Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-23-13, 07:52 PM   #1
B. Carfree
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Good News, Bad News in The Golden State

After refusing to sign similar legislation into law the past two years, Governor Brown has finally relented and signed a three-foot passing law. That's the good news. The bad news is the trivial fines:
Quote:
A violation of the new 3-foot requirement would be punishable by fines starting at $35. If unsafe passing results in a crash that injures the cyclist, the driver could face a $220 fine.
Unenforced laws with fines that are so low no one would even notice them isn't exactly a giant leap forward in my mind. Are there any other deadly behaviors that have such low fines for willful violations?

http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/C...aw-4837434.php
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-13, 07:56 PM   #2
daihard 
Senior Member
 
daihard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Trek, Cannondale
Posts: 1,878
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wonder how the cyclist can prove a rule violation? An onboard camcorder?
__________________

The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
daihard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-13, 08:15 PM   #3
B. Carfree
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by daihard View Post
I wonder how the cyclist can prove a rule violation? An onboard camcorder?
The article said it was left to local law enforcement to deal with. As I said, unenforced laws...
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-13, 09:38 PM   #4
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Bikes:
Posts: 6,142
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Given the difficulty in measuring passing distances and the section of the law that says you can pass at less than 3' as long as you slow enough to do it 'safely' I don't expect many citations to be issued for close, but non-collision, passes. But having the law in the CVC could lead to better education campaigns that emphasize a minimum 3' passing distance and I hope this distance will appear in future editions of the Drivers Manual and as a test question on the license exam.

Not sure why this part of the CVC specifies the fine amount since most other sections merely state what is allowed and not allowed without mention of any specific fines for particular transgressions. It should be noted that the amounts stated are apparently just the base amount and there are assorted court surcharges that make the actual amount of the fine considerably higher.
prathmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-13, 10:32 PM   #5
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,326
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
Given the difficulty in measuring passing distances and the section of the law that says you can pass at less than 3' as long as you slow enough to do it 'safely' I don't expect many citations to be issued for close, but non-collision, passes.
I have a couple of videos that, if this law was in effect at the time, would very possibly garnered the motorists a ticket.
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 01:10 PM   #6
WPeabody 
Senior Member
 
WPeabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Monterey Bay area, California
Bikes: Terratrike Tour, recumbent tadpole tricycle.
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Not so sure that anyone has to worry about measuring the 3 foot law per se, but rather whether the car comes close enough to sideswipe the cyclist, or makes an aggressive close pass in an attempt to intimidate. (Or simply makes a dangerous close pass out of being oblivious to the situation) People have done that to me in all three ways, and it is not so much a danger to me on a recumbent trike, but to my daughter who rides a DF bike and is not the steadiest rider. I generally have a camera running all the time while on the road, and if someone knocks her off her bike, at least we have the 3 foot law to take into consideration when filling out the report. It's a step in a positive direction, overall. However, this law doesn't go into effect for another year.
__________________
What do you call a cyclist who sells potpourri on the road? A pedaling petal-peddler.
WPeabody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 01:17 PM   #7
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,780
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 462 Post(s)
I wonder if the law will be publicized in any manner... if not, then motorists won't know the law and will still insist that bikes don't belong on the road.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 01:36 PM   #8
ItsJustMe
Se˝ior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Posts: 13,128
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Traffic laws are more about assigning blame after the fact than keeping idiots from doing idiotic things.

A possible side effect would be to give some ammo to arguments about proper behavior, but I don't count on laws to keep me safe on the road. If followed they would do that but only a fool would count on people following laws.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 04:09 PM   #9
bhop
Senior Member
 
bhop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes: Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Jamis Sputnik
Posts: 1,895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've been reading the comments on ktla's facebook page some of the morning. Drivers don't really care, and of course, it's all our fault for being in the road anyway. Nothing new..

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...r&notif_t=like
bhop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 05:19 PM   #10
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,780
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 462 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhop View Post
I've been reading the comments on ktla's facebook page some of the morning. Drivers don't really care, and of course, it's all our fault for being in the road anyway. Nothing new..

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...aterČif_t=like
This seems to be the most common complaint:
Quote:
I would just like the bicyclists to obey the traffic rules. Ride with not against traffic, signal when turning, stop at the stop signs!!!
I have to say it would be nice if motorists did this also...
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 05:27 PM   #11
bhop
Senior Member
 
bhop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes: Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Jamis Sputnik
Posts: 1,895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
This seems to be the most common complaint:

I have to say it would be nice if motorists did this also...
Exactly. They're hypocrites. Not to mention, in my daily commutes, I see more cyclists actually obeying traffic laws than not. There are still people that ride like they have a death wish, but the same goes for drivers.
bhop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-13, 05:36 PM   #12
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
$35, $220? REALLY? Hell, where I live, the ticket for LOUD stereo starts at $150! (They don't pass out many of those, either.....)

I got a reckless driving ticket (my LAST ONE) in 1977 -- $150 plus court costs! The ticket for a close pass, even if they GET ticketed, is basically LUNCH MONEY.

Way to go, Jerry & Co.
DX-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 07:28 AM   #13
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,326
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DX-MAN View Post
$35, $220? REALLY? Hell, where I live, the ticket for LOUD stereo starts at $150! (They don't pass out many of those, either.....)

I got a reckless driving ticket (my LAST ONE) in 1977 -- $150 plus court costs! The ticket for a close pass, even if they GET ticketed, is basically LUNCH MONEY.

Way to go, Jerry & Co.
Listening to one of the co authors of the this latest passing bill, the 35 dollar fine was one of the carrots used in helping get the law passed. The fine amount can still be increased at a later date in time.
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 07:32 AM   #14
aubiecat 
Senior Member
 
aubiecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Alexander City, Alabama
Bikes:
Posts: 793
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
Listening to one of the co authors of the this latest passing bill, the 35 dollar fine was one of the carrots used in helping get the law passed. The fine amount can still be increased at a later date in time.
Will a bikers life have to be sacrificed to get the fine increased?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
Coffee is already a good antioxidant and it should be like a good cycling kit - black.
aubiecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 08:16 AM   #15
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,326
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aubiecat View Post
Will a bikers life have to be sacrificed to get the fine increased?
Hopefully it will be because of a large number cyclists reporting close passing by undeterred motorists.
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 08:26 AM   #16
aubiecat 
Senior Member
 
aubiecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Alexander City, Alabama
Bikes:
Posts: 793
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
Hopefully it will be because of a large number cyclists reporting close passing by undeterred motorists.
I hate how bills, that would actually benefit society, get watered down due to politics and back room deals. You can probably thank some lobbyist for that ridiculous $35.00 fine.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
Coffee is already a good antioxidant and it should be like a good cycling kit - black.
aubiecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 09:02 AM   #17
phoebeisis
New Orleans
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Notice
Plenty of the ill will toward cyclist is directed toward VC types "taking a lane"
Pissing off drivers- no benefit to them or the rest of us.Smart !
Middle of the lane-with texting on the rise-worst placement for a rider. 1)probability(it is where the car is most often) and 2) more peripheral placement and movement is more noticeable than directly in front.
" I didn't see him"

The 3 foot law- pointless-just an extra ticket when a rider gets hit.
phoebeisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 02:06 PM   #18
B. Carfree
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aubiecat View Post
I hate how bills, that would actually benefit society, get watered down due to politics and back room deals. You can probably thank some lobbyist for that ridiculous $35.00 fine.
Maybe, but probably not. Gov. Brown has become a notorious bike-hater in his dotage. He vetoed prior bills and this "carrot" of the low fine was likely one of his conditions for signing this one.

It's sad. During his first run as Governor Moonbeam, he put a bike division in CalTrans. Something happened to him over the decades. (That bike division was removed in the first month after he left office, so no lasting impact.)
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 04:48 PM   #19
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
What is wrong with the safe passing law already in place?
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 05:42 PM   #20
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,780
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 462 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
What is wrong with the safe passing law already in place?
It left all the decisions on safe passing up to the motorist to determine. While this new law is less than perfect, it at least specifies a distance other than "well, I didn't hit you;" which in the past, is all you had.

The reality is a true safe passing law would be based on what motorists now do to each other naturally, they give more space as speed goes up; part of this is due to streets being striped differently, part is due to the natural paranoia of motorists to avoid hitting one another.

Sadly motorists don't seem to apply those same rules to cyclists, at least all the time. The guys of CyclistView have a nice chart that tells us that motorists now pass safely, depending on your distance from the curb... you can see their chart here: http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/...d-the-3ft-law/ (which BTW is a nice diatribe on three foot laws)

The problem is that we have all experienced close passing... so motorists tend consider the space they give to cyclists a fungible commodity... something readily taken away if the motorist feels pressure of time, speed, or whatever other rationalization is more important than a "silly cyclist."

No, a static three foot law is less than perfect, but it beats the "whatever" law that previously existed.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 10:01 PM   #21
dynodonn 
Senior Member
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 7,326
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post

.......a static three foot law is less than perfect, but it beats the "whatever" law that previously existed.

Listening to one of the co-authors of the bill, one thing that got my attention is that now if a cyclist is hit due a close pass, the motorist has to now prove why they were closer than 3 ft from the cyclist to begin with.
dynodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-13, 11:25 PM   #22
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhop View Post
There are still people that ride like they have a death wish
the dying is caused by the motorists, not the cyclists. just saying.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-13, 07:06 AM   #23
bhop
Senior Member
 
bhop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Bikes: Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Jamis Sputnik
Posts: 1,895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
the dying is caused by the motorists, not the cyclists. just saying.
True, but sometimes the 'he swerved' is actually real. I see people weaving all over the road all the time, moving left into the traffic flow without even looking.
bhop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-13, 08:04 AM   #24
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
I wonder if the law will be publicized in any manner... if not, then motorists won't know the law and will still insist that bikes don't belong on the road.
IMO, this is the crux of the matter. We need more education and awareness programs (radio/TV spots, ads, billboards,... ) explaining and reminding people how to share the road and of the rights of all road users. You can't expect people to behave the way you want if you don't at the least tell them how you want them to behave and explain why. After that, laws and courts are the recourse for those who don't or won't.
Looigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-13, 08:16 AM   #25
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,780
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 462 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Looigi View Post
IMO, this is the crux of the matter. We need more education and awareness programs (radio/TV spots, ads, billboards,... ) explaining and reminding people how to share the road and of the rights of all road users. You can't expect people to behave the way you want if you don't at the least tell them how you want them to behave and explain why. After that, laws and courts are the recourse for those who don't or won't.
I just saw a safety PSA ad about not wearing earbuds and walking on RR tracks... I have never seen a PSA about bikes sharing the road with cars. I see safety posters for boating all around the local marina... I have never once seen a billboard talking about cyclists rights on the road.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 AM.