New ‘sharrows on steroids’ debut
#1
LET'S ROLL
Thread Starter
New ‘sharrows on steroids’ debut
"Some may view the addition of dashed lines to the sides of sharrow icons an underwhelming innovation. But Freedman said she believes drivers will intuitively see the dashed lines as an indication that they should use the left-hand lane if traffic is free-flowing, leaving a wide berth for cyclists in the right-hand lane it’s not rush hour gridlock."
Read the full article:
https://www.boston.com/news/local/blo...3vFJ/blog.html
Read the full article:
https://www.boston.com/news/local/blo...3vFJ/blog.html
__________________
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
#2
Senior Member
Those new sharrow designs ought to generate some real fine examples of tolerance and analytical reasoning in letter to the editor in the local papers.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,658
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5764 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,404 Posts
People ask and expect too much from pavement markings. I'm actually a fan of sharrows, but unless both drivers and cyclists understand what they mean and the basics of safe road sharing they won't help, and could hurt.
For example (and I don't claim this will happen, just showing that it's a possibility) if drivers and cyclists assume this is a primary bike lane and drivers stay left, we might see more right hooks at intersections because of failure to properly merge before turns (both cyclist and driver need to understand this).
IMO- we need less paint, and more assertive traffic education so all road users understand their part in safe road use. Paint with education only benefits those who sell paint.
For example (and I don't claim this will happen, just showing that it's a possibility) if drivers and cyclists assume this is a primary bike lane and drivers stay left, we might see more right hooks at intersections because of failure to properly merge before turns (both cyclist and driver need to understand this).
IMO- we need less paint, and more assertive traffic education so all road users understand their part in safe road use. Paint with education only benefits those who sell paint.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
We have a few sharrow lanes with the dashed lines, here in Dallas.
https://anurbanrambler.blogspot.com/2...ike-lanes.html
https://anurbanrambler.blogspot.com/2...ike-lanes.html
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Sigh. Since I was an inadvertant subject of the "experiment" with sharrows between Harvard Square and North Cambridge, the fears of what horrible things will happen are just that - fears.
Sharrows were better than nothing. Not just a bit better, a lot better. Fewer right hooks, fewer dooring, more safe passes. As soon as the sharrow markings were allowed to fade away, everything went worse too.
And for narrow lanes, the sharrow-steroid edition will probably be better than sharrows and better than nothing. (And from what I can tell, the bikes may use full lane are noticed by one community - bicyclists.) But we don't know, yet, what the bottom line is.
But now we have a new experiment - where parts of Mass Ave between Harvard Square and Lexington Center are marked with sharrows, bike lines, bikes may use full lane, nothing etc. (We don't have the priority bike line markings - yet.) We'll have a major cycling corridor that can be studied for alternatives - an epidemiology study. I still don't like being the subject of this, but....
Not that it will matter in the end, folks will still point to 1974 studies to prove that all this is dangerous.
-mr. bill
Sharrows were better than nothing. Not just a bit better, a lot better. Fewer right hooks, fewer dooring, more safe passes. As soon as the sharrow markings were allowed to fade away, everything went worse too.
And for narrow lanes, the sharrow-steroid edition will probably be better than sharrows and better than nothing. (And from what I can tell, the bikes may use full lane are noticed by one community - bicyclists.) But we don't know, yet, what the bottom line is.
But now we have a new experiment - where parts of Mass Ave between Harvard Square and Lexington Center are marked with sharrows, bike lines, bikes may use full lane, nothing etc. (We don't have the priority bike line markings - yet.) We'll have a major cycling corridor that can be studied for alternatives - an epidemiology study. I still don't like being the subject of this, but....
Not that it will matter in the end, folks will still point to 1974 studies to prove that all this is dangerous.
-mr. bill
#6
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
People ask and expect too much from pavement markings. I'm actually a fan of sharrows, but unless both drivers and cyclists understand what they mean and the basics of safe road sharing they won't help, and could hurt.
For example (and I don't claim this will happen, just showing that it's a possibility) if drivers and cyclists assume this is a primary bike lane and drivers stay left, we might see more right hooks at intersections because of failure to properly merge before turns (both cyclist and driver need to understand this).
IMO- we need less paint, and more assertive traffic education so all road users understand their part in safe road use. Paint with education only benefits those who sell paint.
For example (and I don't claim this will happen, just showing that it's a possibility) if drivers and cyclists assume this is a primary bike lane and drivers stay left, we might see more right hooks at intersections because of failure to properly merge before turns (both cyclist and driver need to understand this).
IMO- we need less paint, and more assertive traffic education so all road users understand their part in safe road use. Paint with education only benefits those who sell paint.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,658
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5764 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,404 Posts
Road safety depends on all players, bicyclists and motorists, understanding what the other guy might be thinking or will or may do in various circumstances. Here on the forum folks are always discussing cyclist rights, I'm more interested in cyclist survival, and the two are not necessarily interlocked.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
That's not what I had in mind. I'll venture that most drivers have no idea what they mean, so the right start is a billboard or public service TV campaign explaining what they are. But there also needs to be scenario specific education, by whatever means are shown to work, dealing with lane placement when making turns, safe passing separation, right of way, and so on. I'm not talking about only educating mororists, the reality is that the majority of cyclists are ill-equipped to stay safe on the road.
Road safety depends on all players, bicyclists and motorists, understanding what the other guy might be thinking or will or may do in various circumstances. Here on the forum folks are always discussing cyclist rights, I'm more interested in cyclist survival, and the two are not necessarily interlocked.
Road safety depends on all players, bicyclists and motorists, understanding what the other guy might be thinking or will or may do in various circumstances. Here on the forum folks are always discussing cyclist rights, I'm more interested in cyclist survival, and the two are not necessarily interlocked.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
In a sense, I think they either need to put sharrows everywhere or nowhere, because the laws are the same regardless so the sharrows have no affect on the right and responsibilities of road users. By putting them only a few areas, it can give the impression that cyclists shouldn't be using the road where the are not.
A good example is the town I live in which just put sharrows on a few blocks of Main Street in the middle of downtown. That's great for those few blocks, but what about the road before and after where there are no sharrows, and all the other roads in the vicinity?
IMO, the money would be better spent on road user education and awareness programs.
A good example is the town I live in which just put sharrows on a few blocks of Main Street in the middle of downtown. That's great for those few blocks, but what about the road before and after where there are no sharrows, and all the other roads in the vicinity?
IMO, the money would be better spent on road user education and awareness programs.
Last edited by Looigi; 11-22-13 at 07:42 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The dashed lines definitely help get across the "this is a lane for bicycles" message that sharrows are intended to give.
As far as putting them on just a few streets, I think that by putting them on the major roads, drivers and cyclists alike will learn where a bike should be ridden. That knowledge will then translate to roads without sharrows and eventually we won't need sharrows.
As far as putting them on just a few streets, I think that by putting them on the major roads, drivers and cyclists alike will learn where a bike should be ridden. That knowledge will then translate to roads without sharrows and eventually we won't need sharrows.
Last edited by spivonious; 11-22-13 at 10:09 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
"Some may view the addition of dashed lines to the sides of sharrow icons an underwhelming innovation. But Freedman said she believes drivers will intuitively see the dashed lines as an indication that they should use the left-hand lane if traffic is free-flowing, leaving a wide berth for cyclists in the right-hand lane it’s not rush hour gridlock."
Read the full article:
https://www.boston.com/news/local/blo...3vFJ/blog.html
Read the full article:
https://www.boston.com/news/local/blo...3vFJ/blog.html
I'm glad they didn't put those lines in the door zone. However, I wonder how the motorist are going to treat them since those dashed lines in effect take up most off the lane. How are cars going to lane split when you are entitled to practically the whole lane?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sigh. Since I was an inadvertant subject of the "experiment" with sharrows between Harvard Square and North Cambridge, the fears of what horrible things will happen are just that - fears.
Sharrows were better than nothing. Not just a bit better, a lot better. Fewer right hooks, fewer dooring, more safe passes. As soon as the sharrow markings were allowed to fade away, everything went worse too.
And for narrow lanes, the sharrow-steroid edition will probably be better than sharrows and better than nothing. (And from what I can tell, the bikes may use full lane are noticed by one community - bicyclists.) But we don't know, yet, what the bottom line is.
But now we have a new experiment - where parts of Mass Ave between Harvard Square and Lexington Center are marked with sharrows, bike lines, bikes may use full lane, nothing etc. (We don't have the priority bike line markings - yet.) We'll have a major cycling corridor that can be studied for alternatives - an epidemiology study. I still don't like being the subject of this, but....
Not that it will matter in the end, folks will still point to 1974 studies to prove that all this is dangerous.
-mr. bill
Sharrows were better than nothing. Not just a bit better, a lot better. Fewer right hooks, fewer dooring, more safe passes. As soon as the sharrow markings were allowed to fade away, everything went worse too.
And for narrow lanes, the sharrow-steroid edition will probably be better than sharrows and better than nothing. (And from what I can tell, the bikes may use full lane are noticed by one community - bicyclists.) But we don't know, yet, what the bottom line is.
But now we have a new experiment - where parts of Mass Ave between Harvard Square and Lexington Center are marked with sharrows, bike lines, bikes may use full lane, nothing etc. (We don't have the priority bike line markings - yet.) We'll have a major cycling corridor that can be studied for alternatives - an epidemiology study. I still don't like being the subject of this, but....
Not that it will matter in the end, folks will still point to 1974 studies to prove that all this is dangerous.
-mr. bill
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Mr. Bill clearly does not understand the arguments that bikeways make cycling more dangerous. The arguments say that road designs that induce or require drivers to violate the standard rules of the road make cycling more dangerous purely because violating those rules causes collisions. Many examples have been described before this. Sharrows do not induce or require drivers to violate the rules of the road; indeed, they are a form of encouragement for obeying those rules. That is the enormous difference.
-mr. bill
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,810
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,017 Times
in
571 Posts
They've been adding those large lane markings on a number of roads here over the last year. Almost all that I've seen are on two lane roads. None are roads I ride and I haven't seen enough bike traffic on them to have any idea if they impact driver or rider behavior. In a couple of cases, I think as a rider I'd appreciate having them there.
The new markings usually come with repaving and other road improvements and are often accompanied by "bicyclists may use full lane" signs. I believe there is a city regulation requiring accommodations for bicyclists when roads are rebuilt. Given the cost effective nature of sharrows, I might guess they are being used not because they were decided to be better than segregated bike lanes but because they're a whole lot cheaper.
The new markings usually come with repaving and other road improvements and are often accompanied by "bicyclists may use full lane" signs. I believe there is a city regulation requiring accommodations for bicyclists when roads are rebuilt. Given the cost effective nature of sharrows, I might guess they are being used not because they were decided to be better than segregated bike lanes but because they're a whole lot cheaper.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
unterhausen
Advocacy & Safety
70
04-07-18 07:43 AM
randya
Advocacy & Safety
50
01-14-11 06:54 PM