Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-11, 10:18 AM   #1
no motor?
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
no motor?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock
Posts: 4,865
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Does the 3 feet to pass rule cover salmon?

Just wondering..
no motor? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-11, 10:25 AM   #2
mnemia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In Illinois, where you appear to be, the answer is no:

Quote:
(d) The operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle or
individual proceeding in the same direction
on a highway shall
leave a safe distance, but not less than 3 feet, when passing
the bicycle or individual and shall maintain that distance
until safely past the overtaken bicycle or individual.
source: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publ...?Name=095-0231

Basically, it appears that if you do something so reckless as riding like a salmon, you aren't protected by some of the laws.
mnemia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-11, 12:30 PM   #3
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes:
Posts: 13,555
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
No, fish don't get special protection from cars, but unless you're driving in the water, it's pretty hard to get within three feet of them. I don't know the rules governing boats well enough to say. But a couple months ago the salmon were in full force in the canal behind my house, and all sorts of boating traffic used the canal, too. So there probably isn't a specific law about this.

On the other hand, dams are generally required to have fish ladders.
Seattle Forrest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-11, 04:03 PM   #4
no motor?
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
no motor?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock
Posts: 4,865
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemia View Post
In Illinois, where you appear to be, the answer is no:



source: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publ...?Name=095-0231

Basically, it appears that if you do something so reckless as riding like a salmon, you aren't protected by some of the laws.
Nope, I wasn't wondering because I did it, but because I saw someone doing it the other day.
no motor? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-11, 05:30 PM   #5
mnemia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by no motor? View Post
Nope, I wasn't wondering because I did it, but because I saw someone doing it the other day.
I wasn't implying that you did it. The "you" was a general pronoun.
mnemia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-11, 10:29 PM   #6
gcottay
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
Posts: 3,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The law might not but for me the rule sure does. Wrong-way riders have put themselves in enough danger without any of us adding to it.
gcottay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-11, 01:59 AM   #7
HokuLoa
Blissketeer
 
HokuLoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
No, fish don't get special protection from cars, but unless you're driving in the water, it's pretty hard to get within three feet of them. I don't know the rules governing boats well enough to say. But a couple months ago the salmon were in full force in the canal behind my house, and all sorts of boating traffic used the canal, too. So there probably isn't a specific law about this.

On the other hand, dams are generally required to have fish ladders.
HokuLoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-11, 03:30 AM   #8
fuji86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Posts: 1,934
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, it applies to anyone, regardless of which direction they are traveling. As a motorist, they need to take whatever precautions necessary to protect human life. Pecking order is pedestrian, cyclist then other motorists. Right of way is only a legal concept, laws of physics take precedent over man's laws.
fuji86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-11, 04:57 AM   #9
Jamesw2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston TX area
Bikes: Trek 1420 triple, Mercier Corvus, Globe 1 700, Surly Disc Trucker, GT Avalanche, GT Grade, GT Aggressor, GT Helion, Mercier Corvus
Posts: 811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The unabridged Bicycling Dictionary: Dam, fish ladder, and salmon
Jamesw2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-11, 10:58 PM   #10
dougmc
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: Giant OCR2, Bridgestone RB-T, Bike-E, Vision R-40, Novara Safari
Posts: 3,029
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In Austin, TX, the 3' passing law provides an "affirmative defense" to the charge of passing a vulnerable road user too closely if the vulnerable road user is somehow violating the law.

So going the wrong way, no lights at night, no brakes on the bike, having a joint in their pocket -- all of these should mean that the motorist can not be charged under that law. (Though a charge under the more vague state law that requires safe passing might still be possible.)

Here's the actual ordinance, if you want to read it.
dougmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-11, 11:04 PM   #11
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gcottay View Post
The law might not but for me the rule sure does. Wrong-way riders have put themselves in enough danger without any of us adding to it.
+1
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-11, 04:47 PM   #12
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think I'd WANT it to, if I were you; the special brew of stupid may splash on you if you get too close.
DX-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-11, 04:59 PM   #13
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes:
Posts: 13,555
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
We had a pair of salmon in the road up by Skykomish yesterday:



http://www.komonews.com/news/local/S...134319338.html
Seattle Forrest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-11, 05:38 PM   #14
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
That somebody else is breaking the law doesn't mean you can break the law.

That is, the fact that the salmon is breaking the law doesn't remove your obligation to obey the law.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-11, 09:03 PM   #15
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuji86 View Post
Yeah, it applies to anyone, regardless of which direction they are traveling. As a motorist, they need to take whatever precautions necessary to protect human life. Pecking order is pedestrian, cyclist then other motorists. Right of way is only a legal concept, laws of physics take precedent over man's laws.
Regardless of which direction........I am scratching my head on that one. Because a salmon rider is already breaking the law by riding in on-coming traffic. So the illegality of salmon riding supercedes any 3-foot law that supposedly allows for salmon riding in the first place.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-11, 09:03 PM   #16
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
That somebody else is breaking the law doesn't mean you can break the law.

That is, the fact that the salmon is breaking the law doesn't remove your obligation to obey the law.
+1
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-11, 09:04 PM   #17
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest View Post
We had a pair of salmon in the road up by Skykomish yesterday:



http://www.komonews.com/news/local/S...134319338.html
Road hogs.....lol
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-11, 01:10 AM   #18
mnemia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuji86 View Post
Yeah, it applies to anyone, regardless of which direction they are traveling. As a motorist, they need to take whatever precautions necessary to protect human life. Pecking order is pedestrian, cyclist then other motorists. Right of way is only a legal concept, laws of physics take precedent over man's laws.
It doesn't apply to everyone if it specifically is written to exclude protection for bike salmon. That was the specific question. Now, morally, I agree with you. Drivers should still use the same care, regardless of how the cyclist is behaving. But legally, it doesn't necessarily work that way. I also don't think that's unreasonable, given that it's harder to expect people to know how to react when someone is riding unpredictably and unlawfully.
mnemia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-11, 01:46 AM   #19
herctrock
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Bikes: Marin Hamilton 29er
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Get a car, salmon!!!
herctrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-11, 06:39 AM   #20
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemia View Post
It doesn't apply to everyone if it specifically is written to exclude protection for bike salmon.
???

No traffic law would include that exclusion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemia View Post
Drivers should still use the same care, regardless of how the cyclist is behaving. But legally, it doesn't necessarily work that way.
???

Sometimes, people get tickets they don't deserve.

Last edited by njkayaker; 11-24-11 at 06:46 AM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-11, 08:31 AM   #21
Don in Austin
Don from Austin Texas
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Bikes: Schwinn S25 "department store crap" FS MTB, home-made CF 26" hybrid, CF road bike with straight bar, various wierd frankenbikes
Posts: 1,181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris516 View Post
Regardless of which direction........I am scratching my head on that one. Because a salmon rider is already breaking the law by riding in on-coming traffic. So the illegality of salmon riding supercedes any 3-foot law that supposedly allows for salmon riding in the first place.
The salmon rider makes it far more difficult for the oncoming motorist -- or cyclist -- to give him room under heavy two-way traffic conditions or a narrow street. The option to simply follow at a safe distance for however it long it takes until a safe pass is possible has been eliminated by the wrong-way rider.

One possibility is to simply pull over and stop. Something I did once several years ago and have been heavily criticized for in another topic.

Don in Austin
Don in Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-11, 04:41 PM   #22
dougmc
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: Giant OCR2, Bridgestone RB-T, Bike-E, Vision R-40, Novara Safari
Posts: 3,029
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
No traffic law would include that exclusion.
Right or wrong, good idea or bad, Austin, TX's ordinance includes that exclusion.

(h) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that at the time of the offense the vulnerable road user was acting in violation of the law.

Here's the full text of the ordinance.

I'm pretty sure the idea was that they didn't want any "innocent" drivers getting tickets for passing scofflaw cyclists too closely (especially if they didn't see the cyclist at all) because the cyclist was at fault for it, such as if they were doing things like riding without lights at night or the wrong way.

This ordinance was basically written for the state, and was even passed by the state legislature -- but Governor Hairdo vetoed it, so the City of Austin basically passed it as a city ordinance with few or no changes. In any event, it was likely written by motorists rather than cyclists -- and it shows.

Of course, as written, if the cyclist IS violating the law somehow (a joint in his pocket? no brakes?), the motorist can't be prosecuted (under this section) for doing things like intentionally using his car to threaten the cyclist. (Of course, there are other laws that would apply, so it's not a total head-scratcher.)

Last edited by dougmc; 11-24-11 at 04:48 PM.
dougmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.