Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-27-05, 04:07 PM   #1
bluejack
Know Your Turf
Thread Starter
 
bluejack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Bikes: Surly LHT
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Riding Drunk in Washington State

Not that I advocate it, or recommend it, but I did find it interesting that there are special provisions in the Washington State legal code apparently *protecting* the right to ride while intoxicated! Note especially provision #2. Of course, there's also provision #3... but observe that there can be NO FINE! Very interesting reading, the Washington State Legal Code.

(Original available at: http://www.leg.wa.gov/RCW/index.cfm?...action=section )

Quote:
Originally Posted by WashingtonStateLegalCode
RCW 46.61.790
Intoxicated bicyclists.

(1) A law enforcement officer may offer to transport a bicycle rider who appears to be under the influence of alcohol or any drug and who is walking or moving along or within the right of way of a public roadway, unless the bicycle rider is to be taken into protective custody under RCW 70.96A.120. The law enforcement officer offering to transport an intoxicated bicycle rider under this section shall:

(a) Transport the intoxicated bicycle rider to a safe place; or

(b) Release the intoxicated bicycle rider to a competent person.

(2) The law enforcement officer shall not provide the assistance offered if the bicycle rider refuses to accept it. No suit or action may be commenced or prosecuted against the law enforcement officer, law enforcement agency, the state of Washington, or any political subdivision of the state for any act resulting from the refusal of the bicycle rider to accept this assistance.

(3) The law enforcement officer may impound the bicycle operated by an intoxicated bicycle rider if the officer determines that impoundment is necessary to reduce a threat to public safety, and there are no reasonable alternatives to impoundment. The bicyclist will be given a written notice of when and where the impounded bicycle may be reclaimed. The bicycle may be reclaimed by the bicycle rider when the bicycle rider no longer appears to be intoxicated, or by an individual who can establish ownership of the bicycle. The bicycle must be returned without payment of a fee. If the bicycle is not reclaimed within thirty days, it will be subject to sale or disposal consistent with agency procedures.
bluejack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 04:20 PM   #2
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,689
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 281 Post(s)
thassss it... Im' moving.
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 04:20 PM   #3
Treespeed
Warning:Mild Peril
 
Treespeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle Refugee in Los Angeles
Bikes: Cilo, Surly Pacer, Kona Fire Mountain w/Bob Trailer, Scattante
Posts: 3,171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I remember a bunch of us messengers celebrating this law when it went into effect, by of course riding drunk. I think the law was put in place because of the obvious disparity between the dangers of drunk driver and a drunk rider. One is homicidal and the other merely comical or at worse suicidal. Though I guess some places still hold riding while drunk to be as serious as the driving offense. I had a friend that got nailed for riding drunk in Germany and it's still on his record.
__________________
Non semper erit aestas.
Treespeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 04:34 PM   #4
bluejack
Know Your Turf
Thread Starter
 
bluejack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Bikes: Surly LHT
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To be fair, I would say that seriously intoxicating riding can be a hazard to anyone on the road, pedestrian or motorist: a cyclist ramming a pedestrian can do real damage, and a motorist swerving to avoid an erratic cyclist can kill or be killed. I am frankly somewhat astonished by this law: I would be the first to say that the consequences should be less for cyclists than for motorists, and the intoxication levels measured differently, but seriously drunk riding is both dumb and dangerous, and probably not something anyone, cyclist or motorist would want to encourage.

But riding with a buzz on through the night streets? Not so bad. Not bad at all.
bluejack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 05:32 PM   #5
pnj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: seattle
Bikes:
Posts: 1,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
this came about because a drunk cyclist challange the courts. he was arrested for BUI (biking under..) and took it to court.

I have ridden very drunk on my bike before. very very.
I make it a rule to keep my butt on my seat when I do though. just for my own saftey. otherwise I'd do stupid stuff like I do when I'm sober and end up falling really hard. (like I do when I'm sober)
pnj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 05:37 PM   #6
pnj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: seattle
Bikes:
Posts: 1,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
keep in mind, when I'm riding drunk, it's not in the middle of the day....

the last time I rode really drunk was christmas eve 2003. it was 3:00 AM.
pnj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 06:39 PM   #7
glowingrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
bah, DUI is DUI if your on the road I say. If you drunk get on the sidewalk and at worst you get ticket for riding on the sidewalk and PI or disorderly.
If you ##ck up while riding drunk and some hapless passerby finds you in thier grill dead or mangled you and their grill are absolutely not the only ones affected, most people are decent and many a decent person will have lasting problems with having been placed in a situation where they were involved in causing death or trauma even if completly not at fault. DUI is indefensible idiocy in any public safety matter.
glowingrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 07:34 PM   #8
bluejack
Know Your Turf
Thread Starter
 
bluejack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Bikes: Surly LHT
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowingrod
bah, DUI is DUI if your on the road I say. If you drunk get on the sidewalk and at worst you get ticket for riding on the sidewalk and PI or disorderly.
Riding on the sidewalk is also permissible in Seattle:

SMC 11.44.120 Riding on sidewalk or public path.

Every person operating a bicycle upon any sidewalk or public path shall
operate the same in a careful and prudent manner and at a rate of speed
no greater than is reasonable and proper under the conditions existing
at the point of operation, taking into account the amount and character
of pedestrian traffic, grade and width of sidewalk or public path, and
condition of surface, and shall obey all traffic-control devices. Every
person operating a bicycle upon a sidewalk or public path shall yield
the right-of-way to any pedestrian thereon, and shall give an audible
signal before overtaking and passing any pedestrian.

(source
bluejack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-05, 07:46 PM   #9
Dchiefransom
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes:
Posts: 6,201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
I notice that it says these are the options, unless we are "taken into protective custody".
Dchiefransom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 01:05 AM   #10
bluejack
Know Your Turf
Thread Starter
 
bluejack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Bikes: Surly LHT
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
True, but if you reference the section on protective custody, it is specific to cases in which the person is an active hazard to himself, ie., so drunk he needs to be rushed to a hospital to have his stomach pumped, or wacked out on pcp and liable to throw himself in front of a car as an act of mindless bravado. There are no criminal penalties in the protective custody section.
bluejack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 01:11 AM   #11
KrisPistofferson
Immoderator
 
KrisPistofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: POS Tennessee
Bikes: Gary Fisher Simple City 8, Litespeed Obed
Posts: 7,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The way I'm reading it is that it applies to not just alcohol? Like you could be tripping and they'd take you to a "babysitter"? That would be quite kooky.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikeforums
Your rights end where another poster's feelings begin.
KrisPistofferson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 01:12 AM   #12
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejack
True, but if you reference the section on protective custody, it is specific to cases in which the person is an active hazard to himself, ie., so drunk he needs to be rushed to a hospital to have his stomach pumped, or wacked out on pcp and liable to throw himself in front of a car as an act of mindless bravado. There are no criminal penalties in the protective custody section.
It also applies if the individual through his intoxication creates a hazard to himslef by not having the needed faculties to operate a bicycle. Also bear in mind that this is also at the OFFICER'S discretion. If he feels that you pose a threat to yourself by riding drunk he CAN place you in "protective" custody. It's all up to the cop. If you're slobbering drunk hell yes you should be yanked, but a light buzz riding on a quiet street... enjoy
Quote:
Originally Posted by krispistoferson
The way I'm reading it is that it applies to not just alcohol? Like you could be tripping and they'd take you to a "babysitter"? That would be quite kooky.
Ain't no ********************** way I'm going NEAR a bike while tripping. I'll just stay in and watch Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Labyrinth, Legend, Heavy Metal or Willy Wonka as usual.
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 01:24 AM   #13
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I once saw a guy get a ticket for riding a horse drunk.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 05:33 AM   #14
Yoshi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The OP said to note provision 2. It sounds to me like provision 2 is meant to protect the officer, not the rider. If i'm not mistaken, it says that if a drunk rider refuses help and rides off into a tree, s/he can't sue the officer/state/whatever for the accident.
Yoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 05:52 AM   #15
lrzipris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Philadelphia suburb
Bikes:
Posts: 911
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejack
To be fair, I would say that seriously intoxicating riding can be a hazard to anyone on the road, pedestrian or motorist: a cyclist ramming a pedestrian can do real damage, and a motorist swerving to avoid an erratic cyclist can kill or be killed.
This reasoning--the danger of causing an accident involving others, particularly cars--is why an appellate court here in Pennsylvania held that a bicycle is a "vehicle" for DUI purposes. Even the court had to wrench the statutory language to reach its conclusion, there is some common sense to the court's logic.
lrzipris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 11:47 AM   #16
bluejack
Know Your Turf
Thread Starter
 
bluejack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Bikes: Surly LHT
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiyn
It also applies if the individual through his intoxication creates a hazard to himslef by not having the needed faculties to operate a bicycle. Also bear in mind that this is also at the OFFICER'S discretion. If he feels that you pose a threat to yourself by riding drunk he CAN place you in "protective" custody. It's all up to the cop. If you're slobbering drunk hell yes you should be yanked, but a light buzz riding on a quiet street... enjoy
Actually, the officer can only put you in protective custody if he believes you are in immediate danger of self-destruction and need hospital or other expert care. That protective custody is protection against yourself. If you're just a hazard to others, he's supposed to drive you home! Sweet! (But, yes, weird.)

And in no case are the kinds of criminal charges w/ accompanying insurance nightmares going to come down on you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
The OP said to note provision 2. It sounds to me like provision 2 is meant to protect the officer, not the rider.
Yes, I mainly meant to point to the first sentence: "The law enforcement officer shall not provide the assistance offered if the bicycle rider refuses to accept it." I picture it working like this.

OFFICER: "Please put your hands out to your sides. Ok. Now touch your right forefinger to your nose. No, your forefinger. No, your nose.... Ok, buddy. You're drunk. You're coming with me."

RIDER: "No thanks."

OFFICER: "Blast. Foiled again."
bluejack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 11:54 AM   #17
PhattTyre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: 07 Fisher Paragon, 00' Lemond Buenos Aries, Specialized Langster, Schwinn World Sport SS townie, 99 SS-Works single speed conversion, early 90s Raleigh roadie rain bike, 07 Fisher Rig, Trek 520, and a home-modified chopper
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had a class at Gonzaga U taught by a Spokane Police Officer. He told me that a drunk person on anything with wheels (skateboard, roller blades, bike, etc.) or a horse could get a DUI on a public roadway in the state of Washington. If they're on the sidewalk, no DUI. I think that's good. Riding drunk is a bad idea, but it's a whole lot better than driving drunk.
PhattTyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 04:22 PM   #18
derrickito
newfish
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle
Bikes: windsor, GT, tenkai
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
this is awesome. im printing this out and carrying it with me all the time

a group of us regularly ride every thursday night from westlake, and im usually the one carrying a bit of fire juice on me at all times. i usually dont take more than a bit, but for those times that i do, this might be handy

ill just hold it up drunk and demand a ride from a police officer

"YOU OWE ME A RIDE MISTER!"
derrickito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-05, 04:41 PM   #19
eubi
No Rocket Surgeon
 
eubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Corona and S. El Monte, CA
Bikes: Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
Posts: 1,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here's the skinny in CA:

21200.5. Notwithstanding Section 21200, it is unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle upon a highway while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or any drug, or under the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and any drug. Any person arrested for a violation of this section may request to have a chemical test made of the person's blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the alcoholic or drug content of that person's blood pursuant to Section 23612, and, if so requested, the arresting officer shall have the test performed. A conviction of a violation of this section shall be punished by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250). Violations of this section are subject to Section 13202.5.

21200. (a) Every person riding a bicycle upon a highway has all the rights and is subject to all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle by this division, including, but not limited to, provisions concerning driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages or drugs, and by Division 10 (commencing with Section 20000), Section 27400, Division 16.7 (commencing with Section 39000), Division 17 (commencing with Section 40000.1), and Division 18 (commencing with Section 42000), except those provisions which by their very nature can have no application.

...and the legal limit in CA is .08%. Unless you are driving a commercial vehicle, in which case it's .04%.

Last edited by eubi; 01-29-05 at 10:33 PM.
eubi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-05, 10:31 PM   #20
spang621
beer drinker
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: california
Bikes: trek 950
Posts: 116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist
I once saw a guy get a ticket for riding a horse drunk.

what about riding a drunk horse?
spang621 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-05, 01:48 AM   #21
Mtn Mike
Super Biker
 
Mtn Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Spokane WA
Bikes: 2008 Lapierre X-Lite, 2006 Serotta Coeur d’Acier, 2005 Independent Fabrication Steel Delux, 2003 Surly 1x1, 2003 Surly Cross Check, 1986 Schwin Worldsport SS commuter, 1980's Mongoose Supergoose
Posts: 1,183
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There's a good explination of different state laws on drunk cycling here at Velo News .

Personally, I'm glad I live in a state with sensible laws.
Mtn Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.