Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 259
  1. #101
    Can'tre Member 3alarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    ,location, location...
    My Bikes
    old ones
    Posts
    9,195
    Mentioned
    143 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
    Really, your "good" with this?

    I sure as hell hope that you are being sarcastic. If as it appears that this cyclist is being punished for the actions of others that is NOT justice.

    And if he is convicted NOT because of the actions of other cyclists rather than his own actions then hopefully that will will give him a better chance on appeal.

    Or in other words, if the majority of motorists in your area get away with speeding (and we know that in most areas they in fact do) does that mean that YOU would be accepting of when/if caught for speeding that you were in effect punished for all of their actions rather than your actions?
    Justice, (whatever it means exactly), is rarely achieved in this world, my friend.

    Neither, in spite of all efforts, is it the outcome of the criminal justice system
    as we administer and experience it. Sorry, but if you want "justice" (your version),
    you really are going to be disappointed in the majority.

    Not sarcastic at all. I wish to Christ they'd start charging a few motorists
    in the most egregious circumstances of bicycle/car fatalities locally. I'd
    be able to ride here with considerably less paranoia.

    Your defense of this individual borders on the hysterical at this point.

    Your understanding of the real issues, both legal and political, also seems
    minimal from my perspective...........I'd advise giving it a rest, but I've seen
    you here on a couple of priors, so by all means continue ranting.

    We're not talking speeding......we're talking killed a guy who was out for a walk.
    Quote Originally Posted by Terrierman View Post
    No wonder everybody hates you.

  2. #102
    Senior Member Keith99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,785
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by squirtdad View Post
    That is a huge stretch

    What is more probable?
    a) Cyclist posting from his email acct with details related to the crash and medical status and loading data to strava?

    or

    b) Some anomymous person finding out who bucchere was, then finding his email address, then posting to the site using some tool to hide source of email and same person faking data to load to strava?

    People consistently seem to be forgetting a person was killed. This is not about what happens to drivers, this is about the specific incident.

    Based on everything that as been reported the Buccere was

    * speeding and running red lights in the immediate time period before the crash
    * Speeding at the time of the crash
    * Made a decsion go through a light that another cyclist was able to stop for.
    * Entereed the light very late in the yellow cycle at minimum
    * Appeared to be cycling hard, head down and focused on speed crossing the intersection
    * Hit a pedestrian who had a walk signal in an uncrowded cross walk
    * Pedestrian dies
    * Bucchere goes to hospital ER and is released, sell reporting no major injuries
    * Bucchere posts about incident on web site, post is uncaring to callous in tone and contradicts video
    * Bucchere post data from his cyclo meter to strava. Appears he is racing to beat a course time
    * Cleansing occurs with post removed from web site.

    What picture does this paint?
    You left out that witnesses reported that he did not seem to make any attempt to stop before the impact. (Which dovetails nicely with riding hard head down).
    Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly.

  3. #103
    Bicikli Huszár sudo bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    My Bikes
    '95 Novara Randonee
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by San Rensho View Post
    What is going to convict this guy are his own words:


    A posting that originated from Bucchere's e-mail address soon after the accident gave the following account: "I was already way too committed to stop. ... I couldn't see a line through the crowd and I couldn't stop, so I laid it down and just plowed through the crowded crosswalk in the least-populated place I could find."

    If you are speeding at a crowd of pedestrians crossing the sidewalk, albeit illegally, since Bucchere had the light, you can't just claim "I have the right of way" not slow down and plow into them. You have to slow down and avoid them.

    In addition, the surveillance camera shows he was not attempting to slow down. DA was right to charge him with homicide.
    I haven't been following this closely enough to form an opinion on his guilt, but what you quoted here doesn't match your conclusion that he's guilty.

    He is saying he was not able to stop, and so he handled it in the best way he thought he could, which is to aim for the place with the least amount of people while laying it down. It also isn't very unusual for people to "freeze" the moment they realize they are going to crash, they are going to crash hard, and there's nothing they can do to stop it. I've seen enough street lights with short yellow cycles and overzealous pedestrians, that I could certainly imagine an unfortunate scenario where he entered the intersection legally, and then was confronted with a wall of peds. Especially if it is a bigger intersection (haven't seen it, don't know), I've been in situations where it was even turning yellow as my front tire entered, and I still ended up still just in the intersection while red.

    Also, as I'm surprised it is still being discussed, there is nothing in California vehicle code that states entering an intersection on a yellow is illegal. The only way you could be cited is to use another catch-all, like "reckless driving", which I'd be surprised to see stick in that case.

    Now, his other actions prior may encompass reckless driving and so he may be found guilty this way... as I said, I'm not following closely enough to say, but it is certainly possible. I'm just pointing out that the yellow light is a red herring (ironic), and that his quote really doesn't damn him, but rather explains why he chose the action he did.
    "The bicycle is the noblest invention of mankind. I love the bicycle. I always have. I can think of no sincere, decent human being, male or female, young or old, saint or sinner, who can resist the bicycle."

    - William Saroyan

  4. #104
    Senior Member Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
    My Bikes
    Specialized Hardrock Mountain; Giant Seek 2
    Posts
    8,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by squirtdad View Post
    That is a huge stretch

    What is more probable?
    a) Cyclist posting from his email acct with details related to the crash and medical status and loading data to strava?

    or

    b) Some anomymous person finding out who bucchere was, then finding his email address, then posting to the site using some tool to hide source of email and same person faking data to load to strava?

    People consistently seem to be forgetting a person was killed. This is not about what happens to drivers, this is about the specific incident.

    Based on everything that as been reported the Buccere was

    * speeding and running red lights in the immediate time period before the crash
    * Speeding at the time of the crash
    * Made a decsion go through a light that another cyclist was able to stop for.
    * Entereed the light very late in the yellow cycle at minimum
    * Appeared to be cycling hard, head down and focused on speed crossing the intersection
    * Hit a pedestrian who had a walk signal in an uncrowded cross walk
    * Pedestrian dies
    * Bucchere goes to hospital ER and is released, sell reporting no major injuries
    * Bucchere posts about incident on web site, post is uncaring to callous in tone and contradicts video
    * Bucchere post data from his cyclo meter to strava. Appears he is racing to beat a course time
    * Cleansing occurs with post removed from web site.

    What picture does this paint?
    Granted, it doesn't paint a very good picture for Bucchere. And as I have said all along that I agree that should be punished, but is it asking too much that he be punished for the correct offense?

    As for the extent of his injuries unless someone has been able to gain access to his medical records we do not know how severally he was or wasn't injured. Other than the fact that he was rendered unconscious and transported to the hospital. Yes, he apparently was released from the hospital the same day. But that really isn't an indication of the severity (or lack thereof) of his injuries. As people who have been severely injured have been released from the hospital the same day they were seen in the ER.

    Just this past week while I was at the local Radio Shack a customer came in asking to use their phone. His girlfriends mother who was in the hospital being treated for cancer was told that she was in remission and released from the hospital. She died a week later at home.

    So, just because he was released from the hospital the same the as his crash doesn't mean that he wasn't severely injured.

    Also there are a LOT of people who call a broken finger as a severe injury and there are those who would call it a mild injury. Presumably we're not doctors, nor are we Bucchere so we cannot say that his injuries were or were not severe. They were however severe enough that he was rendered unconscious as well as requiring a trip to the ER in the back of an ambulance.

    So once again, as I have said before. Yes, he should be punished, but let's make sure he is paying only for his "sins" and that he isn't paying for the "sins" of all cyclists who have "gotten away" with whatever in the S.F. area.

    Isn't that fair and justice? Or to phrase it another way, would it be justice for him to have answer for the actions of someone else who got a light sentence, or got off scott clean with no charges whatsoever filed against them?

    Also as I've said before if (as it appears) that the D.A. is "throwing the book" at Bucchere, then they had damn welled better be prepared to do the same to EVERY motorist in the same situation. Otherwise this is NOT justice.

    Not to knock Strava's equipment, but how do we know that the data no Bucchere's computer was accurate when it was uploaded? As I've said, if I hold my wireless cyclo-computer too close to my Netbook it'll screw up the data on it.

    Also how do we know that it was Bucchere who removed the posts that he is alleged to have made? It could have been the web sites admin doing it in an effort to distance themselves from someone who is not a member of their group but tags along on group rides. So that they don't get painted with the same paintbrush.

    That is possible, is it not?
    Last edited by Digital_Cowboy; 06-24-12 at 03:37 PM.
    Digital Cowboy
    Cyclists Against Carlos Bertonatti
    1.0.0 Normal Grey Cockatiel (Hikaru)
    0.0.1 2005 Specialized Hardrock MTB
    0.0.2 Albino Cory Cats
    0.0.? Ghost Shrimp
    0.0.3 Neon Tetras
    1.0.0 Red Betta
    0.0.? Snails
    1.2.0 Swordtail
    2.10.0 Swordtail (fry)
    0.0.3 Zebra's
    0.0.1 G. rosea (Kirk)
    0.0.1 A. avicularia (Pinkie)
    0.1.0 Orange Tabby Cat (Little One)
    0.0.1 2009 Giant Seek 2
    Live Long and Prosper

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The fish are spread out between several tanks.

  5. #105
    Senior Member Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
    My Bikes
    Specialized Hardrock Mountain; Giant Seek 2
    Posts
    8,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 3alarmer View Post
    Justice, (whatever it means exactly), is rarely achieved in this world, my friend.

    Neither, in spite of all efforts, is it the outcome of the criminal justice system as we administer and experience it. Sorry, but if you want “justice” (your version), you really are going to be disappointed in the majority.

    Not sarcastic at all. I wish to Christ they’d start charging a few motorists in the most egregious circumstances of bicycle/car fatalities locally. I’d be able to ride here with considerably less paranoia.

    Your defense of this individual borders on the hysterical at this point.

    Your understanding of the real issues, both legal and political, also seems minimal from my perspective...........I’d advise giving it a rest, but I’ve seen you here on a couple of priors, so by all means continue ranting.

    We’re not talking speeding......we’re talking killed a guy who was out for a walk.
    Sadly, that is all too true. It is pretty much common knowledge that the person who has committed a crime lot’s of time end up living better then their victim.

    Again, sadly, I understand that any system administered by man is by our very nature going to be imperfect and that mistakes will be made. Which is why there is the saying “I’d rather see 10 guilty men be let free vs. 1 innocent man wrongly imprisoned.” And why we have such a lengthily appeals process, to the “wrongs” visited on a person by the court/legal system.

    Why just the “most egregious” of circumstances? If the least egregious situations are fully investigated and charges are pressed against the proper party (be it the motorist or the cyclist) then we wouldn’t have to wait until a situation such as that “good doctor” out in L.A. found himself in.

    I am not “defending” him, I have said time-and-time again that I DO want to see him punished. I just want to see him punished for the correct offense.

    Yes, I know that someone died, but to hear some people talk about it. One could get the impression that Bucchere intentionally went out looking for someone to hit and kill.

    Did Bucchere behave in an unsafe manner? I don’t think that there is much of a question that he did. Was he speeding? Again, I don’t think that there is much of a question to that either. Did he behave like a horses arse after the crash? I don’t really know, has the D.A. or police examined his computer to see if he truly did make the posts that he is accused of having made? I haven’t seen any mention that they have. Did he render aid to his victim? No, but it is my understanding that he himself was unconscious, and it is rather difficult to render aid when one is unconscious.

    So once again, YES, I want to see Bucchere punished, but please let’s make sure that he is being punished for his crimes and NOT the crimes of someone else. That, or it should be asking for too much.
    Digital Cowboy
    Cyclists Against Carlos Bertonatti
    1.0.0 Normal Grey Cockatiel (Hikaru)
    0.0.1 2005 Specialized Hardrock MTB
    0.0.2 Albino Cory Cats
    0.0.? Ghost Shrimp
    0.0.3 Neon Tetras
    1.0.0 Red Betta
    0.0.? Snails
    1.2.0 Swordtail
    2.10.0 Swordtail (fry)
    0.0.3 Zebra's
    0.0.1 G. rosea (Kirk)
    0.0.1 A. avicularia (Pinkie)
    0.1.0 Orange Tabby Cat (Little One)
    0.0.1 2009 Giant Seek 2
    Live Long and Prosper

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The fish are spread out between several tanks.

  6. #106
    Can'tre Member 3alarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    ,location, location...
    My Bikes
    old ones
    Posts
    9,195
    Mentioned
    143 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    It's about being in control of your vehicle, not yellow lights.......

    Quote Originally Posted by sudo bike View Post
    Also, as I'm surprised it is still being discussed, there is nothing in California vehicle code that states entering an intersection on a yellow is illegal. The only way you could be cited is to use another catch-all, like "reckless driving", which I'd be surprised to see stick in that case.
    Under the Motor Vehicle Code, a driver can legally enter an intersection if the vehicle's front tires touch the limit line or pedestrian crosswalk line while a signal is still yellow, according to Sgt. Bill Languemi, a code instructor at the California Highway Patrol.
    "It is cheating, but it is within the law," he said.
    In many cases, these limit lines and pedestrian crosswalk lines are positioned well back from the actual intersection, which is typically defined as the imaginary box formed by the curb lines of the road. I measured the intersection in front of my office, which is across from Los Angeles City Hall, and found the limit lines were 18 feet behind the actual intersection.
    Thus, a car can seem to fly through an intersection on a red light and still be legal, so long as the tires hit the limit line on yellow. What's more, the vehicle code gives that car legal possession of the intersection, and cars with the lateral green light must wait for the intersection to clear before entering.
    http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jan...os/hy-wheels12
    V C Section 21950 Right of Way at Crosswalks

    Right-of-Way at Crosswalks

    21950. (a) The driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.

    (b) This section does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for his or her safety. No pedestrian may suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle that is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard. No pedestrian may unnecessarily stop or delay traffic while in a marked or unmarked crosswalk.

    (c) The driver of a vehicle approaching a pedestrian within any marked or unmarked crosswalk shall exercise all due care and shall reduce the speed of the vehicle or take any other action relating to the operation of the vehicle as necessary to safeguard the safety of the pedestrian.

    (d) Subdivision (b) does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection.
    V C Section 21954 Pedestrians Outside Crosswalks

    Pedestrians Outside Crosswalks

    21954. (a) Every pedestrian upon a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway so near as to constitute an immediate hazard.

    (b) The provisions of this section shall not relieve the driver of a vehicle from the duty to exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon a roadway.
    Again, it seems obvious to me that as cyclists we have
    duty to exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon a roadway
    wherever we encounter them, and I believe we are legally accountable under the code if we do not.

    .
    Quote Originally Posted by Terrierman View Post
    No wonder everybody hates you.

  7. #107
    Elitest Murray Owner Mos6502's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper View Post

    2. Multiple witnesses said Sutchi Hui had a green walk light before stepping into the crosswalk at the intersection just before being struck by Bucchere.

    "Witnesses reported that Bucchere, who was riding south on Castro Street, struck Hui as he walked east in a crosswalk with a green light at the time of the collision. Hui died at a hospital on April 2."
    A green light, but more importantly did he have a walk signal? At a controlled intersection where walk signals are present, the walk signal takes precedence over the light for peds so far as I know. I'm a bit confused because you say "green walk light" and the quote just says "green light".

    Walk lights are generally white so I'm assuming it's your mistake.

    Gascon said prosecutors have seen the post and, while it did not necessarily play a role in their decision on the charges, "clearly it raises a concern for us about his state of mind."
    Uh oh. This sounds like some The Stranger ****.
    Last edited by unterhausen; 06-25-12 at 04:27 PM. Reason: please don't defeat the censor

  8. #108
    Bicikli Huszár sudo bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    My Bikes
    '95 Novara Randonee
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 3alarmer View Post
    Again, it seems obvious to me that as cyclists we have
    wherever we encounter them, and I believe we are legally accountable under the code if we do not.
    Absolutely a fair point. Again, I stress that I'm not saying this guy isn't guilty because I haven't payed enough attention at what is going on (and I'd hazard a guess that most of us here are theorizing more than anything else, unless we have nearly all the facts investigators do). I was just pointing out that the yellow light thing is sort of a moot point, and his quote doesn't really damn him. His other actions may have.
    "The bicycle is the noblest invention of mankind. I love the bicycle. I always have. I can think of no sincere, decent human being, male or female, young or old, saint or sinner, who can resist the bicycle."

    - William Saroyan

  9. #109
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mos6502 View Post
    A green light, but more importantly did he have a walk signal? At a controlled intersection where walk signals are present, the walk signal takes precedence over the light for peds so far as I know. I'm a bit confused because you say "green walk light" and the quote just says "green light".

    Walk lights are generally white so I'm assuming it's your mistake.
    The pedestrian "walk" light was white and the traffic light was green for Market Street traffic to cross Castro Street. The pedestrian white walk light and the green traffic light change from red simultaneously for pedestrians and vehicle traffic crossing Castro Street.

    Sorry I wasn't clearer.
    - Stan

  10. #110
    Senior Member bandit1990's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I still think he ran the red light.

  11. #111
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bandit1990 View Post
    I still think he ran the red light.
    I walk, cycle, and drive a car throught that intersection several times a day, and have done so for the past fifteen years. I don't see how Bucchere couldn't have run a red light if the pedestrian had a walk light as multiple witnesses claim. There is at least a five second delay between the traffic light for Castro Street traffic turning red and the Market Street pedestrian signal changing to "walk."
    - Stan

  12. #112
    Elitest Murray Owner Mos6502's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    My Bikes
    1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster
    Posts
    2,562
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
    I walk, cycle, and drive a car throught that intersection several times a day, and have done so for the past fifteen years. I don't see how Bucchere couldn't have run a red light if the pedestrian had a walk light as multiple witnesses claim. There is at least a five second delay between the traffic light for Castro Street traffic turning red and the Market Street pedestrian signal changing to "walk."
    I wonder what the cyclist who stopped at the intersection instead of going on saw. Did he stop because it was a stale yellow, or did he stop because it was red?

    Although I'd think if a witness actually had seen Chris completely blow a red - it would have been brought up by now, and there would be no murkiness about it, since that would pretty much make the whole thing an open and shut case.

  13. #113
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mos6502 View Post
    I wonder what the cyclist who stopped at the intersection instead of going on saw. Did he stop because it was a stale yellow, or did he stop because it was red?

    Although I'd think if a witness actually had seen Chris completely blow a red - it would have been brought up by now, and there would be no murkiness about it, since that would pretty much make the whole thing an open and shut case.
    The D.A. has to share all of the evidence obtained during the investigation with Bucchere's attorney, but not with the public until it's presented at trial (if the case goes to trial).

    It may well be an open an open and shut case.
    - Stan

  14. #114
    Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad Rx Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Front Range
    Posts
    715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    as long as speculation is the soup de jour I'm going to say, I think their heads collided. Buchere's may think he put the bike down but between his speed and the amount of room he had to work with how do you do that? he did blackout so his recollection can't be trusted, even if he's an honest guy.
    as to his lousy judgement, between the group ride and his attempt at KOM, I wonder if his mind wasn't bonking right along with his body. I'm trying to give him a halfass excuse for being reckless but there is no excuse for riding like that in a metropolitan setting. I've gotten into situations where my bad judgement got me into trouble but I bailed, I braked, I turned, I turned again and I braked some more. if Buchere had done something he still would have hit someone but not as hard, not the same way. who's to say what would have happened.
    just makes me glad my foolish self never had to deal with something like this.

  15. #115
    Senior Member Keith99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,785
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooper View Post
    I walk, cycle, and drive a car throught that intersection several times a day, and have done so for the past fifteen years. I don't see how Bucchere couldn't have run a red light if the pedestrian had a walk light as multiple witnesses claim. There is at least a five second delay between the traffic light for Castro Street traffic turning red and the Market Street pedestrian signal changing to "walk."
    This is the kind of specifics that matter. I know streets where ther is little if any time from when one light goes red til the other goes green and others like this.

    5 seconds is forever. enough time for a fairly slow semi that entered jsut as it went red to completely clear an intersection.
    Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly.

  16. #116
    Senior Member Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
    My Bikes
    Specialized Hardrock Mountain; Giant Seek 2
    Posts
    8,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rx Rider View Post
    as long as speculation is the soup de jour I'm going to say, I think their heads collided. Buchere's may think he put the bike down but between his speed and the amount of room he had to work with how do you do that? he did blackout so his recollection can't be trusted, even if he's an honest guy.
    as to his lousy judgement, between the group ride and his attempt at KOM, I wonder if his mind wasn't bonking right along with his body. I'm trying to give him a halfass excuse for being reckless but there is no excuse for riding like that in a metropolitan setting. I've gotten into situations where my bad judgement got me into trouble but I bailed, I braked, I turned, I turned again and I braked some more. if Buchere had done something he still would have hit someone but not as hard, not the same way. who's to say what would have happened.
    just makes me glad my foolish self never had to deal with something like this.
    Agreed, if he was bonking it still wouldn't excuse his actions on that day, but it would help to explain them. And as I've said before I think he should have to answer for his actions. But only for HIS actions, and not the actions of other cyclists.
    Digital Cowboy
    Cyclists Against Carlos Bertonatti
    1.0.0 Normal Grey Cockatiel (Hikaru)
    0.0.1 2005 Specialized Hardrock MTB
    0.0.2 Albino Cory Cats
    0.0.? Ghost Shrimp
    0.0.3 Neon Tetras
    1.0.0 Red Betta
    0.0.? Snails
    1.2.0 Swordtail
    2.10.0 Swordtail (fry)
    0.0.3 Zebra's
    0.0.1 G. rosea (Kirk)
    0.0.1 A. avicularia (Pinkie)
    0.1.0 Orange Tabby Cat (Little One)
    0.0.1 2009 Giant Seek 2
    Live Long and Prosper

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The fish are spread out between several tanks.

  17. #117
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,434
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sudo bike View Post
    I haven't been following this closely enough to form an opinion on his guilt, but what you quoted here doesn't match your conclusion that he's guilty.

    He is saying he was not able to stop, and so he handled it in the best way he thought he could, which is to aim for the place with the least amount of people while laying it down. It also isn't very unusual for people to "freeze" the moment they realize they are going to crash, they are going to crash hard, and there's nothing they can do to stop it. I've seen enough street lights with short yellow cycles and overzealous pedestrians, that I could certainly imagine an unfortunate scenario where he entered the intersection legally, and then was confronted with a wall of peds. Especially if it is a bigger intersection (haven't seen it, don't know), I've been in situations where it was even turning yellow as my front tire entered, and I still ended up still just in the intersection while red.

    Also, as I'm surprised it is still being discussed, there is nothing in California vehicle code that states entering an intersection on a yellow is illegal. The only way you could be cited is to use another catch-all, like "reckless driving", which I'd be surprised to see stick in that case.

    Now, his other actions prior may encompass reckless driving and so he may be found guilty this way... as I said, I'm not following closely enough to say, but it is certainly possible. I'm just pointing out that the yellow light is a red herring (ironic), and that his quote really doesn't damn him, but rather explains why he chose the action he did.
    He said there was a crowd of people in the crosswalk. Crowds don't materialize in half a second. He had to have seen the people in the road from some distance and even if they don't have the right of way, he has to stop for them. He was racing for the intersection, thinking he could sneak through the crowd, instead of just stopping, he miscalculated and hit someone. He was at least negligent, he killed someone because of his negligence, you have negligent manslaughter at least.
    Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

    1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
    1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
    1988 Ducati 750 F1

  18. #118
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
    Posts
    1,824
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are plenty of things that I don't understand, but one of those is how Mr. Bucherre can be charged with VEHICULAR manslaughter when he was riding a bicycle in California. California does not consider bicycles to be vehicles. I would have thought that to bring a charge of vehicular manslaughter, a vehicle would have had to be involved.

  19. #119
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North Attleboro, MA
    My Bikes
    2011 Steamroller; 1998 Cannondale F-400; 1981 Motobecane Jubilee Sport
    Posts
    231
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sauerwald View Post
    I can understand how a cyclist could hit a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
    +1

    While it pisses me off when I see cyclists buzz pedestrians who clearly have the right away and have almost been taken out myself by a bike messenger who blew through a red light, I also commute to and from Providence, RI.

    Providence pedestrians are the worst. I've had jaywalkers make eye contact, so I know they see me, while they are standing on the sidewalk, and yet they still step right out in front of me, no matter what my speed. It's flat out obnoxious behavior.

    If you wouldn't step in front of semi-truck going the same speed as me, then don't step in front of me either.
    Last edited by SteamingAlong; 06-29-12 at 12:52 PM.
    2011 Surly Steamroller; 1998 Cannondale F-400; 1981 Motobecane Jubilee Sport
    Car free since 1998. Big Oil hates me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Nye, The Science Guy
    Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There's something wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.

  20. #120
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,649
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by San Rensho View Post
    He said there was a crowd of people in the crosswalk. Crowds don't materialize in half a second. He had to have seen the people in the road from some distance and even if they don't have the right of way, he has to stop for them. He was racing for the intersection, thinking he could sneak through the crowd, instead of just stopping, he miscalculated and hit someone. He was at least negligent, he killed someone because of his negligence, you have negligent manslaughter at least.
    I agree with your logic, but apparently it doesn't work this way for motorists. That never made sense to me

  21. #121
    Senior Member Keith99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,785
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sauerwald View Post
    There are plenty of things that I don't understand, but one of those is how Mr. Bucherre can be charged with VEHICULAR manslaughter when he was riding a bicycle in California. California does not consider bicycles to be vehicles. I would have thought that to bring a charge of vehicular manslaughter, a vehicle would have had to be involved.
    Wrong. in California like most states bicycles are vehicels and have all hte rights and responsibilities of vehicles.

    They are not motor vehicles. The law that governs traffic is the vehicle code, not the motor vehicle code.
    Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly.

  22. #122
    Senior Member alhedges's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Naptown
    My Bikes
    NWT 24sp DD; Brompton M6R
    Posts
    1,133
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Keith99 View Post
    Wrong. in California like most states bicycles are vehicels and have all hte rights and responsibilities of vehicles.
    Cite?

    V C Section 670 Vehicle

    Vehicle

    670. A "vehicle" is a device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.

    Amended Ch. 987, Stats. 1975. Effective January 1, 1976.





  23. #123
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
    Posts
    1,824
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Keith99 View Post
    Wrong. in California like most states bicycles are vehicels and have all hte rights and responsibilities of vehicles.

    They are not motor vehicles. The law that governs traffic is the vehicle code, not the motor vehicle code.
    California explicitly excepts human powered vehicles from their definition of vehicle, therefore in California, a bicycle is NOT a vehicle - it is a human powered device.

    I believe that in most other states, bicycles are vehicles.

  24. #124
    Senior Member Dchiefransom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    6,191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting. Vehicular manslaughter requires a vehicle. I wonder if they'd just charge him with manslaughter?
    Silver Eagle Pilot

  25. #125
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    - Stan

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •