Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Politician thinks cyclists cause more pollution because they "breathe more".

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Politician thinks cyclists cause more pollution because they "breathe more".

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-13, 12:09 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 705

Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dougmc
Bikes beat trains for transporting humans. (Here's a citation though it doesn't give much detail.) Especially if the cyclist is going 12 mph rather than trying to go 24 mph.

A train might win for transporting cargo, however.

As for the politician, what he initially said was technically accurate -- a cyclist does emit more CO2 during a ride than they do just sitting there, so if we consider CO2 to be a pollutant, by virtue of going on a bike ride, you *are* creating more pollution than you would if you took a nap instead. It's a stupid point to make, as humans emit far less CO2 than a car, but it's technically correct.

But then he got it wrong when he said that a cyclist emits more CO2 than a driver in a car. Unless he was talking about only the CO2 emitted by the humans involved and ignoring that from the car? That would be a stupid way of looking at it.

But then he got it right in his apology.
Also the fact that CO2 is one component of auto exhaust.

Humans don't emit any SOx, NOx, VOC's, etc. Our bodies alone don't sweat or bleed hydrocarbons like motor oil and gasoline, cooling fluid glycol, brake, steering and transmission hydraulic fluids all over the place and contaminate storm sewers and soil.
kmv2 is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 01:14 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Posts: 3,078

Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by kmv2

The gov't basically pays electric vehicles to go on the road and provides the roads for them. Yet, they want to tax another mode of transport that provides similar benefits.

A $25 tax is nothing. A $25 tax does nothing.
Good Point
CommuteCommando is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 01:49 PM
  #53  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by dougmc
But then he got it right in his apology.
Immaterial to the ranters; they continue to beat this dead horse.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 02:25 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
kmv2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 705

Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Immaterial to the ranters; they continue to beat this dead horse.
Yeah aside from the fact that he still doesn't "get it".

From his reply:
The idea of bicyclists paying for some of the infrastructure they are using is one which merits consideration
"Hey, sorry you're right my CO2 comment was silly and inappropriate. You know what, in addition to the CO2 confusion, I also don't understand how infrastructure is paid for. However, please stay off of the road because you don't pay for it. Thanks! PS. I still didn't answer your original query or address your numerous counter points to the proposed tax."
kmv2 is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 02:27 PM
  #55  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
I would be willing to consider paying something for infrastructure if they had the guts to raise the gas tax to the point of paying for roads. And also had a road tax on the trucks that actually cause all the damage to the roads. And priced parking high enough that it pays for parking spaces

Other than that, I'm easily satisfied
unterhausen is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 03:11 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078

Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
This official would have a stronger case for CO2 emissions if he pointed out cyclists probably take more showers and launder more clothing (hot water / electricity usage.) Problem is, making people feel guilty about exercising (because it's "bad" for the environment) is probably a bad thing from a public policy standpoint.

I also completely agree about the federal and state governments subsidizing hyrbrids and electric cars. Those drivers aren't being asked to pay for the infrastructure and enjoy significant perks in many cases (tax breaks, free charging stations, dedicated parking etc.) Until that changes I don't think you can expect cyclists (who use no fossil fuels) to pay a dedicated tax for cycling infrastructure.

Last edited by Dunbar; 03-05-13 at 03:17 PM.
Dunbar is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 04:45 PM
  #57  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I would be willing to consider paying something for infrastructure if they had the guts to raise the gas tax to the point of paying for roads. And also had a road tax on the trucks that actually cause all the damage to the roads. And priced parking high enough that it pays for parking spaces

Other than that, I'm easily satisfied
If it is equality they want, then start by cutting property taxes for cyclist by a fair amount. Then add the a new purchase tax law for everyone. Since these guys like $25 for bicycles, that is close to $1.00 per pound. So modify the vehicle purchase tax to $1.00 per pound:

$15 to $50 for bicycles
$2,000 to $7,000 cars and pickups
$???,???,??? how much do tractor trailers weigh

and to equalize gas taxes, cyclist could pay a $0.50 tax for each tire they buy.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 05:09 PM
  #58  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
If it is equality they want, then start by cutting property taxes for cyclist by a fair amount. Then add the a new purchase tax law for everyone. Since these guys like $25 for bicycles, that is close to $1.00 per pound. So modify the vehicle purchase tax to $1.00 per pound:

$15 to $50 for bicycles
$2,000 to $7,000 cars and pickups
$???,???,??? how much do tractor trailers weigh

and to equalize gas taxes, cyclist could pay a $0.50 tax for each tire they buy.
Is your next proposal that the individual income tax based on income be discarded to be replaced by an individual tax based on the individual's weight? Would sound good to cyclists who are skinny straws; and make as much sense as thinking that the proposed $25 bicycle tax had anything to do with its weight.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 05:30 PM
  #59  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
please don't talk about political parties in A&S. If you want to talk about who or who isn't the stupid party, that discussion can go to P&R
unterhausen is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 06:04 PM
  #60  
Full Member
 
La Tortue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
LOL, our politicians say dumb stuff, lie, etc, all the time. I'm simply giddy over the real issue which is Washington State has a bill under consideration to tax cyclists. It will simply be cake if it actually passes. Those who are opposed to spending beyond their means saw this coming for a long time. I'm of the belief we have gone beyond the tipping point and it will take economic collapse in order to start over and bring America back on track. Now if we could only see bills for Licensing and registration next!
La Tortue is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 06:24 PM
  #61  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Is your next proposal that the individual income tax based on income be discarded to be replaced by an individual tax based on the individual's weight? Would sound good to cyclists who are skinny straws; and make as much sense as thinking that the proposed $25 bicycle tax had anything to do with its weight.
The $25 amount is a random number pulled out of someones ass. Are you proposing individual taxes be based on random numbers pulled out of someones ass.

Or do you believe 18 wheelers and cyclist cause the same amount of road damage?

Are you not aware that many, maybe most states base their vehicle registration fees on vehicle weight. If the bicycle fee is based on those current rates, the bicycle fee would be about $1.00 to $3.00 depending on the state rate.

For my state, I would owe about $2.00 and still would not be allowed on the freeways.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 07:22 PM
  #62  
ECT
Member
 
ECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just another example of a politician trying to use "science" to hide his prejudice - this time against cyclist.
ECT is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 08:22 PM
  #63  
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ECT
Just another example of a politician trying to use "science" to hide his prejudice - this time against cyclist.
Well said
Chris516 is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 08:59 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
asmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261

Bikes: Salsa Vaya

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Are you kidding? The receipt of a response by .gov email to a private email is not an open invitation to leak its content to the blogosphere, anymore than a govt representative should broadcast to the world every private email they receive from the public.
That is ridiculous. My communication to a government official is private because I am a private citizen. A letter from a government official to me is not private if I choose to share it because he/she is a government official. You make it sound like I'm violating a tax official's privacy by showing my wife a letter he/she sent me.
asmac is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 09:09 PM
  #65  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
Are you not aware that many, maybe most states base their vehicle registration fees on vehicle weight. If the bicycle fee is based on those current rates, the bicycle fee would be about $1.00 to $3.00 depending on the state rate.
Hungary bases it on vehicle weight and engine displacement. I always thought that was a pretty fair idea.
sudo bike is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 09:11 PM
  #66  
ECT
Member
 
ECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by asmac
That is ridiculous. My communication to a government official is private because I am a private citizen. A letter from a government official to me is not private if I choose to share it because he/she is a government official. You make it sound like I'm violating a tax official's privacy by showing my wife a letter he/she sent me.
+1
ECT is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 09:14 PM
  #67  
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116

Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vol
Policemen cause more air pollution because they fart more.
I've been in pacelines that would lead me to believe police would lose that battle. Besides, if there's anything cyclists are full of, it's hot air. And beer.
sudo bike is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 10:00 PM
  #68  
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
I've been in pacelines that would lead me to believe police would lose that battle. Besides, if there's anything cyclists are full of, it's hot air. And beer.
Sorry, I was in a hurry and misread the title to be "Policemen..." instead of "Politician...", so couldn't resist posting that line. Now I'm back and just deleted it. (maybe could just change "policemen" to "Orcutt" and keep the post )

Last edited by vol; 03-05-13 at 10:14 PM.
vol is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 11:01 PM
  #69  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
The $25 amount is a random number pulled out of someones ass.
[SKIP]
Are you not aware that many, maybe most states base their vehicle registration fees on vehicle weight.
You are right, the $25 figure is a random number, picked to make a point. Vehicle weight doesn't have a dang thing to do with it except for some wooly headed day dreaming and naval gazing.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 11:13 PM
  #70  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
I've been in pacelines that would lead me to believe police would lose that battle. Besides, if there's anything cyclists are full of, it's hot air. And beer.
Cyclist cannot come remotely close to skydivers. Think of a bunch of people drinking beer on a Friday night, climbing into a small plane on Saturday morning, then climbing to 13,000 feet in a few minutes.

A lot like shaking a soda can and then opening it.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-05-13, 11:13 PM
  #71  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by asmac
You make it sound like I'm violating a tax official's privacy by showing my wife a letter he/she sent me.
You don't know the difference between showing a private letter to your wife vice posting it on a blog? OK, you've said enough on the issue.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 10:23 AM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ECT
Just another example of a politician trying to use "science" to hide his prejudice - this time against cyclist.
I think that's about the size of it...he's just a silly person who said a silly thing. Not much in it, really.
Commodus is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 11:25 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Commodus
I think that's about the size of it...he's just a silly person who said a silly thing. Not much in it, really.
Happens every day on the BikeForums! (And the Internet as a whole.)

He also seemed to have learned from the experience, which is a much rarer thing. Cut him some slack already. (Not you specifically, but everybody.)
dougmc is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 02:25 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
kookaburra1701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,345

Bikes: 2014 Specialized Dolce Triple, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 2012 Windsor Kensington 8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sudo bike
I've been in pacelines that would lead me to believe police would lose that battle. Besides, if there's anything cyclists are full of, it's hot air. And beer.
Nobody ever wants to be in a paceline with me after I've stopped at the burrito stand on the corner.
kookaburra1701 is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 05:23 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
asmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261

Bikes: Salsa Vaya

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
You don't know the difference between showing a private letter to your wife vice posting it on a blog? OK, you've said enough on the issue.
No vice involved. Sorry, ILB, but a letter to me is my property and I can do with it as I please so I don't see the difference and don't need the sender's invitation. That's legally true in general and imo, morally true for correspondence from a public official. It sucks to be them.

I'll stop when you stop.

To be fair the guy did recognize his own foolishness and back down so deserves a bit of slack. I see his letter made the Toronto Star so his fame has gone international. Politicians really do have to watch what they say.

Last edited by asmac; 03-06-13 at 05:29 PM.
asmac is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.