Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Cycling advocates say [bike] tracks are the future.

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Cycling advocates say [bike] tracks are the future.

Old 11-01-12, 07:04 PM
  #51  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by ro-monster
Hate to break it to you, but you live in California, where it is has been illegal to ride outside the bike lane for 15 years (although I've never heard of this actually being enforced).

V C Section 21208 Permitted Movements from Bicycle Lanes

Permitted Movements from Bicycle Lanes

21208. (a) Whenever a bicycle lane has been established on a roadway pursuant to Section 21207, any person operating a bicycle upon the roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at that time shall ride within the bicycle lane, except that the person may move out of the lane under any of the following situations:

(1) When overtaking and passing another bicycle, vehicle, or pedestrian within the lane or about to enter the lane if the overtaking and passing cannot be done safely within the lane.

(2) When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.

(3) When reasonably necessary to leave the bicycle lane to avoid debris or other hazardous conditions.

(4) When approaching a place where a right turn is authorized.

(b) No person operating a bicycle shall leave a bicycle lane until the movement can be made with reasonable safety and then only after giving an appropriate signal in the manner provided in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 22100) in the event that any vehicle may be affected by the movement.

Amended Sec. 5, Ch. 674, Stats. 1996. Effective January 1, 1997.
FYI, in spite of the tone of that law, rule 3 gives you just about any excuse you may want to leave the BL... and coupled with the other rules... well let's just say that staying in the BL is only done by choice.
genec is offline  
Old 11-01-12, 09:34 PM
  #52  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by hagen2456
Nice reply. I'm still waiting for facts to back it up, though.
Many BF members have read your post and seen the facts you yourself have provided.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 11-01-12, 10:40 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
ro-monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 799

Bikes: Pacific Reach, Strida

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrrabbit
Also, note 21208a:
1. Has a speed parameter - i.e., it recognizes the right to stay in a regular lane at speed.
2. In doing so, it is consistent with the other part of the VC slower traffic stays right - and/or pulls over to allow 5 or more followers to get by.
3. In this case the bicycle lane is simply an extension of the "invisible" lane of slower bicycle traffic that is to stay as close as is possible to the right anyway.
Hmmm, that interpretation seems to be stretching it. It says you can stay in the main travel lanes if you're going at or above the normal speed of traffic. Unless there's a traffic jam, normal speed is 25 mph minimum. How many cyclists can maintain that sort of speed?

Originally Posted by genec
FYI, in spite of the tone of that law, rule 3 gives you just about any excuse you may want to leave the BL... and coupled with the other rules... well let's just say that staying in the BL is only done by choice.
Of course nobody is going to be ticketed because they aren't in the bike lane.* But that really wasn't my point here. I was responding to this:
Originally Posted by mrrabbit
...We already have the RIGHT to share the road with all other vehicles...
...but nah, let's trade that in for bike lanes and isolated bike lanes.
In California, we actually don't have any such absolute right to share the road if the road is equipped with a bike lane; that's all I was saying.

*Our local cops have even said in casual conversation that they aren't going to be picky about the details of the vehicle code as it applies to bikes, so long as you seem to be making an effort to comply with the general intent of the laws.
ro-monster is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 12:34 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ro-monster
...In California, we actually don't have any such absolute right to share the road if the road is equipped with a bike lane; that's all I was saying.

[/SIZE]
Just like cars. Try driving at 45 in the fast lane in the freeway. First police officer that comes along is going to ticket you.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 11-02-12, 04:29 PM
  #55  
On your right
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 735

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hagen2456
This is a deeply disquieting post. The paranoia it shows is incomprehensible to me, and I hope for the rest of you that it is so for you too.
You hope for the rest of us that it is "so" for us, too?
Incomprehensible? Why would you wish others would share your lack of comprehension?
Deeply disquieting? Why would you wish others would find the expression of an idea to be "deeply disquieting"?
Daves_Not_Here is offline  
Old 11-03-12, 08:48 AM
  #56  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
Just like cars. Try driving at 45 in the fast lane in the freeway. First police officer that comes along is going to ticket you.

All depends on the conditions at the time, under ideal conditions you may have a point, but my personally seeing motorists doing that speed in the fast lane downhill in a whiteout/blizzard/snow covered road condition was watching an act of dangerous bravado.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 11-03-12, 08:57 AM
  #57  
2 Fat 2 Furious
 
contango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: England
Posts: 3,996

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport RIP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Daves_Not_Here
Actually not singling anyone out in particular -- I've just noticed that when a cycling-specific investment is announced somewhere, the local cyclists seem to come out of the woodwork to complain. I'm thinking of the bikeway on the Miami Causeway and various bikelanes and sharrows.
Maybe people are cynical. Maybe people have experienced something similar and see how it doesn't work as well as one might think.

When I was newer to cycling I would use segregated lanes wherever possible and accept that I had to stop every 100 yards to cross a side road. Now I'm faster I'm aware that firstly I'd rather not be stopping every 100 yards and secondly if I'm riding around 20mph I'd rather share space with cars doing 30 than with pedestrians doing 3 along with associated issues such as children and dogs.
__________________
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
contango is offline  
Old 11-03-12, 02:04 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832

Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daves_Not_Here
You hope for the rest of us that it is "so" for us, too?
Incomprehensible? Why would you wish others would share your lack of comprehension?
Deeply disquieting? Why would you wish others would find the expression of an idea to be "deeply disquieting"?
Your questions suggest that you don't find any of it disquieting.
hagen2456 is offline  
Old 11-04-12, 06:07 AM
  #59  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by telkanuru
I'm gonna go grab some popcorn for this.
These are always my favorite.
sudo bike is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bekologist
Advocacy & Safety
6
08-22-12 11:04 PM
Andy_K
Commuting
34
04-23-12 04:46 PM
CCrew
Commuting
41
09-15-11 04:13 AM
mikeybikes
Advocacy & Safety
30
05-20-11 07:06 AM
artimus
Advocacy & Safety
1
06-05-10 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.