Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-12, 02:30 PM   #1
1nterceptor
LET'S ROLL
Thread Starter
 
1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NEW YORK, NY - USA
Bikes: 2014 BMC Gran Fondo, 2013 Brompton S6L-X
Posts: 3,829
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Driver sentenced to 30 days in jail in cyclist’s death

“A polygraph examination established that Amber K. Fernandez didn’t realize that she had struck a bicyclist on a dark, rainy Columbus street nearly two years ago.

But her failure to stop and determine what had bounced off her SUV, cracking the windshield, was a criminal act that required “serious consequences,” a Franklin County judge said yesterday."

Read the full article:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...sts-death.html
1nterceptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-12, 02:34 PM   #2
Kurt Erlenbach
Senior Member
 
Kurt Erlenbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Bikes:
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here is a superb column about the crash and sentencing by my friend and classmate, Steve Magas, who represented the victim's mother in the civil suit over the crash. Someone, I'd say, is pretty PO'd about this.
Kurt Erlenbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-12, 02:37 PM   #3
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Read the responces also. It seems she had been drinking (at least if the person refering to others sources is telling the truth).
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-12, 10:06 PM   #4
smasha
Vegan on a bicycle
 
smasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: wellington NZ (via NJ & NC)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
here's my comment....

The only solution I can think of is to have different degrees of hit-n-run…

1st degree – Leaving the scene of an accident where someone died.

2nd degree – Leaving the scene of an accident where someone is injured (and by “injured” I mean they need a band-aid).

3rd degree – Simple hit-n-run; Leaving the scene of an accident.

Needless to say, #1 & #2 should all carry penalties in excess of “just an accident” that results in injury or death.

The statutes should also provide for sentencing that exceeds the penalties for DUI/DWI if there is ANY suspicion that the driver was under the influence of anything, but they succeeded in hiding for long enough to avoid proper testing. If someone hit-n-runs, the burden should be on THEM to provide breath/blood/urine/hair samples to the police in a timely manner, in order to get a reduced sentence. Otherwise the maximum sentence should apply. This would not be a “presumption of guilt” (as such) but rather just applying sentencing and sentencing guidelines that encourage drivers to do the right thing, as soon as practicable.
smasha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-12, 10:17 PM   #5
Shimagnolo
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Bikes:
Posts: 7,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
As if 30 days for a fatal hit & run wasn't bad enough, why do we have authorities in the US still using 20th century witchcraft (polygraph).
Shimagnolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-12, 11:03 PM   #6
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,823
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo View Post
As if 30 days for a fatal hit & run wasn't bad enough, why do we have authorities in the US still using 20th century witchcraft (polygraph).
The defense lawyer set it up to get the client off (no authority in that). If I were the judge, I would not have allowed it or I would have insisted the killer take abother polygraph with a tester of my choice and additional questions of my choice.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-12, 10:27 PM   #7
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As if 30 days in jail will make an emotional difference!!
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-12, 12:12 AM   #8
dougmc
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: Giant OCR2, Bridgestone RB-T, Bike-E, Vision R-40, Novara Safari
Posts: 3,029
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by smasha View Post
If someone hit-n-runs, the burden should be on THEM to provide breath/blood/urine/hair samples to the police in a timely manner, in order to get a reduced sentence. Otherwise the maximum sentence should apply. This would not be a “presumption of guilt” (as such) but rather just applying sentencing and sentencing guidelines that encourage drivers to do the right thing, as soon as practicable.
Except that it would be seen as a "presumption of guilt" and thrown out as unconstitutional.

We certainly could make the penalties for hit and run to be significantly more serious than even DWI, and give such crime similar penalties -- that might help, and wouldn't be found to be unconstitutional. But anything that requires people to prove that they're not guilty of something is going to be thrown out by the courts.

And hit and runs are difficult to prove -- if there's no witnesses and the person doesn't open their mouth and confess, it's nearly impossible to show "beyond a reasonable doubt" that they were driving their car (let's assume the car was found later with damage that shows it was the murder weapon -- that happens often) when it killed the victim. Unfortunately, this is difficult to fix without running into Constitutional issues -- anything that starts with the assumption that somebody is guilty (even if you call it something else) will be thrown out -- and correctly so, since right or wrong it's not compatible with the highest law in our land.
dougmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-12, 03:43 AM   #9
LemondFanForeve
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pasadena, CA(for now)
Bikes:
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt Erlenbach View Post
Here is a superb column about the crash and sentencing by my friend and classmate, Steve Magas, who represented the victim's mother in the civil suit over the crash. Someone, I'd say, is pretty PO'd about this.
Great read & totally.understandable, WTF IS WRONG W/PEOPLE?

You can be sure if it had happened to a cop, or the judge, that guy wouldve received the chair.
LemondFanForeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 AM.