Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 92
  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spdracr39 View Post
    I have never seen a *** just randomly go off and kill someone nor has a car ever just jumped up and pummeled anyone to death. Cars don't murder people other people do. Don't blame the tool blame the operator. I could just as easily kill someone with my bicycle so this argument is rediculous.
    Your analogy sucks. Is it legal to fire guns randomly in the middle of densely populated urban areas?
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  2. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
    "Pro" at what?

    Probably the most foolish argument being made on this thread is about costs of motorized transportation from individuals who apparently wish to return transportation options for commerce and individuals back to 1900 or earlier. If that is not what is being advocated by the rhetorical ranters, then what is being advocated?
    Nice straw man but this argument you are concocting is entirely your own. I was simply challenging the dubious statement you made above -- a statement that you have failed to support with a single piece of evidence (even dubious internet evidence). As someone who constantly goes after others for making stuff up as they go along it's hilarious to see you hoisted by your own petard.

    PS:

    Mass-produced gasoline motorvehicle: Benz Motorwagen -1885
    Mass production of electric cars: Electric Construction Corporation - 1888
    Mass-production of chain-driven dunlop tire bicycle: 1889
    Last edited by spare_wheel; 03-17-14 at 12:14 PM.
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  3. #53
    Senior Member RPK79's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SE MN
    My Bikes
    Fuji Roubaix Pro
    Posts
    3,569
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Death Puppies: Why Pit Bulls Will Kill 25 Americans a Year

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake View Post
    With some of the most inane commentary I've ever seen. Even for a group of ideologues like this one, this is bordering on comedy of the absurd.

    Cars, which were a novelty in 1910 with no supporting infrastructure, are now judged by status in 1910...and the cheaper manufacture and infrastructure improvements by 1930 were just the results of propaganda.

    After all - it's self evident that autos offered no improvement in transportation and the only way "they" got people to buy into them was propaganda and government programming.

    ...nope - it was evil brain machines constructed by the murder lobby, since anyone who disagrees with this vocal minority must be duped idiots.

    Maybe the government backed motorized transport so the 30,000 murders could push their illuminati leaders into heaven!
    I think we can agree that the statements you made are completely absurd. But I'm curious where you see others making similarly absurd statements ?
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  5. #55
    rugged individualist wphamilton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    My Bikes
    Nashbar Road
    Posts
    5,922
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
    Also, to actually comment on the OP headline, DOT estimates that the total annual miles driven is in the neighborhood of 3,000,000,000,000 (Note thats 3 trillion), 30,000/3,000,000,000,000 = 1 death /100,000,000 miles driven.

    Or

    since there are about 2,500,000 deaths per year total in the US (Census data) 30,000/2,500,000 = .012 or 1.2 per cent of all deaths are due to traffic accidents.

    thats why as a society we "accept 30000 deaths per year.
    That's an interesting perspective. Let's look at the other leading causes of death and see if the same thing holds true. The included number represents deaths in one year. This is from the CDC:


    • Heart disease: 597,689
    • Cancer: 574,743
    • Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 138,080
    • Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 129,476
    • Accidents (unintentional injuries): 120,859
    • Alzheimer's disease: 83,494
    • Diabetes: 69,071
    • Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 50,476
    • Influenza and Pneumonia: 50,097
    • Intentional self-harm (suicide): 38,364


    Fatal car accidents are on the same order as suicides, and somewhat lower than Influenza and Pneumonia. Would it be accurate to say that we "accept 38,000 to 50,000 deaths" from each of these causes because they're such a low percentage of the total? It seems to me that it's not, that we expend quite a bit of effort and resources in prevention of suicide and influenza. So I am skeptical of your surmise, and I think there must be some other reason for our relative apathy over automobile fatalities.

  6. #56
    Senior Member howsteepisit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Mecian
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WP I see your point, and to some extent I think we as a society just accept the traffic deaths as a cost of dong business, however there are substantial resources expended on trying to reduce traffic deaths, including PSAs, traffic law enforcement (crappy as it is) development of auto safety devices and the like. I'd guess, that if all costs various auto safety initiatives, research and development were summed they would vastly exceed the amount spent on suicide prevention.

    Would be some interesting comparisons to be made for sure. My personal observation is the amount spent on the prevention of any death/injury is more related to the strength and attractiveness of the lobbying organization than to the actual number of deaths or death rates.
    Recycle, Reclaim, Reuse and Repair
    The 4 Rs to save the planet

    "Toes"

  7. #57
    rugged individualist wphamilton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    My Bikes
    Nashbar Road
    Posts
    5,922
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
    WP I see your point, and to some extent I think we as a society just accept the traffic deaths as a cost of dong business, however there are substantial resources expended on trying to reduce traffic deaths, including PSAs, traffic law enforcement (crappy as it is) development of auto safety devices and the like. I'd guess, that if all costs various auto safety initiatives, research and development were summed they would vastly exceed the amount spent on suicide prevention.

    Would be some interesting comparisons to be made for sure. My personal observation is the amount spent on the prevention of any death/injury is more related to the strength and attractiveness of the lobbying organization than to the actual number of deaths or death rates.

    That's probably right, on both points.

    Maybe we're asking the wrong question. Why do we spend so much on making the equipment safer in order to mitigate crashes, but resist changes to prevent crashes?

  8. #58
    Senior Member howsteepisit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Mecian
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think thats a fair question, and from my perspective, at least here in the US the answer runs something like we want "sound bite" solutions which require no actual effort to solve problems. If we can install seat belts and air bags to keep (some of) us safe in accidents, why have law enforcement, skills testing, alternative transportations and so on. So to say, Its the American way, sadly.
    Recycle, Reclaim, Reuse and Repair
    The 4 Rs to save the planet

    "Toes"

  9. #59
    Senior Member spdracr39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Cabot, Arkansas
    My Bikes
    2012 Trek Madone 5.2, 2012 Giant Composite XTC 29er 1, 2014 Specialized Dolce Sport, (2) 2014 Trek 7.1FX, 2014 Electra Townie 7D
    Posts
    540
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
    Your analogy sucks. Is it legal to fire guns randomly in the middle of densely populated urban areas?
    That is exactly what validates the point. A person must fire the *** or operate the vehicle and make decisions to cause the problem. The *** or car cannot and will not ever produce injury or death without human interaction. It is the careless HUMAN that is the issue not the tool being utilized. Increase the penalties for people that can't drive within the boundaries of the law to a point severe enough to force compliance. To ban the use of the tool because some people are to lazy/dumb to use it safely is asinine.

  10. #60
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    19,822
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
    Maybe we're asking the wrong question. Why do we spend so much on making the equipment safer in order to mitigate crashes, but resist changes to prevent crashes?
    What "changes" do you, or the shocked, shocked ranters advocate to restrain/prevent the so-called murder rate of cars besides wailing and gnashing of teeth?

    Did you find any useful or practical changes advocated in the OP or follow on posts on this thread?

    Prefer to read suggestions for practical changes rather than simple utopian solutions that sound good late at night in a hipster bar, college dorm, or on a wacka-doodle Internet site.

  11. #61
    rugged individualist wphamilton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    My Bikes
    Nashbar Road
    Posts
    5,922
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
    What "changes" do you, or the shocked, shocked ranters advocate to restrain the so-called murder rate of card besides wailing and gnashing of teeth?

    Prefer to read suggestions for practical changes rather than simple utopian solutions that sound good late at night in a hipster bar, college dorm, or on a wacka-doodle Internet site.
    Off the top I'd say lower urban speed limits, repeal of right turn on red, and everybody's favorite, stronger enforcement of distracted/aggressive driving laws would be a start.

    In the realm of infrastructure, there are a number of traffic calming strategies that are well tested. In my local area, traffic calming would be seen as an infringement on individual liberties. Or worse. So I'd advocate changing those perceptions.

    Technologically, you probably don't want to go this deep into the rabbit hole but I advocate for event data recorders to be accessed by insurance companies and law enforcement in the event of traffic incidents. I think that a lot of bad behavior is rationalized simply by the fact that they expect to get away with it and usually do.

    I realize that your question is likely a rhetorical one, but it's a good question in my opinion. I'd like to give it a better treatment than this, but this isn't really the right time for it. Maybe later.

  12. #62
    Senior Member howsteepisit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Mecian
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ILTB, Not sure I understand your point of view on this. Are you thinking the accident/death rate is sufficiently low as to not need additional action? Or is your post a reply to earlier rantings? Did you have any proposed actions, or is status quo fine with you?

    Personally, I not into much handwringing, but better and more consistent enforcement of all traffic laws would go a long way in my opinion. Or, as many of my Econ professors liked to take about, it you want to see better driving, mount a 6-inch spike in the center of the steering wheel pointed directly at the drivers chest. Driving habits would change overnight. I am not sure that in the long run they would stay changes, because nobody actually thinks they are going to hit something/someone, but that would need to be seen.
    Recycle, Reclaim, Reuse and Repair
    The 4 Rs to save the planet

    "Toes"

  13. #63
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    19,822
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
    Off the top I'd say lower urban speed limits, repeal of right turn on red, and everybody's favorite, stronger enforcement of distracted/aggressive driving laws would be a start.

    In the realm of infrastructure, there are a number of traffic calming strategies that are well tested. In my local area, traffic calming would be seen as an infringement on individual liberties. Or worse. So I'd advocate changing those perceptions.

    Technologically, you probably don't want to go this deep into the rabbit hole but I advocate for event data recorders to be accessed by insurance companies and law enforcement in the event of traffic incidents. I think that a lot of bad behavior is rationalized simply by the fact that they expect to get away with it and usually do.

    I realize that your question is likely a rhetorical one, but it's a good question in my opinion. I'd like to give it a better treatment than this, but this isn't really the right time for it. Maybe later.
    Your suggestions seem reasonable or at least plausible. Whether if implemented they would have any significant effect on the so-called "murder" rate is subject to debate.

    However if/when reasonable suggestions for change such as your own are allowed to be framed/"owned" by hot-headed ideologues (as seen on this list) more interested in inflammatory rhetoric than productive advocacy, rational proponents of such changes can count on zero public support.

  14. #64
    Senior Member howsteepisit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Mecian
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "to fight, the impossible fight, To dream the impossible dream"

    ILTB's future on A&S

    Note to ILTB I agree with you way way way more often than not, I am just jabbing at cha.
    Recycle, Reclaim, Reuse and Repair
    The 4 Rs to save the planet

    "Toes"

  15. #65
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    19,822
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
    ILTB, Not sure I understand your point of view on this. Are you thinking the accident/death rate is sufficiently low as to not need additional action? Or is your post a reply to earlier rantings? Did you have any proposed actions, or is status quo fine with you?
    Howsteepisit, I think my response to Wphamilton answered your question. My previous posts on this thread were directed to the inflammatory anti-motorist, anti motoring rantings without any suggested proposals being passed off as some sort of bicycling safety or advocacy topic.

    My view is that such anti motorist/anti-motoring threads should be redirected to Foo or P&R since the bicycling content is zero.

  16. #66
    Senior Member howsteepisit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Mecian
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes it did, there are often timing issues on internet forums.
    Recycle, Reclaim, Reuse and Repair
    The 4 Rs to save the planet

    "Toes"

  17. #67
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
    Off the top I'd say lower urban speed limits, repeal of right turn on red, and everybody's favorite, stronger enforcement of distracted/aggressive driving laws would be a start.
    An enforced standard urban speed limit of 20 mph would largely eliminate fatalities caused by motorvehicle collisions .
    Last edited by spare_wheel; 03-17-14 at 03:59 PM.
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  18. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spdracr39 View Post
    That is exactly what validates the point. A person must fire the *** or operate the vehicle and make decisions to cause the problem. The *** or car cannot and will not ever produce injury or death without human interaction. It is the careless HUMAN that is the issue not the tool being utilized. Increase the penalties for people that can't drive within the boundaries of the law to a point severe enough to force compliance.
    Being "careful" does not eliminate the risk of using a dangerous tool in an urban area (whether it's a *** or a motorvehicle). Moreover, you are ignoring the indirect harm that motorvehicles cause to human health.

    To ban the use of the tool because some people are to lazy/dumb to use it safely is asinine.
    Strawman.
    No one has proposed banning cars. In fact, I suspect a transition to driverless cars will be what really causes active transport to take off in the USA.
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  19. #69
    Home School Valedictorian 02Giant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Back home in Iowa
    My Bikes
    13 Orbea Orca Bronze 02 Giant Cypress sx 85 Mongoose Switchback
    Posts
    409
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
    An enforced standard urban speed limit of 20 mph would largely eliminate fatalities caused by motorvehicle collisions .
    What is your definition of urban?
    Between 1998 and 2007 57% of traffic fatalities happened in rural areas, from year to year the statistic remains very consistent.

  20. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 02Giant View Post
    What is your definition of urban?
    Between 1998 and 2007 57% of traffic fatalities happened in rural areas, from year to year the statistic remains very consistent.
    any incorporated area with a significant population concentration. (i'm provisionally OK with higher speed limits on limited access roads or rural highways.)

    but according to the fhwa only ~25% of pedestrian/cyclist fatalities occur on rural highways.

    Factors Contributing to Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes on Rural Highways - FHWA-HRT-10-052
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  21. #71
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Kent Wa.
    My Bikes
    1935 Raleigh Sports X,1970 Robin Hood, Flying Pigeon, Ross hi-tec, Schwinn Phantom
    Posts
    616
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
    An enforced standard urban speed limit of 20 mph would largely eliminate fatalities caused by motorvehicle collisions .
    I see that as reasonable on 2 lane roads or where street parking is allowed, but multi lane arterials and roads that support safe mixed use should be able to maintain their higher limits or at least higher than 20 mph.

    I suspect that within the next ten to twenty years advances in vehicle safety technology will make a significant reduction in accidents.

  22. #72
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,166
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
    Howsteepisit, I think my response to Wphamilton answered your question. My previous posts on this thread were directed to the inflammatory anti-motorist, anti motoring rantings without any suggested proposals being passed off as some sort of bicycling safety or advocacy topic.

    My view is that such anti motorist/anti-motoring threads should be redirected to Foo or P&R since the bicycling content is zero.
    The problem is that the truly ridiculous lack the experience, maturity, knowledge and general perspective required to understand that they're extremist demagogues who think the world revolves around their convenience. They typically take the same pedantic approach to whatever issue or group they identify with that year - extremist idiots are extremist idiots, regardless of cause. Hence people who think all speed limits should be adjusted to fit the wants of 1% of the population and believe that cars and car infrastructure became predominant because people are sheep who were all brain washed by the nefarious auto Illuminati.

  23. #73
    Home School Valedictorian 02Giant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Back home in Iowa
    My Bikes
    13 Orbea Orca Bronze 02 Giant Cypress sx 85 Mongoose Switchback
    Posts
    409
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
    An enforced standard urban speed limit of 20 mph would largely eliminate fatalities caused by motorvehicle collisions .
    Quote Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
    any incorporated area with a significant population concentration. (i'm provisionally OK with higher speed limits on limited access roads or rural highways.)

    but according to the fhwa only ~25% of pedestrian/cyclist fatalities occur on rural highways.

    Factors Contributing to Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes on Rural Highways - FHWA-HRT-10-052
    I missed the part where you specified pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities.
    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...62922401,d.aWc

  24. #74
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake View Post
    Hence people who think all speed limits should be adjusted to fit the wants of 1% of the population and believe that cars and car infrastructure became predominant because people are sheep who were all brain washed by the nefarious auto Illuminati.
    Strawman.


    Also: *yawn*.
    Last edited by spare_wheel; 03-18-14 at 08:51 AM.
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

  25. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    2,667
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 02Giant View Post
    I missed the part where you specified pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities.
    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...62922401,d.aWc
    Contrary to the pathetic whining on this page about anyone who dares to challenge autocentrism, I'm not against low occupancy vehicles. I am against the negative environmental, social, and economic impact of low occupancy motoring. And I'm not going to sugar coat these negative impacts. What is really galling is that all of these issues are addressable *NOW* (via a mix of approaches).
    Road rash is a precious gift. Road rash is your friend. Bask in it, appreciate it, love it. Above all, learn from it. --Robert Hurst

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •