Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-12, 09:03 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
Safety

Since the second part of this thread is labled safety, I thot I would post the following for comment.

In 1890 give or take the "safety" bike was invented. It is what we have called the diamond frame bike for more than 100 years. It was called safety because it got rid of the huge wheel of the penney farthling.

Now consider that the LWB recumbent is the true safety bike. You cant be thrown over the handlebars. There is a short distance to fall in the case of a wreck. Your feet arrive at the scene of the accident first, not your head. The weight shift forward without pitching over the handlebars allows for better braking. And sitting upright with 180 degrees view allows you to stay out of trouble.
rydabent is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 09:12 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Flying Merkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Costa Mesa CA
Posts: 2,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
All of this is offset by the lessened visibility of the recumbent. I doubt there is any real-world safety difference between the two styles.
Flying Merkel is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 09:20 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 172

Bikes: Unidentifiable CX-based franken-commuter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When considering the safety of a bicycle in a collision with a vehicle, I tend to think the potential energy between the height of the rider and ground level is far overshadowed by the kinetic energy of the impact from a moving petrochemical-powered automobile. Unless someone provides me with solid statistics to suggest otherwise, I'm inclined to agree with FM.
A10K is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 10:39 AM
  #4  
On your right
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 735

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A DF is safer then a recumbant when you need to sprint uphill to outrun a crazed psychopath who has it out for trolls

Last edited by Daves_Not_Here; 08-13-12 at 10:42 AM.
Daves_Not_Here is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 10:57 AM
  #5  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by Flying Merkel
All of this is offset by the lessened visibility of the recumbent. I doubt there is any real-world safety difference between the two styles.
The lessened visibility of the recumbent in traffic more than offsets the trivial safety advantages claimed by the poster for his hobby horse/bicycle. IMO I suspect the only way that a recumbent rider can be as reasonably safe is to avoid riding in traffic.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 11:04 AM
  #6  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Recumbents also benefit from the safety advantage of having front airbags... otherwise known as aero-bellies.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 11:45 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Flying Merkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Costa Mesa CA
Posts: 2,636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
Recumbents also benefit from the safety advantage of having front airbags... otherwise known as aero-bellies.

That's not funny. And I swear that's not me laughing.
Flying Merkel is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 11:50 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Flying Merkel
All of this is offset by the lessened visibility of the recumbent. I doubt there is any real-world safety difference between the two styles.
Seems like the vastly decreased maneuverability of a recumbent would be a negative for safety as well.
RobertHurst is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 11:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
Since the second part of this thread is labled safety, I thot I would post the following for comment.

In 1890 give or take the "safety" bike was invented. It is what we have called the diamond frame bike for more than 100 years. It was called safety because it got rid of the huge wheel of the penney farthling.
...
Interestingly, those 'safety' bikes were fixed gear/no brakes bikes. DEATHWISH!!
RobertHurst is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 11:56 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
How do you bunny hop a stick, pot hole or curb ? Can't ride around all the obstacles. Besides, they are only allowed if you live in Cambridge, home of Harvard and MIT.
Leebo is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 01:54 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
robert

"vastly decreased maneuverablility"??? I dont think so.

Also the visibility thing is pretty much an old wives tail, which is over come by the strangeness of the bike. Cars actually seem to give me a much wider berth when I am on my recumbents.
rydabent is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 02:04 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
GrandaddyBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RobertHurst
Interestingly, those 'safety' bikes were fixed gear/no brakes bikes. DEATHWISH!!
They had 2 brakes. They were called left foot and right foot.
GrandaddyBiker is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 02:04 PM
  #13  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
leebo

With curb ramps, and trails, I manage quite well avoiding pot holes. I do not ride like a 12 year old.

Harvard and MIT-----------hmmmmm where the really smart people are. That says something about recumbents doesnt it.

You might concider another fact. Almost all bent riders have thousands of miles on DF bikes before we got our bents. Now well over 90% would not go back to DF bikes at all. I know I wont.

Safety is just one of the advantages of riding a bent. Actually a very important one.

RANS Stratus LE
TerraTrike Cruiser
rydabent is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 02:15 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times in 571 Posts
Also the visibility thing is pretty much an old wives tail

Have to say that as a driver I find them much less visible in that I am generally much closer to the bike before I actually see it. I'd love to try one, but I would admit that I'd be scared to ride one in an urban environment.
jon c. is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 02:29 PM
  #15  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by RobertHurst
Interestingly, those 'safety' bikes were fixed gear/no brakes bikes. DEATHWISH!!
And believe it or don't, those crazy fools rode without you-know-what on their heads.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 03:12 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606

Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times in 418 Posts
Originally Posted by RobertHurst
Seems like the vastly decreased maneuverability of a recumbent would be a negative for safety as well.
My 'bent is a swb, but it's pretty much just as maneuverable as my DF.
Notso_fastLane is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 03:21 PM
  #17  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
Upright tricycles are safer yet
noisebeam is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 09:09 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
GrandaddyBiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Upright tricycles are safer yet
Before I retire back in1993, I worked at a Naval Base. This was a large base. In some areas of the Base private owned cars/trucks were not allowed. However, I could go to the bike shop and check out a Navy issue bike to get around the Base. They had only 2 choices for you to check out, a large heavy Beach cruiser type, single speed with coaster brakes (in Black only) or you could check out a tricycle with a huge basket on the back. Since I often had to carry a briefcase and large plans one day I decide to try the tricycle. I was shocked at how easy that tricycle was to tip over if you tried to go fast on it. After turning that sucker over several times I got to where I only felt safe on the tricycle at walking speeds (5 mph).

So I am not sure the tricycles are safer.

I went back to the bicycle. Since I could keep the same bike check out as long as I wanted to, I put my own basket on front to carry my stuff. However, you were fully reasonable for the bike. If it got stolen they would deduct the price of the bike from your paycheck. It never happen to me but it did happen to some of my coworkers.

Oh, one more thing the Government Issue tricycles came in black only also, just like the bike. Was it Henry Ford that use to say, “You can have any color you want as long as it is black.”?
GrandaddyBiker is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 02:23 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Notso_fastLane
My 'bent is a swb, but it's pretty much just as maneuverable as my DF.
Can you do a track stand on it? Can you hop a curb on it? Can you stand on the pedals and hammer up a steep hill or sprint for a light?
RobertHurst is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 02:25 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Upright tricycles are safer yet
Riding a trike feels a bit like pushing a shopping cart full of canned beans.
RobertHurst is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 02:32 AM
  #21  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by GrandaddyBiker
They had 2 brakes. They were called left foot and right foot.
Similar to the three wheeled versions that we put our youngest kids on these days. It must be driving the anti-fixed gear guys crazy.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 02:40 AM
  #22  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
Harvard and MIT-----------hmmmmm where the really smart people are. That says something about recumbents doesnt it.
Did you really type that after calling A&S forum a thread and the many other errors in this thread?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 06:19 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
silmarillion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 720

Bikes: 2012 Cinelli Mystic Rat, Nashbar CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I also ride a Bacchetta Corsa.

I enjoy riding my recumbent on centuries, especially flat ones. But most of the time I ride my CX bike. I definitely don't care to commute on my recumbent, mainly because of the daily climbing I do on my ride. Too much wear and tear on the knees.

I will have to disagree with you on one point though. Most recumbent crashes I have seen, people end up on their butts. I personally know of 2 people who ride recumbents who have broken their hips in crashes. I was lucky. I only had to deal with road rash on my butt-cheek that would stick to my underwear for about 2 weeks. Unfortunately, the area in question was very difficult to successfully bandage, which made it even more pleasant.

I set my personal downhill speed record on that bike. Which was a setup run on a closed course. You simply can't hit speeds over 60 on a DF bike. They begin to wobble once you get around 50. The recumbents lower center of gravity makes them ride more solidly at higher speeds.
silmarillion is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 07:10 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
I would love for you to pedal on some of these "awesome" Boston streets to see if you could avoid potholes. Ride what you like, YRMV. Those college types all have beards and aero bellies, so that's a natural fit. My point on the bunny hopping is that it sometimes gets me out of trouble, not possible on a bent. Over a curb, branch, trash etc.
Leebo is offline  
Old 08-15-12, 07:26 AM
  #25  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by GrandaddyBiker
I was shocked at how easy that tricycle was to tip over if you tried to go fast on it. After turning that sucker over several times I got to where I only felt safe on the tricycle at walking speeds (5 mph).
I had a standard adult trike for a short while… had big plans to build it into a wicked chopper with a custom stake bed out back that I never followed through with. Anyway, I quickly mastered riding the thing on two wheels, the front and drive side rear. Could easily go for blocks that way, around turns and all. Never dumped it once.
AlmostTrick is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.