Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-02, 08:21 AM   #1
nathank
cycle-powered
Thread Starter
 
nathank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Posts: 1,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
U.S. Senate adopts pro-bike amendment

from BTA newsletter (http://www.bta4bikes.org)::
actually from April 12, 2002...

Message 8: BELIEVE IT OR NOT - U.S. SENATE ADOPTS PRO-BIKE AMENDMENT

It was only a matter of time until our leaders got the message

In the midst of a debate on the energy bill, the US Senate adopted an amendment promoting bicycling as a way to conserve energy. The amendment, introduced by Illinois Senator Richard Durbin and Maine Senator Susan Collins, established a new "Conserve By Bicycling" program within the US Department of Transportation.

The new project will oversee pilot programs across the country
designed to promote and document bicycling as a clean and responsible alternative to regional automotive travel. The program still needs approval by the US House and President Bush before it can be implemented.

For details go to http://www.bikeleague.org/mediacenter/medprs041202.htm
nathank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-02, 08:50 AM   #2
cycletourist
opinionated SOB
 
cycletourist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Branson, Missouri USA
Bikes:
Posts: 968
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
very cool.
cycletourist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-02, 08:52 AM   #3
RonH
Life is good
 
RonH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Bikes: My beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my 2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod
Posts: 16,117
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Thanks for the information. I like reading these kinds of articles. :thumbup:
__________________


The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy. - Psalm 103:8
RonH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-02, 09:17 AM   #4
LittleBigMan
Sumanitu taka owaci
 
LittleBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks, Nathan, very positive! I enjoy your posts.

I will read it through before I comment...
__________________
No worries
LittleBigMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-02, 09:29 AM   #5
RoAdRaGeR
I kill car drivers 4 fun!
 
RoAdRaGeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oregon (cycling heaven)
Bikes:
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
ITS ABOUT TIME!
I hope this amendment helps to spur the building of more biking trails or lanes, because im tired of sharing the road with these speed demon car freaks. This amendment should also give cyclists priority when it comes to crossing intersections, etc.
Anyways this is very cool!
RoAdRaGeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-02, 11:16 AM   #6
Oxymoron
Poky
 
Oxymoron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pocahontas, Iowa
Bikes: 1999/2000 Rans Rocket - red, of course, and a forest green 2001 Specialized Expedition w/ 2" slicks, fenders and Jaand baskets
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This is a great amendment, but its support is based solely on energy conservation. If this becomes a non-issue for what ever reason, this support will be yanked about as fast as we heard of it. But hey, I'm not looking a gift horse in the mouth...I just love that it's now a political issue--both biking and energy conservation.

I wonder when the last time Pres. Bush rode a bike was? Which brings me to another question--does dragging a bike beneath your car constitute riding ON a bike?:confused:
Oxymoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-02, 06:29 AM   #7
jmlee
serial mender
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bonn, Germany
Bikes:
Posts: 416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Boy, I am sure glad we never gave Bill Clinton the line-item veto he was hankering for. Surely, Mr. "Conservation is no sound energy policy" Cheney would have instructed Bush to strike the amendment.

This happened to us, more or less, in Wisconsin about 4 years ago. I don't recall the details very well, but in one of the yearly budgets, the Wisconsin House had put in some nice sound dollars for more bicycle paths and additional mass transit. Wisconsin has one of the most powerful line-item vetoes in the nation--the governor can all but re-write legislation with it. As a governor who loved to use his line-item veto power, Tommy Thompson moved most the bicycle and mass-transit money into highway construction (i.e. into the pocket of his campaign contributors).

Let's hope this bill makes it all the way.

Cheers.
jmlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-02, 09:52 AM   #8
ViciousCycle
Chicago Cyclist
 
ViciousCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Bikes: My frame is covered in reflective tape. After adding ridiculously large handlebars, a comfy seat, and enough carrying capacity to haul a Thanksgiving grocery run home, the manufacturer wouldn't recognize it.
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The executive director of a bicycle advocacy organization in Illinois worked with Durbin's staff to come up with the proposal for the amendment. I'm a member of that organization, and work like this makes me feel that my membership dues are being well spent.
ViciousCycle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-02, 06:03 PM   #9
LittleBigMan
Sumanitu taka owaci
 
LittleBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am glad to see someone in Washington who actually believes the bicycle is competative with the automobile. (I already know it is!)

I read a "recommendation" written by an independent advisory group which outlined the feasability of various solutions to urban traffic problems. The purpose of the study was to help transportation planners spend their money most wisely, to get the "most bang for the buck" in solving overcrowding on our roads.

Bottom line of report: cars are king, and will continue to be. However, the study recommended allocating some token money
for the construction of "bicycle facilities" because of the positive effect their construction seems to have in public relations. Yet, the study flatly declared bicycling to be of no real value in reducing traffic congestion.

I have personally found bicycling to be of tremendous value in reducing traffic congestion. That is, I never seem to find myself cussing the traffic jams. If I want to take a quieter route, I know all the back streets through every neighborhood.

Stress is a word I find alien to me in my commute.
__________________
No worries
LittleBigMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 PM.