Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-13, 03:11 AM   #76
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 440 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
Don't worry, the rest of New Orleans will still enjoy it, and likely, most of the other bicyclists.

you can leave the parks to the morons and idiots.
A prime example of the level of quality and usefulness Bek expects from bicycle facilities.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 03:19 AM   #77
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
mabye CBHI would like New Orleans to post traffic police along the MUPs, keep the pedestrians to one side -the people joey maligns as 'morons and idiots' for JoeyBike's benefit.



there's something moronic depicted in the video, and It's interesting how the opinions on "where" that is differs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
I am just getting over my disappointment slowly.
oh, its awful, isn't it? A park puts a MUP through it, and it presents daunting bicycle maneuvering "issues" for some of the bicyclists.



I have serious doubts any path markings as being regulatory; they're likely an advisory marking with no real regulatory structure to require pedestrians to walk to the right of a MUP.

Ever ridden the Golden Gate Bridge? Yeah, the cyclists think the pedestrians shouldn't be in the way. Or those bridges in NYC, how dare the pedestrians walk on the bike side!

Last edited by Bekologist; 06-04-13 at 03:44 AM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 09:32 AM   #78
Chitown_Mike
That guy from the Chi
 
Chitown_Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chicago
Bikes: 88 Trek 800 - gone to new cheeks; '14 Trek 1.2 - aka The X1 Advanced; '13 Trek 3500 Disc
Posts: 1,006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
So you missed the fact that it is not crowding that Joey is complaining about but the inability to follow the basic rules of the path as clearly marked on the path.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB HI View Post
No, I simply responded to another poster, who like you, has problems comprehending the thread. He said the OP should avoid peak hours and I simply told him the OP was commuting and did not have the luxury of picking times he commutes.

Most in this thread understood that, but not you.

I wouldn't say it was a comprehension thing for me, I was under the impression he was thinking about taking it for commuting and then making a statement on the peds inabilities to follow the signs. Then made a video during peak hours to make a statement, which seems backwards if he is trying to say people are being a hazard during his riding time.

I am sorry I didn't get a doctorate in literary works and comprehension (obviously like you have) and instead work in the automotive field.
Chitown_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 10:26 AM   #79
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyBike View Post
IQ rankings in the USA by state:

49. LOUISIANA......................................... .................95.3 [average IQ]
50. MISSISSIPPI....................................... .................94.2 [average IQ]
(source)

These are AVERAGE IQs which means HALF of them are dumber than that! (George Carlin)

I live in Louisiana and only 60 miles from Mississippi. Trust me, they are morons.
Actually I'm inclined to say that is too kind.

At least as I see it someone lacking smarts is not as bad as someone who simply does not care in the slightest about anyone else.

But I'm also inclined to think the designers are morons or a committee. The path as shown with the 10MPH limit you asserted earlier makes no sense. One directional bike lane with no return? Now if the bike part had a MINIMUM speed of 15 MPH it would make sense in a twisted way. E.g. a dedicated part for hammerheads training and all slower traffic, bikes and peds in the other half. A very twisted sense, but more logical than what they have. (Stop and think, just where should a pedestrian going the same direction as the bike part be in that 2 way mess).
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 11:38 AM   #80
danmc
Senior Member
 
danmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes:
Posts: 923
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyBike View Post
IQ rankings in the USA by state:

49. LOUISIANA......................................... .................95.3 [average IQ]
50. MISSISSIPPI....................................... .................94.2 [average IQ]
(source)

These are AVERAGE IQs which means HALF of them are dumber than that! (George Carlin)

I live in Louisiana and only 60 miles from Mississippi. Trust me, they are morons.
Not to be rude, but if you live in Louisiana only 60 miles from Mississippi, then shouldn't it be "we" and not "they"?
danmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-13, 04:50 PM   #81
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
Thread Starter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Bikes: Surly LHT, and 3 others
Posts: 5,623
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 260 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by danmc View Post
Not to be rude, but if you live in Louisiana only 60 miles from Mississippi, then shouldn't it be "we" and not "they"?
"We" are not the problem here. A subset of "We", namely "they" (those who walk on top of the bike symbols) are the problem. Notice many folks were walking and biking on the correct sides? "We" are using the path correctly while "They" are not. Not all of "Them" are morons but all of "Them" are knuckleheads.

Clear?
JoeyBike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.