View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#7651
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,843
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5852 Post(s)
Liked 2,692 Times
in
1,502 Posts
Here's a rational for those who wish to retain their rights not to wear helmets. It's not about whether helmets save lives or not, but whether helmet laws make sense.
Yet, here you are screaming, "BS" "anti-helmet" or just bloody murder.
We know you're pro helmet, and consider anything not 100% pro helmet to be anti-helmet. So why don't you cut the nonsense, be honest, and admit you're actually in favor of mandatory helmet laws. Because if you were really opposed you these laws you wouldn't be so busy shooting down arguments against them.
As for your claim that it belongs in the helmet thread, I expect it will be moved there, which would be sad. This isn't about helmets, but about helmet laws, and moving it to the helmet thread is the surest way to ensure that there's no open debate about MHLs.
It would be like insisting that all debate about teaching evolution be conducted in churches.
To the Mods, maybe we need a separate MHL thread so we can discuss this serious issue without all the acrimony we gt in the helmet thread.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 05-17-14 at 12:54 PM.
#7652
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 85
Bikes: Raleigh RX 1.0; Late 90's Trek 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ah yes the pavement thingy. Our system allows for very safe normal riding. For faster folks there are a few... difficulties. However for a normal joe like me who doesn't (yet) participate in the commute criteriums (CoCr, I think I just made up a brilliant term!) cycling is very safe indeed. You see we don't ride amidst cars that often (depends on the street and of course other cities have different situations etc). Most of our infra is a shared path with pedestrians and some riding with the cars in the city streets. The streets have like 30-40km/h speed limits so that's not a problem.
In the bigger cities (well, Helsinki is our only biggish city) we have shared paths, bike lanes, protected bike lanes, using of the bus lane, using normal lanes etc. Still cycling is considered very safe even with all that variety. But maybe it is the chance to plan a riskier or a safer route. Riding on the bus lane is pretty bad on one main street but there are plans for fixing that. And if you get run over a bus the helmet is not going to help that much, seriously.
As far as the bus goes, a helmet would help if you got clipped by a bus not run over by one
#7653
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 85
Bikes: Raleigh RX 1.0; Late 90's Trek 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My disagreement with helmet law is more because of my political leanings than my solid belief that helmets add a level of safety for me. Just because I think its wrong to legislate doesn't mean I don't think its a good idea to wear a helmet.
#7654
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,843
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5852 Post(s)
Liked 2,692 Times
in
1,502 Posts
This country was founded on the principle of free and open exchange of ideas. Regardless of their political leanings, those who oppose debate on MHLs are for all practical purposes in favor of them. In fact the current climate has the legislative process turned on t's had.
Instead of proponents of MHLs having to make their case, it's opponents who are placed on th defensive and forced to make the case against.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 05-17-14 at 01:31 PM.
#7655
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 85
Bikes: Raleigh RX 1.0; Late 90's Trek 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's fine, but the issue is that so many who wear helmets yet, like you, are opposed to helmet laws (for whatever reason) do all they can to stifle debate on the issue. In the absence of reasonable, open debate, helmet laws get proposed and sometimes passed because somebody thought it was a good idea and nobody said (or could) say otherwise.
#7656
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
What'd I say about making up laughable crap? You JUST did exactly that. Do you really think people wear helmets because they're "afraid of the world?
That's not just laughable, that's downright arrogant. You really think YOU know why other people do what they do?
And what'd I say about not having the balls to go without a helmet simply because you don't want to wear one? Instead of just saying you don't wear your helmet because you don't want to, you went OFF and ranted about other people trying "justify their fear of the world", then made all kinds of claims about how safe your cycling is - even when you're "wasted". (Yeah, sure, that's safe...)
Q.E.D.
#7657
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
That's fine, but the issue is that so many who wear helmets yet, like you, are opposed to helmet laws (for whatever reason) do all they can to stifle debate on the issue. In the absence of reasonable, open debate, helmet laws get proposed and sometimes passed because somebody thought it was a good idea and nobody said (or could) say otherwise.
This country was founded on the principle of free and open exchange of ideas. Regardless of their political leanings, those who oppose debate on MHLs are for all practical purposes in favor of them. In fact the current climate has the legislative process turned on t's had.
Instead of proponents of MHLs having to make their case, it's opponents who are placed on th defensive and forced to make the case against.
This country was founded on the principle of free and open exchange of ideas. Regardless of their political leanings, those who oppose debate on MHLs are for all practical purposes in favor of them. In fact the current climate has the legislative process turned on t's had.
Instead of proponents of MHLs having to make their case, it's opponents who are placed on th defensive and forced to make the case against.
The first group is more than correct, IMO: no one has the right to force you to wear a helmet. It's your head.
The second group? There's no "debating" the most fervent advocates there. If you go and actually READ the scientific papers they claim support their position, you'll literally be laughing your ass off after going through three or four. Go look a couple of years ago in this very thread. I spent some time doing just that - actually reading the papers the "helmets don't protect you" proponents claimed supported them. After about 10 or 15 or so, the pattern was clear: the claims made about the papers supporting the position that helmets offer no protection were, to be kind, exaggerated. Hell, they were downright false in most cases.
I've reached the point I don't bother to debate the "helmets provide no protection" crowd. It's literally like I imagine debating a Flat Earther would be.
I just occasionally point out that the "helmets provide no protection" crowd just doesn't have the capacity to do without a possible safety measure without resorting to claiming it's not a safety measure.
And then watch the fun.
Jeez, they should just grow a pair and say they don't want to wear a helmet.
#7658
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,843
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5852 Post(s)
Liked 2,692 Times
in
1,502 Posts
And there's the rub.
Fervent helmet believers shout down any debate, and simply won't accept any discussion on the issue, except for 100% support of the notion that bicyclists should wear helmets. Then they claim to be opposed to MHLs.
The fact is that there's a tremendous spectrum between the proposition that helmets can prevent or mitigate TBI in the event of a head strike (accepted proposition) and that they make enough of a difference to justify 100% use when bicycling, either through persuasion or legislation.
That's were legitimate discussion of helmets should focus. This is not a black and white issue, and one can accept the proposition that helmets offer some benefit while still choosing to not wear one. Unfortunately, the nature of the debate, or more pointedly the lack of any honest discussion means that the pro helmet, anti MHL crowd will get what they really want but won't admit --- MHLs.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7660
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,520
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times
in
221 Posts
I wear a helmet religiously - I do not want helmet laws. I have Libertarian sensibilities about such things. Even though I have also never abused drugs, I don't think the government should legislate what adults smoke, snort, or shoot into their veins unless it causes someone else harm directly (like DUI). I don't think the government should decree what sort of appliances adults should buy, use, or collect including guns, baseball bats, machetes, chainsaws, golf clubs, or Samurai swords.
I wear a helmet. I hereby, once and for all, defend everyone's decision to not wear one. I do not think you are any less intelligent than me for making your choice. It is obvious that you believe you will never hit your head, or that a helmet is a waste of time and money even if you did hit your head wearing one. I want to be free to choose things in my life and that freedom comes with the responsibly to zealously defend your right of free choice - so long as it does not directly hurt someone else. I don't buy the lame excuse that head injuries are wasting hospital beds. This is what hospitals are for - treating trauma and disease, much of it inflicted on ourselves from smoking, drinking too much, eating the wrong foods, overdosing on drugs, sedentary lifestyles, exposure to contaminants at home and work, falling off of ladders, and cracking our skulls a number of ways. I just don't want it to be me in the E.R. getting my scalp stitched up when I could be out riding my bicycle, on my skateboard, whatever - because once in a while I do fall off.
I can't be the only one here who feels this way.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 05-17-14 at 03:23 PM.
#7661
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
My wife and I are mutually dependent on each others health and assistance..... as are most couples. She insists that the inconvenience of my helmet wearing provides HER with a benefit. I only wear a helmet out of love and mutual respect for her. If I didn't have someone in my life who needed me to be here.... risk taking would be a non-issue.
#7662
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
FB
Yes I think intelligent people wear a helmet when biking. No I dont think cycling is particuarly dangerous if you obey the rules of the road, and be vigilant. And yes I am against MHLs. Like another person posted it is mainly on political grounds. It is suposed to be a free country but some people seem to want to control others by rules, regulations and laws. We already have far to many law, rules and regulations. If some want to ride without a helmet its fine by me, I just dont think they should crusade against helmets. I feel crusading against helmets is a disservice to the young and new cyclist that probably need helmets the most.
Yes I think intelligent people wear a helmet when biking. No I dont think cycling is particuarly dangerous if you obey the rules of the road, and be vigilant. And yes I am against MHLs. Like another person posted it is mainly on political grounds. It is suposed to be a free country but some people seem to want to control others by rules, regulations and laws. We already have far to many law, rules and regulations. If some want to ride without a helmet its fine by me, I just dont think they should crusade against helmets. I feel crusading against helmets is a disservice to the young and new cyclist that probably need helmets the most.
#7663
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Being against MLHs is just plain logical. Helmet laws would be a can of worms for the police that have far far better things to do than cuff little Susie and run her in for not wearing a helmet.
#7664
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,843
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5852 Post(s)
Liked 2,692 Times
in
1,502 Posts
I do agree that newbies probably need helmets the most, but don't think that exposure to a well balanced debate will hurt them. More likely, discussions on the benefits of helmets, and most important the limitations of those benefits will help them the most. Unfortunately the safety discussion these days is boiled down to a simplistic "wear a helmet to be safe, not wearing one is too dangerous" without regard to how to ride safely and manage the real risks of bicycling.
For the record, I'm not anti helmet (though I don't wear one), but I object to being put on the defensive about it. My standard answer if people ask whether they should wear a helmet is "if you have to ask, you should wear a helmet", but I also remind them that wearing a helmet is only a small part of staying safe.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7665
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,843
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5852 Post(s)
Liked 2,692 Times
in
1,502 Posts
It's a bigger category than you might think. You make decisions but don't think any less of pole who make different ones. We're alike that way. You don't lecture me about helmets, I don't criticize how you ride.
It's a good attitude, and I salute you for it.
It's a good attitude, and I salute you for it.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7666
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,688
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1127 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
205 Posts
About your second accident. You can't do much about crazed gunmen shooting people on the street short of wearing body armor all the time. Then again such occasions are extremely rare. So is your second accident. It's in fact almost a malicious intent to cause harm- kind of situation and at least groo negligence. These massive efups which indeed are extremely rare cannot be a guide for safety equipment since they fall into the class of "anything can happen, a plane can fall on you"
.
.
#7667
Senior Member
That might explain why most of the cops I see are not wearing a vest. Just like not wearing a helmet unless the specific activity is more risky than normal.
#7668
Just a person on bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: 2015 Trek 1.1, 2021 Specialized Roubaix, 2022 Tern HSD S+
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
56 Posts
I do agree that newbies probably need helmets the most, but don't think that exposure to a well balanced debate will hurt them. More likely, discussions on the benefits of helmets, and most important the limitations of those benefits will help them the most. Unfortunately the safety discussion these days is boiled down to a simplistic "wear a helmet to be safe, not wearing one is too dangerous" without regard to how to ride safely and manage the real risks of bicycling.
For the record, I'm not anti helmet (though I don't wear one), but I object to being put on the defensive about it. My standard answer if people ask whether they should wear a helmet is "if you have to ask, you should wear a helmet", but I also remind them that wearing a helmet is only a small part of staying safe.
For the record, I'm not anti helmet (though I don't wear one), but I object to being put on the defensive about it. My standard answer if people ask whether they should wear a helmet is "if you have to ask, you should wear a helmet", but I also remind them that wearing a helmet is only a small part of staying safe.
The county I live in has a mandatory helmet law. When I ride fast for fitness/training, I wear a helmet to protect myself. When I ride for commuting, I wear a helmet because I ride in traffic all the way. When I ride for recreation or errands, I wear a helmet to not be ticketed.
__________________
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
#7669
Senior Member
More blah blah blah that makes absolutely no sense and has been covered over and over. funny thing is Cops wear bulletproof vests yet only out of 700,000 cops only 48 get shot at, not hit, just shot at, but even at 48 that's only a tiny fraction of 1% of the cops getting shot at. So why bother wearing a vest since all they do is make you hot and weigh you down? Some of you come up with the greatest examples for not wearing a helmet. Since the average person only gets into 1.7 auto accidents in their lifetime and the huge majority of these are minor why wear a seatbelt? they should also disarm their airbags.
And again with the car safety devices! Do you not understand minor accidents with cars are actually surprisingly common? Airbags and seatbelts help so much that a person might walk off an accident at 40km/h. If you didn't have any of the stuff you would most likely be pretty badly hurt. Car safety devices are very, very effective at a wide range of accidents (people should still wear helmets while driving though)
to bind that to bike helmets. bike helmets are not very effective for a wide range of accidents. tgey are low to moderately effective in one type of accident and that is the linear head strike. Not that common.
#7670
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
131 Posts
In the US of A where helmet promotion is pretty much Gospel, 70% of people IIRC say they want to ride a bicycle but say they are afraid to do so. In the Netherlands where bicycle helmet promotion is unheard of, hardly anyone seems to be afraid of cycling and everyone cycles. correlation doesn't mean causation, but the more successful a bicycle culture is, the more uncommon helmets seem to be. This is btw only true for utility cycling, Dutchies will generally don a helmet when they engage in risky types of cycling like mountain biking or racing. Be it that those activities are seen as completely different from regular cycling. It's a "driving a car" vs "Formule 1" kind of thing from a Dutch POV, with a completely different approach on safety issues.
#7671
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
131 Posts
Well, let me play you a song of my people then. Proceed with care, because you might experience an aneurysms rupturing increase in blood pressure or something:
Last edited by CarinusMalmari; 05-18-14 at 06:58 AM.
#7672
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
131 Posts
1) Dogmatic believe in effectiveness of helmets.
While I’m the first to admit that a bicycle helmet is probably better than nothing in case of an accident, they’re simply not all that effective. If you can’t tell by just looking at one, the inconclusive research and the understanding of how they work are good hints. Helmets should be viewed as an optional safety measure that somewhat increases your safety but nothing much more than that. They shouldn't be promoted as the most important piece of cycling gear and as something you can’t do without. Also, if you want something that’s really effective, consider wearing a full face motorcycle helmet for cycling.
2) Fear Mongering
Cycling is all kinds of good, and while there’s nothing really wrong with arguing helmets will make things a bit safer, the horror stories about comatose vegetables and brain splattered tarmac are not representative for cycling, nor do they prove a whole lot about cycling helmets. In fact the only thing those stories seem to be particularly good for is to discourage cycling.
3) Anecdotal “Evidence”
The anecdotes about how a cycling helmet saved someone’s life/health or how lives were lost for want of a helmet have two major problems. First of all, anecdotes in general don’t prove anything, and secondly these “anecdotes” usually aren't even really anecdotes, but mere speculations about anecdotes. Without exactly repeating the accident and adding or removing a helmet, it’s usually hard if not impossible to say what would have happened and how exactly (the lack of) a cycling helmet would have influenced things.
4) Shaming people who don’t wear helmets.
A common coercion technique that’s only really good for proving the Shamer is a rude meddling **** who has a compulsive desire to aggressively coerce others to share their delusions about the magical properties of polystyrene. They should be verbally abused until they get through their thick skulls they should stop with their obnoxious bull**** and shut the **** up.
5) Denial of disadvantages.
There are good reasons to not wear a helmet. Besides the obvious, (helmets are uncomfortable, inconvenient, mess up your hair etc.) there’s a lot of things that aren't directly related to protection of the skull. Most notably that helmets seem to discourage cycling, which is of course a huge drawback. Your typical Cycling Helmet Advocate will ignore these things or simply lie about them.
And the extra bonus: One-liners. If you express your opinion about cycling helmets is mostly or wholly through one-liners, there’s a very good chance you simply lack the knowledge and/or capacity to have a meaningful discussion about cycling helmets.
In case it isn't clear. This isn't a rant against cycling helmets it’s about the bull**** Bicycle Helmet Advocates use to convince or coerce others to wear a helmet. Also note you’re not necessarily an BHA if you simply choose to wear a helmet and/or think helmets are a good idea. It’s when you try to make your beliefs about cycling helmets someone else’s problem.
Last edited by CarinusMalmari; 05-18-14 at 07:01 AM.
#7673
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 85
Bikes: Raleigh RX 1.0; Late 90's Trek 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the US of A where helmet promotion is pretty much Gospel, 70% of people IIRC say they want to ride a bicycle but say they are afraid to do so. In the Netherlands where bicycle helmet promotion is unheard of, hardly anyone seems to be afraid of cycling and everyone cycles. correlation doesn't mean causation, but the more successful a bicycle culture is, the more uncommon helmets seem to be. This is btw only true for utility cycling, Dutchies will generally don a helmet when they engage in risky types of cycling like mountain biking or racing. Be it that those activities are seen as completely different from regular cycling. It's a "driving a car" vs "Formule 1" kind of thing from a Dutch POV, with a completely different approach on safety issues.
What makes you think helmets seem to be the issue here? And where are you getting this 70% number from?
#7674
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,520
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times
in
221 Posts
Yesterday's ride made me remember another point regarding why i pick up a helmet instead of a regular hat.
I have already mentioned here that I am a hat wearer by nature. My helmet is just a hat that keeps my head cool, holds my rear view mirror, and stays on my head even on the most windy days thanks to a strap. And it MIGHT keep me from getting stitches in my grape 'cause I tend to fall off about once a year although, I have never hit my head...yet.
Yesterday I realized that I use two helmets - one for summer and one for winter. Countless people have asked me how I keep my head warm in the winter. That's easy - I wear a wool or fleece beanie under an insulated, wind-proof ice chest. I choose a helmet with no vents, or adjustable vents/plugs/liner so I can close off all of the vents if I want. So basically I DO have a Styrofoam ice chest on my head holding in all of my skull heat.
During the hottest part of the summer I have a helmet that is mostly vents. It weighs about as much as a baseball cap. The key to this working is a sunscreen product called Kinesis. I keep my hair really short, spray the Kinesis into my hands and cover hair and exposed scalp completely - just like applying shampoo without trying to lather it. The stuff dries fast and is very slightly oily. Give it 5 minutes to dry and towel the excess off. This lasts 5 hours, does not sweat into my eyes, and is completely invisible. Without this product I guess I would be wearing a regular cycling cap. A bud of mine wears a regular cycling cap under his summer helmet. Sounds hot but I have never tried it myself.
So this is the addition to my previous posts: My two helmets are used for temperature management during extreme weather.
I have already mentioned here that I am a hat wearer by nature. My helmet is just a hat that keeps my head cool, holds my rear view mirror, and stays on my head even on the most windy days thanks to a strap. And it MIGHT keep me from getting stitches in my grape 'cause I tend to fall off about once a year although, I have never hit my head...yet.
Yesterday I realized that I use two helmets - one for summer and one for winter. Countless people have asked me how I keep my head warm in the winter. That's easy - I wear a wool or fleece beanie under an insulated, wind-proof ice chest. I choose a helmet with no vents, or adjustable vents/plugs/liner so I can close off all of the vents if I want. So basically I DO have a Styrofoam ice chest on my head holding in all of my skull heat.
During the hottest part of the summer I have a helmet that is mostly vents. It weighs about as much as a baseball cap. The key to this working is a sunscreen product called Kinesis. I keep my hair really short, spray the Kinesis into my hands and cover hair and exposed scalp completely - just like applying shampoo without trying to lather it. The stuff dries fast and is very slightly oily. Give it 5 minutes to dry and towel the excess off. This lasts 5 hours, does not sweat into my eyes, and is completely invisible. Without this product I guess I would be wearing a regular cycling cap. A bud of mine wears a regular cycling cap under his summer helmet. Sounds hot but I have never tried it myself.
So this is the addition to my previous posts: My two helmets are used for temperature management during extreme weather.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 05-18-14 at 08:13 AM.
#7675
Senior Member
I once tried a helmet when it was winter here. Did not do the same mistake twice. The portion covered by the helmet was fine but the part right under it sucked all the wind and froze in seconds. A frozen forehead is not a cool thing. So nowdays in the winter I use 2-3 buffs and a fleece lined thick merino wool beanie.