Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 60 of 60
  1. #51
    Seńior Member ItsJustMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    My Bikes
    Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
    Posts
    11,823
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickGSR94 View Post
    So they have actual people monitoring all these cameras, and they issue citations if they see someone doing something like that? I know that red light cameras can be automated to snap a pic of someone running a red light, but with these quick left turns, the cameras in the perpendicular direction would have to be the ones catching the license plates and drivers' faces.
    It wouldn't be hard to automate. They can detect a car in the turn lane proceeding when there's still someone on the straight through traffic sensor, or had moved off just a moment ago.
    Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.

  2. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    830
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Remember--they're drivers, so they are temporarily not people. No irony or humor meant, not the least little bit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Number400 View Post
    Four way intersection. Each direction has a turn lane and a straight/right turn lane combination. Lighted crosswalk signs with painted crosswalk on road.

    We were astride our bikes on the pedestrian/bike path (this is an official, marked bike route that is also a sidewalk) and pressed the cross button. Lights changed our way and our walk sign lit up at the same instant the light turned green. An oncoming driver in the opposing left turn lane started to race through to turn left before the cars with us began to move. I was looking back and forth to make sure no drivers were turning right from behind me as I was entering the crosswalk. So I get a few feet into the crosswalk and swivel my head back and see him going for it. He has to slam on his brakes but is now looking like he is attempting to time me and dart behind but still try to beat the oncoming traffic. He winds up partially blocking the opposing traffic from making it through the intersection. I yelled "don't do it!", but had already put myself in harms way by entering the crosswalk. I guess it is another lesson and situation to put on my list of things to watch out for. It happened pretty fast and I usually wait for a few seconds before entering an intersection but in this case there was zero cross traffic in either direction.

    Life really is cheap for a few impatient and dangerous drivers.

  3. #53
    vol
    vol is online now
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,638
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had to keep reminding me of watching for the vehicles coming from the opposite direction making left turn or U-turn in front of me, because I experienced the same many times. Many drivers cut you off when they see you are on a bike. Whenever a driver actually waited to let me pass before making the left turn, I knew (and proved right) that it's not because of me, but there was a vehicle following behind me, that made the opposite driver stop and wait. IOW, those drivers yield for other vehicles but not bikes.

    (Side note: it's common in jay-walker pedestrians too: if they stopped to let me go through, chances are they saw a car behind me )

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY
    My Bikes
    too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
    Posts
    22,562
    Mentioned
    69 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vol View Post
    I had to keep reminding me of watching for the vehicles coming from the opposite direction making left turn or U-turn in front of me, because I experienced the same many times. Many drivers cut you off when they see you are on a bike. Whenever a driver actually waited to let me pass before making the left turn, I knew (and proved right) that it's not because of me, but there was a vehicle following behind me, that made the opposite driver stop and wait. IOW, those drivers yield for other vehicles but not bikes.

    (Side note: it's common in jay-walker pedestrians too: if they stopped to let me go through, chances are they saw a car behind me )
    Required watching for anyone just starting out riding in NYC. A three minute video that shows how it really is, rather than what it should be.
    FB
    Chain-L site

    An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

    “Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

    “One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

    WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

  5. #55
    aka Tom Reingold noglider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Village, New York City
    My Bikes
    too many
    Posts
    20,821
    Mentioned
    113 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
    Required watching for anyone just starting out riding in NYC. A three minute video that shows how it really is, rather than what it should be.
    I'm glad you reposted it, because I think about it a lot. Now I bookmarked it.

    It's amusing when people from places where they drive more orderly than we do chastise us about running lights or jaywalking. They need to understand what it means to do as the Romans do.
    You don't read my signature anyway, do you?

    Tom Reingold, noglider@pobox.com
    Residences: West Village, New York City and High Falls, NY
    Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

  6. #56
    Senior Member PatrickGSR94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Memphis TN area
    Posts
    4,195
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems to me that video is more-so showing the crazy messenger-type cyclists weaving through traffic and running lights than it is showing just the everyday commuter. But man some of those motorists were ARSE HOLES!!
    2011 Felt Z85 105 | Ultegra | KMC | Selle Italia | Vuelta | Topeak
    90's-ish KHS Alite 1000 MTB Road-going utility hauler

  7. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Northern NJ
    My Bikes
    Trek 4900, Marin Hawk
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carusoswi View Post
    Hate to be contrary, but it sounds to me as though the driver trying to "jump" the light (actually, based upon my interpretation of what the OP wrote, the driver only moved on green - just because he moves before oncoming traffic doesn't make him a "jumper" in my book). ultimately did exactly what is required of him in this situation. Being alert to the opportunity to making a left turn on green ahead of oncoming traffic is no violation. Obviously, the driver must wait for the intersection to clear and must be aware of and avoid collision with pedestrians or cyclists in the crosswalk.

    It sounds to me that he managed to do this in the OP's case.

    Furthermore, he is no more guilty of "jumping" the green than the OP, who also appears to have "jumped" the green. OP, you have the entire light cycle to safely make it across the intersection. The "jumping" motorist will sit through that same cycle if he cannot safely make the left ahead of oncoming traffic.

    Fortunately, there is no blood here, and that is how I call it, no blood.

    As operators of vehicles (motorized and not), we all tend to view situations from our perspective alone.

    In reality, there are always two sides to every coin.

    If I were a motorist, in line behind the "jumper" in this case, I would be grateful that he was alert enough to make his left ahead of the oncoming traffic - one more car that can get through the light at a congested intersection. As a cyclist, I would try to be more aware, sympathetic to the fact that I save almost no time in getting through the intersection ahead of "jumper". Be aware and let him pass, then be on my way safely. No need for me to assert my vehicular rights in this situation.

    OP, in my view, the motorist was at least as alert as you, since he stopped. The momentary blocking of the intersection (for the oncoming motorists) was of minor consequence.

    There is no cop that would cite "jumper" as he committed no infraction. To suggest a license suspension is beyond extreme in my view.

    Happy cycling.

    Caruso
    Even if the other traffic has not moved yet, it is "Failure to Yield the Right of Way at an Interserction."

    Quote Originally Posted by Number400 View Post
    Here in PA, it is illegal; "Failure to yield to oncoming driver when making left turn = 3 points on your license". So it's against the law here and that is nice to know. Keeping my eyes open for it for sure.
    Yep, points and a fine.

    Quote Originally Posted by Camilo View Post
    It's not necessarily failure to yield any more than it would be if you turned left in a gap between two oncoming cars. If you turn left before the oncoming car even starts moving, it's not failure to yield. For example, some dip who is too busy talking on his cell phone or texting to proceed in a timely manner when his light turns green. I'd for sure turn left in front of him and not cause him any inconvenience or lack of proper yield.
    Still a violation, I've written it many times and never had one bounced. The testimony is the through traffic "could not start" that is why the held their position.

    Quote Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
    Good luck getting a cop or judge to agree with you.
    Cop will write, prosecutor will prosecute and Judge will Convict. I worked in a very heavily travelled area of the US and wrote that summons all the time. It just pissed me off due to the lack of concern for anyone else. Always thought it to be dangerous.


    Quote Originally Posted by ItsJustMe View Post
    It wouldn't be hard to automate. They can detect a car in the turn lane proceeding when there's still someone on the straight through traffic sensor, or had moved off just a moment ago.
    The laws governing the use of the cameras are specific to the red light violation and has no points attached to your license for paying the fine. They are not interested in public safety, just the collection of money. I'm not sure the person who reviews the video can write a summons based on the what they see in the video, but it is a good question.

    ***Caveat: I only know NY/NJ/PA and some CT stuff, so if it is different in the other 46, forgive me.****
    “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the former."
    ― Albert Einstein

  8. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,523
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just don't understand how it can be "failure to yield" if the oncoming car is not moving and/or you do not cause the oncoming car to slow or brake.

    Why is it any different than turning left in a safe gap between two oncoming cars?

  9. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,070
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Camilo View Post
    I just don't understand how it can be "failure to yield" if the oncoming car is not moving and/or you do not cause the oncoming car to slow or brake.

    Why is it any different than turning left in a safe gap between two oncoming cars?
    It is failure to yield because both drivers are facing reds that simultaneously change to green. Both have equal chances to start, and, therefore, the left turning driver should yield to the straight-through driver.

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,523
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by John Forester View Post
    It is failure to yield because both drivers are facing reds that simultaneously change to green. Both have equal chances to start, and, therefore, the left turning driver should yield to the straight-through driver.
    I probably just sound argumentative and apologize for that. But, if the oncoming driver is just sitting there (my example above, distracted by a cell phone or whatever), and I just go ahead and turn left while he/she is just sitting there, I guess it's a judgement call for the LEO as to whether to ticket me. If I caused that driver to have to brake or avoid me, yea, sure, definitely failure to yield.

    I also understand that the quick jumped left turn I used to do in the city using my youthful sharp reflexes to get in front of the oncoming car because he/she wasn't as quick off the line as me would be considered failure to yield.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •