Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Listen to me powers2b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lexus Texas
    Posts
    2,791
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    EU proposal to make motorist liable

    FEBRUARY 21, 2005 -- BRUSSELS, Belgium (BRAIN)--The European Union, now 25 nations strong, may be on the verge of shaking motorists out of the unconscious fog some seem to be in when driving into cyclists and pedestrians. The method: slap 'em in their pocketbooks, where it may actually hurt.



    The European Two-Wheel Retailers' Association (ETRA), reports that a bill making motorists automatically liable in an accident with cyclists and pedestrians has passed the European Parliament and will soon be before the European Council, the union's main decision- making body. If the council adopts it, all member nations will within the next two years have to pass similar laws guarantee cyclists compensation if they are involved in a crash with a motorized vehicle.



    "In ETRA's view, assuring non-motorized road users of damages is making a clear signal to motorized users. Many accidents happen because of the dominant attitude of motorized users, as a result of which they seriously lack attention for non-motorized users. This attitude needs to change in order to get priorities right," said Annick Roetynck, the association's secretary general.



    Holland, Belgium and several other countries already have similar legislation in place, and, ETRA observed, it "proves to considerably improve the relation between cyclists and motorists." Those countries' legislation has not sent insurance rates skyrocketing or resulted in outlandish claims, Roetynck said.



    ETRA and many of its 6,000 retail store members lobbied for the legislation, arguing that cyclists and pedestrians are more exposed to injury and suffer fatality rates five to six times higher than motorists'.

    Enjoy

  2. #2
    山馬鹿 Spire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
    My Bikes
    TREK 1000 and a junk bike with a basket on the front to go to the shops.
    Posts
    1,398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wholly agree with this kind of logic and I suppose that it would generally follow that should a cyclist hit a pedestian, the cyclist would automatically be liable unless he can prove otherwise.
    http://www.cyclistsroadmap.com/eng/ - Cyclists' road map. Checkout which roads are good for cycling and rate roads in your area.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Metro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maplewood, NJ
    My Bikes
    EPX 303 (You probably never heard of it)
    Posts
    376
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Excellent post!. I was on London earlier this year and was apalled at the traffic flow on some streets. Roads are narrow and traffic is swift and agressive. Pedestrian crossing zones are few and far between, with a limited amount of time to cross before the light changes. I was glad I did not bring my bike with me. When you couple the tight, fast traffic with travel on the wrong side of the street, you have a dangerous combination.

    We take for granted the privilages we have. Accoding to the DMV manual, a pedestrian ALWAYS has the right of way, even when crossing against a red light. This is because the potential for harm is great. They built into the law a buffer to protect the weaker party (the pedestrian). I have never seen it really enforced, but at least it exists on paper. The fact that in the EU they have to lobby for the same rights says quite a lot.

  4. #4
    No Rocket Surgeon eubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Corona and S. El Monte, CA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
    Posts
    1,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the basic premise here, but we need to remember that all motorists are not bad drivers.

    If this passes, the floodgates will open.

    Need some money? Let a car hit you!

    There are plenty of bad bicycle riders and even pedestrians out there. Why assume a motorist is at fault because a bicycle rider or pedestrian does something way out in left field?

    Riding on the wrong side of the street? No lights at night? Run out between parked cars? Cross against a light? These are things I regularly deal with while driving in the neighborhood where I work. And it's not kids, it ADULTS!

    I can't believe these people are stupid, but there sure needs to be some education somewhere along the line. At least in CA, we have laws to cover these things. Why not learn them?

    Too bad the schools are too busy teaching to the exit exams now. When I was in elementary school way back in the 60's we had pedestrian and bicycle safety classes. We had to pass a safety test before we rode our bike to school!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Montreal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
    Posts
    6,521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In Quebec there is an insurance charge included in the annual vehicle registration fee. This covers injuries, time off work and damaged clothes to pedestrians and cyclists. It doesnt cover damage to the bike. If you are hit by a car you then claim on the government insurance - it doesnt matter if the driver has any insurance or not.

  6. #6
    Ride the Road Daily Commute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
    Posts
    4,059
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This rule sounds like the rule for many boats. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but on the water, larger boats must always yield to smaller boats, even if the small boats are piloted by idiots. I don't think the law would encourage reckless cycling. Most of us are more afraid of the emergency room than court room.

  7. #7
    militant commuter
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    lower manhattan
    Posts
    476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry Daily, let me correct you, and I do agree with the latter part of what you say. As a Captain that has crossed the Gulfstream from Lauderdale to the Bahamas nearly 30 times in the last few years, I can tell you that might makes right just as on our roads. 800 foot container ships do not give way to 65 foot cargo boats, even when the smaller has the right of way in a crossing situation. Even in Inland waterways larger vessels often have the right of way because they are often constricted by their draft. Sailboats under sail power have rights on paper, but in New York harbor, taunting sailboats when you are driving a highspeed ferry is a bit of a sport.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love the idea that the motorist would ALWAYS pay for a cyclist's medical bills, but lawyers would hate it. "Who is at fault?" "The motorist....when the guy on the bike ran the red light, the motorist failed to get out of his way".

  9. #9
    Huachuca Rider webist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    My Bikes
    Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix
    Posts
    4,274
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Metro
    Excellent post!. I was on London earlier this year and was apalled at the traffic flow on some streets. Roads are narrow and traffic is swift and agressive. Pedestrian crossing zones are few and far between, with a limited amount of time to cross before the light changes. I was glad I did not bring my bike with me. When you couple the tight, fast traffic with travel on the wrong side of the street, you have a dangerous combination.

    We take for granted the privilages we have. Accoding to the DMV manual, a pedestrian ALWAYS has the right of way, even when crossing against a red light. This is because the potential for harm is great. They built into the law a buffer to protect the weaker party (the pedestrian). I have never seen it really enforced, but at least it exists on paper. The fact that in the EU they have to lobby for the same rights says quite a lot.
    WRONG side of the road or DIFFERENT side of the road?
    Just Peddlin' Around

  10. #10
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd like to know the basis of this statement.


    Many accidents happen because of the dominant attitude of motorized users, as a result of which they seriously lack attention for non-motorized users.
    "Many" is very vague. 1% can be "many", since there are thousands of accidents per year, and 1% of, say, 10,000, is 100, which is arguably "many".

    But addressing 1% of any problem is hardly addressing the problem seriously.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,154
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
    I love the idea that the motorist would ALWAYS pay for a cyclist's medical bills, but lawyers would hate it. "Who is at fault?" "The motorist....when the guy on the bike ran the red light, the motorist failed to get out of his way".
    NJ has "No fault" insurance which means doctors don't have to wait forever to receive payment because the insurance companies have to pay regardless of who is at fault. This system does make for higher insurance payments for everyone but if you're car free, it will not effect you.

  12. #12
    Senior Member joeprim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Northern Neck Tidewater Va.
    Posts
    1,688
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Steve

    I'm surprised that no fault raises insurance cost. Other places that tried it lowered their cost.


    eubi

    I couldn't agree more. Automatic anything is scary and will likely lead to grave errors. Once Mass. had a similar law I think it was that any driver involved in a fatel accident with a ped automatically lost his drivers license for some time period I think a year. Then A ped commited sucisde my jumping in front of a bus. Lots of witnesses! They changed the law.

    Joe

  13. #13
    Senior Member Metro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maplewood, NJ
    My Bikes
    EPX 303 (You probably never heard of it)
    Posts
    376
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry Webist, "wrong" choice of words on my part. I was speaking from the USA perspecive. I should have said "other side of the road". (Did not put enough thought into my response. Please accept my apology.) I will try to be more thorough in the future.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,154
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by joeprim
    Steve

    I'm surprised that no fault raises insurance cost. Other places that tried it lowered their cost.


    eubi

    I couldn't agree more. Automatic anything is scary and will likely lead to grave errors. Once Mass. had a similar law I think it was that any driver involved in a fatel accident with a ped automatically lost his drivers license for some time period I think a year. Then A ped commited sucisde my jumping in front of a bus. Lots of witnesses! They changed the law.

    Joe
    NJ for many reasons has one of the highest insurance rates in the country. The last governor made some changes in derugulation and brough in Geico so rates have gone down. I don't know much about it since I've been car free.

  15. #15
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,824
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I respect the efficiency of no-fault insurance, but I fear it further insulates motorists from accountability. The end resutls we all want to obtain are to make everyone a more conscientious road user and to compensate civil wrongs financially. How we get there is a challenging puzzle.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  16. #16
    Senior Member DieselDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
    My Bikes
    Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    8,524
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I smell an Onion. This sounds too good to be true, and too ignorant to be real. The EU doesn't pass sweeping laws that effect sovergin countries, the EU wasn't organized to do this. There are quite a number of accidents where the cyclists or ped is at fault.

    Just think, you aren't at fault for riding on the wrong side of the road and hit a car? What about a man on a suicide mission that steps out in front of a truck? This looks way to bogus to me.
    Bikes use brakes to stop.

    If your bike has breaks, don't ride it.

  17. #17
    山馬鹿 Spire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Fuchu, Tokyo, Japan
    My Bikes
    TREK 1000 and a junk bike with a basket on the front to go to the shops.
    Posts
    1,398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP
    In Quebec there is an insurance charge included in the annual vehicle registration fee. This covers injuries, time off work and damaged clothes to pedestrians and cyclists. It doesnt cover damage to the bike. If you are hit by a car you then claim on the government insurance - it doesnt matter if the driver has any insurance or not.
    I'm not so sure that the no-fault system we have in Quebec is really the best.
    Partically because (as stated in the Civil Code) the payouts do seem to be quite low and consequently the premiums are quite low. But a good point is that they are directly linked to the number of points that you have on your liscence.
    http://www.cyclistsroadmap.com/eng/ - Cyclists' road map. Checkout which roads are good for cycling and rate roads in your area.

  18. #18
    Senior Member royalflash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Munich
    My Bikes
    Lemond Alpe dīHuez, Scott Sub 10, homemade mtb, Radlbauer adler (old city bike), Dahon impulse (folder with 20 inch wheels), haibike eq xduro
    Posts
    1,372
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eubi
    I like the basic premise here, but we need to remember that all motorists are not bad drivers.

    If this passes, the floodgates will open.

    Need some money? Let a car hit you!

    There are plenty of bad bicycle riders and even pedestrians out there. Why assume a motorist is at fault because a bicycle rider or pedestrian does something way out in left field?

    Riding on the wrong side of the street? No lights at night? Run out between parked cars? Cross against a light? These are things I regularly deal with while driving in the neighborhood where I work. And it's not kids, it ADULTS!

    I can't believe these people are stupid, but there sure needs to be some education somewhere along the line. At least in CA, we have laws to cover these things. Why not learn them?

    Too bad the schools are too busy teaching to the exit exams now. When I was in elementary school way back in the 60's we had pedestrian and bicycle safety classes. We had to pass a safety test before we rode our bike to school!
    I donīt think there will be a lot of cyclists who will decide to ride into cars if this legislation were to be passed. If they would only get ther medical bills paid it would just have the effect of making the doctors richer. I have not heard of this happening in Holland anyway.

    I dont think it would be a bad idea though to have an initial presumption of financial liability at least for the car driver with maybe the possibility for the car driver to prove he/she wasnīt at fault. It would have the effect of making them a bit more cautious and less likely to perorm aggressive and dangerous manouvers when they perceive that you are holding them up.

    We need to change the car-centric culture that says that cars rule the roads and eveyone else had better get out of the way or else. I was talking to my parents in the UK last summer and they were telling me how they needed to drive on the pavement to get somewhere and it was really dangerous because the peds had to jump out of the way and they were serious .

    Anyway- donīt worry the car-centric UK will never pass such legislation and I think the last time it was raised they blocked it.
    only the dead have seen the end of mass motorized stupidity

    Plato

    (well if he was alive today he would have written it)

  19. #19
    Listen to me powers2b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lexus Texas
    Posts
    2,791
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  20. #20
    Drive the Bicycle.
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    Three-speed modified for comfort.
    Posts
    608
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DieselDan
    I smell an Onion. This sounds too good to be true, and too ignorant to be real. The EU doesn't pass sweeping laws that effect sovergin countries, the EU wasn't organized to do this. There are quite a number of accidents where the cyclists or ped is at fault.

    Just think, you aren't at fault for riding on the wrong side of the road and hit a car? What about a man on a suicide mission that steps out in front of a truck? This looks way to bogus to me.
    - - Check out today's thread by Grasschopper: American returns from Denmark with observations

    One of his observations is:

    "The law - WOW these people actually STOP for a stop sign or stop light...and they wait. In 4 days there I saw 2 people run lights and that is of litterally more than a thousand cyclists I saw."

    Apparently The European Union does not have as many bicycling scofflaws as we do in the USA so the proposal is more feasible there.
    "The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man's metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well." Ivan Illich ('Energy and Equity')1974

  21. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by royalflash
    I donīt think there will be a lot of cyclists who will decide to ride into cars if this legislation were to be passed. If they would only get ther medical bills paid it would just have the effect of making the doctors richer. I have not heard of this happening in Holland anyway.

    I dont think it would be a bad idea though to have an initial presumption of financial liability at least for the car driver with maybe the possibility for the car driver to prove he/she wasnīt at fault. It would have the effect of making them a bit more cautious and less likely to perorm aggressive and dangerous manouvers when they perceive that you are holding them up.

    We need to change the car-centric culture that says that cars rule the roads and eveyone else had better get out of the way or else. I was talking to my parents in the UK last summer and they were telling me how they needed to drive on the pavement to get somewhere and it was really dangerous because the peds had to jump out of the way and they were serious .

    Anyway- donīt worry the car-centric UK will never pass such legislation and I think the last time it was raised they blocked it.
    There are no personal medical bills in the UK apart from trivial prescription charges for certain working people and riding on the pavement is illegal so it's no wonder the peds were angry.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •