Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?

Voters
1670. You may not vote on this poll
  • I've never worn a bike helmet

    178 10.66%
  • I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped

    94 5.63%
  • I've always worn a helmet

    648 38.80%
  • I didn't wear a helmet, but now do

    408 24.43%
  • I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions

    342 20.48%
Page 71 of 350 FirstFirst ... 2161697071727381121171 ... LastLast
Results 1,751 to 1,775 of 8743
  1. #1751
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sudo bike View Post
    Just to temporarily threadjack, if I may: Why? Is it the cold or ice affecting braking? (doesn't really get all that cold here and I don't have steel rims...)
    Steel rims are smooth polished chrome to protect against corrosion. A tiny bit of moisture acts like a lubricant. Both of these reduce the friction needed for effective braking. Steel was used because making sufficiently strong rims/wheels out of aluminum was more expensive.
    Last edited by njkayaker; 03-05-12 at 09:37 AM.

  2. #1752
    Quirky Grifter LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    21,721
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sudo bike View Post
    Just to temporarily threadjack, if I may: Why? Is it the cold or ice affecting braking? (doesn't really get all that cold here and I don't have steel rims...)
    Here it's the wet primarily. My Raleigh Sports with brakes applied in the wet is barely different than it is without brakes applied.

    If you've never ridden 70s bike boom gaspipe with steel rims, you'd likely be appalled at how poorly those brakes work in dry conditions.

    Even dual pivot brakes provided a huge braking improvement as they hit mass market road bikes in the 1990s.
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  3. #1753
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post


    They would, of course, be wrong in saying this. Certainly, no respectable health professional would say that anything would "prevent" strokes.

    Because you won't get why your statement is funny: you keep saying (paraphrasing a bit) that helmets are worthless because no one claims they "prevent" concussions!
    I suppose the obvious comeback would be that the science showing the role of regular aerobic exercise helping prevent strokes is far more sound than the science that shows helmets help prevent brain injuries.
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  4. #1754
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    I suppose the obvious comeback would be that the science showing the role of regular aerobic exercise helping prevent strokes is far more sound than the science that shows helmets help prevent brain injuries.
    That comeback would be "obvious" only to somebody who still doesn't get it.

    Again, this is wrong. Strokes happen even in people who exercise regularly.

    What exercise (and other things) do is reduce the rate of strokes. Nothing "prevents" them.

  5. #1755
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I hope I'm not offending anyone by not being as articulate as some would like me to be.

    I think the point is still valid though. Aerobic exercise reduces the rate of brain injury with greater success than helmet usage does.

    (and the numbers of stroke victims are far greater than the numbers of bare headed brain damaged cyclist)

    ( - did I say that right? - )
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  6. #1756
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    I think the point is still valid though. Aerobic exercise reduces the rate of brain injury with greater success than helmet usage does.

    (and the numbers of stroke victims are far greater than the numbers of bare headed brain damaged cyclist)

    ( - did I say that right? - )
    Yes. This is most likely (almost certainly) correct (of course, it depends highly on how much aerobic exercise is being done). Many, many cyclists don't cycle anywhere near enough for the aerobic exercise to have any real benefit.

    And, of course, by itself, this statement (being true) really doesn't address the question of whether helmets work or whether they are (or can be) useful.

    Note that I'm only criticizing your use of "prevent" for arguing for something (applied to strokes) and against something else (applied to concussions).
    Last edited by njkayaker; 03-05-12 at 12:43 PM.

  7. #1757
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    ... by itself, this statement (being true) really doesn't address the question of whether helmets work or whether they are (or can be) useful.
    But it does provide a little perspective.

    Some people are afraid of that which helps them
    Last edited by closetbiker; 03-05-12 at 12:59 PM.
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  8. #1758
    Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad Rx Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Front Range
    Posts
    715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My favorite pro helmet advice was a claim someone made that, they had fallen 3 times at 10 mph or less and the helmet they were wearing was destroyed, thus it had saved their life.
    First, if you're falling that often at that speed, cycling isn't for you.
    Second, if your hitting your head every time you fall, maybe you need to learn how to fall.
    Third, just because your helmet turned into popcorn it doesn't mean your fate was death, it doesn't even prove a concussion was imminent. It proves helmets are designed to explode.
    Don't get me wrong I'm not anti-helmet, I'm anti lie to you to get you to wear what we tell you is safer.
    We've all seen a child riding a bike with a slipped helmet completely covering the kids eyes, right? self-fulfilling prophesy at work.
    Helmets have their place, as do padded gloves, bike control, being aware of your surroundings and seeing.

  9. #1759
    Nobody mconlonx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,460
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    Yeah, it's funny how a number of posters don't answer questions. I'm sure we all have our reasons for doing so but I don't think you can say I haven't answered this question. I believe I said the data is in the tables, that the numbers of the different groups of cyclists observed were different.

    As I posted earlier, I can accept if you don't agree with this. Heck, there still a number of people who don't agree helmet laws reduce the number of cyclists, but that's another matter.

    Speaking of avoiding questions, I don't think you've answered my question about if you think a sense of fear of injury while riding bikes keeps people from riding bikes.
    Quote Originally Posted by mconlonx View Post
    Must have missed it -- where did you relay it here...?
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    See? There's a reason. I asked, but you just didn't see it. People miss stuff all the time.

    Of course you know we agree about the culture of fear stuff and I'm not surprised you agree fear keeps people from riding.

    It seems the disention centers on what it is that whips up fear in riders or potential riders. Near mention of possibilities? Experiences?
    So...

    You ask me about my claim that you are fearmongering and I reply with a specific post citation; I ask you where you cited three "experts" in this thread -- your claim -- and you dissemble. Where, exactly, did you post opinions of three experts regarding the study in question in this thread...?

    You seem more than willing to ease debate into marginally related topics; less than willing to engage in honest answers to relevant questions...
    I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.

  10. #1760
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mconlonx View Post
    .. You seem more than willing to ease debate into marginally related topics; less than willing to engage in honest answers to relevant questions...
    It's easier to come to an understanding when the parties work from areas of agreement.

    It's also easier to come to an understanding when the parties pay attention to what has been posted...
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  11. #1761
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    But it does provide a little perspective.

    Some people are afraid of that which helps them
    The little bit of perspective it provides is useful as long as it not presented in a misleading manner.

    Many people manage to get lots of "aerobic exercise" riding with a helmet (which means they are not necessarily mutually exclusive).

    I don't know but I suspect that most people discouraged from riding by MHL weren't getting much "aerobic exercise" benefit from the riding they were doing. (And no one here is talking about MHL, which means that any discouragement due to MHL is some other discussion.)

  12. #1762
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    ... Many people manage to get lots of "aerobic exercise" riding with a helmet (which means they are not necessarily mutually exclusive).

    I don't know but I suspect that most people discouraged from riding by MHL weren't getting much "aerobic exercise" benefit from the riding they were doing...
    most people don't get much in the way of aerobic exercise

    I'm sure the evidence that says being active reduces the chances of brain injury via stroke is much more reliable than the evidence that says wearing a helmet does the same
    Last edited by closetbiker; 03-05-12 at 03:35 PM.
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  13. #1763
    Bicikli Huszár sudo bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    My Bikes
    '95 Novara Randonee
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    Steel rims are smooth polished chrome to protect against corrosion. A tiny bit of moisture acts like a lubricant. Both of these reduce the friction needed for effective braking. Steel was used because making sufficiently strong rims/wheels out of aluminum was more expensive.
    Quote Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets View Post
    Here it's the wet primarily. My Raleigh Sports with brakes applied in the wet is barely different than it is without brakes applied.

    If you've never ridden 70s bike boom gaspipe with steel rims, you'd likely be appalled at how poorly those brakes work in dry conditions.

    Even dual pivot brakes provided a huge braking improvement as they hit mass market road bikes in the 1990s.
    Ah. Thanks, I figured it must be something to do with lack of grippiness and poor braking.
    "The bicycle is the noblest invention of mankind. I love the bicycle. I always have. I can think of no sincere, decent human being, male or female, young or old, saint or sinner, who can resist the bicycle."

    - William Saroyan

  14. #1764
    Senior Member Monster Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Warwick, UK
    My Bikes
    2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion
    Posts
    1,048
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rx Rider View Post
    My favorite pro helmet advice was a claim someone made that, they had fallen 3 times at 10 mph or less and the helmet they were wearing was destroyed, thus it had saved their life.
    First, if you're falling that often at that speed, cycling isn't for you.
    Second, if your hitting your head every time you fall, maybe you need to learn how to fall.
    Third, just because your helmet turned into popcorn it doesn't mean your fate was death, it doesn't even prove a concussion was imminent. It proves helmets are designed to explode.
    Don't get me wrong I'm not anti-helmet, I'm anti lie to you to get you to wear what we tell you is safer.
    We've all seen a child riding a bike with a slipped helmet completely covering the kids eyes, right? self-fulfilling prophesy at work.
    Helmets have their place, as do padded gloves, bike control, being aware of your surroundings and seeing.
    +1 This exactly.
    I've got a bike, you can ride if you like it's got a basket, a bell that rings and things to make it look good- Pink Floyd, 1967

  15. #1765
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, Calif.
    Posts
    5,031
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets View Post
    If you've never ridden 70s bike boom gaspipe with steel rims, you'd likely be appalled at how poorly those brakes work in dry conditions.
    Actually on the bikes that I converted from chrome-plated rims to aluminum I found that the dry braking performance got marginally worse, but it was still more than adequate. But the braking performance in wet conditions was greatly improved. Wet chrome rims frequently didn't seem to be braking at all until the wheels had gone around once or twice to let the brake pads start drying them.

  16. #1766
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    most people don't get much in the way of aerobic exercise

    I'm sure the evidence that says being active reduces the chances of brain injury via stroke is much more reliable than the evidence that says wearing a helmet does the same
    But using a helmet doesn't necessarily preclude getting the aerobic exercise (ed: from cycling).

    Helmets might discourage riding but it would seems likely that most the people they might discourage don't ride enough to get any "aerobic exercise" benefit.

    And, of course, any discouragement that MHL might induce is something else entirely. And next-to no one here is for MHL anyway.
    Last edited by njkayaker; 03-06-12 at 07:25 AM. Reason: clearly, the exercise we are discussing is cycling

  17. #1767
    Nobody mconlonx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,460
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    It's easier to come to an understanding when the parties work from areas of agreement.

    It's also easier to come to an understanding when the parties pay attention to what has been posted...
    We agree on many things.

    I answered specifically when you asked where I said something.

    You refuse to do so.
    I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.

  18. #1768
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    But using a helmet doesn't necessarily preclude getting the aerobic exercise..
    Of course a helmet doesn't stop someone from exercise. It's the reliability of evidence of prevention between the 2 methods that's the issue
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  19. #1769
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    Of course a helmet doesn't stop someone from exercise. It's the reliability of evidence of prevention between the 2 methods that's the issue
    Only if you think that one should ignore all conclusions based on evidence that is less reliable than the stroke evidence.

  20. #1770
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, Calif.
    Posts
    5,031
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    Helmets might discourage riding but it would seems likely that most the people they might discourage don't ride enough to get any "aerobic exercise" benefit.

    And, of course, any discouragement that MHL might induce is something else entirely. And next-to no one here is for MHL anyway.
    Agreed that ardent cyclists are unlikely to be discouraged.

    But someone who is discouraged from being even a casual cyclist is then unlikely to later become an enthusiast. And while cycling among adults doesn't seem to be diminishing in the US, I see far fewer children cycling now than even 15 years ago - and there are many more jurisdictions that have MHLs for children than for adults. Will those who never did much cycling as kids be as likely to even think about becoming cyclists as adults?

  21. #1771
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mconlonx View Post
    We agree on many things.

    I answered specifically when you asked where I said something.

    You refuse to do so.
    Dude. If I do the same thing for you 3 times, I'm not helping you, I'm enabling you.
    Last edited by closetbiker; 03-05-12 at 08:24 PM.
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  22. #1772
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    Only if you think that one should ignore all conclusions based on evidence that is less reliable than the stroke evidence.
    evidence that has less reliability should be given less weight than evidence that is been proven to be more reliable.
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

  23. #1773
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
    Agreed that ardent cyclists are unlikely to be discouraged.

    But someone who is discouraged from being even a casual cyclist is then unlikely to later become an enthusiast.
    Who really knows if this is "unlikely" or not.

    Quote Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
    And while cycling among adults doesn't seem to be diminishing in the US, I see far fewer children cycling now than even 15 years ago - and there are many more jurisdictions that have MHLs for children than for adults. Will those who never did much cycling as kids be as likely to even think about becoming cyclists as adults?
    It's very hard to say whether it's MHL's for children that are reducing the numbers of child cyclists since there is a general trend of less activity in children (and adults). Fewer children walk (to school, for example) too.

    Interestingly, not many people seem to object to children wearing helmets (or child-specific MHL's)!
    Last edited by njkayaker; 03-05-12 at 07:42 PM.

  24. #1774
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,602
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by closetbiker View Post
    evidence that has less reliability should be given less weight than evidence that is been proven to be more reliable.
    Kind of obvious but so what? There doesn't seem to be any clear personal downside to using a helmet even if the benefits don't have "reliable" evidence to support it.
    Last edited by njkayaker; 03-05-12 at 07:43 PM.

  25. #1775
    Senior Member closetbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    Kind of obvious but so what? There doesn't seem to be any clear personal downside to using a helmet even if the benefits don't have "reliable" evidence to support it.
    If the benefits don't have "reliable" evidence to support it, there doesn't seem to be any clear personal upside to it either.

    This compared to the significant upside to increased health benefits.
    Last edited by closetbiker; 03-05-12 at 09:52 PM.
    "My two favourite things in life are libraries and bicycles. They both move people forward without wasting anything" -Peter Golkin
    [SIGPIC]http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/striphandler.ashx?stripid=57f6ca71-73a8-42a3-acc4-29e6d333df27[/SIGPIC]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •