Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-13, 02:21 PM   #51
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Don't ya mean that your kneejerk reaction is - representatives, no matter what their background, who hold a different opinion than your own "don't know any better" and are unqualified for office, even when they are elected by the people in their district and may even be representing their constituents' views?
1. Residents complain about bikes on one section of road.
2. Reps propose banning bikes on large section of roads.

How is that not knee jerk? How does that represent their constituents' views beyond the people who complained?
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-13, 02:40 PM   #52
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmv2 View Post
1. Residents complain about bikes on one section of road.
2. Reps propose banning bikes on large section of roads.

How is that not knee jerk? How does that represent their constituents' views beyond the people who complained?
Probably better than emails from outraged cyclists from Portlandia and other far off environs.

I'm not supporting the proposed ban, but only point out that smarmy comments and emails from "educated cyclists" about the education level of the representative, his"lack of smarts" and/or being "unqualified for office" are not going to defeat this proposal but if sent to the representative in question are more likely to get his dander up.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-13, 02:57 PM   #53
kmv2
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Probably better than emails from outraged cyclists from Portlandia and other far off environs.

I'm not supporting the proposed ban, but only point out that smarmy comments and emails from "educated cyclists" about the education level of the representative, his"lack of smarts" and/or being "unqualified for office" are not going to defeat this proposal but if sent to the representative in question are more likely to get his dander up.
Probably better yeah, that's why I'm not emailing them from Canadia. They are still idiots though, educated or not.

Thats just like, my opinion, man.
kmv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-13, 03:53 PM   #54
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,947
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 187 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Duplicate post
One would think that you would have learned how to delete a post by now.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-13, 04:07 PM   #55
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
One would think that you would have learned how to delete a post by now.
You "think" too much. I tried before, it didn't work. So sue me.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-13, 12:13 AM   #56
ChasH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Bikes:
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Unenforceable proposal.
ChasH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-13, 06:31 PM   #57
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Given the exceptions listed, I suspect the citizens' complaints are/may be the result of encounters with cycling club group activity/"training" rides. A similar proposal was made several years ago in Iowa because of a state legislator's personal unpleasant encounter with members of a cycling club on the highway near Ames. I believe it was never passed.
this happened in Florida. A mandatory bike lane law was blitzkrieged through the legislature, and on the governors desk which he signed before cycling advocacy could effectively rally against it. MBL in florida now.

-----------

Some eloquent Missouri cyclists need to get on that pronto. I was able to help successfully defeat proposed mandatory shoulder and bike lane laws in Washington state by writing solid rejections of the proposals to all the sponsors of the bills, bike advocates and rallied local outrage among other cyclists. It worked in Washington state, the bill got dropped.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-13, 10:48 AM   #58
DirtRoadRunner
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Bikes:
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Interview with Rep. Korman: http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dai...n_missouri.php

Quote:
Originally Posted by excerpts from Riverfront Times Article
"There were tensions to begin with," he says regarding the implementation of bike paths and related property disputes. "It really aggravates those folks when they see them riding their bicycles on roads and not using the trails that they fought against for so long."

But Korman says it can be incredible dangerous when cyclists and drivers share the road. "That's just the laws of physics," he says of potential collisions between large vehicles and bikes.

"It's not only devastating to a cyclist getting hit," he says. "It's also devastating to a motorist that hits the cyclist. It happens too often.... A lot of bicycles are out there and sometimes they get hit and injured. It's very impacting to the family of the cyclist...and very impacting for the motorist."

Korman says he has heard enough complaints from constituents.

"Finally, I just tried to look at a legislative way to help resolve the issue," he says.
I find it interesting that he doesn't mention the 800 or so motor vehicle fatalities that occur every year in Missouri. Apparently it is only impacting if a car and bike collide - not if a car and car collides (or a car hits something else). Cyclists fatalities are pretty rare in Missouri, usually < 10 a year.

He just doesn't understand that its incredibly dangerous when CARS use the road, and decides to try to ban bikes instead.
DirtRoadRunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-13, 01:32 PM   #59
CommuteCommando
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium
Posts: 3,010
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
And to think I used to like Missouri.
I've met several nice people from MO. None of them were politicians.
CommuteCommando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-13, 03:19 PM   #60
agent pombero
Mmm hm!
 
agent pombero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 1,164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Repubs: Keepin' Missouri fat is our job!
agent pombero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 AM.