Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-24-13, 02:17 PM   #76
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Is that right? I hadn't noticed this factoid ever posted anywhere.
Go sit in a testing center sometime. The testers are always amazed when I am able to get 100% on the test. Teenagers often complain about how hard the test is and that they had to take it a second time. Feel free to fund a million dollar study to prove me right or wrong.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 02:21 PM   #77
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Go sit in a testing center sometime. The testers are always amazed when I am able to get 100% on the test. Teenagers often complain about how hard the test is and that they had to take it a second time. Feel free to fund a million dollar study to prove me right or wrong.
Got it; you made up a factoid to match your impression/anecdote. No problem, happens all the time on BF.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 02:29 PM   #78
Dunbar
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
I don't see anything here which suggests the rider was passing the truck on the right? Perhaps I am missing it?
The witness account (which I quoted in my post) is very clear that the bike was travelling to the right of the truck when the accident occured. Right hooks can happen whether you are passing or being passed so I'm not sure why that matters from an "advocacy & safety" standpoint. Just don't put yourself in that position if it can be avoided. Right hooks are one of the easier situations to avoid if you ride defensively.

Last edited by Dunbar; 05-24-13 at 02:44 PM.
Dunbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 03:18 PM   #79
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith99 View Post
Let's just stop and think for a second. Reporter has almost zero facts. Driver likely say he never saw the cyclist.

Other than cyclist dead there is pretty much just one other cold hard fact.

Helmet or no helmet!

And people get upset because they include the one real fact they have.
There are lots of facts; cold, hard and otherwise. Some of them are even relevant.
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 03:19 PM   #80
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunbar View Post
The witness account (which I quoted in my post) is very clear that the bike was travelling to the right of the truck when the accident occured. Right hooks can happen whether you are passing or being passed so I'm not sure why that matters from an "advocacy & safety" standpoint. Just don't put yourself in that position if it can be avoided. Right hooks are one of the easier situations to avoid if you ride defensively.
Maybe you have some special technique you'd like to share, but when I'm riding along I get passed by cars all the time. If one of them gets the sudden urge to turn right my survival depends mostly on when and where said driver gets said urge.
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 03:30 PM   #81
Dunbar
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
Maybe you have some special technique you'd like to share.
If you're in the right-most traffic lane (if more than one lane exists) then you need to take the lane when going through intersections. And since it's not really safe to go in/out of traffic you better stay there (to say nothing of staying ouf out of the door zone.)

Here the Google street view of the street the bike and truck were traveling on. The intersection ahead is where the collision occured.

Dunbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 03:57 PM   #82
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
So many of drivers today just barely pass the written test. Insert a couple of cycling related questions into the drivers test, and they either learn the cycling stuff or they likely fail the test.
Yep. Easy and cheap. Not a total solution, but a lot more of the newbies hitting the roads would at least have been exposed to the concept of road-sharing.

And my experience with sharrows and Share the Road signs is that they actually help quite a bit.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 04:02 PM   #83
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Dunbar is correct, of course. Note that we don't know how many of the parking spaces that are empty in the Google street view were occupied at the time of the crash.

This is a straightforward place to ride, but curb-hugging is especially dangerous when these streets get busy. And Recology trucks ripping around corners (oh, yes, they do) are guaranteed to crush at least a few humans now and then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunbar View Post
If you're in the right-most traffic lane (if more than one lane exists) then you need to take the lane when going through intersections. And since it's not really safe to go in/out of traffic you better stay there (to say nothing of staying ouf out of the door zone.)

Here the Google street view of the street the bike and truck were traveling on. The intersection ahead is where the collision occured.

__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 04:12 PM   #84
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
Go sit in a testing center sometime.
Yup. It probably matters where you go to observe, of course, but I noticed quite a bit of obvious struggling and several people who were being re-tested, last time I was in DMV, 2-3 years ago.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 04:14 PM   #85
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunbar View Post
If you're in the right-most traffic lane (if more than one lane exists) then you need to take the lane when going through intersections. And since it's not really safe to go in/out of traffic you better stay there (to say nothing of staying ouf out of the door zone.)

Here the Google street view of the street the bike and truck were traveling on. The intersection ahead is where the collision occured.
I don't understand how anything you've said here is relevant. Even if you take the lane cars will obviously still be passing you.
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 04:30 PM   #86
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
Even if you take the lane cars will obviously still be passing you.
No. They won't, for the most part, except where it's safe to do so. Certainly very few will (perhaps partially) leave the lane to pass you on the left, approaching an intersection, and then turn right in front of you. Only a madman would deliberately do that in a garbage truck at the intersection in question.

If you hug the curb or the parked cars, most right-turners will probably cut you off. It's just a question of how close and how fast. Take the lane approaching intersections.

If you make right turns without merging right, in your garbage truck, at 16th & S. Van Ness. . . sooner or later you'll probably crunch somebody.

Paint sharrows there and put up a couple of Share signs with appropriate graphics. Send cops out, on bikes and motorcycles, for a few rush-hour cycles. They can politely remind folks how to share and issue warnings or citations to jerks.

Call the local TV stations. Get the real professional drivers to join the campaign.

Aren't there any Mission bikers here?
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 07:24 PM   #87
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Got it; you made up a factoid to match your impression/anecdote. No problem, happens all the time on BF.
Got it, you live in a very dark, closed in room.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 08:40 PM   #88
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Is that right? I hadn't noticed this factoid ever posted anywhere.
Well, it's pretty widely known. The last California DMV survey I remember (and could find) should give you a sense of the big picture, even though it's more than a decade out of date:

Quote:
Would you believe that almost two-thirds of California's adult original Class C license applicants fail the English written test on their first attempt? Or that more than half of the renewal applicants also fail the English written test on the first attempt? A recent evaluation by the Department's Research and Development Branch discovered these findings and many others. We collected more than 20,000 written tests over a 2-day period in August 1997 for original, renewal, and provisional English and Spanish language applicants. The results indicated surprisingly high fail rates for applicants taking the written tests. As illustrated in the figure, 65% of original applicants, 54.9% of renewal applicants, and 45.6% of provisional (English language only) license applicants failed the written test on their first attempt. The figure also shows that the fail rates remained high over successive test attempts.

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/about/profile/...evaluation.htm
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 09:30 PM   #89
Dunbar
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
I don't understand how anything you've said here is relevant. Even if you take the lane cars will obviously still be passing you.
In addition to what kalliergo said, I don't care if they pass me. If you're going to take the lane you need to be comfortable with the notion of cars changing their position to pass you. If they want to cross a double yellow to pass on my left that's fine. If they want to use empty parking spaces to pass on my right that's also fine (although both are probably illegal.) On the pictured street if I saw a motorist using their right turn signal in my mirror I'd probably move left to let them pass on the right and get into position to make their turn. But I'm not putting myself in a position to be right hooked (or doored.)

Last edited by Dunbar; 05-24-13 at 09:38 PM.
Dunbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 07:52 AM   #90
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,966
i don't know if it's been mentioned but the article in the OP no longer seems to mention the helmet status

it's the 3rd sentence in this report though http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?sec...rticle-9113406
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 09:38 AM   #91
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalliergo View Post
And Recology trucks ripping around corners (oh, yes, they do) are guaranteed to crush at least a few humans now and then.
apparently...
Quote:
Almost two months ago, a Recology truck struck a grandmother and her 7-year-old granddaughter in the crosswalk of Broadway and Embarcadero, crushing the girl's foot. She is now recovering, but that accident is still under investigation.
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 09:55 AM   #92
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,244
"Almost two months ago, a Recology truck struck a grandmother and her 7-year-old granddaughter in the crosswalk of Broadway and Embarcadero, crushing the girl's foot. She is now recovering, but that accident is still under investigation."


WOW! No apparent mentioning of whether the 7 yo girl was wearing steel toed boots or not.
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 10:21 AM   #93
Tony N.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North West South Carolina
Bikes:
Posts: 519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunbar View Post
If you're in the right-most traffic lane (if more than one lane exists) then you need to take the lane when going through intersections. And since it's not really safe to go in/out of traffic you better stay there (to say nothing of staying ouf out of the door zone.)

Here the Google street view of the street the bike and truck were traveling on. The intersection ahead is where the collision occured.

Just curious. In this picture, which way was the truck and cyclist traveling? 2 lane or single lane? If cyclist was outside of door zone in single lane, truck could still squeeze by cyclist and not cross couble yellow. IMO it is impotant to most cyclist to know if cyclist had on a helmet. Most other non cyclist don't care to know. As a cyclist, I want to know if a helmet prevents head injuries in any accident.
Tony N. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 10:26 AM   #94
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,603
Since not all accidents are reported in the news, the presence of a helmet in a single accident where the rider was crushed by a truck in not evidence of the efficacy of a helmut in preventing injury nor death.

As a cyclist I don't need nor want to know if the rider in a fatal accident was wearing a helmet as part a a standard news report package,

Last edited by howsteepisit; 05-26-13 at 10:28 AM. Reason: added comment
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 10:29 AM   #95
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony N. View Post
IMO it is impotant to most cyclist to know if cyclist had on a helmet. Most other non cyclist don't care to know. As a cyclist, I want to know if a helmet prevents head injuries in any accident.
Generally, that's not the case, it's basically used as a means to point the blame at a cyclist for being the main cause of their demise, and diverting attention from other contributing factors.
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 11:11 AM   #96
Dunbar
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony N. View Post
Just curious. In this picture, which way was the truck and cyclist traveling? 2 lane or single lane? If cyclist was outside of door zone in single lane, truck could still squeeze by cyclist and not cross couble yellow.
In the single lane, heading east which is the direction they were heading according to the article. As far as squeezing past the cyclist without crossing the double yellow, that's debatable and I doubt a truck would do that near an intersection where they intended to turn right. Proper lane position forces vehicles to acknowledge your existance and go around you. Riding in the gutter means they may not see you and will behave as if you don't exist. I really doubt this truck driver intentionally hit the cyclist and it's very possible he/she never saw him.

Last edited by Dunbar; 05-26-13 at 11:14 AM.
Dunbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 11:36 AM   #97
frantik
Chainstay Brake Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Bikes:
Posts: 5,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
"Almost two months ago, a Recology truck struck a grandmother and her 7-year-old granddaughter in the crosswalk of Broadway and Embarcadero, crushing the girl's foot. She is now recovering, but that accident is still under investigation."


WOW! No apparent mentioning of whether the 7 yo girl was wearing steel toed boots or not.
also no mention if the cyclist was wearing steel toed boots. or shin guards. or gloves, or mtb body armor. seems like they're leaving out some info!
frantik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 11:39 AM   #98
kenji666
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: On yer left
Bikes:
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by frantik View Post
also no mention if the cyclist was wearing steel toed boots. or shin guards. or gloves, or mtb body armor. seems like they're leaving out some info!
The article also doesn't mention if the truck had wheels like this:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wheel-spikes.jpg (8.4 KB, 14 views)
kenji666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 11:49 AM   #99
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by frantik View Post
also no mention if the cyclist was wearing steel toed boots. or shin guards. or gloves, or mtb body armor. seems like they're leaving out some info!

.....and what irritates me even more is the mentioning that the cyclist was traveling "at a high rate of speed", compared to what?
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 02:02 PM   #100
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
.....and what irritates me even more is the mentioning that the cyclist was traveling "at a high rate of speed", compared to what?
Compared to the truck that passed the cyclist.



Oh wait, the truck was traveling faster.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM.