in the right by showing footage of him crashing into obstacles that are in bike lanes, but the law says you can leave the bike lane for "safety"

we don't know what the situation was when he got the ticket. He could have just been riding down the street with the lane with no obstacles in it next to him.

BC used to have a law like this, but it was removed. It's much better now. You can use it or not
closetbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 02:55 PM   #43
akohekohe
The Professor
 
akohekohe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: O'ahu
Bikes: Alex Moulton Double Pylon, Surly Big Dummy, Alex Moulton GT
Posts: 889
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As It Happens interviewed the author of the video. Go to this link and click Listen to Part 2. The interview is a 16:45.
akohekohe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-11, 04:25 PM   #44
exile
Senior Member
 
exile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes: 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 1999 Jamis Exile
Posts: 2,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by akohekohe View Post
As It Happens interviewed the author of the video. Go to this link and click Listen to Part 2. The interview is a 16:45.
Thanks for the link akohekohe . This is a filmmaker making a movie. The only things known for sure is that he was ticketed for riding outside the bike lane & that there are obstructions in NYC bike lanes.

Due to editing we don't know if Neistat was ticketed or pulled over for other things. Also, the Cop never stated that Neistat can only ride in bike lanes.

Neistat made a movie loosely based on an encounter with an officer and an extreme (albeit incorrect) interpretation of NYC bike lane law.

Neistat is and wants to be a filmmaker. As a filmmaker he took liberties in the design and editing of his film. He made a movie in his own words "that would be funny and might get some attention". Neistat accomplished goal .
exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-13, 12:35 PM   #45
HonestOne
Senior Member
 
HonestOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Friend of mine just posted this on Facebook, happy to see there was a discussion about it here. Pretty funny video!
HonestOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-13, 12:38 PM   #46
ItsJustMe
Seņior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Posts: 13,130
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Resurrected zombie thread alert.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-13, 10:19 PM   #47
HonestOne
Senior Member
 
HonestOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe View Post
Resurrected zombie thread alert.
Guess you could call it that, I call it keeping it organized instead of making another thread to add to the millions already on the site.
HonestOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.