Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Warning: it is now legal to look at your smartphone while driving in CA

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Warning: it is now legal to look at your smartphone while driving in CA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-14, 08:48 AM
  #1  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Warning: it is now legal to look at your smartphone while driving in CA

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/C...to-5274997.php

It's illegal in California to talk or text on a handheld cell phone while driving. But it's OK to pick up your phone and look at a map to see where you're going and how to get there.

That was the message Thursday from a state appeals court in Fresno, which threw out a driver's traffic ticket and $165 fine for using a map app in a traffic jam.
So apparently taking your eyes off the road and looking at a map is not dangerous... at least according to this judge that dismissed the ticket for cell phone use.

The driver, Steven Spriggs of Fresno, was stuck in freeway traffic on Highway 41 in January 2012 and pulled out his iPhone for a map to find another route. A Highway Patrol officer saw him holding the phone and pulled him over.

Spriggs challenged his ticket, but lower courts agreed with prosecutors that the law forbids all use of handheld phones. On Thursday, the appeals court said that's an unreasonable interpretation of the statute's language and history.
So cyclists, pedestrians, and other road users beware... distraction by looking at a map on a hand held device is apparently OK.
genec is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 08:55 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 293 Posts
The judge ruled as he did because the statute was vague. Do not blame the judge for following the law. Blame the legislators, and their lobbyists (who write mosts laws) for writing a vague statute.

Having said that--I agree with you, this will now only encourage even more distracted driving.
eja_ bottecchia is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 09:15 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
bmontgomery87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997

Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
while that sucks and all, if he was in a traffic jam, i can see why the guy needed to peek at a map.
bmontgomery87 is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 10:13 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
How many bicycles were on the freeway when that guy looked at his phone...?
mconlonx is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 10:30 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
CbadRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't see how looking at a map on your phone is any different than looking at a paper map or a map on a GPS device. Either way you're taking your eyes off the road.
__________________
Originally Posted by Xerum 525
Now get on your cheap bike and give me a double century. You walking can of Crisco!!

Forum Guidelines *click here*
CbadRider is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 10:31 AM
  #6  
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
I took my eyes off the road once and myself and three other people all died.
RPK79 is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 12:46 PM
  #7  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by CbadRider
I don't see how looking at a map on your phone is any different than looking at a paper map or a map on a GPS device. Either way you're taking your eyes off the road.
Tend to agree... a distraction that requires your eyes to be elsewhere, is still a driving distraction.

I use a talking GPS... she tells me where to turn and I continue to look out the windshield and verify that the turn exists, and that I am not driving into a body of water or other hazard. Works fine for me.

I do have a map app on my cell phone, but I only use it while parked, and I memorize the streets I need to know to get there. That map app on the phone is NOT smart enough to know exactly where I am, so I don't trust it to "drive."
genec is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 12:47 PM
  #8  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by RPK79
I took my eyes off the road once and myself and three other people all died.
Hey, your ghost is still posting here...
genec is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 12:51 PM
  #9  
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Hey, your ghost is still posting here...
Yes. As a warning to others.
RPK79 is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 01:05 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times in 44 Posts
Yeah, no different than looking at your Garmin. Or cycling computer for the troglodytes out there.
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 01:07 PM
  #11  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by rebel1916
Yeah, no different than looking at your Garmin. Or cycling computer for the troglodytes out there.
My garmin talks. I only have to look at it when I first set my desired destination. I do that in the parking lot before heading out.
genec is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 01:12 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
My garmin talks. I only have to look at it when I first set my desired destination. I do that in the parking lot before heading out.
The voices in my head tell me where to go and who to kill.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 01:41 PM
  #13  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
so. if i'm reading this correctly, the defendant took a look at his GPS / cell phone map while he was stuck in traffic. i further surmise that perhaps he was STOPPED in 'stuck' traffic. now, if this is correct, you'll never convince me that this situation carries the same risk of consequence as doing this act while driving at speed. AND, if this assumption is correct, then tossing the ticket was the reasonable thing to do.

let's be honest folks: auto makers now install GPS displays as standard ewuipment. that is, a designed and built-in distraction. so, who is condoning the risky behavior ?
adablduya is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 01:53 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
I'd be interested in see the judges decision and how narrowly or broadly it limits ticketing for use of smartphones.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 02:54 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,713

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times in 1,429 Posts
Originally Posted by CbadRider
I don't see how looking at a map on your phone is any different than looking at a paper map or a map on a GPS device. Either way you're taking your eyes off the road.
Yes, but historically folks have not been cited for looking at paper maps while driving.

The piecemeal approach to distracted driving makes little sense. It's motivated by the desire by legislators to "do something" about a problem, without actually doing anything.

We'll never address this issue through unenforceable laws or laws that are enforced unevenly. It's a question of responsibility, and rather than creating a bunch of narrow rules, we let drivers take more responsibility with mandated higher deductibles on insurance, including deductibles and some level of co-insurance for both the medical (PIP) and liability portions.

Drivers will be more motivated to be more careful, if they have heir own dough at risk.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 03:03 PM
  #16  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
When I drive my smartphone goes in the cradle and will display messages like email and text and if needed, provide me with a GPS / map.

Do I look at while I am moving in city traffic ?

Nope.

On the open road I can glance at the GPS if I am looking for a turn off... it is no more distracting than changing the radio station.

I have a hands free kit for making / taking calls with voice recognition so I only have to say a person's name to call them or tap the headset to receive calls if I am in a place to do that.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 03:04 PM
  #17  
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Yes, but historically folks have not been cited for looking at paper maps while driving.

The piecemeal approach to distracted driving makes little sense. It's motivated by the desire by legislators to "do something" about a problem, without actually doing anything.

We'll never address this issue through unenforceable laws or laws that are enforced unevenly. It's a question of responsibility, and rather than creating a bunch of narrow rules, we let drivers take more responsibility with mandated higher deductibles on insurance, including deductibles and some level of co-insurance for both the medical (PIP) and liability portions.

Drivers will be more motivated to be more careful, if they have heir own dough at risk.
+1

Unfortunately legislators think they need to pass laws in order to look like they're doing their jobs.
RPK79 is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 03:39 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times in 2,342 Posts
but but but ... in the old days it wasn't illegal to look at a real map!
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 03:44 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by eja_ bottecchia
The judge ruled as he did because the statute was vague. Do not blame the judge for following the law. Blame the legislators, and their lobbyists (who write mosts laws) for writing a vague statute.
I disagree. The statute is quite clear in that it specifically prohibits holding a voice conversation on a handheld phone and has been amended to also include texting. In this case the person wasn't doing that and the judge properly dismissed the charge. I'm just surprised the case had to go this far up the judicial system.

Sounds like he was stuck in a serious traffic jam where traffic would frequently be stopped or just barely moving. Under those conditions there wouldn't be any safety issue with a glance at the map while waiting for traffic to start moving again and the officer should never have issued the citation in the first place.

"23123.5. (a) A person shall not drive a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication, unless the electronic wireless communications device is specifically designed and configured to allow voice-operated and hands-free operation to dictate, send, or listen to a text-based communication, and it is used in that manner while driving. (b) As used in this section "write, send, or read a text-based communication" means using an electronic wireless communications device to manually communicate with any person using a text-based communication, including, but not limited to, communications referred to as a text message, instant message, or electronic mail. (c) For purposes of this section, a person shall not be deemed to be writing, reading, or sending a text-based communication if the person reads, selects, or enters a telephone number or name in an electronic wireless communications device for the purpose of making or receiving a telephone call or if a person otherwise activates or deactivates a feature or function on an electronic wireless communications device."
prathmann is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 04:48 PM
  #20  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by adablduya
so. if i'm reading this correctly, the defendant took a look at his GPS / cell phone map while he was stuck in traffic. i further surmise that perhaps he was STOPPED in 'stuck' traffic. now, if this is correct, you'll never convince me that this situation carries the same risk of consequence as doing this act while driving at speed. AND, if this assumption is correct, then tossing the ticket was the reasonable thing to do.

let's be honest folks: auto makers now install GPS displays as standard ewuipment. that is, a designed and built-in distraction. so, who is condoning the risky behavior ?
Exactly... thus making the auto so equipped even more dangerous for the rest of us... especially, depending on the skills of the user.
genec is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 04:50 PM
  #21  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
I wonder how often the "I was just checking the map" excuse will now be used in the future.
genec is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 04:55 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,713

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times in 1,429 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Exactly... thus making the auto so equipped even more dangerous for the rest of us... especially, depending on the skills of the user.
Most newer car's GPS systems automatically disable, except for audio prompts once a car reaches 5mph. If the system is on a live map, some will show your current location as the map scrolls while you drive. Some won't and will only give audio instructions until you stop.

Being real much of the "distracted driving debate is nonsense. For about a century, folks have been checking maps (paper) & tuning radios. More recently, they've been digging through a stock of CDs, eating, looking for snacks, doing make up, sneezing, coughing and blowing their noses, and all sorts of other momentary distractions.
So the technology has changed, but the reality hasn't, except for degree. Whereas, folks were only occasionally distracted before, now, cell phone habits have made it nearly constant.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 02-28-14 at 04:59 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 02-28-14, 09:31 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Being real much of the "distracted driving debate is nonsense. For about a century, folks have been checking maps (paper) & tuning radios. More recently, they've been digging through a stock of CDs, eating, looking for snacks, doing make up, sneezing, coughing and blowing their noses, and all sorts of other momentary distractions.
So the technology has changed, but the reality hasn't, except for degree. Whereas, folks were only occasionally distracted before, now, cell phone habits have made it nearly constant.
One key difference with cell phone use vs. other distractions is that the timing is largely controlled by the person on the other end of the conversation. Especially with things like business conference calls the driver will tend to feel that he needs to pay attention to the phone call at critical moments even if he's also dealing with potential traffic dangers at the same time. In contrast, things like looking for snacks, tuning the radio, etc., can be done during lulls in other driving tasks and can be set aside the moment there's an indication that the traffic situation requires more attention.

Of course the laws tend to miss the key point of most studies that I've seen on the dangers of cellphone use while driving - the problem is the lack of concentration on driving tasks, not whether your hand is holding the phone. Hand-free vs. handheld makes very little difference in the degree of distraction or the increased danger, yet that's what the laws in most states emphasize.
prathmann is offline  
Old 03-01-14, 12:21 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 97

Bikes: Bicycle!

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
How many bicycles were on the freeway when that guy looked at his phone...?
None. But now that the law is loud and clear, you can bet your life that some motorist will be using Google maps in a residential area...
Solid_Spoke is offline  
Old 03-01-14, 08:27 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by genec

So cyclists, pedestrians, and other road users beware... distraction by looking at a map on a hand held device is apparently OK.

....and here I thought all along that our hands free cell phone law prohibited one from even having a cell phone in their hand while driving a motor vehicle.......... silly me.
dynodonn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.