Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-04, 08:45 AM   #1
powers2b
Listen to me
Thread Starter
 
powers2b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 2,789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
CM Athens, Ohio

http://www.athensnews.com/issue/arti...story_id=18957

This article illustrates how CM events may be viewed by lawmakers as an incentive to make bicycling laws more restrictive.
powers2b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-04, 11:49 AM   #2
scarry
Bent_Rider
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road
Posts: 1,248
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Officer Gray, however, said that while the bike riders may have felt they were exercising their rights, he doesn't agree that they were adding to their safety by riding up to 6 feet out in the lane.

"Obviously they haven't experienced road rage if they think it's safer to ride in the middle of the street," he suggested.


So now law enforcment is suggesting/threatening/condoning road rage.

Cops, to protect and serve. Who?
scarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-04, 12:40 PM   #3
jerrryhazard
Senior Member
 
jerrryhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Durango, Colorado
Bikes: 05 Giant Reign, Sette Shadow, parts
Posts: 148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In this case, I agree. The judge made reference to reforming/reviewing laws regarding the behavior of the cyclists, but nothing about improving conditions under which cyclist exist on the road, or reforming/reviewing the way cars operate in respect to cyclists.

(I don't see how the cops statement is suggesting/threatening/condoning road rage though. He's only acknowledging it's existence as a danger. Or maybe I'm missing his tone?) Either way, I don't agree with his action in citing the riders, and I'm glad for them that they were not forced to pay. Maybe this goes to show that CM is not necessarily the best thing in all cities for advocating cyclinst rights. I'm not sure it's doing any good where I live, but maybe it is in other places.
jerrryhazard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-04, 02:03 PM   #4
randya
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Actually, that's one of the more balanced articles on CM that I have seen lately, and the judge actually upheld the cyclists' rights. Wahoo! The police officer as quoted doesn't really seem to have a very good grasp of the traffic code as it applies to bicyclists, and, as is all too typical for a motorized patrol officer, identifies with other motorists and not with cyclists. By his statement, he is placing speed over safety (and I thought cops were supposed to be *public safety* officers).
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.