near bridge fatality
#1
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
near bridge fatality
This railroad crossing is closed for repairs.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/15...e85365954a901c
So all the traffic has been using this one-lane bridge, for several weeks now creating long backups during the PM-Rush Hour.
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.1376...6b_o0TYogw!2e0
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...94735976128878
A moron tried to pass me on this one-lane bridge.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/15...e85365954a901c
So all the traffic has been using this one-lane bridge, for several weeks now creating long backups during the PM-Rush Hour.
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.1376...6b_o0TYogw!2e0
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...94735976128878
A moron tried to pass me on this one-lane bridge.
Last edited by Chris516; 03-12-14 at 12:44 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
The street view makes it look like it might be possible, with perfect timing, for a car with good acceleration to pass a very slow cyclist safely. However, that bridge is so short I should be amazed that anyone would try it, but I'm not.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Not sure I understand what happened,
Were there cars going both ways at the time? That would be scarey, but the bridge looks to be about 20' wide which would be ample room for a car to pass a bike with lots of room to spare. Perhaps the google image deceiving?
We have one lane two way bridges, and one lane one way bridges. Being passed on the one way is normal and stress free, on the two way it would be virtually impossible.
Were there cars going both ways at the time? That would be scarey, but the bridge looks to be about 20' wide which would be ample room for a car to pass a bike with lots of room to spare. Perhaps the google image deceiving?
We have one lane two way bridges, and one lane one way bridges. Being passed on the one way is normal and stress free, on the two way it would be virtually impossible.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
The usual practice in NYS is to place traffic lights on either side of the single lane two-way roadway. The traffic lights set the travel direction.
This presents two problems for cyclists. The first is that sometimes bikes don't actuate the traffic light. The second is that the travel time is too short because it's based on a 40 mph car.
This presents two problems for cyclists. The first is that sometimes bikes don't actuate the traffic light. The second is that the travel time is too short because it's based on a 40 mph car.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
From the text, I gather there was no contact. As they say, close only counts in horseshoes.
For those who don't see the bridge, navigate forward in google maps, and it's on the left.
I did so, and turned (virtualy) onto the bridge. Gauging the car in the view and the width of the span it seems that there's reasonable room for a car to pass a bicycle on the span (or the other way around). Of course I'm only gauging based on a computer image, and the speed differential during the pass might be a factor.
The OP may not like this, but near fatality is a great exaggeration of what happened to say the least. Given the delay, and the long line of backed up traffic, saving everybody some time by passing the cyclist (safely) doesn't see so out of line.
For those who don't see the bridge, navigate forward in google maps, and it's on the left.
I did so, and turned (virtualy) onto the bridge. Gauging the car in the view and the width of the span it seems that there's reasonable room for a car to pass a bicycle on the span (or the other way around). Of course I'm only gauging based on a computer image, and the speed differential during the pass might be a factor.
The OP may not like this, but near fatality is a great exaggeration of what happened to say the least. Given the delay, and the long line of backed up traffic, saving everybody some time by passing the cyclist (safely) doesn't see so out of line.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7
Senior Member
That is my suspicion also, but thought I would give the OP the benefit if the doubt.
#8
An un-oiled squeaky wheel
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 480
Bikes: 2013 Wilier Triestina Gran Turismo, Mercian King of Mercia (Floppy); Fuji 500X; GT backwoods; Tour de Suisse; Diamond Back Interval
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Someone is given to hyperbole around here....not mentioning any names...
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
It's only near hyperbole.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I always try to give the cars the right to the road and do everything I can to avoid interaction. Knowing the situation with traffic and the single lane perhaps an alternate route or even walking the bike across would be in order. Better safe than sorry ( or dead). There is nothing to gain by asserting the bikers right to the road in an already automobile impatient situation.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
....Knowing the situation with traffic and the single lane perhaps an alternate route or even walking the bike across would be in order. Better safe than sorry ( or dead). There is nothing to gain by asserting the bikers right to the road in an already automobile impatient situation.
Maybe it's my 45 years of riding in close quarters here in NYC, but I don't see the need to own the whole lane. Ironically, narrow confined spaces are often safest because speeds are lower and everyone being on guard. It's open stretches where drivers are moving faster, don't expect bikes, and are at low attention because they see an open road free of (expected) hazards which can be the most dangerous.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#12
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not sure I understand what happened,
Were there cars going both ways at the time? That would be scarey, but the bridge looks to be about 20' wide which would be ample room for a car to pass a bike with lots of room to spare. Perhaps the google image deceiving?
We have one lane two way bridges, and one lane one way bridges. Being passed on the one way is normal and stress free, on the two way it would be virtually impossible.
Were there cars going both ways at the time? That would be scarey, but the bridge looks to be about 20' wide which would be ample room for a car to pass a bike with lots of room to spare. Perhaps the google image deceiving?
We have one lane two way bridges, and one lane one way bridges. Being passed on the one way is normal and stress free, on the two way it would be virtually impossible.
The usual practice in NYS is to place traffic lights on either side of the single lane two-way roadway. The traffic lights set the travel direction.
This presents two problems for cyclists. The first is that sometimes bikes don't actuate the traffic light. The second is that the travel time is too short because it's based on a 40 mph car.
This presents two problems for cyclists. The first is that sometimes bikes don't actuate the traffic light. The second is that the travel time is too short because it's based on a 40 mph car.
I used the words 'near fatality' because I would have gone over the side and died on the railroad tracks below the bridge.
From the text, I gather there was no contact. As they say, close only counts in horseshoes.
For those who don't see the bridge, navigate forward in Google maps, and it's on the left.
I did so, and turned (virtually) onto the bridge. Gauging the car in the view and the width of the span it seems that there's reasonable room for a car to pass a bicycle on the span (or the other way around). Of course I'm only gauging based on a computer image, and the speed differential during the pass might be a factor.
The OP may not like this, but near fatality is a great exaggeration of what happened to say the least. Given the delay, and the long line of backed up traffic, saving everybody some time by passing the cyclist (safely) doesn't see so out of line.
For those who don't see the bridge, navigate forward in Google maps, and it's on the left.
I did so, and turned (virtually) onto the bridge. Gauging the car in the view and the width of the span it seems that there's reasonable room for a car to pass a bicycle on the span (or the other way around). Of course I'm only gauging based on a computer image, and the speed differential during the pass might be a factor.
The OP may not like this, but near fatality is a great exaggeration of what happened to say the least. Given the delay, and the long line of backed up traffic, saving everybody some time by passing the cyclist (safely) doesn't see so out of line.
I know 'close only counts in horseshoes'. But, A driver passing on a 2/4/6-lane road has room to NOT make a close pass. That isn't the case on that bridge without knocking a cyclist off the bridge. Regardless of the size of the vehicle, the driver was in too much of a rush. That bridge is not the place to make a close pass.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
The bridge is only wide enough for a car, not a car and a bike. It would also be an egregious violation of the state's 3ft. passing law.
Traffic is controlled by traffic lights(I don't think they were shown in the streetview map of the bridge), at both ends of the bridge, and the bridge only has room for traffic going one direction at a time. The image is very deceiving.
Correct, It is a one-lane two-way bridge with traffic signals at both ends of the bridge. That is a very good point about bikes not triggering the signal. Yes I try to get across the bridge quickly, so I can crest the small hill in the bridge and down the other side without delaying the traffic.
I used the words 'near fatality' because I would have gone over the side and died on the railroad tracks below the bridge.
Correct, no contact. I will give you kudos' for explaining having to go further in the map to see the bridge. I tried be exact with the images, but Google Maps wouldn't let me.
I know 'close only counts in horseshoes'. But, A driver passing on a 2/4/6-lane road has room to NOT make a close pass. That isn't the case on that bridge without knocking a cyclist off the bridge. Regardless of the size of the vehicle, the driver was in too much of a rush. That bridge is not the place to make a close pass.
Traffic is controlled by traffic lights(I don't think they were shown in the streetview map of the bridge), at both ends of the bridge, and the bridge only has room for traffic going one direction at a time. The image is very deceiving.
Correct, It is a one-lane two-way bridge with traffic signals at both ends of the bridge. That is a very good point about bikes not triggering the signal. Yes I try to get across the bridge quickly, so I can crest the small hill in the bridge and down the other side without delaying the traffic.
I used the words 'near fatality' because I would have gone over the side and died on the railroad tracks below the bridge.
Correct, no contact. I will give you kudos' for explaining having to go further in the map to see the bridge. I tried be exact with the images, but Google Maps wouldn't let me.
I know 'close only counts in horseshoes'. But, A driver passing on a 2/4/6-lane road has room to NOT make a close pass. That isn't the case on that bridge without knocking a cyclist off the bridge. Regardless of the size of the vehicle, the driver was in too much of a rush. That bridge is not the place to make a close pass.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
I haven't seen that bridge in person, but from the google view sighting down the bridge to the cars at the far end, and the painted line in the middle there appears to be room for a car and bicycle side by side with decent clearance between both, and between either and the side rails.
Of course, working in tight quarters requires some cooperation, and the pass should be done with a limited speed difference.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
How about we stipulate that "near" is much much less than 3 feet, and "near death" is but for a few inches....
-mr. bill
#16
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I always try to give the cars the right to the road and do everything I can to avoid interaction. Knowing the situation with traffic and the single lane perhaps an alternate route or even walking the bike across would be in order. Better safe than sorry ( or dead). There is nothing to gain by asserting the bikers right to the road in an already automobile impatient situation.
An alternate route might make sense if it's an easy alternative. Otherwise there's nothing wrong with sharing the road, even with impatient drivers. But sharing the road doesn't imply owning the road. Where there's room to pass safely, even if it's limited, then share the road using the amount of lane width necessary and allow traffic to pass.
Maybe it's my 45 years of riding in close quarters here in NYC, but I don't see the need to own the whole lane. Ironically, narrow confined spaces are often safest because speeds are lower and everyone being on guard. It's open stretches where drivers are moving faster, don't expect bikes, and are at low attention because they see an open road free of (expected) hazards which can be the most dangerous.
Maybe it's my 45 years of riding in close quarters here in NYC, but I don't see the need to own the whole lane. Ironically, narrow confined spaces are often safest because speeds are lower and everyone being on guard. It's open stretches where drivers are moving faster, don't expect bikes, and are at low attention because they see an open road free of (expected) hazards which can be the most dangerous.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
The bridge is the alternative to the closed railroad crossing. The only 'alternative' to the bridge is to go a mile north, before I can get on another road back towards my destination(in the situation).
Yes, You are used to riding in close quarters. Yet, I will give you that, confined spaces cause speeds to be lower. But there was no need for the motorist to try making a dangerous pass on that bridge. The closest alternate route after the bridge being the alternate for the railroad crossing, is to go 10mi. and an additional 45mins. out of my way, just to avoid the bridge.
Yes, You are used to riding in close quarters. Yet, I will give you that, confined spaces cause speeds to be lower. But there was no need for the motorist to try making a dangerous pass on that bridge. The closest alternate route after the bridge being the alternate for the railroad crossing, is to go 10mi. and an additional 45mins. out of my way, just to avoid the bridge.
Certainly, if the bridge is only 10' wide, there's no room at all. At 14' it leaves room if the driver stays to the side with 2' or so to his guardrail, and 7' for the car, leaving 5' or a bit more as a lane. It's crowded, but not dangerous. At 16' there's plenty of room for a car and bike to share.
In lower Manhattan cars and cyclists routinely share roads with only a bit over 12' or so between parked cars on both sides, and while it's a bit dicey, it's very workable at low passing speeds. My SOP on those it to ride the center until a car slows to my speed, then move over and let him pass. This works to our mutual benefit, preventing the fast pass I don't want, and the delay the driver doesn't.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, the leafy NW side
Posts: 2,477
Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 154 Times
in
78 Posts
If this is the bridge in question, it sure seems to have room for a bike and car at the same time, though of course that's not to say the car gave proper passing distance. Width looks a bit more than we have on some two-way, two lane streets in my neighborhood. That is, the streets are wider, but they have parking on the sides. Sometimes people treat them as if they are one-lane, but that is because they don't know how wide their own cars are.
__________________
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.
- Dr Samuel Johnson
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.
- Dr Samuel Johnson
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
It's Deja vu all over again (thanks Yogi).
Post 20 and 16 are identical.
No one's saying to make a big detour, but as the photo of the bridge with a car on it clearly shows, there's plenty of room, even for someone not used to very close quarters.
You could leave 3-4' to the guard rail as a margin for yourself, and the car could pass safely in what's left. My preference would be to leave 5' to my right until the car slowed, then move over leaving 2' or so so there was plenty of room for a safe pass. Or if there was a line of cars, keeping 2-3' to my right and letting it flow by.
Everyone is tired and wants to get home, holding traffic at the bridge, just means frustrated drivers passing you once you get passed it.
I have no problem with the "take the lane" concept, but IMO taking the lane, doesn't have to mean keeping it when there's room to share the available roadway safely.
Post 20 and 16 are identical.
No one's saying to make a big detour, but as the photo of the bridge with a car on it clearly shows, there's plenty of room, even for someone not used to very close quarters.
You could leave 3-4' to the guard rail as a margin for yourself, and the car could pass safely in what's left. My preference would be to leave 5' to my right until the car slowed, then move over leaving 2' or so so there was plenty of room for a safe pass. Or if there was a line of cars, keeping 2-3' to my right and letting it flow by.
Everyone is tired and wants to get home, holding traffic at the bridge, just means frustrated drivers passing you once you get passed it.
I have no problem with the "take the lane" concept, but IMO taking the lane, doesn't have to mean keeping it when there's room to share the available roadway safely.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 03-13-14 at 02:30 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I navigated back and forth on the bridge, and the Google images consistently show ample room for a safe pass unless riding directly down the center with the intention of blocking traffic. Unless the images are totally distorted it must be a case of inadequate situational awareness by the rider or intentionally malicious behavior by the driver.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,689
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5772 Post(s)
Liked 2,564 Times
in
1,420 Posts
I navigated back and forth on the bridge, and the Google images consistently show ample room for a safe pass unless riding directly down the center with the intention of blocking traffic. Unless the images are totally distorted it must be a case of inadequate situational awareness by the rider or intentionally malicious behavior by the driver.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#23
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
As both Kickstart and I suggested, there seems to be adequate room to pass (based on the google image). So the real question here is how much room was there? Or to put it another way, how wide is the bridge?
Certainly, if the bridge is only 10' wide, there's no room at all. At 14' it leaves room if the driver stays to the side with 2' or so to his guardrail, and 7' for the car, leaving 5' or a bit more as a lane. It's crowded, but not dangerous. At 16' there's plenty of room for a car and bike to share.
In lower Manhattan cars and cyclists routinely share roads with only a bit over 12' or so between parked cars on both sides, and while it's a bit dicey, it's very workable at low passing speeds. My SOP on those it to ride the center until a car slows to my speed, then move over and let him pass. This works to our mutual benefit, preventing the fast pass I don't want, and the delay the driver doesn't.
Certainly, if the bridge is only 10' wide, there's no room at all. At 14' it leaves room if the driver stays to the side with 2' or so to his guardrail, and 7' for the car, leaving 5' or a bit more as a lane. It's crowded, but not dangerous. At 16' there's plenty of room for a car and bike to share.
In lower Manhattan cars and cyclists routinely share roads with only a bit over 12' or so between parked cars on both sides, and while it's a bit dicey, it's very workable at low passing speeds. My SOP on those it to ride the center until a car slows to my speed, then move over and let him pass. This works to our mutual benefit, preventing the fast pass I don't want, and the delay the driver doesn't.
If this is the bridge in question, it sure seems to have room for a bike and car at the same time, though of course that's not to say the car gave proper passing distance. Width looks a bit more than we have on some two-way, two lane streets in my neighborhood. That is, the streets are wider, but they have parking on the sides. Sometimes people treat them as if they are one-lane, but that is because they don't know how wide their own cars are.
It is a one-lane two-way bridge. There is no room for two lanes of traffic.
#25
Senior Member
So I am thinking that the OP tried to take the lane, and a inpatient driver passed anyway. This demonstrates my ambivalence of vehicular cycling and engineering analysis as the be-all, end-all of how to bicycle in traffic. There is clearly room for both a bicycle and an auto on that bridge. However when taking the lane, the cyclist encountered a driver who clearly did not believe in the bicycle as a motor vehicle.