Raging driver throws milkshake, grabs rider, runs her over, flees scene
#126
Senior Member
Fair enough, but still not a solution for me. But too far off topic to get into that one.
#127
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
One of the cyclists smashed the truck's window and it's "unimaginable" that the driver got physical? Apparently their imaginer is broken. If you escalate to physical violence you'd better be sure to have control of the situation. Really stupid move IMO. Honestly I'd have been on the phone with 911 as soon as the guy got out of the vehicle.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#129
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Posts: 6,007
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Dude almost runs them off the road one time, throws things at them, then stops his car and is getting out to fight. At this point, you think the situation isn't escalated? The dude has already attacked them and was looking for more... He's apparently known to other cyclists and has done similar things in the past, WITHOUT a cyclist responding in kind. What would this psycho have to do before you would feel someone would be justified in defending themselves?
Dude is also a convicted r*pist.. that was probably the victims fault too..
Dude is also a convicted r*pist.. that was probably the victims fault too..
Last edited by frantik; 05-20-13 at 07:43 AM.
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,420
Bikes: Baum Romano, Brompton S2, Homemade Bamboo!
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
129 Posts
Dude almost runs them off the road one time, throws things at them, then stops his car and is getting out to fight. At this point, you think the situation isn't escalated? The dude has already attacked them and was looking for more... He's apparently known to other cyclists and has done similar things in the past, WITHOUT a cyclist responding in kind. What would this psycho have to do before you would feel someone would be justified in defending themselves?
Dude is also a convicted r*pist.. that was probably the victims fault too..
Dude is also a convicted r*pist.. that was probably the victims fault too..
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here.
- Using Hanlon's Razor as the test on the first one, plenty of drivers cut of cyclists without malice. They are simply idiots. The riders do not know anything about this driver (as we now do with the benefit of hindsight and a bit of research), yet they choose their response by 'swarming' the truck at the next traffic light. Then the cyclist smashes the window when he could have avoided the situation by stopping short and calling the cops.
The cyclists were unlucky to encounter a guy who was going to react badly and severely, but they are not completely innocent there.
#131
Banned
In reading the comment section of the article in the OP, it seems that just the mere act of riding a bike can be the catalyst to set off this motorist's anger. Here's an excerpt of one comment:
"To everyone saying "the bikers started it" you were not there and you don't know this man. He is hostile, aggressive, unreasonable and violent. He's also 6'3" and 270lbs. I had a run-in with this same guy, and so did a person I work with, on a completely separate occasion. Neither of us did anything to him, and he even told me that he "hates bicyclists." When he attacked me, we had not had any kind of incident leading up to the altercation. I was simply riding alone when he suddenly brushed me off the road with his truck, then pulled over, got out, and started yelling at me and chasing me. Then he took a metal bar from his truck and started waving it around, kicked my rim in with his big boots when I tried to get away, and then got back in the truck and drove up onto the sidewalk in a crazy attempt to hit me. I was lucky to escape with just a trashed rim. I found out who he was from a neighbor who witnessed this. I looked up his criminal history, and it is long and bad."
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,420
Bikes: Baum Romano, Brompton S2, Homemade Bamboo!
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
129 Posts
In reading the comment section of the article in the OP, it seems that just the mere act of riding a bike can be the catalyst to set off this motorist's anger. Here's an excerpt of one comment:
"To everyone saying "the bikers started it" you were not there and you don't know this man. He is hostile, aggressive, unreasonable and violent. He's also 6'3" and 270lbs. I had a run-in with this same guy, and so did a person I work with, on a completely separate occasion. Neither of us did anything to him, and he even told me that he "hates bicyclists." When he attacked me, we had not had any kind of incident leading up to the altercation. I was simply riding alone when he suddenly brushed me off the road with his truck, then pulled over, got out, and started yelling at me and chasing me. Then he took a metal bar from his truck and started waving it around, kicked my rim in with his big boots when I tried to get away, and then got back in the truck and drove up onto the sidewalk in a crazy attempt to hit me. I was lucky to escape with just a trashed rim. I found out who he was from a neighbor who witnessed this. I looked up his criminal history, and it is long and bad."
"To everyone saying "the bikers started it" you were not there and you don't know this man. He is hostile, aggressive, unreasonable and violent. He's also 6'3" and 270lbs. I had a run-in with this same guy, and so did a person I work with, on a completely separate occasion. Neither of us did anything to him, and he even told me that he "hates bicyclists." When he attacked me, we had not had any kind of incident leading up to the altercation. I was simply riding alone when he suddenly brushed me off the road with his truck, then pulled over, got out, and started yelling at me and chasing me. Then he took a metal bar from his truck and started waving it around, kicked my rim in with his big boots when I tried to get away, and then got back in the truck and drove up onto the sidewalk in a crazy attempt to hit me. I was lucky to escape with just a trashed rim. I found out who he was from a neighbor who witnessed this. I looked up his criminal history, and it is long and bad."
I don't believe the bikers "started it", but they had at least TWO clear moments to back off and avoid being dragged further down - yet they, as a group or due to poor 'leadership' by one of them, boldly dug themselves a deeper hole and one of them paid a very dear price.
The fact that ANOTHER cyclist in a SEPARATE incident on a DIFFERENT day had a problem with this a-hole driver does not absolve this group of 4 from being called stupid.
#133
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Having followed most of the discussion I am still drawn to the opinion that this group of cyclists were idiots who were one half of the escalation that then got out of control when the driver turned out to be a violent a-hole.
They could have stayed behind the truck after the first incident - yet they chose to ride around it on both sides, putting themselves in danger and almost certainly antagonising the driver.
They could have stopped or turned off after the milkshake, but they chose to ride by the stopped truck AGAIN (this time with the driver out) leading to a physical altercation and the smashing of the window. If the driver wasn't going psycho before, a smashed window was going to guarantee it - AND YOU'VE JUST RIDDEN CLOSE ENOUGH FOR HIM TO GRAB ONE OF YOU. Nice work Einstein.
The driver is going to go to jail - and deserve it - but I hope that the 3 riders who were not injured learn a few things for the future. Don't get tangled up with idiot drivers. Let them go on their way (and report them later, film them on your GoPro, whatever), and don't do macho **** that gets another in your group hurt.
These cyclists (or the key alpha male) didn't learn the lesson about poking wild animals with sticks. That never ends well.
They could have stayed behind the truck after the first incident - yet they chose to ride around it on both sides, putting themselves in danger and almost certainly antagonising the driver.
They could have stopped or turned off after the milkshake, but they chose to ride by the stopped truck AGAIN (this time with the driver out) leading to a physical altercation and the smashing of the window. If the driver wasn't going psycho before, a smashed window was going to guarantee it - AND YOU'VE JUST RIDDEN CLOSE ENOUGH FOR HIM TO GRAB ONE OF YOU. Nice work Einstein.
The driver is going to go to jail - and deserve it - but I hope that the 3 riders who were not injured learn a few things for the future. Don't get tangled up with idiot drivers. Let them go on their way (and report them later, film them on your GoPro, whatever), and don't do macho **** that gets another in your group hurt.
These cyclists (or the key alpha male) didn't learn the lesson about poking wild animals with sticks. That never ends well.
Agree with what you wrote. One thing I notice we don't see in the article is how the cyclists reacted to the driver. It's almost as if this article expects us to believe that the cyclists never communicated with the idiot driver.
A driver buzzed them and yet they rode past him at the intersection. He had a red light which means the cyclists had a red light but didn't stop. You've already got an idiot driver who buzzed them and no doubt they said something to him or looked at him in the way one looks at a idiot or they gave him the one finger salute or a combination of all three as they ran the red light.
It's like waving a red flag in front of a bull.
So he catches up to them and tossed a milkshake. I'm sure there was some more words and gestures given by the cyclist nearest the milkshake. Can't blame them as I would have let loose a string of words/gestures as well if someone threw something at me. The idiot driver obviously had his window down and heard/saw the reaction to his throwing the milkshake and then stopped and got out of his truck.
And yet all four cyclists still approached him and his truck. Close enough that one rider could break a window on his vehicle and close enough for him, the driver, to grab one of the cyclists.
I might be new to riding but after being buzzed on purpose I'm not going to ride past the car running a red light in the process. I might decide to make a right turn and just go for a block or two and then double back. Or if I can't turn I'll stop for a minute or two and let the driver drive off.
If someone throws something at me I'm not going to get close enough for them to do something else because you can't know what the next "else" is going to be.
Are the cyclists victims? Yes.
But not all victims are blameless in what happens to them. Some victims don't stop to think about what they are doing. Some victims keep waving that flag in front of the idiot bull and then they get gored.
I hope this guy goes to jail for life.
But I also hope all the cyclists who where involved realize that they ignored the signs of danger and kept plunging head strong into the final confrontation. They are so lucky this criminal wasn't armed and willing to shoot over a broken window.
#134
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Posts: 6,007
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
I don't believe the bikers "started it", but they had at least TWO clear moments to back off and avoid being dragged further down - yet they, as a group or due to poor 'leadership' by one of them, boldly dug themselves a deeper hole and one of them paid a very dear price.
I don't see a clear moment where you expect these people to "back off". I don't even think they would have to back off.. if someone starts attacking you, you have every right to defend yourself. Oh wait, never mind, that's "escalating things".. don't want to do anything that might upset your attacker. just relax and take it. it'll be over soon
this dude could run over half of you guys and you'd be like "sorry bro, totally my bad!"
Last edited by frantik; 05-20-13 at 11:14 AM.
#135
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Posts: 6,007
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
I know it's your first post and all.. but you're straight making things up. makes it so much easier to blame the victim that way!
#136
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 234
Bikes: 2012 Cervelo R3 Team
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#137
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You expect me to believe that after the second incident where he threw a shake and hit one cyclist with it that not one person of the four cyclists said or did anything?
If so I'd say you're the one making things up.
But for sake of argument let's say that the cyclists did nothing after getting buzzed and hit with the shake by that idiot driver.....
That idiot driver threw something at them and hit one of the cyclists. That idiot driver then stopped further down the road and got out of his car and was waiting for the cyclists to come to him. That idiot driver was looking for a physical confrontation.
And not one cyclist of the four stopped short of him or turned around or turned onto another street to avoid a physical confrontation with him. Not one of them pulled out a cell phone and called the cops. (until after the girl was run over)
No they decided to ride past him again. One cyclist as he rode by the car broke a window after the guy lunged at him. That tells me the cyclist already had the u-lock in his hand was ready to use it as he rode up on the guy.
Make no mistake: The cyclists are victims.
But what I've noticed reading this thread is you don't understand that not all victims are equal. These victims were being harassed by an idiot driver and these victims made no effort to get away from him. They continued to travel the same direction as the idiot driver.
These four cyclists had multiple chances to break off the confrontation with the idiot driver.
If the driver had buzzed them and then immediately stop and jump out of the truck then you and I would be in agreement. However that didn't happen. The driver buzzed them and went further down the road. They passed him. He attacked them with the shake. They still rode in the same direction. The driver went further down the road and got out of his vehicle. The cyclists still rode towards him.
Understand this: The cyclists are victims. I hope the girl gets better soon. But I would tell those cyclists to their face that they were stupid to do what they did when it was clear the idiot driver was looking for a fight. I would tell them they are lucky that this career criminal didn't jump out with a gun and start shooting at them. I would tell them in the future that sometimes it's better to swallow your pride and hold back so as to avoid confrontation with an unknown then it is to continue to ride in a dangerous situation.
#138
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the driver buzzed them. they could have turned off the street, but i doubt many people would turn off due to a close pass. The bikers passed the vehicle at an intersection.. if they blew the red light, for most of you, this ALONE would justify the driver running all of them over. Then the driver passed them again, threw a milkshake, cut them off (according to another article i read - this explains why the riders were on the driver's side) and started to get out of his car.
I don't see a clear moment where you expect these people to "back off". I don't even think they would have to back off.. if someone starts attacking you, you have every right to defend yourself. Oh wait, never mind, that's "escalating things".. don't want to do anything that might upset your attacker. just relax and take it. it'll be over soon
this dude could run over half of you guys and you'd be like "sorry bro, totally my bad!"
I don't see a clear moment where you expect these people to "back off". I don't even think they would have to back off.. if someone starts attacking you, you have every right to defend yourself. Oh wait, never mind, that's "escalating things".. don't want to do anything that might upset your attacker. just relax and take it. it'll be over soon
this dude could run over half of you guys and you'd be like "sorry bro, totally my bad!"
I wouldn't have run a light right next to him after he buzzed me. I'd hang back. Let the light turn green. Let him drive off. Is everyone in such a hurry that they can't stop for a minute?
He's an idiot. Let him have his stupid "victory" against bikers. Don't aggravate an idiot whose already tried to harm you with his car.
#139
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't believe the bikers "started it", but they had at least TWO clear moments to back off and avoid being dragged further down - yet they, as a group or due to poor 'leadership' by one of them, boldly dug themselves a deeper hole and one of them paid a very dear price.
The fact that ANOTHER cyclist in a SEPARATE incident on a DIFFERENT day had a problem with this a-hole driver does not absolve this group of 4 from being called stupid.
The fact that ANOTHER cyclist in a SEPARATE incident on a DIFFERENT day had a problem with this a-hole driver does not absolve this group of 4 from being called stupid.
Last edited by sudo bike; 05-20-13 at 01:26 PM.
#140
Senior Member
Sudo, I think that it would have been understandable under these circumstances to fight back. But to me, breaking out a window in the vehicle is not fighting back, its escalating the situation, and ultimately whether it was escalation or not, an innocent cyclist was severely injured. Yes, I personally believe that the cyclists could have ducked down a side street, or stopped and not passed by the guy, or some such thing, but for sure, if they decided enough was enough, the first hit should have been aimed to disable the driver, not to damage his car.
#141
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sudo, I think that it would have been understandable under these circumstances to fight back. But to me, breaking out a window in the vehicle is not fighting back, its escalating the situation, and ultimately whether it was escalation or not, an innocent cyclist was severely injured. Yes, I personally believe that the cyclists could have ducked down a side street, or stopped and not passed by the guy, or some such thing, but for sure, if they decided enough was enough, the first hit should have been aimed to disable the driver, not to damage his car.
Big assumptions against the cyclist need to be made in order to assume it was just escalation. I agree that disabling the driver, if that point was reached, would have been a better course of action, but particularly for people who have never experienced it, violence is a very hard thing for some people to engage in, even when necessary. People get panicky. Who's to say whether the window was busted out from anger, fear, or any number of other visceral reactions you might expect when you're being harassed by a lunatic in a 2 ton steel cage. It's easy for us to criticize from our comfy chairs without tons of adrenaline pumping through us.
#142
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I have no problem with defending yourself. Smashing the guy's window is in no way defending yourself. If the guy with the U lock came up behind him and smashed him in the head while he was clearly getting ready to attack one of the other riders, or if he hit him while he was attacking, or even if it was clear that the guy was unstable, I'd have no problem with it. That's defending yourself. Committing property damage because you're in a rage is just escalation.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#143
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#144
Senior Member
"
the truck driver stepped out to confront the lead cyclist, Josh Harrington, 31, of Oakland. Harrington swerved around the motorist, then reached back with a U-lock and smashed the driver's-side window."
Read more: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/johnso...#ixzz2TsA4ZCt9
Seem pretty clear to me. Your have your read, I have mine
Read more: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/johnso...#ixzz2TsA4ZCt9
Seem pretty clear to me. Your have your read, I have mine
#145
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do not rely on the other person to deescalate a situation. Especially when that other person started the problem.
The driver has already tried to hurt the cyclists by buzzing them which could have caused one or more of them to crash on the side of the road.
It is illogical to think the driver would then back off.
It is best to assume the driver will continue to harass the cyclists and that the cyclists should take action to deescalate the situation.
At least twice they were harassed and did nothing; they continued on their way without retaliating (which is more than a "reasonable person" would likely do). This is a clear indicator that he intended to continue harassing them... why anyone thinks stopping behind the truck would magically stop this continuing harassment is beyond me.
Second since it's clear that he's not going to back off the cyclists should have realized that and backed off themselves for their own safety.
Third it is possible that stopping behind his truck would not stop the harassment but remember after the initial buzzing he drove further down the road and was stopped at a red light. Had they stopped far enough back he may have just driven off when the light turned green. If he didn't move then they could have called the police and/or turned around and headed away from him. Instead they drove up to his car and ran the red light. Not a smart move IMHO. The idiot has already buzzed them as he drove by. No doubt he's "enraged" that a bunch of cyclists ran the light when he can't. He's already a stupid guy for the buzzing and that's probably exactly what he was thinking when the cyclists blew through the light.
He got out of the damn truck to go after them. There's allegations from one person that he drove up on the sidewalk to chase down a fleeing cyclist in another incident. So I ask again: at what point is it finally OK to fight back in some way without it being labeled escalation? Because it doesn't sound like this point ever exists until it is too late.
Had they I bet they would have backed off.
It of course depends on state law regarding self defense for your question. The cyclist with the lock would probably be justified at taking a swing at the idiot since the idiot did get out to confront and attack the cyclist. But swerving around the guy and then hitting the window? That's not self defense. That's revenge for the driver being a jerk.
And look at the result. The driver almost killed another cyclist because of it.
#146
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Monterey Bay area, California
Posts: 523
Bikes: Terratrike Tour, recumbent tadpole tricycle.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
Oy... some of the people on the news site commenting on the article are making it all about cyclists versus motorists. It was the rare case of an unstable individual who needs some serious psychiatric intervention, who came upon some cyclists, who just happened to cross the radius of this unstable person's radar. I've had my own run-ins with whack jobs and it had absolutely nothing to do with what I was driving, or riding or what I was doing at all. Random, crazy people are just that. Random and crazy. It's better to make that assessment ASAP, and get away from them in any way possible. And call the police to report it. That way, if said whack job does it again, it's on the record. Some of these people are always looking for something to blame for their misery...
__________________
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.
Last edited by WPeabody; 05-20-13 at 05:25 PM.
#147
Cycle Year Round
"
the truck driver stepped out to confront the lead cyclist, Josh Harrington, 31, of Oakland. Harrington swerved around the motorist, then reached back with a U-lock and smashed the driver's-side window."
Read more: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/johnso...#ixzz2TsA4ZCt9
Seem pretty clear to me. Your have your read, I have mine
Read more: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/johnso...#ixzz2TsA4ZCt9
Seem pretty clear to me. Your have your read, I have mine
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#148
Transportation Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montana U.S.A.
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Too many to list, some I built myself including the frame. I "do" ~ Human-Only-Pedal-Powered-Cycles, Human-Electric-Hybrid-Cycles, Human-IC-Hybrid-Cycles, and one Human-IC-Electric-3way-Hybrid-Cycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oy... some of the people on the news site commenting on the article are making it all about cyclists versus motorists. It was the rare case of an unstable individual who needs some serious psychiatric intervention, who came upon some cyclists, who just happened to cross the radius of this unstable person's radar. I've had my own run-ins with whack jobs and it had absolutely nothing to do with what I was driving, or riding or what I was doing at all. Random, crazy people are just that. Random and crazy. It's better to make that assessment ASAP, and get away from them in any way possible. And call the police to report it. That way, if said whack job does it again, it's on the record. Some of these people are always looking for something to blame for their misery...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, unrelated to the above quoted post, some are saying that the cyclists passed the guy's vehicle against the light running a red light. Although what I know of cyclists behaving badly I certainly consider that possible. I also know a little bit about motorists behaving badly and I've had more then one stop on a green light and position their vehicle either to try to block me or to turn into me "waiting in ambush" for me to try to pass them when they were stopped at a green light. Do we know that the light was red and this guy stopped for the red light and the cyclists didn't, do we know that he stopped for a green light trying to block them from proceeding or waiting in ambush, or do we not know which of the two it was ??? Some facts clarification would help.
#149
Senior Member
So it is possible based on that quote, that the cyclist was swinging his U-lock behind him to hit the driver, missed and got the window instead.
Doubtful
Doubtful
#150
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Monterey Bay area, California
Posts: 523
Bikes: Terratrike Tour, recumbent tadpole tricycle.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
I just found the way the article was slanted was that it seemed to be about how this is an example of how cylists and motorists are "clashing", when it was actually the rare person who was highly unstable who committed a crime against an innocent person. Most drivers aren't that crazy, just clueless. It was a bad example to use, and it just stirs people up... there should be more emphasis on those people who aren't paying attention, or are too impatient to proceed safely. That is the common occurrence. If people were behaving more like this person in this particular incident, I'd probably be carrying a firearm. Or move to Baghdad.
__________________
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.