Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-13, 09:26 AM   #1
squirtdad
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: '89 Miyata 1400, '82 nishiski, 84 Torpado super strada (Cino someday)
Posts: 4,207
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
nyc bike lanes

entertaining if nothing else, but guy gets ticke (apparently not valid) for not using bikelanes. Point of concern for me is the : build bike infrastructure and restrict cyclists to the infrastructure, even infrastructure is no good.

don't recall seeing this posted before, but apologies if it is a duplicate


http://www.minds.com/blog/view/23184...-in-bike-lanes
__________________
Looking for Torpado Superlight 58cm
squirtdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-13, 09:34 AM   #2
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,968
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 855 Post(s)
Humorous, wonder what would have happened if he mailed back the ticket with a "not illegal" letter explaining the law....
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-13, 10:02 AM   #3
Essex
Senior Member
 
Essex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast United States
Bikes: Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid
Posts: 1,148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
This is an older video. The cop is pretty mellow about it. The lanes have only slightly improved given the higher number of Citibikes on the lanes.

It's also easy enough to fight a ticket. Usually the cops don't show up for the hearing and the case is dismissed. This has happened several times for me already in NYC.
Essex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-13, 02:33 PM   #4
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
One of the unintended consequences of bike infrastructure. It reinforces people's misapprehension that bicycles should not be on the roads, but be restricted to bike lanes and paths.
Looigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-13, 09:21 PM   #5
dangorange
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Funny, he's a well known filmmaker, definitely appreciate this one
dangorange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-13, 08:58 AM   #6
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,847
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Looigi View Post
One of the unintended consequences of bike infrastructure. It reinforces people's misapprehension that bicycles should not be on the roads, but be restricted to bike lanes and paths.
I agree which is why I'm generally not in favor of bike infrastructure.

OTOH, the law in NY is pretty clear on this point, where lanes exist, we're compelled to use them. I've been riding in NYC doe 45 years, never had a serious issue sharing the strees and avenues with cars. Now since NYC has become "bike friendly" the number of avenues available to me is reduced, but so far it's manageable.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-13, 10:57 PM   #7
walrus1
Senior Member
 
walrus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Bikes: Schwinn World Sport Jamis Ventura
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That video is pretty old but still very relevant. Bike lanes are often anything but bike lanes. They are commercial unloading spots, drop off and pick up spots, running tracks, smoking lounges, waiting rooms and parking spots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
I agree which is why I'm generally not in favor of bike infrastructure.

OTOH, the law in NY is pretty clear on this point, where lanes exist, we're compelled to use them. I've been riding in NYC doe 45 years, never had a serious issue sharing the streets and avenues with cars. Now since NYC has become "bike friendly" the number of avenues available to me is reduced, but so far it's manageable.
It's my understanding that you're not confined to roads with bike lanes in fact he can go any surface street unless otherwise noted or common sense says not to.

Last edited by walrus1; 10-09-13 at 11:08 PM.
walrus1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 08:23 AM   #8
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,847
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus1 View Post

It's my understanding that you're not confined to roads with bike lanes in fact he can go any surface street unless otherwise noted or common sense says not to.
Yes, one can avoid roads with adjacent bike lanes. I didn't say that I was forced o ride only on bike lanes. But my choices of usable roads is reduced because the ones with lanes are eliminated.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 09:31 PM   #9
walrus1
Senior Member
 
walrus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Bikes: Schwinn World Sport Jamis Ventura
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
Yes, one can avoid roads with adjacent bike lanes. I didn't say that I was forced o ride only on bike lanes. But my choices of usable roads is reduced because the ones with lanes are eliminated.
Um, why are ones with bike lanes eliminated? What your saying makes zero sense. If there is an obstruction you can simply take the lane and go around it. If the lane is blocked or so damaged that it is unsafe to ride in you can again take the lane. In both these cases taking the lane is 100% legal.
walrus1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 09:40 PM   #10
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,847
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus1 View Post
Um, why are ones with bike lanes eliminated? What your saying makes zero sense. If there is an obstruction you can simply take the lane and go around it. If the lane is blocked or so damaged that it is unsafe to ride in you can again take the lane. In both these cases taking the lane is 100% legal.
Of course it makes zero sense, unless you understand that I don't ride in bike lanes when there's a good safe road parallel, but the state mandates exactly the opposite, so I am (self) banned from riding on avenues where there are bike lanes.

Why I don't ride bike lanes.

Bike lanes are dangerous for cyclists who can and do ride at the pace of general street traffic.

The bike lanes are narrow, often in the door lane, and full of slower moving cyclists who cannot hold a line. Moreover they greatly increase the risk of left hooks (NYC lanes on avenues are usually on the left) and other cross traffic accidents.

They're also on the wrong side of the road, if I'm planning a right turn onto a cross street (Yes, I can do a so-called Copenhagen turn).

Since the law mandates that I use a bike lane when it's there, I opt to avoid those streets and avenues entirely.

----

Overall, my opinion of bike lanes is that most are bike unfriendly, and analogous to cages in the zoo. I don't know if they're designed to keep cars out or bikes in, though I suspect the latter. This is why I characterize bike lanes as separate but Unequal.

Long ago, when they first started proposing separate bike lanes, I warned that the existence of separate facilities would lead to mandates that we use them (losing more of whatever remains of our general rights to public roads). This was greeted with "can't and won't happen. Well, it can and has, and must use mandates are in our future, whether you believe it or not.

Understand that I'm categorically opposed to bike lanes, and they do make sense in many places. But IMO, the bike lanes in most cities don't make sense, and experienced cyclists were or are safer without them.

Of course, you're free to have your own opinion, this is mine.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 10-10-13 at 09:51 PM.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 09:55 PM   #11
walrus1
Senior Member
 
walrus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Bikes: Schwinn World Sport Jamis Ventura
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
@FBinNY links (preferably from major publications, scientific journals etc.) to back up your argument that bike lanes are unsafe for cyclists. Everything I've read says they drastically increase bicycle safety.

Let me make this abundantly clear for ya. The law only requires that you stay in the lane if it is unblocked and and safe to ride otherwise hop in the travel lane.

Bike lanes are designed to separate two very different vehicles sharing the same road way. So that both vehicles can move freely and safely. They are designed to keep cars out and sometimes bikes in. Umm how are they unequal?


I wish to apologize my concluding sentence was too snarky even by my standards. I do maintain that this is an awfully odd theory.

Last edited by walrus1; 10-10-13 at 10:09 PM.
walrus1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 10:23 PM   #12
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,847
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus1 View Post
...... links (preferably from major publications, scientific journals etc.) to back up your argument that bike lanes are unsafe for cyclists. Everything I've read says they drastically increase bicycle safety.
Statistics are fine, but they are not fate. We can control our own destinies and beat the odds by choices we make. We do this every day. Those who chose an active lifestyle can beat the heart attack statistics, those who are streetwise, and avoid poor neighborhoods and deserted parks at night can beat the crime statistics.

There is also a vast difference between statistical safety for an entire category, and actual safety for a subcategory. Everything is a matter of tradeoffs, and improvements for one subcategory, may be worse for others. So what may improve the overall numbers may work the opposite way for others.

I don't doubt that slower or less experienced riders, may benefit from bike lanes, and be safer within their confines. But experienced riders who ride faster, can hold a line, understand traffic cross flow implications, and know enough to stay clear of the door lane are safer mixed with the general traffic flow. I might point out that I've been riding in traffic, including NYC traffic for shy of 50 years, and when in NYC ride at very close to the speed of avenue motor traffic (sometimes faster).

Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus1 View Post
Let me make this abundantly clear for ya. The law only requires that you stay in the lane if it is unblocked and and safe to ride otherwise hop in the travel lane.

....They are designed to keep cars out and sometimes bikes in. Umm how are they unequal?
It is more than abundantly clear to me. Yes, if they are simply painted lines, I can swing around them as needed, but what about those which are divided by curbs? As for the language of the law, define "unblocked", or "unsafe". Is the door lane unsafe? If I am riding at closer to the speed of motor traffic than I am to that of cyclists in a bike lane, doesn't that disparity of speed create an unsafe situation, not only for me, but for other bike lane users?

What makes them unequal? Lack of maneuvering width, clogged with slow moving traffic, door lane, in some places more litter or glass because mechanical street sweepers don't fit, increased danger of cross turning traffic with poor sight lines, and/or confusion about rights of way..... Need I go on?

Fortunately so far, I don't have to deal with this, there are still enough choices where there's no segregated bike lanes, so for me it's simply a matter of some adjustments in road selection and route planning.

Oh, and I'm not trying to convince you or anybody else. You have your opinion and are entitled to have it, since I no longer live in NYC I don't have a say in what it it does. I ride in NYC as a visitor, and have no wish to tell those who live there how they should run their city.

As for overall safety numbers ---- 100,000+ zero injury* miles speak for themselves. (road rash doesn't count)

*injury- defined as something requiring professional medical attention,
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 10-10-13 at 10:39 PM.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 11:29 PM   #13
John Forester
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus1 View Post
@FBinNY links (preferably from major publications, scientific journals etc.) to back up your argument that bike lanes are unsafe for cyclists. Everything I've read says they drastically increase bicycle safety.

Let me make this abundantly clear for ya. The law only requires that you stay in the lane if it is unblocked and and safe to ride otherwise hop in the travel lane.

Bike lanes are designed to separate two very different vehicles sharing the same road way. So that both vehicles can move freely and safely. They are designed to keep cars out and sometimes bikes in. Umm how are they unequal?


I wish to apologize my concluding sentence was too snarky even by my standards. I do maintain that this is an awfully odd theory.
There has never been a study that has shown how a bike-lane stripe has reduced car-bike collisions. Most of the studies are by enthusiasts or propagandists (including politicians) who know nothing of traffic engineering and mix in together many other causes into an agglomerated data set which prevents one from learning. The most careful study of cycle tracks in Copenhagen concludes that those cycle tracks cause more car-bike collisions than would otherwise exist.
John Forester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 11:38 PM   #14
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,847
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
There has never been a study that has shown how a bike-lane stripe has reduced car-bike collisions. Most of the studies are by enthusiasts or propagandists (including politicians) who know nothing of traffic engineering and mix in together many other causes into an agglomerated data set which prevents one from learning. The most careful study of cycle tracks in Copenhagen concludes that those cycle tracks cause more car-bike collisions than would otherwise exist.
Thank you for the supporting data, such as it is.

As I said earlier, statistics aren't fate.

The choices we make for ourselves are more important than statistical averages.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 03:24 AM   #15
Essex
Senior Member
 
Essex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast United States
Bikes: Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid
Posts: 1,148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
On a anecdotal note I often veer to the West Side of Central Park to test the bike lanes on Columbus/9th Ave in NYC. I've been doing that for the past two years to see usage and efficacy of said bike lane. To date it's sparsely used, sometimes problematic as bike delivery guys salmon up the way and drivers do a WHOLE lot of unpacking, or loitering in the path. Peds do all sorts of oddball things which can be patently dangerous if you are going 20-25 mph. If I actually want to get somewhere with speed I ditch the bike lane and go rate of traffic in the main road.

Overall, I think it's an interesting experiment and I am waiting to see how the cold weather affects Citibike usage, as well as traffic on the bike lanes.
Essex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 08:49 AM   #16
walrus1
Senior Member
 
walrus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Bikes: Schwinn World Sport Jamis Ventura
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
Statistics are fine, but they are not fate. We can control our own destinies and beat the odds by choices we make. We do this every day. Those who chose an active lifestyle can beat the heart attack statistics, those who are streetwise, and avoid poor neighborhoods and deserted parks at night can beat the crime statistics.

There is also a vast difference between statistical safety for an entire category, and actual safety for a subcategory. Everything is a matter of tradeoffs, and improvements for one subcategory, may be worse for others. So what may improve the overall numbers may work the opposite way for others.

Fortunately so far, I don't have to deal with this, there are still enough choices where there's no segregated bike lanes, so for me it's simply a matter of some adjustments in road selection and route planning.

As for overall safety numbers ---- 100,000+ zero injury* miles speak for themselves. (road rash doesn't count)

*injury- defined as something requiring professional medical attention,
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
There has never been a study that has shown how a bike-lane stripe has reduced car-bike collisions. Most of the studies are by enthusiasts or propagandists (including politicians) who know nothing of traffic engineering and mix in together many other causes into an agglomerated data set which prevents one from learning. The most careful study of cycle tracks in Copenhagen concludes that those cycle tracks cause more car-bike collisions than would otherwise exist.
So in other words you two have nothing but your gut feelings backing you up?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Essex View Post
On a anecdotal note I often veer to the West Side of Central Park to test the bike lanes on Columbus/9th Ave in NYC. I've been doing that for the past two years to see usage and efficacy of said bike lane. To date it's sparsely used, sometimes problematic as bike delivery guys salmon up the way and drivers do a WHOLE lot of unpacking, or loitering in the path. Peds do all sorts of oddball things which can be patently dangerous if you are going 20-25 mph. If I actually want to get somewhere with speed I ditch the bike lane and go rate of traffic in the main road.

Overall, I think it's an interesting experiment and I am waiting to see how the cold weather affects Citibike usage, as well as traffic on the bike lanes.
It's my understanding that many cyclists will be deterred by the cold weather. I see a lot more cyclists in the bike lanes on 70° day then I do on a 35° day. I suspect that Citibike ridership will be just as affected. However, this is a hypothesis based on my extremely unscientific observations.

Last edited by walrus1; 10-11-13 at 08:54 AM.
walrus1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 09:04 AM   #17
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 30,847
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 872 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus1 View Post
So in other words you two have nothing but your gut feelings backing you up?
John F. and I aren't associated in any way so I don't and can't speak for him, but I don't need any more than my gut feelings (as you call it) since I'm not proposing any public policy for others, only making my own personal decisions about my own safety. However those gut feelings are based on shy of 50 years experience riding bicycles in NYC traffic. (you're not saying I don't have the right to manage my own safety, are you?)

OTOH- those who do propose public policy do need a good basis for the proposals, and from what I've seen don't have that.

In any case, you have your opinion, and I have mine. I'm not trying to change your mind, only explaining that for riders like myself, the bike lanes have no benefit, and some drawbacks. Just as you're entitled to have and live by your opinion, I and le minded people have the rights to our own.

As I said earlier, I no longer live in NYC, so I don't try to influence policy there, I simply adapt to it.

You, OTOH, seem to be a believer in bike lanes and shouldn't take anything I say as in any way trying to talk you out of your opinion.

Consider this my sign-off on this thread.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 10-11-13 at 09:11 AM.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-13, 11:12 AM   #18
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 3,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I only feel significantly safer in bike paths/lanes that are separated from vehicles by solid physical dividers. If it's just a lane marked with white bike symbols, vehicles can still (and often do) go there or park there.
vol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 AM.