7/31/11 fatality--"bicyclist lost control" or rundown? Bedford, PA (Buffalo Mills)
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Route+...=12,50.79,,0,0
The cyclist is on a CAAD9, riding on a 1 foot berm and the 21 year olds claim they were safely passing the cyclist while they were in the narrow lane and it was the cyclist that SUDDENLY lost control and swerved in front of them at exactly the wrong second in time.
BS
The cyclist is on a CAAD9, riding on a 1 foot berm and the 21 year olds claim they were safely passing the cyclist while they were in the narrow lane and it was the cyclist that SUDDENLY lost control and swerved in front of them at exactly the wrong second in time.
BS
#28
Lotus Monomaniac
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,046
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
The friends/family/co-workers of the two men in the car will probably be able to judge their character and if they are the type of people that would harass a cyclist or not. Not conclusive proof, but will probably sway opinion one way or the other.
For example, if the unfortunate should happen and I hit a cyclist, everyone I know would be positive that it was just an accident. I couldn't say the same about other people I know.
For example, if the unfortunate should happen and I hit a cyclist, everyone I know would be positive that it was just an accident. I couldn't say the same about other people I know.
#29
Cycle Year Round
12 foot lane (narrow lane) - 6 foot wide car (avg width of car https://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_th...width_of_a_car) = 6 feet of room... If the cyclist was on the shoulder (as you say) it is entirely possible for the motorist to pass safely using your 3 foot rule.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#30
Don from Austin Texas
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,211
Bikes: Schwinn S25 "department store crap" FS MTB, home-made CF 26" hybrid, CF road bike with straight bar, various wierd frankenbikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Don in Austin
#31
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The driver claimed that he tried to swerve when the cyclist moved, which doesn't preclude him already providing sufficient (3') of passing distance for the original described circumstances. You stated that it wasn't possible to "safely" pass under the conditions described. The "facts" are it is possible. Only the individuals involved know if it actually happened.
The bottom line is that there is no evidence offered to support or dispute the drivers claim. All claims by you and others (supporting either side) are based upon prejudice driven speculation. As such they are completely worthless.
#32
Cycle Year Round
Ten feet still means a margin of 4 feet. Obviously the cyclist didn't remain on the shoulder, but if he was there in the first place he was not in the lane, so the car passed in the lane providing sufficient safety margin...
The driver claimed that he tried to swerve when the cyclist moved, which doesn't preclude him already providing sufficient (3') of passing distance for the original described circumstances. You stated that it wasn't possible to "safely" pass under the conditions described. The "facts" are it is possible. Only the individuals involved know if it actually happened.
The bottom line is that there is no evidence offered to support or dispute the drivers claim. All claims by you and others (supporting either side) are based upon prejudice driven speculation. As such they are completely worthless.
The driver claimed that he tried to swerve when the cyclist moved, which doesn't preclude him already providing sufficient (3') of passing distance for the original described circumstances. You stated that it wasn't possible to "safely" pass under the conditions described. The "facts" are it is possible. Only the individuals involved know if it actually happened.
The bottom line is that there is no evidence offered to support or dispute the drivers claim. All claims by you and others (supporting either side) are based upon prejudice driven speculation. As such they are completely worthless.
1 + 7 + 2 + 3 = 13
So, the lane is 3 feet too narrow for the driver to be likely of providing an actual 3 feet clearance.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#34
Cycle Year Round
SARCASM (for those lacking an understanding of such)
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#35
Βanned.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 620
Bikes: 1976 Dawes Galaxy, 1993 Trek 950 Single Track and Made-to-Measure Reynolds 753 road bike with Campag throughout.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Route+...=12,50.79,,0,0
The cyclist is on a CAAD9, riding on a 1 foot berm and the 21 year olds claim they were safely passing the cyclist while they were in the narrow lane and it was the cyclist that SUDDENLY lost control and swerved in front of them at exactly the wrong second in time.
BS
The cyclist is on a CAAD9, riding on a 1 foot berm and the 21 year olds claim they were safely passing the cyclist while they were in the narrow lane and it was the cyclist that SUDDENLY lost control and swerved in front of them at exactly the wrong second in time.
BS
His obituary provides his home address and place of work - Google maps shows this to be a 60 mile commute, so his Sunday afternoon ride was likely a training ride, though I can find no report that provides any details.
He was approximately 6 miles from home and heading north on 96 towards Manns Choice and his home.
His obituary does not state anything about his hobbies or if he was a keen cyclist. No mention of touring or club riding, etc. Though the Cannondale Caad9 looks like a reasonably nice road bike.
The weather on the afternoon of his ride, according to Weather.com was excellent with a high of 89°F.
"The accident was at the end of a gradual curve," [Trooper] Bonin said - Google maps shows an almost straight road for more than a half mile either side of the post office at Buffalo Mills.
I do not see many links to online reports above, so here is one.
Those one-foot shoulders are a travesty - I see so many cyclists riding in them as though they are adequate, this is a disservice to all other cyclists. We will probably never know the truth of where and how Gary was riding. I would have been in the lane and moved to the shoulder as a courtesy to other vehicles - but only after I am sure they have slowed down.
It would also be nice to know if Gary was using a mirror, hi-vis clothing, etc.
One wonders where the evangelical Far-Right-As-Practicable people (Bekologist) would ride on that particular piece of road.
__________________
LOL The End is Nigh (for 80% of middle class North Americans) - I sneer in their general direction.
LOL The End is Nigh (for 80% of middle class North Americans) - I sneer in their general direction.
#36
Cycle Year Round
Based on photos of the road, based on the width of the road, based on real probabilities and statistics. Based on the fact that cyclist handlebars/elbows are 22 to 24 inches wide which you seem to ignore. Based on unreasonable claims by the motorist of sudden wide 4.5 feet swerves by the cyclist at the last second. Even if the cyclist was in the middle of the berm, the motorist would be 0.5 feet into the oncoming lane to provide 3 feet passing clearance.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#37
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
As opposed to people who have convinced themselves that they should always automatically blame the driver, regardless of the facts?
It's amazing to me that so many people in A&S are absolutely convinced that the cyclist is never, ever in the wrong. They never veer. They never get in front of a car without looking. They're never ninja salmon at night. ( But if they are, they're still not at fault. )
There's no question that drivers are frequently at fault in car/cyclist accidents. But there's also no question that many cyclists are just as oblivious to basic rules of common sense when it comes to sharing roads.
It's amazing to me that so many people in A&S are absolutely convinced that the cyclist is never, ever in the wrong. They never veer. They never get in front of a car without looking. They're never ninja salmon at night. ( But if they are, they're still not at fault. )
There's no question that drivers are frequently at fault in car/cyclist accidents. But there's also no question that many cyclists are just as oblivious to basic rules of common sense when it comes to sharing roads.
And yes, we do see the ninjas, and the other cycling idiots that just make us slap our heads and shudder... while thinking "well, no wonder... "
As a side note, I do know a cat that plays the piano... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ860P4iTaM
#38
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Based on photos of the road, based on the width of the road, based on real probabilities and statistics. Based on the fact that cyclist handlebars/elbows are 22 to 24 inches wide which you seem to ignore. Based on unreasonable claims by the motorist of sudden wide 4.5 feet swerves by the cyclist at the last second. Even if the cyclist was in the middle of the berm, the motorist would be 0.5 feet into the oncoming lane to provide 3 feet passing clearance.
If the cyclist was traveling on the berm.shoulder when the motorist went to pass, then the motorist would clearly have been able to pass safely in the narrow lane despite you claim to the contrary. And you, nor anyone else on this thread have no evidence that the cyclists was not riding in the shoulder/berm.
You mention real probabilities and statistics... something that clearly indicates you know nothing of the subject since the facts are that a safe pass under the described conditions is possible. It is possible for a cyclist to swerve several feet (particularly when riding in a shoulder as anyone here should know) thereby causing an unavoidable collision. It is also possible that the motorist caused the accident. There is simply no empirical evidence to assign probabilities to either situation. Your claims are based solely upon your own prejudices...
#39
Banned
Too bad that the cyclist didn't have some sort of rearward facing video cam on his bike, it might have helped shed some light in this incident.
__________________
Prisoner No. 979
Prisoner No. 979
#40
Cycle Year Round
From OP, "Police said Latterner was riding a Cannondale Caad9 bicycle on the east berm while traveling northbound on Route 96. He lost control of the bicycle and then traveled into the northbound lane..."
If the cyclist was traveling on the berm.shoulder when the motorist went to pass, then the motorist would clearly have been able to pass safely in the narrow lane despite you claim to the contrary. And you, nor anyone else on this thread have no evidence that the cyclists was not riding in the shoulder/berm.
You mention real probabilities and statistics... something that clearly indicates you know nothing of the subject since the facts are that a safe pass under the described conditions is possible. It is possible for a cyclist to swerve several feet (particularly when riding in a shoulder as anyone here should know) thereby causing an unavoidable collision. It is also possible that the motorist caused the accident. There is simply no empirical evidence to assign probabilities to either situation. Your claims are based solely upon your own prejudices...
If the cyclist was traveling on the berm.shoulder when the motorist went to pass, then the motorist would clearly have been able to pass safely in the narrow lane despite you claim to the contrary. And you, nor anyone else on this thread have no evidence that the cyclists was not riding in the shoulder/berm.
You mention real probabilities and statistics... something that clearly indicates you know nothing of the subject since the facts are that a safe pass under the described conditions is possible. It is possible for a cyclist to swerve several feet (particularly when riding in a shoulder as anyone here should know) thereby causing an unavoidable collision. It is also possible that the motorist caused the accident. There is simply no empirical evidence to assign probabilities to either situation. Your claims are based solely upon your own prejudices...
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#41
Senior Member
It may be because some of us use mirrors, can hold a straight line so well that we can ride the bike lane stripe for as long as we want, and we have good lighting and believe in making ourselves both visible and predictable... and yet, in spite of all that, we find we do get close passes by motorists that could have easily made other choices... or worse, choose to harass cyclists.
And yes, we do see the ninjas, and the other cycling idiots that just make us slap our heads and shudder... while thinking "well, no wonder... "
As a side note, I do know a cat that plays the piano... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ860P4iTaM
And yes, we do see the ninjas, and the other cycling idiots that just make us slap our heads and shudder... while thinking "well, no wonder... "
As a side note, I do know a cat that plays the piano... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ860P4iTaM
I was discussing this subject with my 10-yr-old on our ride tonight. We started out at 6:30PM, and it was a bit cloudy. Decked out in all of our Fredly glory with front and rear blinking lights and his spoke lights ( you can't start the Fred-ness too young ) and highly visible clothes, we kept track of the riders we saw. We rode on suburban streets, mostly with designated bike routes. ( Mostly Penfield Road and then Clover Street in Brighton, for anyone who cares )
Unlit Ninjas: ( Based on them wearing black after 8:00PM - it was at least 30 minutes since most cars turned on lights ) : 5
Salmon: 1 ( Which must be a new record! )
Fred/Wilmas: ( Yay! ) 3
Sundry scofflaws: ( Running red lights ) 2
Wobbler and Weavers: ( Highly subjective ) 3
Of the motorists:
Potential right-hookers : 0
Potential Left hooker: 1
Close passers: We stopped counting at 20
Safe passers: Way too many to count
What does all that prove? Not much. Except that the number of cyclists doing things that would have me say to my kid "If I see you doing that your bike is going in the garage for two weeks" significantly outnumbered the ones that I could point out and say "Now THAT'S how you ride safely."
__________________
Knows the weight of my bike to the nearest 10 pounds.
Knows the weight of my bike to the nearest 10 pounds.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston TX area
Posts: 816
Bikes: Trek 1420 triple, Mercier Corvus, Globe 1 700, Surly Disc Trucker, GT Avalanche, GT Grade, GT Helion, Mercier Corvus, Motobacane Boris X7 Fat Bikes,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
IMO the driver buzzed the guy and blew the horn. gut feeling
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Germantown MD
Posts: 279
Bikes: Trek Y-5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As opposed to people who have convinced themselves that they should always automatically blame the driver, regardless of the facts?
It's amazing to me that so many people in A&S are absolutely convinced that the cyclist is never, ever in the wrong. They never veer. They never get in front of a car without looking. They're never ninja salmon at night. ( But if they are, they're still not at fault. )
There's no question that drivers are frequently at fault in car/cyclist accidents. But there's also no question that many cyclists are just as oblivious to basic rules of common sense when it comes to sharing roads.
It's amazing to me that so many people in A&S are absolutely convinced that the cyclist is never, ever in the wrong. They never veer. They never get in front of a car without looking. They're never ninja salmon at night. ( But if they are, they're still not at fault. )
There's no question that drivers are frequently at fault in car/cyclist accidents. But there's also no question that many cyclists are just as oblivious to basic rules of common sense when it comes to sharing roads.
I run about 30 miles a week. I come across just as many clueless drivers as I do bicyclists. I almost get whacked crossing crosswalks and running on multi use pathways.
#44
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your "math" only works because of your prejudices and assumptions. You claimed it wasn't possible to safely pass while remaining in the same lane. The key is your assuming (which you stated above) that the cyclist was in the lane. If they were in fact on the shoulder (which you have no evidence to prove otherwise) than safe passing was possible.
Like so many here you are letting your prejudices make you assume the driver was at fault when the facts are it could have been either the driver or the cyclists or even both who contributed to the accident...
Like so many here you are letting your prejudices make you assume the driver was at fault when the facts are it could have been either the driver or the cyclists or even both who contributed to the accident...
#45
Banned
__________________
Prisoner No. 979
Prisoner No. 979
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's always entertaining to have a few pieces of a 100-piece puzzle and try to figure out what the real picture is. I do it for a living (though with more than a few pieces of evidence, I hope) in court every day. Here's what I know. Without other evidence, you've got to go with the testimony of witnesses (here, the driver and passenger), even if you don't want to. There's plenty of room to speculate, and HoustonB above adds some interesting info. You've got to believe that someone on a long ride with a nice bike is not an inexperienced noob. But a Focus is a small, quiet car, and more than once I've done things (swerved to miss a stick, make an inadequate look when changing lanes, things like that) which in retrospect were not wise. The cyclist might not have heard the car. On balance, I think you've got to go with the witnesses, even though biased, unless other evidence contradicts them.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 411
Bikes: 2009 Giant Cypress DX 2009 Jamis Coda Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the link. I completely agree with you. I will only believe the driver is innocent if he passes a lie detector test - since none will be given, I will assume driver guilt. In the Netherlands, drivers are assumed to be guilty in car / bike collisions and have to prove their innocence. It will be a cold day in hell before we see that in car-centric USA.
#48
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
When the laws are all fair to all road users... Then perhaps we won't entertain notions such as "assuming driver guilt as in the Netherlands where drivers are assumed to be guilty in car / bike collision, unless they can prove otherwise."
#49
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
An adult shouldn't need to hear this, but life is not fair. Some people are smarter than others, some people are richer than others, etc. Nothing in the law is indicative of fairness...
So your willing to change our entire system so that the government can accuse you (or anyone) of a crime and it is your responsibility to prove your innocence? Lets hope that the rest of the country retains their sanity and this never becomes an issue. Since you can't change the assumed innocent presumption for some crimes and not expect it to spread to other (and likely all) crimes, version of the flavor of the month... Whatever, faction gets the upper hand legislatively can than start applying that new rule to whatever crime they wish...
Our system was designed, and rightfully so, not to ensure the conviction of the guilty, but to minimize the chance that the innocent would be convicted... Despite hysterical, prejudice driven rhetoric to the contrary...
Our system was designed, and rightfully so, not to ensure the conviction of the guilty, but to minimize the chance that the innocent would be convicted... Despite hysterical, prejudice driven rhetoric to the contrary...
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 411
Bikes: 2009 Giant Cypress DX 2009 Jamis Coda Comp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some of that "common law" is in place to accommodate motorists... at least some of the written laws DO give priority to motorists... such as the 85% rule. And then there are a whole host of bike laws that restrict movement of cyclists, relative to that of motorists.
When the laws are all fair to all road users... Then perhaps we won't entertain notions such as "assuming driver guilt as in the Netherlands where drivers are assumed to be guilty in car / bike collision, unless they can prove otherwise."
When the laws are all fair to all road users... Then perhaps we won't entertain notions such as "assuming driver guilt as in the Netherlands where drivers are assumed to be guilty in car / bike collision, unless they can prove otherwise."