Politician thinks cyclists cause more pollution because they "breathe more".
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 705
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bikes beat trains for transporting humans. (Here's a citation though it doesn't give much detail.) Especially if the cyclist is going 12 mph rather than trying to go 24 mph.
A train might win for transporting cargo, however.
As for the politician, what he initially said was technically accurate -- a cyclist does emit more CO2 during a ride than they do just sitting there, so if we consider CO2 to be a pollutant, by virtue of going on a bike ride, you *are* creating more pollution than you would if you took a nap instead. It's a stupid point to make, as humans emit far less CO2 than a car, but it's technically correct.
But then he got it wrong when he said that a cyclist emits more CO2 than a driver in a car. Unless he was talking about only the CO2 emitted by the humans involved and ignoring that from the car? That would be a stupid way of looking at it.
But then he got it right in his apology.
A train might win for transporting cargo, however.
As for the politician, what he initially said was technically accurate -- a cyclist does emit more CO2 during a ride than they do just sitting there, so if we consider CO2 to be a pollutant, by virtue of going on a bike ride, you *are* creating more pollution than you would if you took a nap instead. It's a stupid point to make, as humans emit far less CO2 than a car, but it's technically correct.
But then he got it wrong when he said that a cyclist emits more CO2 than a driver in a car. Unless he was talking about only the CO2 emitted by the humans involved and ignoring that from the car? That would be a stupid way of looking at it.
But then he got it right in his apology.
Humans don't emit any SOx, NOx, VOC's, etc. Our bodies alone don't sweat or bleed hydrocarbons like motor oil and gasoline, cooling fluid glycol, brake, steering and transmission hydraulic fluids all over the place and contaminate storm sewers and soil.
#52
Senior Member
#53
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 705
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From his reply:
The idea of bicyclists paying for some of the infrastructure they are using is one which merits consideration
#55
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I would be willing to consider paying something for infrastructure if they had the guts to raise the gas tax to the point of paying for roads. And also had a road tax on the trucks that actually cause all the damage to the roads. And priced parking high enough that it pays for parking spaces
Other than that, I'm easily satisfied
Other than that, I'm easily satisfied
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This official would have a stronger case for CO2 emissions if he pointed out cyclists probably take more showers and launder more clothing (hot water / electricity usage.) Problem is, making people feel guilty about exercising (because it's "bad" for the environment) is probably a bad thing from a public policy standpoint.
I also completely agree about the federal and state governments subsidizing hyrbrids and electric cars. Those drivers aren't being asked to pay for the infrastructure and enjoy significant perks in many cases (tax breaks, free charging stations, dedicated parking etc.) Until that changes I don't think you can expect cyclists (who use no fossil fuels) to pay a dedicated tax for cycling infrastructure.
I also completely agree about the federal and state governments subsidizing hyrbrids and electric cars. Those drivers aren't being asked to pay for the infrastructure and enjoy significant perks in many cases (tax breaks, free charging stations, dedicated parking etc.) Until that changes I don't think you can expect cyclists (who use no fossil fuels) to pay a dedicated tax for cycling infrastructure.
Last edited by Dunbar; 03-05-13 at 03:17 PM.
#57
Cycle Year Round
I would be willing to consider paying something for infrastructure if they had the guts to raise the gas tax to the point of paying for roads. And also had a road tax on the trucks that actually cause all the damage to the roads. And priced parking high enough that it pays for parking spaces
Other than that, I'm easily satisfied
Other than that, I'm easily satisfied
$15 to $50 for bicycles
$2,000 to $7,000 cars and pickups
$???,???,??? how much do tractor trailers weigh
and to equalize gas taxes, cyclist could pay a $0.50 tax for each tire they buy.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#58
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
If it is equality they want, then start by cutting property taxes for cyclist by a fair amount. Then add the a new purchase tax law for everyone. Since these guys like $25 for bicycles, that is close to $1.00 per pound. So modify the vehicle purchase tax to $1.00 per pound:
$15 to $50 for bicycles
$2,000 to $7,000 cars and pickups
$???,???,??? how much do tractor trailers weigh
and to equalize gas taxes, cyclist could pay a $0.50 tax for each tire they buy.
$15 to $50 for bicycles
$2,000 to $7,000 cars and pickups
$???,???,??? how much do tractor trailers weigh
and to equalize gas taxes, cyclist could pay a $0.50 tax for each tire they buy.
#59
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
please don't talk about political parties in A&S. If you want to talk about who or who isn't the stupid party, that discussion can go to P&R
#60
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
LOL, our politicians say dumb stuff, lie, etc, all the time. I'm simply giddy over the real issue which is Washington State has a bill under consideration to tax cyclists. It will simply be cake if it actually passes. Those who are opposed to spending beyond their means saw this coming for a long time. I'm of the belief we have gone beyond the tipping point and it will take economic collapse in order to start over and bring America back on track. Now if we could only see bills for Licensing and registration next!
#61
Cycle Year Round
Is your next proposal that the individual income tax based on income be discarded to be replaced by an individual tax based on the individual's weight? Would sound good to cyclists who are skinny straws; and make as much sense as thinking that the proposed $25 bicycle tax had anything to do with its weight.
Or do you believe 18 wheelers and cyclist cause the same amount of road damage?
Are you not aware that many, maybe most states base their vehicle registration fees on vehicle weight. If the bicycle fee is based on those current rates, the bicycle fee would be about $1.00 to $3.00 depending on the state rate.
For my state, I would owe about $2.00 and still would not be allowed on the freeways.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That is ridiculous. My communication to a government official is private because I am a private citizen. A letter from a government official to me is not private if I choose to share it because he/she is a government official. You make it sound like I'm violating a tax official's privacy by showing my wife a letter he/she sent me.
#65
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hungary bases it on vehicle weight and engine displacement. I always thought that was a pretty fair idea.
#66
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That is ridiculous. My communication to a government official is private because I am a private citizen. A letter from a government official to me is not private if I choose to share it because he/she is a government official. You make it sound like I'm violating a tax official's privacy by showing my wife a letter he/she sent me.
#67
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#68
Senior Member
Sorry, I was in a hurry and misread the title to be "Policemen..." instead of "Politician...", so couldn't resist posting that line. Now I'm back and just deleted it. (maybe could just change "policemen" to "Orcutt" and keep the post )
Last edited by vol; 03-05-13 at 10:14 PM.
#69
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
You are right, the $25 figure is a random number, picked to make a point. Vehicle weight doesn't have a dang thing to do with it except for some wooly headed day dreaming and naval gazing.
#70
Cycle Year Round
A lot like shaking a soda can and then opening it.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#71
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
He also seemed to have learned from the experience, which is a much rarer thing. Cut him some slack already. (Not you specifically, but everybody.)
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,345
Bikes: 2014 Specialized Dolce Triple, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 2012 Windsor Kensington 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'll stop when you stop.
To be fair the guy did recognize his own foolishness and back down so deserves a bit of slack. I see his letter made the Toronto Star so his fame has gone international. Politicians really do have to watch what they say.
Last edited by asmac; 03-06-13 at 05:29 PM.