Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Fun news from the Georgia Ligislature!

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Fun news from the Georgia Ligislature!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-13, 09:02 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
delcrossv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Scalarville
Posts: 1,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Fun news from the Georgia Legislature!

Sorry Roadies, no pelotons for you! (see Section 7)

https://www.legis.ga.gov/legislation/...0132014/HB/689
delcrossv is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 09:13 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
CbadRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A 4" wide x 7" long license plate might be a bit difficult to install on this.

__________________
Originally Posted by Xerum 525
Now get on your cheap bike and give me a double century. You walking can of Crisco!!

Forum Guidelines *click here*
CbadRider is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 09:20 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
It looks to me as if its a proposed law at this point, has it been passed into law yet?

That section seven is a hoot - 4 riders at 4' spacing in a single line is just stupid.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 09:24 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
delcrossv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Scalarville
Posts: 1,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
It's still a bill, and yes, it's a "hoot".
delcrossv is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 09:26 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
lsberrios1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 2,844

Bikes: '13 Spech Roubaix SL4 Expert

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm moving out of this state...
__________________
Cat 6 going on PRO....
lsberrios1 is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 09:48 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
I was just discussing it this morning with a co-worker. It's going nowhere, in fact other legislators in his own party are making fun of the bill's sponsor.

I told my friend that I wouldn't mind paying a registration tax as long as it was proportional to the vehicle weight, since wear on the road is proportional to weight. Sounds fair to me. That would come to about a dollar - but this guy wants $15 per year, or $48 for a permanent tag.

The bizarre distance and grouping restrictions he wants are just funny.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 10:22 AM
  #7  
Not quite there yet
 
Matariki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Monkey Bottom, NC
Posts: 999

Bikes: A bunch of old steel bikes + an ICE trike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Interesting that this requirement does not apply to mopeds.

59 (b) Subsection (a) of this Code section shall not apply:

77 (6) To any moped.
4"x7" plate? Wow! I'd mount it so it sticks out from my left handlebar.

Mr. Rogers looks like he needs to spend some time on a bike.

Also: What would they do about riders from other states? If passed into law, I wouldn't mind taking the bike down to GA to "pass through". "Sorry Officer, I'm from North Carolina and don't need a license".

Last edited by Matariki; 09-27-13 at 10:28 AM.
Matariki is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 10:32 AM
  #8  
VFL For Life
 
Velo Vol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 51,210

Bikes: Velo Volmobile

Mentioned: 780 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28595 Post(s)
Liked 1,855 Times in 1,317 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
I told my friend that I wouldn't mind paying a registration tax as long as it was proportional to the vehicle weight, since wear on the road is proportional to weight. Sounds fair to me. That would come to about a dollar - but this guy wants $15 per year, or $48 for a permanent tag.
Depends how fat you are.
__________________
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
People here don't get it.
Velo Vol is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 10:56 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
FenderTL5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 794

Bikes: Trek 7.3FX, Diamondback Edgewood hybrid, KHS Montana

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Instead of passing one group of riders, he (they) want to pass multiple groups.
They must drive sports cars and like to rev the engine repeatedly.
FenderTL5 is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 11:06 AM
  #10  
Fritz M
 
richardmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: California
Posts: 959

Bikes: Trek, Spesh, GT, Centurion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
Depends how fat you are.
A 300 pound cyclist still masses an order of magnitude less than any motor vehicle.

You all are familiar with the 4th Power Rule, right? Vehicle road damage is not proportional just to weight, but by vehicle speed times axle weight to the fourth power.

If you want registration fees proportional to road damage, let’s start with a 1 penny registration fee for a bicycle. A 5000 pound SUV travels at 3x the speed of a fast cyclist, and weighs 25 times as much as a cyclist and his bike. 25 to the 4th power = 390,625; multiplied by 3 = 1,171,875 pennies or $11,718.75.
richardmasoner is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 11:33 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by richardmasoner
A 300 pound cyclist still masses an order of magnitude less than any motor vehicle.

You all are familiar with the 4th Power Rule, right? Vehicle road damage is not proportional just to weight, but by vehicle speed times axle weight to the fourth power.

If you want registration fees proportional to road damage, let’s start with a 1 penny registration fee for a bicycle. A 5000 pound SUV travels at 3x the speed of a fast cyclist, and weighs 25 times as much as a cyclist and his bike. 25 to the 4th power = 390,625; multiplied by 3 = 1,171,875 pennies or $11,718.75.
True but people want to argue with me about the size of contact patch, how rigid the tire is etc, so I just postulate as proportional and I wouldn't mind paying a penny or a dollar.

But now that you mention it, if we had to overpay our fair share by tens of millions of times, I think it would be fair that we get the right of way no matter what the situation is, and ride right down the middle of any street. No red lights for us either - make those freeloading motorists stop even on green lights.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 12:07 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
So how did that b'crat get his brain damage???? Cant you see cops pulling over a 4 year old and hauling them off to jail for no license? What about poor people that have for or five kids, them shelling out $60 plus dollars a year is unreasonable.

But-------------if that bill passes, any Ga bike rider should ride in the center of a hiway lane and assert his rights as a licensed rider!!!!!!
rydabent is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 12:34 PM
  #13  
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
I would love to see licensing proportional to weight and have that include the operator. Let's see how fast the law gets shot down when you tell the population that the vehicle needs to be weight AND the owner needs to register their weight with the DMV as well.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 12:54 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When a roadway is part of the state highway system, the Department of Transportation
195 may restrict persons from riding bicycles on the roadway or designate certain times when
196 bicycle riding is permissible. When a roadway is part of a local road system, a local
197 governing authority may restrict persons from riding bicycles on the roadway or designate
198 certain times when bicycle riding is permissible.
Good times there. So the state can come in and say "sorry, Mr. Cyclist, you can only ride on state routes between the hours of 1PM and 3PM on Saturdays.

I wonder what event(s) prompted this legislator to draft this bill.
spivonious is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 01:04 PM
  #15  
Chronic 1st-timer
 
lubes17319's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lakehood, CO
Posts: 1,140

Bikes: ...take me places.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yet they choose to ignore the massive peloton of autos seen on a daily basis.
lubes17319 is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 01:05 PM
  #16  
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Even if this goes through, doesn't matter because you can't constitutionally restrict the right of travel, and travel by foot or bicycle has historically been interpreted as falling under the constitutionally protected right of travel.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 01:07 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by spivonious
I wonder what event(s) prompted this legislator to draft this bill.
Closed door meeting with his ALEC representative...
mconlonx is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 02:07 PM
  #18  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times in 1,044 Posts
Originally Posted by spivonious
I wonder what event(s) prompted this legislator to draft this bill.
My guess: One or more gaggles of roadies from "out of town" were seen as obnoxious road hogs by the locals of some town(s) they roll though regularly on training rides and the enraged locals are constituents of the legislator. Hence the specific restrictions on peloton riding; the rest of the legislation is meant to rub salt into wounds.

Luckily it is the bike registration fees and administrative burden that will likely kill the proposal. The restriction on roadie formations would probably pass in many places if the bill had limited itself to peloton restrictions.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 02:09 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
FenderTL5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 794

Bikes: Trek 7.3FX, Diamondback Edgewood hybrid, KHS Montana

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spivonious
I wonder what event(s) prompted this legislator to draft this bill.
All (sponsors/co-sponsors) are from Gainesville... I'd bet there's a catalyst in that area..

Last edited by FenderTL5; 09-27-13 at 02:15 PM.
FenderTL5 is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 02:26 PM
  #20  
Hogosha Sekai
 
RaleighSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STS
Posts: 6,669

Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 15 Posts
A little research on Mr Rogers paints an interesting picture at least to me.

1: He's an independant insurance agent of some sort which leads me to believe he'd have tendencies more favoring that industry rather than peoples rights to the road.. assuming he sells auto insurance and you get at the least a vested interest IMO.

2: He lists his special interests as travelling, golf, family. Which leads me to believe he's fairly insulated from the mentality of most if not all cyclists or understanding of how their rights work...

To be honest, I'd love to pick his brain.
RaleighSport is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 03:03 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,262
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4246 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by spivonious
When a roadway is part of the state highway system, the Department of Transportation
195 may restrict persons from riding bicycles on the roadway or designate certain times when
196 bicycle riding is permissible. When a roadway is part of a local road system, a local
197 governing authority may restrict persons from riding bicycles on the roadway or designate
198 certain times when bicycle riding is permissible.




Good times there. So the state can come in and say "sorry, Mr. Cyclist, you can only ride on state routes between the hours of 1PM and 3PM on Saturdays.

I wonder what event(s) prompted this legislator to draft this bill.
Many (if not most) states already restrict bicycle riding on roads that are part of the "state highway system".

Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
Even if this goes through, doesn't matter because you can't constitutionally restrict the right of travel, and travel by foot or bicycle has historically been interpreted as falling under the constitutionally protected right of travel.
??? What "restriction" are you talking about? Pelotons aren't consitutionally protected and many states prohibit cycling on certain roads. You might be talking about the registration (you aren't clear) but keep in mind that this is only proposed legislation.

Last edited by njkayaker; 09-27-13 at 03:07 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 03:32 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
Many (if not most) states already restrict bicycle riding on roads that are part of the "state highway system".
Many states place some restrictions on cycling on roads that are part of the "Interstate Highway System." I haven't encountered any prohibitions on cycling on state highways other than a few bridge crossings.
prathmann is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 04:53 PM
  #23  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by lubes17319
Yet they choose to ignore the massive peloton of autos seen on a daily basis.
BBBBBut they paid for the road with "road taxes." (didn't you get the bill??)
genec is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 05:10 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,262
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4246 Post(s)
Liked 1,351 Times in 937 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Many states place some restrictions on cycling on roads that are part of the "Interstate Highway System." I haven't encountered any prohibitions on cycling on state highways other than a few bridge crossings.
It's not just interstates or a few bridge crossings.

https://www.state.nj.us/transportatio.../highways.shtm

https://www.dot.ny.gov/display/progr...ism/hwy-bridge

https://www.massrmv.com/rmv/dmanual/Drivers_Manual.pdf

And (ironically) California.

https://www.bikelink.com/law_safety.asp

Last edited by njkayaker; 09-27-13 at 05:26 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 05:15 PM
  #25  
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
??? What "restriction" are you talking about? Pelotons aren't consitutionally protected and many states prohibit cycling on certain roads. You might be talking about the registration (you aren't clear) but keep in mind that this is only proposed legislation.
Time of day restrictions. How can they tell me I can't ride my bike in the hour before I have to be to work, for instance?
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.