Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-13-13, 12:48 PM   #26
GrouchoWretch
Slob
 
GrouchoWretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, and bailing out isn't easy because the curb is a 6" edge trap.

People pelt down Jones-Maltsberger Road (in my pic) like there's free beer and fried chicken at the end of it.
GrouchoWretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 12:54 PM   #27
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Free beer and chicken, i am on my way.
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:07 PM   #28
Doohickie 
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
The road I showed is Bryant Irvin Road in Fort Worth. Going south from Fort Worth's west side, it crosses a large rail yard, then has a single intersection for a feeder road into apartments, then crosses the river, so for about a half mile there's almost no cross traffic and people treat it like a freeway.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:22 PM   #29
GrouchoWretch
Slob
 
GrouchoWretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The road I showed passes right by the police substation about half a mile back of that spot. Patrol cars everywhere, all the time. People still crazy.
GrouchoWretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:33 PM   #30
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrouchoWretch View Post
The road I showed passes right by the police substation about half a mile back of that spot. Patrol cars everywhere, all the time. People still crazy.
I walk past the main police station of the city twice a day and its arguably one of the most dangerous places to walk in the downtown part of the city. I blame that more on a poorly designed highway on/off system mixed with the inability for police to stop every single person for hard to give tickets (entering a crosswalk when pedestrians are present*, rolling stop signs, etc)

*sort of related anecdote: during my driving license test I tried to wait for a crosswalk to be clear of pedestrians (an old lady was crossing) and the guy testing me asked why I was waiting. "You're holding up traffic!" "*adenoidal voice* No sir, I'm obeying the law *adjust masking taped glasses and pocket protector*".
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:40 PM   #31
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
On my commute home, coming off the MUP, there is about 1/2 mile stretch where the sidewalk is the official bike lane. Luckily, it's up about a 4% hill, so I'm not going too much faster than the few pedestrians in the area, anyway. I still have to be very leery of right hooks, and cars coming out of the parking lots (it's one long row of strip malls). There's room to widen the road and put in a bike lane on both sides, but I doubt it will ever happen.

Just take the sidewalk and be aware that you are now the faster moving traffic (mostly), and watch those side streets!
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 01:59 PM   #32
Crazyed..27
I Biked Today
 
Crazyed..27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: My Place
Bikes: 1998 Lemond Zurich, Redline Conquest Pro, Kilo TT
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When I approach situations like these...I shoulder check to analyze traffic behind me...then I make my decision to stay in the lane or hop up on the sidewalk.
Crazyed..27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 05:02 PM   #33
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daves_Not_Here View Post
Agreeing with everyone here, and it sounds like you already have the answer. You have thousands of miles of commuting experience -- I'd say your gut trumps any contrary advice given here.

As to sidewalks being as dangerous or more so than streets, that opinion is often expressed but I think it's a canard. If a pedestrian can walk safely on a sidewalk, so a cyclist can ride safely, assuming they are willing to slow down and yield to cross traffic like a pedestrian.
That is often a huge if. Few cyclists actually maintina a speed as slow as someone walking. Even at those speeds a bike cannot stop nearly as quickly as a walker.

Many do maintain a speed that is close enough for a sidewalk with decent sightlines.

But there are plenty of sidewalks with really poor sightlines, ones passing small businesses with parking in the rear come to mind. Those are situations where a driver cannot see until half way across the sidewalk. (I can think of one such where to the driver has decent visibility on the left, but on the right the building come to the sidewalk. Oh and this is the exit from the drive through of a Jack-in-the-box).

There is a walking path in Palos Verdes that seems wonderful, until you realize just how many driveways you are crossing and how restricted the sightlines are.

Not at all to say that the sidewalk is always bad, just that sometimes it is quite dangerous and those dangers are often more subtle than the ones on the street.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 05:13 PM   #34
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Correct. A safe cyclist will adjust his/her riding technique, to include speed, to the traffic environment.

A cyclist who wants to prove a sidewalk or sidepath is dangerous will ride using the same speeds and right-of-way that he uses on the roadway, and make no adjustments to adapt to the cycling environment.

One alleged safety expert concluded that the risk rate of sidepath (AKA sidewalk) cycling was at least 1,000 times greater on the sidepath than on the roadway, based on just such a "test" ride. This anecdote of idiotic cycling described as a scientific "test" of sidewalk/sidepath cycling safety has been reported in all the various editions of John Forester's books Effective Cycling and Bicycle Transportation. It is no wonder that so many self proclaimed cycling safety experts repeat the mantra of the dangers of any use of a sidewalk for any kind of cycling.
Chit,

I can't ride a sidepath stupid enough to get up to 1000 times as dangerous. Only section of 'path' I can think of where a sane person would be at even near that risk is the Boardwalk near the Santa Monica Pier. (Boardwalk has the problem with gaps between the boards). And that risk gets big only at night. But I still found that better than fighting through 2 lanes of traffic on a 60mph road with potholes (at night of course).

You are totally right, ride one place in a style appropriate for somewhere else and bad things can happen.

But I can get teh street to be 1,000,000 times more dangerous than the sidewalk doing that. After all if I'm on hte sidewalk I don't even think about stopping without warning to take a drink out of my waterbottle or check a route sheet. Stopping without warning in the street is a good way to die.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-13, 05:27 PM   #35
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrouchoWretch View Post
I would rather cut through a parking lot if possible but will take the sidewalk if necessary.

Here is one bridge where I definitely take the sidewalk at night.

While I recently 'seem to have overcome' my fear of heights and close spaces, I would stay on the road. Because, There is more room to maneuver.

My father even started in on me again today, about riding in traffic. He still doesn't understand.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 05:21 AM   #36
Doohickie 
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmv2 View Post
*sort of related anecdote: during my driving license test I tried to wait for a crosswalk to be clear of pedestrians (an old lady was crossing) and the guy testing me asked why I was waiting. "You're holding up traffic!" "*adenoidal voice* No sir, I'm obeying the law *adjust masking taped glasses and pocket protector*".
Some testers do that on purpose to see if you can be flustered into making a bad decision.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 07:50 AM   #37
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doohickie View Post
Some testers do that on purpose to see if you can be flustered into making a bad decision.
Aw, now you ruined my story.
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 10:34 AM   #38
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
has been reported in all the various editions of John Forester
I invoke Godwin.

PS: actual pedestrians in portland have been killed at a far higher rate than cyclists.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 12:01 PM   #39
thiocyclist
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado, USA
Bikes: 2011 Windsor Oxford, 1974 Schwinn Continental
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, I tried a new route yesterday. It did a better job of keeping me on streets that felt safe for the majority the trip. Still, there was literally one block I either had to ride in crazy traffic or go sidewalk. I stayed in the road and despite things being bumper-to-bumper and me generally keeping pace for that one block, some guy still made repeated attempts to pass me. Certain streets just have really aggressive mentalities I guess. Plus, there is a crazy hill after this point on the route that badly needs repaved. This is fine uphill, but downhill it really freaks me out, especially because it's still a relatively busy spot. So I may keep my old route, sidewalk and all.

A note about riding on the sidewalk: for my own safety as well as that of pedestrians, I tend to go from 5-8 mph depending on who else is on it. This speed is still relatively fast compared to a pedestrian, but it leaves plenty of room for error. I was telling a friend yesterday about all the wacky things pedestrians do, myself included, because they don't feel as obligated to see what's around them. It's funny how many people don't even walk in a straight line! They zig and zag... rather than risk hitting them I will just coast until I feel good to tell them I'm there and pass with a wide berth. While the pedestrians can be an annoyance (to my being an annoyance), the most dangerous thing is definitely the turning cars solely focused on arriving at their destination and not seeing who is on the sidewalk.
thiocyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 12:06 PM   #40
GrouchoWretch
Slob
 
GrouchoWretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thiocyclist View Post
Well, I tried a new route yesterday. It did a better job of keeping me on streets that felt safe for the majority the trip. Still, there was literally one block I either had to ride in crazy traffic or go sidewalk. I stayed in the road and despite things being bumper-to-bumper and me generally keeping pace for that one block, some guy still made repeated attempts to pass me. Certain streets just have really aggressive mentalities I guess. Plus, there is a crazy hill after this point on the route that badly needs repaved. This is fine uphill, but downhill it really freaks me out, especially because it's still a relatively busy spot. So I may keep my old route, sidewalk and all.

A note about riding on the sidewalk: for my own safety as well as that of pedestrians, I tend to go from 5-8 mph depending on who else is on it. This speed is still relatively fast compared to a pedestrian, but it leaves plenty of room for error. I was telling a friend yesterday about all the wacky things pedestrians do, myself included, because they don't feel as obligated to see what's around them. It's funny how many people don't even walk in a straight line! They zig and zag... rather than risk hitting them I will just coast until I feel good to tell them I'm there and pass with a wide berth. While the pedestrians can be an annoyance (to my being an annoyance), the most dangerous thing is definitely the turning cars solely focused on arriving at their destination and not seeing who is on the sidewalk.
What town in Colorado?

I've spent some time in Ft C, and although it is sprawly, I also get the impression it's trying very hard to be bike-friendly, and churlish motorist antics would be frowned upon.
GrouchoWretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 02:15 PM   #41
thiocyclist
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado, USA
Bikes: 2011 Windsor Oxford, 1974 Schwinn Continental
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm in Denver and I live 5 miles from where I work. In warm weather it's really good riding. I've been doing it in winter too, not as much fun but still better than driving.
thiocyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 09:22 PM   #42
Doohickie 
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmv2 View Post
Aw, now you ruined my story.
I failed my first driving test because of a dipwad like that. Replaying it in my head after getting home, it was obvious he was doing it on purpose.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-13, 09:56 PM   #43
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thiocyclist View Post
I'm all behind the idea that cyclists largely belong on the street, not on the sidewalk. Sidewalks present at least equal danger and arguably more variables than the road (in my experience; not citing a study or anything).

...And yet. There are a couple of places in Denver on my commute where I just don't feel safe riding on the street, so I take the sidewalk. I always yield to pedestrians, and I have to be extra mindful of turning vehicles that aren't looking for me. But for this two-tenths of a mile or so I just don't feel good on the street because the drivers are always in a rush hour mentality, save sleepy weekends. There is a even a wide bus lane and that is not very safe, because then I have to jockey between buses and parked cars (and rogue drivers trying to save time by using this lane). It's scary! And I consider myself a competent commuter with several thousand miles of street experience.

What do you do in that situation? Suck it up and just learn to deal with it, or adapt to sidewalk riding for a brief distance like I have? Is there a third way? What is it?
Can you mention the stretch of road you are referring to, that inside the city? What specific portions of the road. I want see it on go on Google Maps to take a look at it.

Last edited by Chris516; 02-14-13 at 10:01 PM.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 11:14 AM   #44
thiocyclist
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado, USA
Bikes: 2011 Windsor Oxford, 1974 Schwinn Continental
Posts: 211
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Between 5th and 7th on Broadway. Broadway is one-way with a bus lane. The bus lane can be okay for bikes during slow hours but in busy hours the buses will sometimes push you into parked cars (plus they spew so much exhaust and there are so many of them), or else individual car traffic will merge into that lane to get around some traffic or make a turn.
thiocyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 11:49 AM   #45
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
I invoke Godwin.

PS: actual pedestrians in portland have been killed at a far higher rate than cyclists.
NHTSA data reports that pedestrian fatalities in Portland are 1.6 per 100,000, while cyclist deaths are approximately 20 per 100,000. Seems your swag is biased.
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 06:15 PM   #46
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thiocyclist View Post
Between 5th and 7th on Broadway. Broadway is one-way with a bus lane. The bus lane can be okay for bikes during slow hours but in busy hours the buses will sometimes push you into parked cars (plus they spew so much exhaust and there are so many of them), or else individual car traffic will merge into that lane to get around some traffic or make a turn.
Unless the Google Maps street view gives a false impression, it looks relatively tame, compared to the way the people in the DC-Metro region drive. The DC-Metro region is the most congested region, on the road, in the U.S., with speed limits on the main roads', 30-50mph. But with lots of 'traffic control' elements(traffic lights, stop signs, business/personal driveway cutouts)

Are you allowed to ride in the bus lane, since you are uneasy about riding in the main stream of traffic?

Last edited by Chris516; 02-16-13 at 07:54 PM.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 07:08 PM   #47
Crazyed..27
I Biked Today
 
Crazyed..27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: My Place
Bikes: 1998 Lemond Zurich, Redline Conquest Pro, Kilo TT
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
NHTSA data reports that pedestrian fatalities in Portland are 1.6 per 100,000, while cyclist deaths are approximately 20 per 100,000. Seems your swag is biased.
Linkage?
Crazyed..27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 07:30 PM   #48
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
For the accident rate of cyclist in Portland : http://grist.files.wordpress.com/201...ike-final1.pdf

For the rate of pedestrian fatalities: t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign2011
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 09:10 PM   #49
009jim
Senior Member
 
009jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Bikes: Giant CRX3, Trek 7100
Posts: 1,288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Any city which is serious about cycling facilities will permit cycling on the side walk. The alternative would be to have a separate bicycle path in every single street. If you ride to get to work, inevitably you'll get to the end of the available dedicated cycling paths and still have a mile or so to get to your actual work premises. The safest place in many of these situations is on the side walk. If it were safe to be on the road then there wouldn't be any side walk and pedestrians would also walk on the road. You must however ride at a slow speed.
009jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-13, 09:22 PM   #50
GrouchoWretch
Slob
 
GrouchoWretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
For the accident rate of cyclist in Portland : http://grist.files.wordpress.com/201...ike-final1.pdf

For the rate of pedestrian fatalities: t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign2011
Data not comparable. See p. 34 of Pucher and Buehler for an explanation of why. Briefly, their denominator is only daily bike commuters, while the numerator is all bike fatalities, whether or not the victims were daily bike commuters or even commuting at the time. This inflates the apparent mortality rate, as the authors note. You can't compare this measure with the one you cited for pedestrians. You can only compare their numbers against each other, by city, as they did.
GrouchoWretch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM.