Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-13, 08:47 PM   #51
kalliergo 
Senior Member
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
A few cyclist had fallen due to the crack earlier in the day. The county put a cop there to direct cyclist away from the hazard but at some point pulled the cop off. Then the cyclist crashed and died.
Now, there's a perfect plaintiff's case. Did the county settle quickly?
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 08:59 PM   #52
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,807
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
They settled but I do not believed it was quickly.

Their fist action was to work on banning outsiders from cycling in the county and later changed it to groups of ten or more.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 09:00 PM   #53
kalliergo 
Senior Member
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdtindsm View Post
It did cause counties to consider banning touring events.
Funny how cultures differ. In France, they'd repave the roads by hand, at night and on weekends, to get a Tour stage to start or end in their town. Hell, they even sacrifice their daughters as podium girls (I heard they have to keep the kids sentenced to the KoM dresses under guard before the presentations).

And I don't keep up on details of liability sharing between local and state authorities and the Tour of California organizers, but I wouldn't want to try to get re-elected to a county board of supervisors around here after voting to send it away.

RAGBRAI isn't either Tour, but it's an old and venerable Iowa tradition now. And I would think everyone along the route makes money. Who doesn't like RAGBRAI?
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 09:05 PM   #54
kalliergo 
Senior Member
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Their fist action was to work on banning outsiders from cycling in the county
Ha. I'm guessing the local lawyers weren't up on the finer points of Contitutional law, huh?

Quote:
and later changed it to groups of ten or more.
So, now all local commuters need parade permits for those lines of cars every day?

Who writes the scripts for those guys?
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-13, 01:26 AM   #55
sudo bike
Bicikli Huszár
 
sudo bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Posts: 2,116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdtindsm View Post
+1 camilo

While it would be easy to overlook the hazard of the gap in the direction of travel, it was foreseeable. That the area would have been used by MUP riders susceptible to the hazard increased the responsibility of the designers for the safety of its intended use.

Without comments on the details of damages claimed, I don't think the claim is frivolous, and would not be inclined to forgo damages simply because $**t happens.

While McDonalds had successfully defended a number of scalding lawsuits, the suing lawyer was able to show that they were serving coffee at temperatures (190f) above industry norms and higher than the optimum temperature for enjoyment (160). They certainly knew that there was a problem. I don't know if it was part of the suit, but it has been suggested that part of the reason for the high temperatures was to minimize bottomless cups as customers waited for their drink to cool. The size of the award was less because of the severity of injuries than because of the arrogance that MickyD had shown in failing to protect their customers.
For sure. That McD's case is actually really reasonable when you read the details. McD's and the media did a fantastic job at spinning it as a frivolous lawsuit.
sudo bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-13, 06:34 AM   #56
kookaburra1701
Senior Member
 
kookaburra1701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes: 2014 Specialized Dolce Triple, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 2012 Windsor Kensington 8
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommuteCommando View Post

*(I looked up the whole McD thing, and it turns out that the woman had not sued for three megabucks initially, but rather sued for medical expenses only, and that only after the crew at that particular outlet refused to supply her with ice water that would have lessened the damage. The jury increased the damages in response to McD’s attempt to vilify the woman. After all was said and done, and after an unpublicized and successful appeal by McD, the woman wound up with having her medical expenses paid plus a small pittance out of the punitive damages. The lawyers (hers and McD’s) got the rest, and McD got the kind of free publicity, where they were portrayed as the victim, that was worth far more than the case cost them)
The coffee was also so hot that it caused third degree burns to the woman's thighs and genitals, requiring extensive skin grafts. At her age (79) recovery from injury like that is bleak. And McDonalds had persisted in serving coffee at that dangerous temperature (it was their official written policy to serve coffee at 180-190F) despite many warnings after other people had been injured.

Warning, graphic photo of some of her burns at these links: http://harmfuldruginfocenter.files.w.../mcdonalds.jpg
http://justicebeforecharity.org/imag...la/stella3.jpg

To anyone who wants to know more about how the public perception of "frivolous" lawsuits has been shaped by a concerted effort by big business, I recommend this film: http://www.hotcoffeethemovie.com/

Last edited by kookaburra1701; 05-27-13 at 07:41 AM.
kookaburra1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-13, 07:40 AM   #57
rydabent
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
Posts: 5,624
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
The McDonalds case was just plain stupid, and using it in this case is comparing apples to oranges. People EXPECT coffee to be hot. Cyclist DO NOT expect that there will be a tire grabbing trap in a railroad crossing.

Also-----------I agree with the person that said all the PERFECT riders that blamed the cyclist for the accident are out of line. There are any number of reasons why the cyclist may not have seen that gap in the approach.

As an aside to this, in my state I pay on my property tax bill for rail road safety crossings. It is a stupid tax apparently run thru by legislators paid off by the rail roads. It is supposed to pay for cross arm and lights and even over passes. Things the railroads should be paying for themselves.
rydabent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-13, 07:43 AM   #58
rydabent
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
Posts: 5,624
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Those PERFECT riders that blame the cyclist should note that for her to get her wheel caught in that gap, she was crossing the tracks at the proper 90 degree angle. She was crossing in the proper safe manner.
rydabent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-13, 09:54 PM   #59
edotomato
Senior Member
 
edotomato's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: High Wycombe, England
Bikes: Miyata 1200, '88 Model
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Let's hope the San Franciscans don't get wind of this.
edotomato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 12:38 AM   #60
bragi
bragi
 
bragi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Bikes: LHT
Posts: 2,911
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What a complete idiot. If you're too unskilled to negotiate minor hazards, that's sad, but part of the learning curve. If you want to make other people pay for your ineptness, that's just infuriating. And don't even get me started about the damage this person is doing to the image of cyclists in general.
bragi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 05:48 AM   #61
UberGeek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Bikes: Schwinn Tourist (2010), Trek 6000 (1999)
Posts: 1,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the RR's owner is funny.

"Reactions like that make me regret allowing a right of way"...

Um, you do know that land was GIVEN to you, for free, and cleared at our costs? "Our" being, the tax payer, and the common knowledge that pretty much all rail lines west of the the Mississippi were gifted to the railroad companies.

I think the damages are reasonable, assuming the custom bike was actually worth that much. Only $110 in medical bills, sounds like she is asking for the co-pay. She could sue for full cost, or just sic her insurance companies on the RR. Which would he prefer? a $10K settlement, of a $150K settlement with two different insurers (Health insurance carrier, and homeowners/renters insurance carrier)?
UberGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 06:51 AM   #62
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -=(8)=- View Post
The hilarious irony here is, some of the ones who insult the loudest about "blaming the cyclist" in other dopey threads,
are the ones . . . . you guessed it, blaming the cyclist
That is rather funny, isn't it?
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 09:20 AM   #63
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,478
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalliergo View Post
So, now all local commuters need parade permits for those lines of cars every day?
???

Other than funeral processions, who drives their cars in groups of 10 or more?
njkayaker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 10:01 AM   #64
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 29,108
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
. Cyclist DO NOT expect that there will be a tire grabbing trap in a railroad crossing.
Really? Anyone with any experience knows that railroad tracks can be dangerous, and you need to watch for hazards as you cross them (or just bunny hop them).
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 11:04 AM   #65
UberGeek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Bikes: Schwinn Tourist (2010), Trek 6000 (1999)
Posts: 1,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh View Post
Really? Anyone with any experience knows that railroad tracks can be dangerous, and you need to watch for hazards as you cross them (or just bunny hop them).
There's no bunny hopping over that crack in the pavement.
UberGeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 11:31 AM   #66
Camilo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,988
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bragi View Post
What a complete idiot. If you're too unskilled to negotiate minor hazards, that's sad, but part of the learning curve. If you want to make other people pay for your ineptness, that's just infuriating. And don't even get me started about the damage this person is doing to the image of cyclists in general.
Evidently you haven't read the thread. I suggest you do. Your pronouncement was made by many others several pages ago and several have made sound arguments against it.

After you read the thread, I hope you post again, but in a way that is part of the dialog.
Camilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 11:47 AM   #67
eofelis 
The Rock Cycle
 
eofelis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western Colorado
Bikes: Salsa Vaya Ti, Specialized Ruby, Gunnar Sport, Motobecane Fantom CXX, Jamis Dragon, Novara Randonee x2
Posts: 1,655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If the rr crossings around here looked that good I'd be thrilled! Downtown around here there is a triple rr crossing that I have been over innumerable times on commuter and road bikes with no incident. It's not perpendicular to the road and it's bumpy and uneven. I take the whole car lane to ride it perpendicular to the tracks direction. The road has moderate traffic and I've never had a problem. I just keep it slow and pay attention.

I rode the Bicycle Tour of Colorado a few years back. One part of the route had several road crossings of narrow gauge rr tracks. Some were at acute angles to the road direction. They warned all the riders emphatically numerous times to go extremely slow or to walk the bikes over these tracks. They even posted ride marshalls at the rr crossings to slow riders down right there. But still several people just rode on over them and fell or had some incident (I was told by some ride marshalls). I did stop and just lift my bike over them and then rode on.

Near Delta, Colorado is a nasty rr crossing I saw on a Ride the Rockies route. The tracks were inset at least an inch below metal plates lining the edges of the little "trenches" that the tracks were in. No rider warnings posted around the crossing. I awkwardly bumped through and continued on. I noticed a few people changing flats just after the crossing but didn't think much of it. It was almost to the end of day. That evening I noticed that my rear tire had two deformations on it, the distance apart of the rails. (Had to trash the tire.) Then I realized those people got snakebit flats from hitting the sharp edges where the rails were inset. Next time I ride that I will walk my bike over it!
__________________
Gunnar Sport
Specialized Ruby
Salsa Vaya Ti
Novara Randonee x2
Motobecane Fantom CXX
Jamis Dragon
eofelis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 06:17 PM   #68
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,807
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh View Post
Really? Anyone with any experience knows that railroad tracks can be dangerous, and you need to watch for hazards as you cross them (or just bunny hop them).
Your post reads as though you have not read the article and do not know the hazard that caught her wheel.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-13, 11:18 PM   #69
bragi
bragi
 
bragi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Bikes: LHT
Posts: 2,911
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camilo View Post
Evidently you haven't read the thread. I suggest you do. Your pronouncement was made by many others several pages ago and several have made sound arguments against it.

After you read the thread, I hope you post again, but in a way that is part of the dialog.
I read the thread before I posted. I thought the cyclist was probably inept, clearly unwilling to take responsibility for what happened to her, and did a grave disservice to cyclists in general by suing. And then I shared my opinion. Quit trying to sneer me down. The counter-arguments you refer to were not convincing to me. Her actions are comparable to someone who breaks his ankle while hiking, and then sues the Forest Service because the trail wasn't completely safe enough to account for his lack of experience and/or coordination, or the existence of simple bad luck.
bragi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 06:37 AM   #70
Burton
Certified Bike Brat
 
Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Bikes:
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by squirtdad View Post
The story states " went on the sidewalk to avoid a lineup of traffic from Oaks Amusement Park. She was wearing a helmet and no one was walking at the time on the sidewalk, he said." So this was avoidable by the cyclist by staying on the road. Most likely germane, but who knows with suits.
Yeah - had something similar happen in Montreal this week. There are several organized rides of the Tour de L'Ile that cross several train tracks. For the event they were covered with carpet to reduce the possibility of any accident. Except that one overly impatient roadie felt that other riders were holding him back and decided to skirt to the outside. As in - outside the designated riding are and outside the carpeted area. Got his wheel caught in the track, flipped the bike and wrote off the rim. Wouldn't have happened if he had stayed on the designated path. And I know that for a fact because I did that section myself as part of the Tour de Nuit - at night - when visibility was a lot more marginal.

At least in that case the guy was honest enough to bluntly say it was his own stupidity.

I get to cross 7 different tracks on my commute every day- some at dangerous angles when there's other traffic and compounded by the tracks being slippery in rain. There's no substitute for slowing down or dismounting ocassionally.

Last edited by Burton; 06-04-13 at 06:46 AM.
Burton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 09:41 AM   #71
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 29,108
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Your post reads as though you have not read the article and do not know the hazard that caught her wheel.
I read the article, and looked at the pic.

It would be nice if that crack was repaired, but it's an open an obvious hazard, and there are all sorts of cracks, gaps, hooved up areas, and other assorted hazardds around railroad tracks. Irregularities around rairoad tracks are totally to be expected.

And I could easily bunny hop that crack, as well as the railroad track.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 10:09 AM   #72
Matariki
Not quite there yet
 
Matariki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Monkey Bottom, NC
Bikes: A bunch of old steel bikes + an ICE trike
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh View Post
Irregularities around rairoad tracks are totally to be expected.
Yes, but this does not mean that we should tolerate flaws in the design or construction that could easily be anticipated to cause harm.

Nor should we expect any cyclist to be completely aware of all hazards at all times. Let's face it, there are so many competing distractions that even the most experienced of us will miss something occasionally. Sometimes we get bit.
Matariki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 10:14 AM   #73
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matariki View Post
Yes, but this does not mean that we should tolerate flaws in the design or construction that could easily be anticipated to cause harm.

Nor should we expect any cyclist to be completely aware of all hazards at all times. Let's face it, there are so many competing distractions that even the most experienced of us will miss something occasionally. Sometimes we get bit.
this points out what this thread is really about - in the first case the railroad pays, in the second the cyclist pays.
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 10:31 AM   #74
Burton
Certified Bike Brat
 
Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Bikes:
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matariki View Post
Yes, but this does not mean that we should tolerate flaws in the design or construction that could easily be anticipated to cause harm.

Nor should we expect any cyclist to be completely aware of all hazards at all times. Let's face it, there are so many competing distractions that even the most experienced of us will miss something occasionally. Sometimes we get bit.
So I guess that means sidewalks should be made more cycle friendly - in spite of the fact that cyclists aren't supposed to be there - because thats exactly what went on in this case.

What next? Cyclists should be able to sue motorosts when they run stop lights and cause an accident because the general public should be aware that most cyclists ignore stop signs and traffic lights so everyone should therefore give up their right of way for them?

Last edited by Burton; 06-04-13 at 10:35 AM.
Burton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 AM.