Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 29 of 29
  1. #26
    Senior Member jputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pacific, WA
    My Bikes
    Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
    Posts
    1,168
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by squirtdad View Post
    IMHO the lights are too close together to be of value.
    Agreed, this is an issue with motorcycles, too. Minimum legal separation here in Washington is sixteen inches on motorcycles, and even that isn't enough for all drivers to reliably identify the direction being signaled.

    I have seen one rider with a Radbot 1000 tail light on the wristband of his winter commuting glove. The Radbots have a good reflector and a good bright light. When he's riding, it's pointing down at the ground. When he signals, it faces back at traffic behind.

    Personally, I think I'd find the flashing down at the ground annoying on a dark commute. But it might not be hard to fit in a tilt switch.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jputnam/collections/72157604835074312/

  2. #27
    Senior Member jputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pacific, WA
    My Bikes
    Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
    Posts
    1,168
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quite apart from whether they work, you might also look into what their legal status would be in your jurisdiction. Two separate questions, really -- are they allowed on a bike, and are they recognized as turn signals?

    Are they allowed? They're a flashing light that isn't a tail light, what flashing lights does your state allow for bicycles?

    Are they recognized? If your state only defines hand signals for bicycles, turn signals may not legally qualify as having signaled your turn. Not likely to get a ticket for not signaling if your signals were visible, but could play into liability after an accident. "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, poor old Mrs. Jones would never have struck the cyclist, if only he'd signaled legally..." Plays right into the scofflaw cyclist stereotype.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jputnam/collections/72157604835074312/

  3. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    119
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jputnam View Post
    Quite apart from whether they work, you might also look into what their legal status would be in your jurisdiction. Two separate questions, really -- are they allowed on a bike, and are they recognized as turn signals?

    Are they allowed? They're a flashing light that isn't a tail light, what flashing lights does your state allow for bicycles?

    Are they recognized? If your state only defines hand signals for bicycles, turn signals may not legally qualify as having signaled your turn. Not likely to get a ticket for not signaling if your signals were visible, but could play into liability after an accident. "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, poor old Mrs. Jones would never have struck the cyclist, if only he'd signaled legally..." Plays right into the scofflaw cyclist stereotype.
    Look again at my signals...

    If anyone tried any kind of defense stating that they couldn't see the signals, they'd be full of it...
    especially during nighttime hours, you can DEFINITELY tell which direction I'm heading.
    Theyre really good during the day too!

    I've been using them for 6 months now and not once did I have a problem.
    Just for those who may be new here, the more militant membership is convinced that they need some outrageous amount (Seven feet? Nine feet?) of real estate in order to ride their bikes safely - and even that isn't really enough because they figure it'll always be imperfectly paved or not spotlessly clean or that the whole bike lane thing is some "separate but equal" conspiracy to keep them down.

  4. #29
    Senior Member jputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pacific, WA
    My Bikes
    Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
    Posts
    1,168
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpecialX View Post
    Look again at my signals...

    If anyone tried any kind of defense stating that they couldn't see the signals, they'd be full of it...
    Who said anything about not seeing it?

    I see all sort of things on the road that aren't a cyclist's arm making a turn signal. If your state defines cyclist turns signals exclusively as signals made with the arms, you could have a million candlepower and not be legally signalling your turns.

    It's the same sort of issue as not having legally-mandated reflectors, even if you have more than adequate lights.


    Lawyer: "Did you have a red rear reflector visible at 600 feet, and reflectors on both pedals?"

    Mr. Jones: "No, I had...." Lawyer, interrupting: "Thank you, Mr. Jones. Your honor, please direct the jury that Mr. Jones has admitted not having the reflectors required by law."


    Do your signals comply with the law in the jurisdiction where you're using them?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jputnam/collections/72157604835074312/

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •