View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#1951
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
When cardrivers see s cyclist wearing a helmet, they keep less distance. So the chance of getting hit (and testing your helmet) is bigger.
See https://www.bhsi.org/walkerstudy.htm
See https://www.bhsi.org/walkerstudy.htm
We don't really know that the extra 3 inches (or even 3 feet from passing laws) reduces the chance of getting hit though. That would be a sideswipe as they're going by which is rare and not necessarily life threatening, but the real danger is them hitting from behind.
#1952
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When cardrivers see s cyclist wearing a helmet, they keep less distance. So the chance of getting hit (and testing your helmet) is bigger.
See https://www.bhsi.org/walkerstudy.htm
See https://www.bhsi.org/walkerstudy.htm
thanks for proving my point so well.
#1953
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Summary: Dr Ian Walker's measurements show that under some conditions British drivers leave 3.3 inches more passing distance if the cyclist is not wearing a helmet, and another 2.2 inches if the cyclist is wearing a wig. The average passing clearance for all three cases was more than four feet. The cyclist's position on the road changed everything, canceling the difference at times.
thanks for proving my point so well.
thanks for proving my point so well.
#1954
Observer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 62
Bikes: 2000 LeMond Buenos Aires
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fig. 1 shows that the farther from the curb you bike, the smaller the overtaking distance. https://www.bhsi.org/walkerfigs.pdf. Interesting.
#1955
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#1958
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I say wear one of those beer helmets, a wig and weave all over. safety first.
#1959
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Maybe we had better do things avoiding hurting.
#1960
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#1961
Senior Member
Helmets
contestant - "I'll take safety gear for $500 Alec."
AlecTrebec - The answer is "It's made of 65 cents worth of plastic, and $1.10 in labor, the packaging costs75 cents and the liability insurance costs $4.40 yet sells for between $30 and $130"
contestant - "What is a bicycle helmet?"
Alec- "Correct!"
contestant - "I'll take safety gear for $500 Alec."
AlecTrebec - The answer is "It's made of 65 cents worth of plastic, and $1.10 in labor, the packaging costs75 cents and the liability insurance costs $4.40 yet sells for between $30 and $130"
contestant - "What is a bicycle helmet?"
Alec- "Correct!"
#1962
Snakes on a bike
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 196
Bikes: 80's CCM Mixte ~ SS 70's Apollo ~ Soma Extra Smooth
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are bicycle helmets just plastic hats that keep people from cycling?...
Still, Vancouver city councilor Heather Deal says better safe than sorry. "The issue of helmets is not on the table at the city," she tells me on the phone from Vancouver. "You can do statistics, but one person saved is one person saved.
Still, Vancouver city councilor Heather Deal says better safe than sorry. "The issue of helmets is not on the table at the city," she tells me on the phone from Vancouver. "You can do statistics, but one person saved is one person saved.
#1963
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
What an exercise in futility. At least 4 threads, and this one has 79 pages, and still the anti helmet posters have not talked anyone out of wearing a helmet. When will they realise they are wasting their time????
Besides they fly in the face of the fact that helmet use is up and deaths down in the last 10 years.
Besides they fly in the face of the fact that helmet use is up and deaths down in the last 10 years.
#1964
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
okay guys, if you stop wearing your helmet I'll give you candy. . .
there's is no way to prove we haven't talked anyone out of wearing a helmet. because nobody here cares if you wear a helmet or not. I couldn't careless if you rode in a suit of armor or buck neked. sounds like you're frustrated your statistics are failing to sway the non-helmet wearing (anti-helmet is a bit much) crowd. I still contend that drivers are the reason deaths are down, I've seen a vast improvement in that 10 years.
besides when people cite statistics I always remember . . . there are lies, damned lies and statistics.
now if I've converted anyone to the darkside please remember to post it here so we can keep track statistically.
for a limited time, if you can convince one or more of your family or friends to stop wearing a helmet, I'll give you more candy.
there's is no way to prove we haven't talked anyone out of wearing a helmet. because nobody here cares if you wear a helmet or not. I couldn't careless if you rode in a suit of armor or buck neked. sounds like you're frustrated your statistics are failing to sway the non-helmet wearing (anti-helmet is a bit much) crowd. I still contend that drivers are the reason deaths are down, I've seen a vast improvement in that 10 years.
besides when people cite statistics I always remember . . . there are lies, damned lies and statistics.
now if I've converted anyone to the darkside please remember to post it here so we can keep track statistically.
for a limited time, if you can convince one or more of your family or friends to stop wearing a helmet, I'll give you more candy.
Last edited by Rx Rider; 04-22-12 at 09:29 AM. Reason: mmmmm candy
#1965
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just ignore him. He's not talking to you, he's talking at you. His posts never change much.
#1969
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
You're obviously interested in safety. Your little foam hat is a small part of that picture. So what else are you doing?
Last edited by Six jours; 04-22-12 at 09:56 AM.
#1970
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Oh, easy now, all bike equipment is "good" whether we think it's useful for someone or not. Enjoy the helmet!
#1971
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 775
Bikes: 2019 KonaLibre- 2003 Litespeed Vortex -2016 Intense Spider Factory Build -2008 Wilier Mortorolio- Specialized Stumpjumper Hardtail converted to bafang 750 mid drive -1986 Paramount 2014 - --- Pivot Mach 429c
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
11 Posts
Mine is just about to be replaced due the the condition from being worn so many miles.
My daughter at five had an accident that broke her helmet. The Nero Specialist at Childrens Hospital shook my hand and thanked me for having my daughter wear a helmet. After the CAT scan he explained the story would be very different had she not worn a helmet.
She is 17 now and has more miles under her belt than anyone else in my extended family save myself. She often observes cyclist without helmets and wonders why. She once commented that she thinks they don't wear helmets because they probably think they look cool without one. In her opinion they just look stupid.
I will never chastise one on the road without one as it is their choice. I do agree with my daughter however.
I will never let a kid in my neighborhood ride without one. (small cul de sac and all the parents are friends I know the kids)
I will never ride without one.
My kids automatically get helmets and gloves before riding. Just like Dad, part of the ride.
Do as you will
My daughter at five had an accident that broke her helmet. The Nero Specialist at Childrens Hospital shook my hand and thanked me for having my daughter wear a helmet. After the CAT scan he explained the story would be very different had she not worn a helmet.
She is 17 now and has more miles under her belt than anyone else in my extended family save myself. She often observes cyclist without helmets and wonders why. She once commented that she thinks they don't wear helmets because they probably think they look cool without one. In her opinion they just look stupid.
I will never chastise one on the road without one as it is their choice. I do agree with my daughter however.
I will never let a kid in my neighborhood ride without one. (small cul de sac and all the parents are friends I know the kids)
I will never ride without one.
My kids automatically get helmets and gloves before riding. Just like Dad, part of the ride.
Do as you will
#1972
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
gallo
I see you are new to this forum. You should know that there are a hand full of anti helmet trolls that think it is their duty to talk everyone out of wearing a helmet. Why I have never been able to figure out. Maybe they were scared by a turtle when they were very young.
I see you are new to this forum. You should know that there are a hand full of anti helmet trolls that think it is their duty to talk everyone out of wearing a helmet. Why I have never been able to figure out. Maybe they were scared by a turtle when they were very young.
#1973
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Gallo;
As it happens, I agree that small children learning to ride should wear helmets. They are very likely to fall off, and because of coordination issues are more likely to bump their heads if they do. It is very unlikely to be a life-or-death issue, but kids should be protected from superficial scalp and facial,injuries, and their low-speed falls are exactly what helmets are good for.
Your neurosurgeon may have been mistaken, though. I used to run a hospital with an internationally-renowned neurosurgical unit, and very few if any of the neurosurgeons would make definitve statements about the efficacy, or lack thereof, of helmets. No matter, I'm glad your daughter is OK.
Those who don't wear helmets are not, however, necessarily stupid. The evidence appears to show that the mercifully low rate at which cyclists are killed or seriously injured has not been affected by increasing use of helmets. Since it seems unlikely that people are more likely to fall off now than they were in the eighties, that seems to indicate that in the past, most people who bumped their heads were fine.
And this is what one would expect. Cycle helmets are not designed to save lives. They are designed to protect against simple falls from seven feet onto a flat surface at zero forward speed. That is the standard they have to pass in the laboratory. Bt in the real world, the thing that is likely to kill a cyclist is a collision with another vehicle, and the forces involved in such collisions simply overwhelm the limited protection a styrofoam helmet can provide.
As you say, do what you will. But please don't make assumptions about those who choose differently.
As it happens, I agree that small children learning to ride should wear helmets. They are very likely to fall off, and because of coordination issues are more likely to bump their heads if they do. It is very unlikely to be a life-or-death issue, but kids should be protected from superficial scalp and facial,injuries, and their low-speed falls are exactly what helmets are good for.
Your neurosurgeon may have been mistaken, though. I used to run a hospital with an internationally-renowned neurosurgical unit, and very few if any of the neurosurgeons would make definitve statements about the efficacy, or lack thereof, of helmets. No matter, I'm glad your daughter is OK.
Those who don't wear helmets are not, however, necessarily stupid. The evidence appears to show that the mercifully low rate at which cyclists are killed or seriously injured has not been affected by increasing use of helmets. Since it seems unlikely that people are more likely to fall off now than they were in the eighties, that seems to indicate that in the past, most people who bumped their heads were fine.
And this is what one would expect. Cycle helmets are not designed to save lives. They are designed to protect against simple falls from seven feet onto a flat surface at zero forward speed. That is the standard they have to pass in the laboratory. Bt in the real world, the thing that is likely to kill a cyclist is a collision with another vehicle, and the forces involved in such collisions simply overwhelm the limited protection a styrofoam helmet can provide.
As you say, do what you will. But please don't make assumptions about those who choose differently.
#1974
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Gallo;
As it happens, I agree that small children learning to ride should wear helmets. They are very likely to fall off, and because of coordination issues are more likely to bump their heads if they do. It is very unlikely to be a life-or-death issue, but kids should be protected from superficial scalp and facial,injuries, and their low-speed falls are exactly what helmets are good for.
Your neurosurgeon may have been mistaken, though. I used to run a hospital with an internationally-renowned neurosurgical unit, and very few if any of the neurosurgeons would make definitve statements about the efficacy, or lack thereof, of helmets. No matter, I'm glad your daughter is OK.
Those who don't wear helmets are not, however, necessarily stupid. The evidence appears to show that the mercifully low rate at which cyclists are killed or seriously injured has not been affected by increasing use of helmets. Since it seems unlikely that people are more likely to fall off now than they were in the eighties, that seems to indicate that in the past, most people who bumped their heads were fine.
And this is what one would expect. Cycle helmets are not designed to save lives. They are designed to protect against simple falls from seven feet onto a flat surface at zero forward speed. That is the standard they have to pass in the laboratory. Bt in the real world, the thing that is likely to kill a cyclist is a collision with another vehicle, and the forces involved in such collisions simply overwhelm the limited protection a styrofoam helmet can provide.
As you say, do what you will. But please don't make assumptions about those who choose differently.
As it happens, I agree that small children learning to ride should wear helmets. They are very likely to fall off, and because of coordination issues are more likely to bump their heads if they do. It is very unlikely to be a life-or-death issue, but kids should be protected from superficial scalp and facial,injuries, and their low-speed falls are exactly what helmets are good for.
Your neurosurgeon may have been mistaken, though. I used to run a hospital with an internationally-renowned neurosurgical unit, and very few if any of the neurosurgeons would make definitve statements about the efficacy, or lack thereof, of helmets. No matter, I'm glad your daughter is OK.
Those who don't wear helmets are not, however, necessarily stupid. The evidence appears to show that the mercifully low rate at which cyclists are killed or seriously injured has not been affected by increasing use of helmets. Since it seems unlikely that people are more likely to fall off now than they were in the eighties, that seems to indicate that in the past, most people who bumped their heads were fine.
And this is what one would expect. Cycle helmets are not designed to save lives. They are designed to protect against simple falls from seven feet onto a flat surface at zero forward speed. That is the standard they have to pass in the laboratory. Bt in the real world, the thing that is likely to kill a cyclist is a collision with another vehicle, and the forces involved in such collisions simply overwhelm the limited protection a styrofoam helmet can provide.
As you say, do what you will. But please don't make assumptions about those who choose differently.
#1975
Senior Member
Had that been her head, she could have been seriously injured, or worse.
So if you want to keep thinking helmets are silly, or just plain not cool, go ahead. But trust me when I say this, being in a wheel chair the rest of your life and unable to ride, thats not cool.
And to answer your question, this is the "Little Foam Hat" thread, correct?
Last edited by Drummerboy1975; 04-22-12 at 03:07 PM.