Bike Forums

Bike Forums (http://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Advocacy & Safety (http://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-safety/)
-   -   Couple berate cyclist for reporting illegaly-parked van (http://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-safety/923316-couple-berate-cyclist-reporting-illegaly-parked-van.html)

CB HI 11-28-13 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dchiefransom (Post 16286407)
Would you call in every salmon cyclist you see?

There are other more effective methods for controlling salmon cyclists.

dynodonn 11-28-13 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dchiefransom (Post 16286407)
Would you call in every salmon cyclist you see?


Unfortunately, salmon cyclists have more "skin" in the game, and seldom do I see many repeat salmoning cyclists in my locale, illegal parking motorists have little or no "skin" in the game and generally will continually to park illegally until they get tired of paying parking fines and/or going to court.

I-Like-To-Bike 11-28-13 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CB HI (Post 16286582)
There are other more effective methods for controlling salmon cyclists.

Do tell.

I-Like-To-Bike 11-28-13 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daihard (Post 16286005)
Well-designed bike lanes address some of those issues, if not all. For instance, they can build bike lanes right by the curb, designate the parking spots outside them, and separate them from the bike lanes with a low concrete wall with enough space to prevent passenger dooring.

Bike lanes painted in pixie dust might address some of those issues too and are almost as likely to be be commonly placed and built in/on crowded urban streets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daihard (Post 16286005)
We will still need to be aware of vehicles making a turn onto a crossing street or into a driveway, but the fewer issues to deal with, the better.

The previous poster, Katsrevenge wrote that she expects bike lanes to take cyclists OUT of traffic, period; bike lanes apparently built to a standard suitable for bicyclists unable or unwilling to handle ANY interaction with motorized traffic or parked vehicles.

FBinNY 11-28-13 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CB HI (Post 16286582)
There are other more effective methods for controlling salmon cyclists.

There's no need. If it's a problem, Darwinism will take of it. If it's not a problem, there's no reason to solve it.

daihard 11-28-13 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike (Post 16286872)
Bike lanes painted in pixie dust might address some of those issues too and are almost as likely to be be commonly placed and built in/on crowded urban streets.

What is "pixie dust?"

Quote:

The previous poster, Katsrevenge wrote that she expects bike lanes to take cyclists OUT of traffic, period; bike lanes apparently built to a standard suitable for bicyclists unable or unwilling to handle ANY interaction with motorized traffic or parked vehicles.
My response was not meant to agree completely with the OP, if that's the impression I gave you. I'm saying that there are certain types of bike lanes that better protect cyclists than others.

I-Like-To-Bike 11-28-13 08:32 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by daihard (Post 16286925)
What is "pixie dust?"


My response was not meant to agree completely with the OP, if that's the impression I gave you. I'm saying that there are certain types of bike lanes that better protect cyclists than others.

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=353067Pixie Dust is related to unobtainium or fantasy/imaginary material. See Peter Pan and Tinker Belle for further details.
I agree that some bike lanes are better designs than others but the designs you mentioned are not likely to be installed in (m)any heavily trafficked streets in urban U.S. And NONE, no matter how built or at any cost, are going to deliver bicyclists into some traffic free Nirvana.

I-Like-To-Bike 11-28-13 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FBinNY (Post 16286879)
There's no need. If it's a problem, Darwinism will take of it. If it's not a problem, there's no reason to solve it.

The latter is a reasonable comment; the former a rather smug comment and not your usual response.

daihard 11-28-13 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike (Post 16287005)
See Peter Pan and Tinker Belle for further details.

Goes to show how long ago it is that I read Peter Pan...

Quote:

I agree that some bike lanes are better designs than others but the designs you mentioned are not likely to be installed in (m)any heavily trafficked streets in urban U.S. And NONE, no matter how built or at any cost, are going to deliver bicyclists into some traffic free Nirvana.
I don't think any bike lane would give cyclists 100% protection against motorists, either. I hope I didn't give you the impression that I do.

I-Like-To-Bike 11-28-13 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daihard (Post 16287085)
Goes to show how long ago it is that I read Peter Pan...


I don't think any bike lane would give cyclists 100% protection against motorists, either. I hope I didn't give you the impression that I do.

I believe we are in agreement on this.

dynaryder 11-29-13 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike (Post 16285869)
Urban bike lane cyclists are not isolated from interactions with motor vehicles and cannot be protected by righteous indignation at the sight of a motor vehicle nearby or crossing bike lane paint....
...If cyclists expect to be isolated from motorized traffic they should seek bike trails through the woods to nowhere.

But the entire point of these cycle tracks is to keep car traffic separate from bike traffic. The only mixing is at a couple turn-ins and at left turn intersections. There was no legal reason for that van to be where it was. Again,this isn't a bike lane,this is a separated cycle track.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.