Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-12, 09:46 AM   #1
Fargo Wolf
Resident smartass.
Thread Starter
 
Fargo Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Cycling Advocates Debate Bike Share Idea

CALGARY Different cycling advocacy groups gave aldermen opposing views on how aggressively to pursue a bike sharing system Wednesday as aldermen voted to find a costing plan to launch the program as early as mid-2014.

Cities throughout North America have dotted their downtown with bike rental stations, which rely mostly on user fees and corporate sponsorships to operate.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...827/story.html
Fargo Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-12, 09:32 PM   #2
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargo Wolf View Post
CALGARY Different cycling advocacy groups gave aldermen opposing views on how aggressively to pursue a bike sharing system Wednesday as aldermen voted to find a costing plan to launch the program as early as mid-2014.

Cities throughout North America have dotted their downtown with bike rental stations, which rely mostly on user fees and corporate sponsorships to operate.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...827/story.html
I hope 'Bike Share' programs encourage people to take up bike riding and/or ride more. So to further their own health and encourage one of the best health-related activities that a person can participate in.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-12, 07:40 PM   #3
corvuscorvax
Gone.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 509
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargo Wolf View Post
CALGARY – Different cycling advocacy groups gave aldermen opposing views on how aggressively to pursue a bike sharing system Wednesday as aldermen voted to find a costing plan to launch the program as early as mid-2014.

Cities throughout North America have dotted their downtown with bike rental stations, which rely mostly on user fees and corporate sponsorships to operate.
Whether bike share programs make sense or not depend entirely on how they are implemented. The Velib system in Paris is absolutely wonderful. Bikes and pickup/dropoff stations are plentiful and are located in places where you actually might need to pick up a bike: restaurant districts, near museums, shopping, etc. Most of all, it is cheap. A day pass for the Velib system costs a euro.

Contrast with the bike share system in Chicago, which has a handful of pickup/dropoff stations, almost all of them on the lakefront in the short span between Navy Pier and the Field Museum, distant from restaurants, shopping, or much of anything else. Worse still, the cost to rent a bike is $10 an hour, far more expensive than it would be to take the bus or the subway to where you want to go. Completely pointless.

I suspect no bike share system would be viable on user fees and corporate sponshorship alone, but would require government subsidy. Too bad that's a dirty word in the U.S.

Last edited by corvuscorvax; 01-27-12 at 07:44 PM.
corvuscorvax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-12, 09:14 PM   #4
jputnam
Senior Member
 
jputnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Posts: 1,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by corvuscorvax View Post

I suspect no bike share system would be viable on user fees and corporate sponshorship alone, but would require government subsidy. Too bad that's a dirty word in the U.S.
Of course, you could easily say the same thing about paved roads. Without massive general-fund subsidies, there's no way gas taxes and license fees cover their cost.
jputnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 03:06 AM   #5
shopan
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Chicago is getting a Brand New Program...A real "share" with the first 50 stations on the lake front and in the loop opening in Mid June...
http://divvybikes.com/
shopan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 05:39 AM   #6
UberGeek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Bikes: Schwinn Tourist (2010), Trek 6000 (1999)
Posts: 1,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shopan View Post
Chicago is getting a Brand New Program...A real "share" with the first 50 stations on the lake front and in the loop opening in Mid June...
http://divvybikes.com/
Sounds like a nice start. Just on the loop makes it a worthwhile program to implement.
UberGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 09:15 PM   #7
shopan
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Loop and lake front will be the First stations I believe from the map...They plan 300 stations in the first 3 months...The trick is going to be putting the stations in the right spots and keeping enough empty spaces where traffic demands...
shopan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 10:36 PM   #8
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 3,298
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
There probably were even more debates, complaints, fear and fury when the first bus began to run on the street, and the first subway began to operate underground. (Slightly justified, seeing how many people died under their wheels. Bikes are so much more benign.)
vol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-13, 06:02 AM   #9
UberGeek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Bikes: Schwinn Tourist (2010), Trek 6000 (1999)
Posts: 1,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vol View Post
There probably were even more debates, complaints, fear and fury when the first bus began to run on the street, and the first subway began to operate underground. (Slightly justified, seeing how many people died under their wheels. Bikes are so much more benign.)
Nah, when buses showed up on the scene, people had common sense still. Buses were how you got from town to town, and bikes/walking/horses were the way to navigate through the town. It was just seen as a common sense need.
UberGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-13, 04:54 PM   #10
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 3,298
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Here is a point very relevant to cycling advocacy and safety:

I believe many drivers will become Citi bike riders, occasionally or frequently. This means more drivers will experience what it's like to ride a bike on NYC streets. Hope that will help make them more cyclist-friendly when they drive.

Especially hope more truck drivers will ride Citi bikes and know what danger trucks can cause to cyclists due to blind spots, wide vehicle body, speeding...
vol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 AM.