Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-12, 09:22 PM   #101
BikeLawyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ohio
Bikes: Fuji Cross Pro, Montague Paratrooper Mtn Bike
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Some additional Factoids...

Interesting discussion on this crash. One of the QCB Board Members contacted me around 8am to tell me about the crash... a few minutes later he said the fellow had died. The crash site is a few miles from my home and he indicated police were still on scene, so I grabbed my camera gear, hopped on the Big Bike and rode down. I was able to shoot a number of pix from behind the police tape... later in the day, a few of us returned to the scene to place some flowers and look at the total scene. I didn't measure it off but the total distance of police paint [orange] was at least 50 yards. Most of the orange paint was right around the white line or to the right of the white line. I'm drafting a blog post on my ohiobikelawyer.com page which will probably go up later tonight or tomorrow for sure with additional photos.

Some "facts" and factors, from what I've been able to figure out or read about:
1. Crash was around 615 am - so lights legally required. It appears the rider had lights but we're waiting for the official police report. Also, in addition to pre-dawn light, there were two large streetlights in the area which would have spread large cones of light at the scene of the impact. If the cyclist did NOT have lights I think we would have heard about it -
2. This is an extremely well used area of town for cycling. My understanding is that the motorist was on his way to work and probably drove this every day. If so, he would know that cyclists use this stretch of roadway in the early hours. Not that this is any type of excuse or cause, it just a factor that would make it difficult to believe that the motorist would not be reasonably expecting folks to be riding that early.
3. Handicapped plates- I noted the same thing at the scene and discussed it with the newspaper photographer and one of the cops. No one knew anything... later that day, when we were there laying flowers, a guy jogged by. He said he worked with the motorist. Somebody asked about the plates, and the guy said the motorist had some sort of leg issues - no "impairment" from a driving perspective he felt.
4. What happened? To me, just looking at the scene, it appears that the motorist "didn't see" the bike/rider and just ran the guy down from behind. Speed differential had to be pretty big, I think, given the damage to the car and that fact that it killed the rider... from one news story I read, the rider was a big guy, like 6'2" - It appeared to me that he slid up the hood, hit the windshield with body and snapped his head back onto the roof, near the point where the three roof lines come together... a very strong point on the roof. You can see the indentation on the roof where his head clearly hit. There were "gouge" marks on the pavement which were highlighted by the orange paint - these were to the right of the white line. it appeared to me, from the marks and paint, that the point of impact was likely very very close to the white line, if not to the right of it...
5. Someone asked about the double yellow line - in 2006 we [Ohio Bicycle Federation] got many amendments passed relating to cycling. One was a change which permitted motorists to cross the double yellow under a particular set of circumstances, the key one being that the vehicle being passed was going half the speed limit or slower...

Hope that helps - I'll be posting a lot on this crash. CPD had its fancy CSI truck there with the super duper high def camera so there should be some interesting data to look at some day.

Steve Magas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt Erlenbach View Post
A few points. First, I made a mistake by pointing out the handicapped plate (though some of you certainly would have picked up on it yourselves). There is no evidence that this driver is handicapped, or if he is, whether the handicap contributed to the crash. Second, it apparently was early dawn and foggy at the time of the crash and while it probably was light enough to see if you were, say, jogging on the trail, it would have been neither safe nor legal to bike without lights. It is unclear whether Mr. Gast's lights were on, but I'd bet they were. Third, we all make mistakes while driving. 99+% of the time, nothing happens. For most of the remaining 1%, the result is bent sheet metal, maybe some whiplash, and a ticket. In only a tiny fraction of those mistakes is someone seriously hurt or killed. Whenever I get all high and mighty about bad drivers, I try to imagine how I would feel if one of my children were the driver. That tempers my judgment. Finally, crashes like this should keep no one from cycling, any more than a fatal car crash in the news should keep anyone from driving. This should be a learning experience for all of us, both in how we drive and how we ride. We can change what we ourselves do - we cannot change what others do, at least not by much. I've learned a lot from A&S about how to ride more safely and how to drive more safely. The best way to honor Mr. Gast is by learning from his death.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screen Shot 2012-08-30 at 8.58.09 AM.jpg (48.5 KB, 37 views)
File Type: jpg Screen Shot 2012-08-30 at 10.39.42 PM.jpg (43.2 KB, 36 views)
BikeLawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-12, 09:25 PM   #102
Myosmith
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
 
Myosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Bikes:
Posts: 2,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Why are handicap people allowed to drive?
Wow, really Not every handicap impares the ability to drive. I have a friend who lost his left leg below the knee in the first Gulf war. He drives an automatic and is every bit as good and safe a driver as any person I know with two legs, yet he qualifies for a handicapped plate. There is also an individual in the area who uses a wheelchair who has an adapted SUV. She is way more careful than 90% of the teenagers and probably 50% of the non-handicapped adults on the road. I seriously doubt she is at any higher risk of an accident than any one of us. Did you know that you can also get a handicapped plate for a vehicle that is the primary transportation for a handicapped person, even if someone else is the driver? For example: If you have a child with cerebral palsy, you can get a handicap plate for the family car.

Handicapped people are allowed to drive for the same reason that paraplegics can ride hand-powered recumbents or why double amputees can run in the Olympics.

Ignorance is perhaps the greatest human handicap.

Last edited by Myosmith; 08-30-12 at 09:29 PM.
Myosmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-12, 09:36 PM   #103
honey locust
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myosmith View Post
Wow, really Not every handicap impares the ability to drive. I have a friend who lost his left leg below the knee in the first Gulf war. He drives an automatic and is every bit as good and safe a driver as any person I know with two legs, yet he qualifies for a handicapped plate. There is also an individual in the area who uses a wheelchair who has an adapted SUV. She is way more careful than 90% of the teenagers and probably 50% of the non-handicapped adults on the road. I seriously doubt she is at any higher risk of an accident than any one of us.

Handicapped people are allowed to drive for the same reason that paraplegics can ride hand-powered recumbents or why double amputees can run in the Olympics.

Ignorance is perhaps the greatest human handicap.
I really have to say this again? Being able to ride a hand-powered recumbent is a right that us Americans have(and probably every other country I would assume). Driving a car is NOT A RIGHT. Its a privilege for those able to do it safely. Can't drive a car without having to text constantly? Your privilege should be revoked. Have a handicap that makes you even a fraction less able to drive safely compared to an able bodied person? Your privilege should be revoked. I don't care if this makes you sad, inconveniences you, makes you lose your job, or whatever.
honey locust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-12, 10:59 PM   #104
Digital_Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997
Posts: 9,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
Gene,

I did not say or suggest that the handicap not be allowed to drive. What I said us that because of the fact that they are handicapped, that they have to prove that they can safely drive a car on the public roads. That us not saying that they shouldn't be allowed to drive.

And as a Disabled Vet myself, I understand that a person with either handicap plates or a disabled mirror hanger could be a Disabled Vet. But that aside, if it's not safe for them to drive it doesn't matter why they're disabled.
I never knew that. Thanks for your service.
Paul,

Thank you, and you are welcome.
Digital_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-12, 11:08 PM   #105
Digital_Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997
Posts: 9,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt Erlenbach View Post
A few points. First, I made a mistake by pointing out the handicapped plate (though some of you certainly would have picked up on it yourselves). There is no evidence that this driver is handicapped, or if he is, whether the handicap contributed to the crash. Second, it apparently was early dawn and foggy at the time of the crash and while it probably was light enough to see if you were, say, jogging on the trail, it would have been neither safe nor legal to bike without lights. It is unclear whether Mr. Gast's lights were on, but I'd bet they were. Third, we all make mistakes while driving. 99+% of the time, nothing happens. For most of the remaining 1%, the result is bent sheet metal, maybe some whiplash, and a ticket. In only a tiny fraction of those mistakes is someone seriously hurt or killed. Whenever I get all high and mighty about bad drivers, I try to imagine how I would feel if one of my children were the driver. That tempers my judgment. Finally, crashes like this should keep no one from cycling, any more than a fatal car crash in the news should keep anyone from driving. This should be a learning experience for all of us, both in how we drive and how we ride. We can change what we ourselves do - we cannot change what others do, at least not by much. I've learned a lot from A&S about how to ride more safely and how to drive more safely. The best way to honor Mr. Gast is by learning from his death.
I think that that sums it up best.

Last edited by Digital_Cowboy; 08-31-12 at 08:04 AM.
Digital_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 03:22 AM   #106
FlatSix911
Senior Member
 
FlatSix911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Altos, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,741
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lsberrios1 View Post
Very sad ...

[h=1]Police: 100-year-old driver hits 11 near LA school[/h]
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 4df6dd7a7127b018190f6a706700e674.jpg (80.8 KB, 3 views)
FlatSix911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 07:19 AM   #107
dpeters11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Bikes: 2010 Trek FX 7.5, 2011 Trek 2.1
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by honey locust View Post
I really have to say this again? Being able to ride a hand-powered recumbent is a right that us Americans have(and probably every other country I would assume). Driving a car is NOT A RIGHT. Its a privilege for those able to do it safely. Can't drive a car without having to text constantly? Your privilege should be revoked. Have a handicap that makes you even a fraction less able to drive safely compared to an able bodied person? Your privilege should be revoked. I don't care if this makes you sad, inconveniences you, makes you lose your job, or whatever.
Going by that you could say that someone that needs corrective lenses to pass the vision test is a small fraction less able to drive safely than someone with uncorrected 20/20.
dpeters11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 08:21 AM   #108
honey locust
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpeters11 View Post
Going by that you could say that someone that needs corrective lenses to pass the vision test is a small fraction less able to drive safely than someone with uncorrected 20/20.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
honey locust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 09:12 AM   #109
dpeters11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Bikes: 2010 Trek FX 7.5, 2011 Trek 2.1
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yikes, that would take out about 30% of the US population in terms of drivers.

Though, I guess at that point we might have better mass transit systems. Roads would be less crowded for bikers, though might have more potholes if the road infrastructure wasn't kept up. But I do think that position is a bit extreme.
dpeters11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 10:50 AM   #110
gmt13
Half way there
 
gmt13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Durham, NC
Bikes: 69 Hercules, 73 Raleigh Sports, 74 Raliegh Competition, 78 Nishiki Professional, 79 Nishiki International, 83 Colnago Super, 83 Viner Junior
Posts: 1,107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by honey locust View Post
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Well, how about all of the folks who have seasonal allergies? They shouldn't drive either because sneezing certainly affects your ability to control the vehicle. And how about the folks that stayed up late the night before? We should have REM clocks on everybody that gauge whether the have had sufficient sleep before driving.

I do thing a full bladder improves driving skill, though. 1) it keeps you awake and 2) you are very alert because you are on the lookout for a convenient spot.

The question is: If a person with contact lenses drinks a lot of water before driving, does that compensate for the slight decrement in driving ability?

Also: my apologies for moving away from the main topic, I won't do it again unless in response to another outrageous post.

-G
gmt13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 11:15 AM   #111
Hoshnasi
Senior Member
 
Hoshnasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cerritos, Ca.
Bikes:
Posts: 562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by honey locust View Post
I really have to say this again? ... Driving a car is NOT A RIGHT. Its a privilege for those able to do it safely...
This is false, and patently against what the founding fathers had in mind regarding the country. I'll speak no more politics in this thread, just leave a link which you can go read.Watch the video in particular.
Hoshnasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 11:24 AM   #112
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My in-laws have a handicap plate. My FIL drives, but the plate is because my MIL is wheelchair bound. However, all that discussion is really not the point of this thread. I do hope that information will eventually come to light that tells more about why this tragedy occurred. I also really hope it wasn't simple negligence, but I won't hold my breath on that part....
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 11:28 AM   #113
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoshnasi View Post
This is false, and patently against what the founding fathers had in mind regarding the country. I'll speak no more politics in this thread, just leave a link which you can go read.Watch the video in particular.
This is an interesting assertion. It's off topic here, but maybe worth a thread.
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 11:39 AM   #114
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,506
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoshnasi View Post
This is false, and patently against what the founding fathers had in mind regarding the country. I'll speak no more politics in this thread, just leave a link which you can go read.Watch the video in particular.


You have a right to travel. You don't have a right to a particular mode of travel.

You don't need a car to travel (people travel all the time without driving), thus being able to drive isn't necessary to the right to travel (that is, the two things are not the same thing).

Last edited by njkayaker; 08-31-12 at 11:43 AM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 12:19 PM   #115
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,707
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 314 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
Paul,

Thank you, and you are welcome.
BTW I didn't know it either. Regardless of our conversation, thank you for your service.

Now the odd thing is that I seem to be defending you, as I interpreted the earlier conversation as a jab on the disabled and thought it was totally off base.

Let's just leave it as a misunderstanding... really no point in going further.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 12:23 PM   #116
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,707
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 314 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by honey locust View Post
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
As someone that wears glasses... I have to agree... but I also don't believe that such "disabilities" can't be well compensated for.

I have poor peripheral vision as glasses don't help much there... I simply turn my head more and use mirrors more, and have developed a habit to "always look twice." Am I a perfect driver... well, no. But then few of us are.

But I do see quite well the things that are right in front of me. And I am very observant of cyclists.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 12:59 PM   #117
Kactus 
Senior Member
 
Kactus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tacoma, WA
Bikes: 1971 Schwinn Paramount P-13, 1974 Motobecane Champion Team, 1976 Masi Gran Criterium, 1978 Raleigh Professional
Posts: 2,019
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmt13 View Post
Well, how about all of the folks who have seasonal allergies? They shouldn't drive either because sneezing certainly affects your ability to control the vehicle. And how about the folks that stayed up late the night before? We should have REM clocks on everybody that gauge whether the have had sufficient sleep before driving.

-G
Science has shown that our judgment has not fully developed until our mid to late 20's... should people younger than 25 be prohibited from driving? Also our reflexes start to deteriorate after 40... should everyone over 40 be prohibited from driving? I can see it now; only people between 25 and 40 in perfect health can drive. So basically this would only be active duty Air Force pilots!
Kactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 01:44 PM   #118
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,742
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by honey locust View Post
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
I thought so. Is there anybody whom YOU ( if you were the all powerful Queen) would authorize to own and drive a privately owned motor vehicle. If so, why?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 01:55 PM   #119
Myosmith
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
 
Myosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Bikes:
Posts: 2,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Have a handicap that makes you even a fraction less able to drive safely compared to an able bodied person? Your privilege should be revoked.
I know a lot of "able bodied" people who can't drive worth s*** and several individuals who are legally handicapped who are probably above average in both driving skill and road awareness. Yes, people whose handicap prevents them from driving safely under normal conditions should not be issued a license. But if they can pass the same behind the wheel test required of everyone else, who are you to say their "privilege" should be any more restricted than yours? Just having a handicap plate does not automatically mean the person behind the wheel is any less safe of a driver than anyone else on the road.

I personally think there should be an IQ test right along side the behind the wheel as I share the road with a lot of "able bodied" dumb a$$es every day. Which would you rather have behind the wheel, a man with one leg or a guy who's a half-wit?
Myosmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 02:09 PM   #120
Digital_Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997
Posts: 9,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
Paul,

Thank you, and you are welcome.
BTW I didn't know it either. Regardless of our conversation, thank you for your service.

Now the odd thing is that I seem to be defending you, as I interpreted the earlier conversation as a jab on the disabled and thought it was totally off base.

Let's just leave it as a misunderstanding... really no point in going further.
Thank you Gene, and you are also welcome. One of the things I've enjoyed about all of our conversations is that even though we don't always agree with each other. We've always managed to do so respectfully.
Digital_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 02:10 PM   #121
dpeters11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Bikes: 2010 Trek FX 7.5, 2011 Trek 2.1
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kactus View Post
Science has shown that our judgment has not fully developed until our mid to late 20's... should people younger than 25 be prohibited from driving? Also our reflexes start to deteriorate after 40... should everyone over 40 be prohibited from driving? I can see it now; only people between 25 and 40 in perfect health can drive. So basically this would only be active duty Air Force pilots!
Even the Air Force allows their pilots to have up to 20/70 vision as long as it's correctable to 20/20, at least for a normal pilot. The Navy I think is more strict. So maybe driving would be limited to current Blue Angels.

Last edited by dpeters11; 08-31-12 at 02:14 PM.
dpeters11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 02:18 PM   #122
Digital_Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997
Posts: 9,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by honey locust View Post
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
As someone that wears glasses... I have to agree... but I also don't believe that such "disabilities" can't be well compensated for.

I have poor peripheral vision as glasses don't help much there... I simply turn my head more and use mirrors more, and have developed a habit to "always look twice." Am I a perfect driver... well, no. But then few of us are.

But I do see quite well the things that are right in front of me. And I am very observant of cyclists.
Gene,

As someone who also wears glasses I also agree. I use my helmet mounted mirror quite frequently. And if I see any cars behind me, no matter how far back I'll do a shoulder check either just before or at the same time that I'm singling that I am getting ready to change lanes or turn.

And just as an aside for those who haven't been I'm the military. The military (or at least the Army) doesn't consider wearing glasses to be a disability. As if I remember correctly, the Army rates things starting at zero and working up. When I first enlisted my rating was zero, even though I wear glasses.
Digital_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 02:36 PM   #123
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,707
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 314 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
Gene,

As someone who also wears glasses I also agree. I use my helmet mounted mirror quite frequently. And if I see any cars behind me, no matter how far back I'll do a shoulder check either just before or at the same time that I'm singling that I am getting ready to change lanes or turn.

And just as an aside for those who haven't been I'm the military. The military (or at least the Army) doesn't consider wearing glasses to be a disability. As if I remember correctly, the Army rates things starting at zero and working up. When I first enlisted my rating was zero, even though I wear glasses.
Of course that somewhat depends on your job in the military. I believe you have to have 20/20 vision to be a fighter pilot or a SEAL team member for instance.

I was in electronics... my eyesight requirement was I could not be colorblind. Glasses were no problem.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 02:38 PM   #124
corvuscorvax
Gone.
 
Join Date: May 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 509
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kactus View Post
Science has shown that our judgment has not fully developed until our mid to late 20's... should people younger than 25 be prohibited from driving?
I have often thought that we get things absolutely backwards in the U.S.: the drinking age should be 16 and the driving age should be 21. It would solve a lot of problems.
corvuscorvax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-12, 02:41 PM   #125
Digital_Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997
Posts: 9,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy View Post
Gene,

As someone who also wears glasses I also agree. I use my helmet mounted mirror quite frequently. And if I see any cars behind me, no matter how far back I'll do a shoulder check either just before or at the same time that I'm singling that I am getting ready to change lanes or turn.

And just as an aside for those who haven't been I'm the military. The military (or at least the Army) doesn't consider wearing glasses to be a disability. As if I remember correctly, the Army rates things starting at zero and working up. When I first enlisted my rating was zero, even though I wear glasses.
Of course that somewhat depends on your job in the military. I believe you have to have 20/20 vision to be a fighter pilot or a SEAL team member for instance.

I was in electronics... my eyesight requirement was I could not be colorblind. Glasses were no problem.
Gene,

You could be right, but not having held either of those MOSes I can't speak to the qualifications for them.
Digital_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.