Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

NJ cyclist, NJ Supreme Court really screwed you

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

NJ cyclist, NJ Supreme Court really screwed you

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-12, 10:20 AM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
I think these wipe-outs have something to do with road bikes. I will make an arguement for "Human Powered Vehicles". I have followed the developments in Motorcycle Technology, since the 1920's, and there are a few things Bicyclers could learn.

Did you know that in order for a motorcycle to be legal, it must have a wheelbase of at least forty-five inches? This is what keeps riders from being catapulted over the handlebars whenever they hit a pothole or "surface depression".

I'm highly in favor of semi-recumbent bicycles, or "crank forward" designs. Also I do not recommend riding very fast unless the route has been inspected earier in the week. Every Bicycle Club should have a rotational duty roster, and someone has to inspect the course, and remove any debris hazards as much as posible, and report back to the other members of theBicycle Club before the ride. I'm in favor of having a motorcycle escort on any group bicycle ride.
hotbike is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 10:35 AM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
teachme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nederland, Texas
Posts: 1,441

Bikes: 2011 Specialized Sectuer, 1988 Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sangesf
They are vehicles... That was about a pothole / depression incident...

Basically that case was saying that when that woman was riding on the SHOULDER (NOT part of the roadway and NOT a designated bike lane) and hit that whatever and fell and died, her husband had no recourse to sue the county, because of it..

Sucked bad too! So basically, if you're not far right on the roadway and something happens, you can't sue because, basically they said the roadway shoulders of NJ are not "bike compatible" nor are they maintained in such a way as to allow riding on them... (Although they are "car compatible", because cars have "better tires"... --- I'm paraphrasing a bit, but that's the gist of it!) Oh and the shoulder is only to be used for emergency parking and the like..

Here is the statute about bicycles actually being vehicles...

39:4-14.1 Rights, duties of bicycle riders on roadways, exemptions.


16. a. Every person riding a bicycle upon a roadway shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by chapter four of Title 39 of the Revised Statutes and all supplements thereto except as to those provisions thereof which by their nature can have no application.
Regulations applicable to bicycles shall apply whenever a bicycle is operated upon any highway or upon any path set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles subject to those exceptions stated herein.
So, your interpretation of the law is bicycles are considered to be vehicles when on the roadway. I agree, the shoulder is not part of the roadway and I can see where the state kind of weasled its way out of responsibility for the death of the woman.
Would you say the state would have to assume responsibility if the woman had hit a pothole "in" the roadway?
teachme is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 11:15 AM
  #128  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by teachme
....Would you say the state would have to assume responsibility if the woman had hit a pothole "in" the roadway?

Going by the NJ supreme court's interpretation, the answer would be no, by their definition, NJ roadways, without specific bike infrastructure in place, were not designed for bicycle travel. Basically saying, "Ride at one's own risk".
dynodonn is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 11:25 AM
  #129  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,270
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4254 Post(s)
Liked 1,353 Times in 939 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
I think these wipe-outs have something to do with road bikes. I will make an arguement for "Human Powered Vehicles". I have followed the developments in Motorcycle Technology, since the 1920's, and there are a few things Bicyclers could learn.

Did you know that in order for a motorcycle to be legal, it must have a wheelbase of at least forty-five inches? This is what keeps riders from being catapulted over the handlebars whenever they hit a pothole or "surface depression".
Do you realize that motorcycles are inherently much more risky than 4 wheel vehicles?

Originally Posted by hotbike
I'm highly in favor of semi-recumbent bicycles, or "crank forward" designs. Also I do not recommend riding very fast unless the route has been inspected earlier in the week. Every Bicycle Club should have a rotational duty roster, and someone has to inspect the course, and remove any debris hazards as much as possible, and report back to the other members of theBicycle Club before the ride. I'm in favor of having a motorcycle escort on any group bicycle ride.
Lots of eminently practical advice! (I'm being sarcastic.)
njkayaker is online now  
Old 03-16-12, 05:21 PM
  #130  
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
Anybody can choose to sue. "Contingency" is not a requirement of bringing a suit. Obviously, if you can't afford it, you can't get it (that's an economic argument).

Clearly, a lawyer isn't going to take on a contingency case unless there's a good probability of winning (and, obviously, they would take legal history into account in determining the probability). No doubt, this case reduces that probability somewhat.

I know at least one person in NJ who has recently recovered (possibly by settling) damages for roadway defects.
So if the lawyers will not take the case on continency, and the people do not have the money to hire a lawyer without contingence and legal aid will not take the case for free (which they tend not to do for civil suits like this) and the people do not have the knowledge to file and go to trial pro-se, then how do they sue?

Originally Posted by njkayaker
They were on a bike (that is reasonable to assume given the topic of this thread).

The defect was a lump in the asphalt at the end of a patched trench (some sort of utility work?).

I'm not sure if it the agency was notified of the issue before hand. (Notification before hand is almost a requirement for liability.)
How many times are you going to bring up this case that you do not know jack about and pretend that it has some bearing on the current discussion?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 06:35 PM
  #131  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,270
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4254 Post(s)
Liked 1,353 Times in 939 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
So if the lawyers will not take the case on continency, and the people do not have the money to hire a lawyer without contingence and legal aid will not take the case for free (which they tend not to do for civil suits like this) and the people do not have the knowledge to file and go to trial pro-se, then how do they sue?
When in the US is suing somebody ever free?

(Contingency cases cost the lawyer time/money, so they are not free Legal aid costs time/money too.)

Originally Posted by CB HI
How many times are you going to bring up this case that you do not know jack about and pretend that it has some bearing on the current discussion?
njkayaker is online now  
Old 03-16-12, 06:52 PM
  #132  
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
When in the US is suing somebody ever free?

(Contingency cases cost the lawyer time/money, so they are not free Legal aid costs time/money too.)


I know it is hard for you to distinguish between lawyer cost and the cost to the victim, there is a difference.
Time to join the real world rather than trying to switch the point.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 06:57 PM
  #133  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,270
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4254 Post(s)
Liked 1,353 Times in 939 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
I know it is hard for you to distinguish between lawyer cost and the cost to the victim, there is a difference.
Time to join the real world rather than trying to switch the point.


And you have no idea whether this case was taken on contingency!
njkayaker is online now  
Old 03-16-12, 07:06 PM
  #134  
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker


And you have no idea whether this case was taken on contingency!
Which has no bearing on if others are able to get a lawyer to take a case on contingency if they do not have enough money to hire a lawyer. Focus just a little bit please.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 07:12 PM
  #135  
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,334

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 28 Posts
New Jersey and you...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yUsnESf3Ug

... perfect together.

I used to watch "The Uncle Floyd Show" (Floyd Vivino) on NJN growing up... we'd wheel it in from over in Penn. I remember this commercial from back in the day.
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 07:15 PM
  #136  
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,334

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 28 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
I think these wipe-outs have something to do with road bikes. I will make an arguement for "Human Powered Vehicles". I have followed the developments in Motorcycle Technology, since the 1920's, and there are a few things Bicyclers could learn.

Did you know that in order for a motorcycle to be legal, it must have a wheelbase of at least forty-five inches? This is what keeps riders from being catapulted over the handlebars whenever they hit a pothole or "surface depression".

I'm highly in favor of semi-recumbent bicycles, or "crank forward" designs. Also I do not recommend riding very fast unless the route has been inspected earier in the week. Every Bicycle Club should have a rotational duty roster, and someone has to inspect the course, and remove any debris hazards as much as posible, and report back to the other members of theBicycle Club before the ride. I'm in favor of having a motorcycle escort on any group bicycle ride.
Then we can sue whoever was on duty that week when we crash!
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline  
Old 03-16-12, 08:09 PM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 607
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
To answer an earlier question about "Do I have to follow traffic laws when on the shoulder"?

Yeah, if you want to cross a road(way), you better!

MY question is, if you're riding and not crossing a roadway, can you ride drunk and not get a DUI or BUI as some states call them..
(I'm sure you can still get an intoxicated inpublic charge....
Which would be worse tho?)

And the other poster was correct, the original link was NOT an "official" document...
We would need the actual case log..
(which will probably never happen)
Sangesf is offline  
Old 03-17-12, 12:52 PM
  #138  
Senior Member
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Standalone
Then we can sue whoever was on duty that week when we crash!
No. What will happen is you'll be the only member left in the Bike Club, No one will want to do Dog Duty, and you'll be on your own.
hotbike is offline  
Old 03-17-12, 06:40 PM
  #139  
Cycle Year Round
Thread Starter
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
No. What will happen is you'll be the only member left in the Bike Club, No one will want to do Dog Duty, and you'll be on your own.
I suspect the cyclist pushing too hard for motorcycle ******* during club rides will be the one booted out.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5kdad
Advocacy & Safety
9
11-07-15 10:08 AM
CrankyOne
Advocacy & Safety
66
08-31-15 09:55 PM
cannabinoid
Advocacy & Safety
7
07-25-13 09:13 AM
spooner
Advocacy & Safety
4
07-07-10 07:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.