Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-02-11, 03:53 PM   #1
3alarmer
Can'tre Member
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Tomato
Bikes: old ones
Posts: 14,215
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1620 Post(s)
Seattle's 10-year bike plan obsolete after 4 years?

Quote:
Just four years after Seattle published its $300,000 Bicycle Master Plan, city officials are considering spending an additional $400,000 to revise it.

The 2007 bike plan, a 174-page document produced for then-Mayor Greg Nickels, was supposed to be a 10-year blueprint to help Seattle build a $240 million cycling network as good or better than Portland's.

Now the plan apparently is reaching obsolescence.

Urban bicycle networks are changing quickly: the development of safe walking and cycling routes called "greenways" on the side streets of Portland; a growing commuter-trail network in Minneapolis; parts of streets becoming protected "cycle tracks" in New York City.

"It's really interesting to see the public getting out ahead of us on this, clamoring for greenways," said Craig Benjamin, policy and government-affairs manager for Cascade Bicycle Club.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...keplan02m.html
3alarmer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-11, 04:38 PM   #2
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes:
Posts: 14,536
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1407 Post(s)
That's nothing. They actually began tearing the viaduct down. I was pretty sure it would be standing forever ... until The Big One hit.

Anyway, the old plan came in the Nickles era, and McGinn is a mayor who actually rides a bike. So it's not surprising that he would put more priority into two wheels.





Seattle Forrest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-11, 10:13 PM   #3
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Seattle is showing me my city's future. We are about to pass a truly crappy bike and ped master plan. Our mayor once posed on a bike, but appears to have never ridden one. She will probably serve one more term and then whoever is elected (hopefully someone who rides) will push to get a proper plan in place. What a waste of citizen time and city money.
B. Carfree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-11, 11:34 PM   #4
The Human Car
-=Barry=-
 
The Human Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Bikes:
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Maryland's 20 year bike master plan hasn't been revised in 9 years, so we passed a law requiring them to revise it every 5 years. Periodic revisions are fairly typical for most transportation plans so I see this as good news for Seattle.
__________________
Cycling Advocate
http://BaltimoreSpokes.org
. . . o
. . /L
=()>()
The Human Car is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM.