Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?

Voters
1670. You may not vote on this poll
  • I've never worn a bike helmet

    178 10.66%
  • I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped

    94 5.63%
  • I've always worn a helmet

    648 38.80%
  • I didn't wear a helmet, but now do

    408 24.43%
  • I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions

    342 20.48%
Page 318 of 350 FirstFirst ... 218268308316317318319320328 ... LastLast
Results 7,926 to 7,950 of 8743
  1. #7926
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    20,552
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMACH 5 View Post
    I've spoken out against MHLs at numerous bicycle committee and city council meetings. I rode my bicycle to each one and spoke with my helmet in my hand. I don't think my position is disingenuous or dishonest.
    I don't think your position is disingenuous or dishonest. I also do not think it is representative or typical of hysterical helmet proselytizers at A&S or elsewhere. I believe the ghoulish prototype posted by CarinousMalmari is more in line with the mindset of the smug emotional ranters; licking their chops at the thought of alleged Darwin Candidates contributing their organs, salivating at the thought of alleged OrganDonor Candidates being singled out to pay for medical bills incurred in a cycling accident.

  2. #7927
    Cycle Dallas MMACH 5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Land of Gar, TX
    My Bikes
    Lucinda--2010 Jamis Aurora Elite & a few others
    Posts
    3,413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
    I don't think your position is disingenuous or dishonest. I also do not think it is representative or typical of hysterical helmet proselytizers at A&S or elsewhere.
    ...
    It is more atypical than I realized.
    That's gonna leave a mark.

  3. #7928
    Cycle Dallas MMACH 5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Land of Gar, TX
    My Bikes
    Lucinda--2010 Jamis Aurora Elite & a few others
    Posts
    3,413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMACH 5 View Post
    As I sat here at work, posting in the helmet thread this morning, Dallas' city council FINALLY voted to repeal the adult MHL! Over the years, there was no argument that could be made to sway them (and I tried). What it took was our sister city of Fort Worth having a successful bike-share program. Any hopes of starting a similar program here in Dallas were dashed by the city ordinance dictating that all cyclists, regardless of age were required to wear a helmet.

    City of Dallas drops bike helmet law for adults - CultureMap Dallas
    They also repealed the ordinance that made it illegal to ride with no hands. I had forgotten about that one being on the books. I've been an occasional skofflaw for all these years.
    That's gonna leave a mark.

  4. #7929
    Senior Member rydabent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lincoln Ne
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
    Posts
    4,148
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    wphamilton

    How are you going to guarantee that the rider you are talking about will NEVER hit his head on the ground?

  5. #7930
    Senior Member rekmeyata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    5,866
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CarinusMalmari View Post
    Real bicycle safety would be accident prevention. It's 100% effective every time. Now I agree that you can't guarantee that you prevent all accidents from happening, but you can decimate those statistics, even without resorting to expensive measures like hoovering cycling roundabouts, etc. Anyway you already mentioned a couple of them.


    Funny; around here bicycle helmets are generally not on any do or don't list. What makes you think the American do/don't list about cycling is superior to ours?


    How about nope? There are types of cycling that are safe enough that bothering with any type of safety gear is nonsensical, let alone with crappy safety gear like bicycle helmets.


    You can pry a bicycle helmet on my cold dead skull.


    Actually, these particular statistics speak for the cause of a known helmeteer institution. I personally favor the view of the Dutch Cycling Union, which boils down to: Helmeth Not Even Once.
    Your first paragraph is completely wrong, all the accident prevention classes in the world won't prevent all accidents, you live in la la land if you believe that.

    Second paragraph doesn't make any sense either because it doesn't follow what I was originally was conveying.

    Third paragraph same as the first, you're wrong.

    Forth paragraph more nonsense.

    Fifth paragraph is simply your refusal to see facts because they don't agree with your religion. Dutch? the Dutch are even closely related to American roads and behavior of drivers and cyclists. And it's the same organization father...the US government...that statistically proved that wearing seatbelts saved lives or reduced injury in car accidents and thus were required by law, so you accept the car statistics but not the bicycle one...I see, pick and chose the one you like is your moto.

    Thanks for playing, now move along.
    Last edited by rekmeyata; 06-11-14 at 03:43 PM.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4MIEkIBZs

  6. #7931
    Senior Member rekmeyata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    5,866
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMACH 5 View Post
    Ummmm. Yikes.
    Sure it's yikes, but the law requires car riders to wear seatbelts, and 20 states out of 50 states require all to wear motorcycle helmets, only 2 states have no law to wear a helmet, the rest require helmets for ages 17 to 20 depending on the state. And it's the same thing with motorcycle helmets as with bicycle helmets, motorcycle statistics prove they save lives and reduce the risk of injury. Thus if it is proven statistically that seatbelts save lives and reduce injury and they're required by law then so should motorcycle riders and cyclists be required to wear helmets.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4MIEkIBZs

  7. #7932
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,408
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMACH 5 View Post
    As I sat here at work, posting in the helmet thread this morning, Dallas' city council FINALLY voted to repeal the adult MHL! Over the years, there was no argument that could be made to sway them (and I tried). What it took was our sister city of Fort Worth having a successful bike-share program. Any hopes of starting a similar program here in Dallas were dashed by the city ordinance dictating that all cyclists, regardless of age were required to wear a helmet.

    City of Dallas drops bike helmet law for adults - CultureMap Dallas
    Score one for the forces of freedom.

    Interesting that all the lofty arguments never carried any weight, but the practical reality of wanting a workable bike share program made the difference.

    I guess this is one more reason to be a bike share fan.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  8. #7933
    Senior Member rydabent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lincoln Ne
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
    Posts
    4,148
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would I be wrong saying that I suspect the general public would be more in favor of MHLs than cyclist. While they know nothing about cycling, they are swayed by nanny state agitators. These days so many people it seems want a nanny state and are for more gov control.

  9. #7934
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,408
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    Would I be wrong saying that I suspect the general public would be more in favor of MHLs than cyclist. While they know nothing about cycling, they are swayed by nanny state agitators. These days so many people it seems want a nanny state and are for more gov control.
    Yes, and those nanny state agitators get their info about the danger of riding w/o a helmet from folks like you.

    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    ..

    How are you going to guarantee that the rider you are talking about will NEVER hit his head on the ground?
    The same way you'll guaranty that the person dissuaded from bicycling by all the fear mongering about head injuries won't die of a heart attack, or that a helmeted rider won't die anyway if/when he suffers that head strike you're so sure is coming.
    Last edited by FBinNY; 06-11-14 at 03:49 PM.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  10. #7935
    rugged individualist wphamilton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    My Bikes
    Nashbar Road
    Posts
    6,533
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    wphamilton

    How are you going to guarantee that the rider you are talking about will NEVER hit his head on the ground?
    Why would I want or need to do that?

    Are you going the guarantee that the car passenger will never hit his head in the car?

  11. #7936
    Senior Member rydabent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lincoln Ne
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
    Posts
    4,148
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FB

    Can you guranatee all riders that ride with out a helmet their head will never hit the ground?

    Since I ride somewhere between 2 and 3 thousand miles a year, I apparently dont feel that cycling is unsafe.

  12. #7937
    Senior Member rekmeyata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    5,866
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    FB

    Can you guranatee all riders that ride with out a helmet their head will never hit the ground?

    Since I ride somewhere between 2 and 3 thousand miles a year, I apparently dont feel that cycling is unsafe.

    Exactly, I drive about 14,000 miles a year in my car and wear my seatbelt yet I don't consider driving to be unsafe, just as I ride about 4,000 miles a year on my bicycle and wear my helmet but I too don't consider cycling to be unsafe. Yet even though I'm a good driver and a good rider safety wise (performance wise is a different story, LOL) and yet I cannot ever guarantee myself, or my passengers who I insist they wear their belts, that I will never ever have an accident thus I wear my seatbelt when driving and my helmet when cycling. If it was just me and only me on the roads while driving or riding then I would probably never wear a seatbelt or a helmet!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4MIEkIBZs

  13. #7938
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, Calif.
    Posts
    5,030
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    These days so many people it seems want a nanny state and are for more gov control.
    Finally a statement by you with which I agree. This was brought home to me on a recent bike tour while waiting for a friend to do some shopping at a Target store. I was sitting at a bench outside and a woman came out of the store who wanted to take a cigarette break. She asked me if it was ok if she shared the bench while smoking and we got to talking about a few things - bike touring, political trends, and Colorado's marijuana legalization. She then mentioned that she wished the government would outlaw cigarette smoking since that would finally give her the motivation to quit. Struck me as very odd that someone would want something banned even though they currently do that thing voluntarily, but she seemed quite sincere in her belief that a government ban would get her to quit even though she had made several attempts in the past and always started smoking again.

  14. #7939
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,408
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
    ....She then mentioned that she wished the government would outlaw cigarette smoking since that would finally give her the motivation to quit. Struck me as very odd that someone would want something banned even though they currently do that thing voluntarily, but she seemed quite sincere in her belief that a government ban would get her to quit even though she had made several attempts in the past and always started smoking again.
    And she said this after discussing marijuana, whose ban had been so effective for decades.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  15. #7940
    Senior Member rekmeyata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    5,866
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
    Finally a statement by you with which I agree. This was brought home to me on a recent bike tour while waiting for a friend to do some shopping at a Target store. I was sitting at a bench outside and a woman came out of the store who wanted to take a cigarette break. She asked me if it was ok if she shared the bench while smoking and we got to talking about a few things - bike touring, political trends, and Colorado's marijuana legalization. She then mentioned that she wished the government would outlaw cigarette smoking since that would finally give her the motivation to quit. Struck me as very odd that someone would want something banned even though they currently do that thing voluntarily, but she seemed quite sincere in her belief that a government ban would get her to quit even though she had made several attempts in the past and always started smoking again.
    The crazy thing is, as much as it sounded like I was contrary to this, I also agree! Here's the rub. I believe that seatbelts, helmets of any kind, should not be required by law, it should be optional. However, because seatbelts are required by law and motorcycle helmets are required in a lot of states, then you cannot exclude one safety law and include another, thus all have to be included or none at all, you can't have one and not the other, I'm for none at all but that's just me.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4MIEkIBZs

  16. #7941
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,408
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    FB

    Can you guranatee all riders that ride with out a helmet their head will never hit the ground?

    .
    Never is a long time, but since you're so convinced that those head strikes are likely, can you guaranty that the helmet will prevent serious injury?

    Nobody can guaranty anything, we play the odds. Helmets move the line, and shift the odds, but don't make it a sure bet. The reality is that many cyclists die and suffer TBIs despite wearing helmets. In any case, for a "coldly logical person" you have a serious flaw in your logic. It's not incumbent on me to offer any guaranties, since I'm not advocating anything. You're the one taking the advocate position " wear a helmet" so any burden is on you.

    BUT

    Instead of shouting back and forth in a black and white world of helmet or no helmet, we should focus on an honest discussion of just how far they move the line.

    I continue to be amazed that after so many posts the helmet forum is still locked into the basic argument of whether cyclists should wear helmets or not, and rarely makes an effort to discuss any of the more nuanced helmet questions. Or do helmet advocates think that all helmets are equal in the protection they afford, and that it really is as simple as wear a helmet and live, don't and die.
    Last edited by FBinNY; 06-11-14 at 06:38 PM.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  17. #7942
    Senior Member Brennan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    My Bikes
    Surly CC, Trek Earl
    Posts
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's fantastic. Great news.

  18. #7943
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Canada, PG BC
    My Bikes
    27 speed oryx
    Posts
    1,021
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
    And she said this after discussing marijuana, whose ban had been so effective for decades.
    Ha, Ha, marijuana laws being effective... About the only thing it is effective at, is filling up the jails... I would bet I could buy some in any mega city, small city, town, or a town with only 1 stop sign, anywhere in N America... Spewing beer out my nose and Laughing and rolling on the ground...


    EDIT; OOoops, It seems my irony detector failed me... Oh well, I did get a good laugh...
    Last edited by 350htrr; 06-11-14 at 09:04 PM.
    He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts...for support rather than illumination. I do like my beer, so sometimes I do end up leaning on the lamp-post...

  19. #7944
    Senior Member rydabent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lincoln Ne
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
    Posts
    4,148
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Doped up pot head driving cars on the streets is just another reason to wear a helmet. On the news from Colo, police have already written approx 300 tickets for driving under the influence of pot.

  20. #7945
    Senior Member rekmeyata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    5,866
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    Doped up pot head driving cars on the streets is just another reason to wear a helmet. On the news from Colo, police have already written approx 300 tickets for driving under the influence of pot.
    Actually a doped up pot head driving a car is safer than a beered up drunk driving a car! You see a drunk driver weaves all over the road and hits whatever and thinks they're not impaired so they take risks and drive faster; a stoned driver doesn't weave all over the road they just can't seem to figure out their speed so they keep changing it and drive a lot slower and they don't take risks. So if I had to accept a choice of a drunk or a stoned driver driving towards me I'd take the stoned driver in a flash.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4MIEkIBZs

  21. #7946
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Canada, PG BC
    My Bikes
    27 speed oryx
    Posts
    1,021
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
    Doped up pot head driving cars on the streets is just another reason to wear a helmet. On the news from Colo, police have already written approx 300 tickets for driving under the influence of pot.
    The only reason to wear a helmet is to reduce/mitigate some injury to the head if said head somehow hits the pavement, it doesn't matter really, how it happens, but said head does hit the pavement a certain % of the time out of the general bicycling population, so if you think the risk is high enough that your head hits the pavement then wear one, if you don't think the risk is high enough than don't... But if you really think it can't/won't happen to me then you have just eliminating the last resort said head has in protection, as minimal as that maybe, it's better than nothing... JMO
    He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts...for support rather than illumination. I do like my beer, so sometimes I do end up leaning on the lamp-post...

  22. #7947
    20+mph Commuter JoeyBike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA USA
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT
    Posts
    4,643
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rekmeyata View Post
    I believe that seat belts...should not be required by law, it should be optional.
    Helmets, I don't care. Seat belt laws are going to get me picking up my sword.

    Without seat belts, the operator of a vehicle can be removed from behind the wheel very easily just by swerving around an obstacle or other vehicle. Now there is a 2000 lb vehicle LOOSE on the road heading for me with the operator in the passenger seat, rear seat, or out the window. Seriously. Seat belts are not just for protecting the occupants from flying around inside the car during an accident, seat belts help PREVENT horrible accidents by keeping the operator on the driver's seat.

    I was driving a full sized 1966 van back in the 70s before seat belt laws. My van didn't even have seat belts. An oncoming vehicle crossed the double yellow (operator asleep at the wheel) and I had JUST enough time to take drastic evasive actions. The violent "S" turn I made tossed me into the back of the van where I rolled around until the van - standard transmission - lugged to a stop and the engine killed...without killing anybody standing around by some miracle.

    Say what you want about helmets and wear your freaking seat belt.
    "For all we know his skills may be excellent, allowing him to ride like an idiot without actually being one." - FBinNY

  23. #7948
    Senior Member Brennan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    My Bikes
    Surly CC, Trek Earl
    Posts
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rekmeyata View Post
    So if I had to accept a choice of a drunk or a stoned driver driving towards me I'd take the stoned driver in a flash.
    A lil off topic, but yup.

    KIRO tests pot-smoking drivers
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6gLrnJxS8c

  24. #7949
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rekmeyata View Post
    Your first paragraph is completely wrong, all the accident prevention classes in the world won't prevent all accidents, you live in la la land if you believe that.
    Like many bicycle helmet advocates, you seem to lack the ability to absorb information that's more complex than a soundbite or a one liner. Even in part you quote I'm saying this:

    Now I agree that you can't guarantee that you prevent all accidents from happening, but you can decimate those statistics

    So I'm not wrong, it's just that you can't read very well.

    Second paragraph doesn't make any sense either because it doesn't follow what I was originally was conveying.
    You were saying that a cycling helmet is on the do-list. Well, it isn't in many, if not most, societies that do a much better job at providing bicycle safety than America. Most notably Dutch and Danish society. It's only logical to follow the advise of the people who perform best.

    Third paragraph same as the first, you're wrong.
    I've got two countries that prove on a daily basis that bicycle helmets are of little importance to bicycle safety. And a dozen or so that suggest the same. It's not my opinion, it's a fact.

    Forth paragraph more nonsense.
    Oh irony:

    Fifth paragraph is simply your refusal to see facts because they don't agree with your religion. Dutch? the Dutch are even closely related to American roads and behavior of drivers and cyclists. And it's the same organization father...the US government...that statistically proved that wearing seatbelts saved lives or reduced injury in car accidents and thus were required by law, so you accept the car statistics but not the bicycle one...I see, pick and chose the one you like is your moto.
    Last edited by CarinusMalmari; 06-12-14 at 05:04 AM.

  25. #7950
    Senior Member rydabent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lincoln Ne
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
    Posts
    4,148
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The bottom line here is that you can go thru life cycling thinking that nothing will ever happen to you, or you can be proactive and take some safety precautions like wearing a helmet. Any injury prevented is a good thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •