Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-23-13, 11:03 AM   #1
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cyclist dies in SF garbage-truck crash

Cyclist dies in SF garbage-truck crash
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:26 AM   #2
ItsJustMe
Seņior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Posts: 13,036
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
No idea who is at fault but people, do not ride alongside trucks regardless of what you think your rights are. I've driven large farm vehicles before, and it's simply not possible to see everything around them.

If a truck is pulling past me, I will watch carefully and if he's going to be there more than a few seconds, I slow down to get him past me as quickly as possible. If I'm overtaking, I either slow down to stay at least 20 feet behind, or I find some way to get around him without putting myself between him and any other object.

(of course, the mandatory "the cyclist was not wearing a helmet" is in the article. Neither was he probably wearing a condom - it would have done him about as much good and is exactly as relevant to the situation).
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:32 AM   #3
AnthonyMcEwen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Whats the point in this comment.

"It does not appear that the bicyclist was wearing a helmet, according to a preliminary investigation, said police spokesman Officer Gordon Shyy."

F*** load of good a foam helmet would make against a dumpster truck...just trying to lay the blame on the cyclist / or trying to make it sound like its partly the cyclist fult (well it could be we dont know the excact details) but the way they say that at then end it just trying to divert attention to the cyclist. like the cyclist is in the wrong just cos hes not wearing a helmet...

And I bet the driver will use this in his statement or defence as well....grr...

* and breath....

It seems now days the media use antthing they can to make thing controversial or sell there news ect even when it has nothing to do with what there reporting...

grr..
AnthonyMcEwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:33 AM   #4
AnthonyMcEwen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe View Post
No idea who is at fault but people, do not ride alongside trucks regardless of what you think your rights are. I've driven large farm vehicles before, and it's simply not possible to see everything around them.

If a truck is pulling past me, I will watch carefully and if he's going to be there more than a few seconds, I slow down to get him past me as quickly as possible. If I'm overtaking, I either slow down to stay at least 20 feet behind, or I find some way to get around him without putting myself between him and any other object.

(of course, the mandatory "the cyclist was not wearing a helmet" is in the article. Neither was he probably wearing a condom - it would have done him about as much good and is exactly as relevant to the situation).



oh dang u beat me to it...but +1 why is there a need to do this!!
AnthonyMcEwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:34 AM   #5
rica rica
Senior Member
 
rica rica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Bikes: my bikes would not impress anyone
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
a guy i know was killed recently in a motorcycle accident and he was wearing a helmet, which all the news stories pointed out. I'm not sure but maybe the reporter thinks everyone reading will ask that question anyway.
rica rica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:38 AM   #6
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,671
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
I had the same thought relative to the not wearing a helmet comment. talk about blaming the victim. Or perhaps the spin doctors and lawyers for the trash company are already starting the defense?
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:55 AM   #7
lostarchitect 
incazzare.
 
lostarchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: See sig
Posts: 6,114
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
I had the same thought relative to the not wearing a helmet comment. talk about blaming the victim. Or perhaps the spin doctors and lawyers for the trash company are already starting the defense?

It's standard to note in accidents. If it isn't noted, people will ask.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
lostarchitect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:56 AM   #8
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Can't assign responsibility until we know a bunch more. But, very likely, one of the standard combinations of bad lane-positioning choices by cyclist and driver.

[Insert standard sharrows and Share the Road signs rant here.]

Do drop into the comment thread if you have a few moments. There's cyclist blood on the road and the cagers want more. ["Welcome, ladies and gentlemen to our beautiful City by the Bay!"] And most haven't the tiniest clue what legal, best-practice behavior would look like.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 11:59 AM   #9
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostarchitect View Post
It's standard to note in accidents. If it isn't noted, people will ask.
Yes, and it's also fuel for the victim-blaming parties that inevitably develop around these incidents: "Duh! Darwin winner!"
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 12:05 PM   #10
ItsJustMe
Seņior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Posts: 13,036
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
I sent an email to the reporter asking what was the point in saying he wasn't wearing a helmet, unless it's to blame the victim.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 12:06 PM   #11
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostarchitect View Post
It's standard to note in accidents. If it isn't noted, people will ask.
Who would ask in this instance? And why?
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 12:15 PM   #12
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
Who would ask in this instance? And why?
The same type of donkeys who post moronic comments about news, gossip and factoids read on the Internet. Why? Because they are morons.

For examples of the thought process involved, see the helmet thread. Or the reader comments below any political or economic news anywhere on the Internet.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 12:48 PM   #13
bikecrate
Senior Member
 
bikecrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LF, APMAT
Bikes:
Posts: 1,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Even our very good local paper always ends these kinds of stories with a helmet status comment. I think the inference is if you not wearing a helmet you’re prejudged a reckless cyclist who doesn’t care about their own safety.
bikecrate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 01:36 PM   #14
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, the SFGate torch & pitchfork crowd will draw and quarter the dead cyclist and all his tribe, one way or another. The helmet subplot is just especially idiotic.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:08 PM   #15
SwampDude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SW Florida
Bikes: All Treks - fitness and road
Posts: 383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalliergo View Post
Yes, and it's also fuel for the victim-blaming parties that inevitably develop around these incidents: "Duh! Darwin winner!"
Maybe it would be a good idea to wait until some facts are known. No point in getting all frothed up until a "victim blaming" statement is actually made.

Some of us are awfully goosy about anything printed concerning cyclists. Maybe its because we're members of the vast minority when it comes to populating our streets. Like other minorities, we should understand our status and work extra hard to present the best image possible...including wearing helmets and high-vis apparel.
SwampDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:12 PM   #16
SwampDude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SW Florida
Bikes: All Treks - fitness and road
Posts: 383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalliergo View Post
Well, the SFGate torch & pitchfork crowd will draw and quarter the dead cyclist and all his tribe, one way or another. The helmet subplot is just especially idiotic.
Who the hell is the "torch and pitchfork crowd"?
SwampDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:14 PM   #17
spivonious
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Posts: 1,857
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
From the description in the article, it looks like a right-hook by the truck. Rights to the road or not, the truck driver had no idea the cyclist was there. No one at fault here, and possible bad decision by the cyclist.
spivonious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:16 PM   #18
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampDude View Post
Maybe it would be a good idea to wait until some facts are known. No point in getting all frothed up until a "victim blaming" statement is actually made.

Some of us are awfully goosy about anything printed concerning cyclists. Maybe its because we're members of the vast minority when it comes to populating our streets. Like other minorities, we should understand our status and work extra hard to present the best image possible...including wearing helmets and high-vis apparel.
This is a charming bit of fantasy. 'If only we were better somehow' maybe they would like us.'
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:16 PM   #19
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
we should understand our status and work extra hard to present the best image possible...including wearing helmets and high-vis apparel.

I lie down on my bed, open my legs and think of England.

Lady Hillingdon -- 1912
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:16 PM   #20
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampDude View Post
Who the hell is the "torch and pitchfork crowd"?
If you're interested, read the comment thread on the article in question, referenced and linked above. It's an example of a long-running blood feud, overwhelmingly anti-cyclist, in that large metro area news outlet. I'm not going to do remedial work here.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:20 PM   #21
longbeachgary
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL; 2012 CAAD10; 2013 Cannondale CAAD10 DI2, The Black Mambo
Posts: 3,375
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalliergo View Post
Can't assign responsibility until we know a bunch more. But, very likely, one of the standard combinations of bad lane-positioning choices by cyclist and driver.
Can't assign responsibility but you did anyway. Way to go.
longbeachgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:26 PM   #22
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 3,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
No mention of the speed of the truck. I've seen garbage trucks speeding on city streets in the dark.

Shouldn't the driver stop immediately and stay there instead of "drove the truck around the block and parked back near the crash site"?
vol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:26 PM   #23
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spivonious View Post
From the description in the article, it looks like a right-hook by the truck. Rights to the road or not, the truck driver had no idea the cyclist was there. No one at fault here, and possible bad decision by the cyclist.
If it was a right hook, the truck could have been overtaking the cyclist. No one at fault? Are you suggesting overtaking another vehicle and turning directly into their path is an allowable course of action?
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:27 PM   #24
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spivonious View Post
From the description in the article, it looks like a right-hook by the truck. Rights to the road or not, the truck driver had no idea the cyclist was there. No one at fault here, and possible bad decision by the cyclist.
Premature judgment.

How do you know, from the description, who was there first? How do you know who was passing whom, or who had caught up with whom? How do you even know what direction the cyclist intended to travel through the intersection?

Which operator(s) if either, signaled intention to change position or direction of travel on the roadway? How and for how long?

Why do you think the driver had no idea that the cyclist was there? How would that situation have developed if the driver had properly merged to the far right edge of the road before executing the right turn, as required by the California Vehicle Code?

Was the garbage truck equipped with the usual complement of mirrors that are mounted on those vehicles, intended for operation in tight spaces and dense traffic? Did that include the mirror systems that permit drivers to see traffic on the right side of the truck?

If we don't know these things and more, how can you say things like "No one at fault. . ."?
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-13, 02:29 PM   #25
kalliergo 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbeachgary View Post
Can't assign responsibility but you did anyway. Way to go.
No I didn't Gary. You failed to comprehend what I wrote. We suspect you are doing so because I told you in a previous thread that your mother should have taught you manners. I don't want to play with you. You'll go on ignore in a heartbeat.
__________________
"What if we fail to stop the erosion of cities by automobiles?. . . In that case, we Americans will hardly need to ponder a mystery that has troubled men for millennia: What is the purpose of life? For us, the answer will be clear, established and for all practical purposes indisputable: The purpose of life is to produce and consume automobiles."

~Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities
kalliergo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.