Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Motorist upset after footage of driving posted

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Motorist upset after footage of driving posted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-14, 09:51 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
Oh, and a couple of interesting points from the article...

From the driver: "I think he does normal cyclists a disservice by not using the cycle lanes for safety reasons, but happily using them if traffic impedes his progress,"

This is a common theme with the VC crowd - they want all the advantages of "vehicularity" but seem perfectly happy to run stop lights, ride on sidewalks, and generally do anything they want in the name of convenience. Meanwhile, motorists are expected to go above and beyond (way, way beyond, in many cases) their legal and moral obligations if they are to avoid being labeled "jackasses" and worse by the usual crowd here.

And from a commentator:

"Cyclingmikey has far too many videos on his youtube channel, it's almost like he wants the confrontation (I ride in London daily and don't have half as many confrontations as him)."

This sums up the whole "movement" as far as I am concerned. There seems to be a subset of humans who are not happy unless they are manufacturing indignant and self-righteous drama. And some of that subset rides bicycles. I wonder if any of them would continue to do so if they didn't have helmet cams and the internet. I strongly suspect that they would find merely riding around without incident far too uninteresting to hold their attention.
I agree with everything you say about some cyclists as represented here, but that is still no excuse for the drivers behavior.

Neither represent the majority which is why their behavior stands out and gets noticed.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-26-14, 10:03 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
I agree with everything you say about some cyclists as represented here, but that is still no excuse for the drivers behavior.

Neither represent the majority which is why their behavior stands out and gets noticed.
Sadly (at least for my purposes here) you are correct. The driver misbehaved, at least by American standards. (In my very limited experience with Brits, it seems that they are more tolerant of the 'random stranger giving advice' bit than we are in America.) By my personal American standards, the driver should have ignored whatever he thought the hand signals might have been* and passed when, in a reasonable person's judgement, it was safe. For a fuller picture, though, it's worth watching more than one of "CyclingMikey's" videos, and also reading some of his Twitter interactions with fellow cyclists. The fellow is, frankly, completely interchangeable with several of the more militant VCers here on A&S, and it is a shame that such people are occasionally seen as representatives of the cycling community.

*I learned my lesson about hand signals when a motorist waved me around on a blind curve (I was driving as well) directly into the path of an oncoming semi. I now depend entirely upon my own judgement in such circumstances...
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-26-14, 10:55 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
walrus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 476

Bikes: Schwinn World Sport Jamis Ventura

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
Neither fulfilled their obligations to share the road safely, and respectfully. Both could have prevented the entire conflict, the driver failed to wait to make a safe pass, the cyclist attempted to force his will on another. Both had the opportunity to do the right thing and defuse the situation, yet both chose escalate the situation by being confrontational.
Winner winner chicken dinner.
walrus1 is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 08:12 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Traveling at the same speed as the cyclist, I would have avoided that POS bike lane as well, but I would have been less accommodating in sharing the roadway at the ped island choke points, in taking the center of the lane well before I approached them. I've learned that a number of motorists will attempt to make a pass if they see a sliver of a chance to do so. Other than directional signals or a friendly hand wave, I have stopped using hand signals as a communication attempt with motorists.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 10:00 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
Other than directional signals or a friendly hand wave, I have stopped using hand signals as a communication attempt with motorists.
i personally find it very satisfying to use a particular hand "signal" after these types of interactions.

i also agree that the only mistake the cyclist made was to not take the full lane at the choke points. of course, this would be viewed as even ruder by commenters who believe sharing the road means getting out of their way...
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 10:14 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
i personally find it very satisfying to use a particular hand "signal" after these types of interactions.
Meh. That can only do nothing, or escalate the situation.

Not tha I've never done it in response to someone doing something dangerous...

i also agree that the only mistake the cyclist made was to not take the full lane at the choke points. of course, this would be viewed as even ruder by commenters who believe sharing the road means getting out of their way...
I actually have said that to drivers who say "Share the road" to me.

"Share the road does not mean I have to get out of your way. If it's not safe to pass, you don't get to. You wouldn't pass a car going 20 mph there, so why do you think you should be able to pass a bike?"
achoo is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 12:45 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by achoo
Meh. That can only do nothing, or escalate the situation.
Believe it or not there are motorists who pass close to cyclists who may not even be aware that their behavior is dangerous and unethical. My gesture appropriately communicates shock and displeasure that another human being would endanger my life. There is no need to adopt the fetal position simply because a tiny minority of the motoring majority is angry at you.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 01:21 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours

I do have to note one new twist, however: the argument that somewhere out there is at least one motorist who is not always perfectly polite, so all cyclists are justified in being complete A-holes to every other road user. Good times.
I'd settle for having our motorists meet the minimum requirements to legally operate their vehicles on our public roadways. Our local police did a rare traffic enforcement operation two days ago. They pulled over 100 motorists who were speeding. They let one-fourth go with a warning. Of the remaining 75, 30% of them were driving without insurance, 15% had illegally tinted their windows (which makes it impossible to report anything they do since one must be able to ID the driver) and 15% were illegally using their cell phones while driving.

It goes a bit beyond a bit of rudeness out there and it's not just a trivial percentage. Because many experienced cyclists choose to not bet our lives on motorized road users following the law, because many of them don't, we are marginalized by the "get out of their way or they'll hate us all" crowd. I think the gutter-huggers are putting me in danger by making their dangerous riding appear to be the norm so that when cyclists take the lane where necessary for safety, we are demonized and attacked by self-righteous motorists.


Originally Posted by RegisterGuard (Eugene, OR)
During Tuesday’s effort, officers ticketed 75 drivers for speeding; 11 for illegally using cell phones while behind the wheel; 24 for driving without insurance; and 11 for having illegally tinted windows. Officers issued a variety of additional citations to motorists, and impounded one vehicle.
Eugene police ticket dozens of drivers during targeted-enforcement effort | News | The Register-Guard | Eugene, Oregon
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 01:28 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 23

Bikes: 2013 Giant Roam 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
Neither fulfilled their obligations to share the road safely, and respectfully. Both could have prevented the entire conflict, the driver failed to wait to make a safe pass, the cyclist attempted to force his will on another. Both had the opportunity to do the right thing and defuse the situation, yet both chose escalate the situation by being confrontational.
I feel this sums things up exactly. The cyclist seems to be of the mindset that he has the right over the car to maintain his speed/pace. As far as using the bike path, the cyclist argues that, "This section of road is a difficult one for cyclists as most of us are simply travelling too fast for the pavement cycle path, and the lane itself is narrow and has the pedestrian islands." Well, tough. You aren't forced to travel at a speed too fast for the path. Most motorists would like to travel at a faster speed than traffic permits as well, something the cyclist doesn't seem to want to admit. I just hope that cyclist has good health coverage in the private sector there as several tons of car will usually win in a collision with ~100 lbs of bike quite handily. How much (or little) do you value your body to try to prove a dubious point that could have been a non-issue?
JeffreyGlobe is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 02:32 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
i personally find it very satisfying to use a particular hand "signal" after these types of interactions.

i also agree that the only mistake the cyclist made was to not take the full lane at the choke points. of course, this would be viewed as even ruder by commenters who believe sharing the road means getting out of their way...
The cyclist could have done better.
Use the correct standard hand signals to avoid confusion. if you know there is going to be a conflict at a choke point slow down or speed up to avoid it, do not attempt to "correct" or "educate" others while traveling down the road.
If we want motorists to slow down and show us proper courtesy when they must, we should be equally willing to do so when we can.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 02:33 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,546

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5223 Post(s)
Liked 3,579 Times in 2,341 Posts
pretty funny, that town is trying to do the right thing but fails, cyclist tries to do the right but fails because he chooses to ride there and knows he is in for trouble so he equips himself with front/rear cameras to prove his point. won't help much in a grave. driver is so confused I don't blame him. arguing while riding is so dangerous cuz there are cars wanting to come into the lane from the left side. what a busy area, right or no right I wouldn't ride there
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 02:49 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
if you know there is going to be a conflict at a choke point slow down or speed up to avoid it, do not attempt to "correct" or "educate" others while traveling down the road.
If we want motorists to slow down and show us proper courtesy when they must, we should be equally willing to do so when we can.
i agree with most of this except for the part about correction and education. we owe it to our fellow citizens to correct and educate those who engage in dangerous behavior. i'll admit that the dude in the recumbent was pretty ineffective at this. i've had almost 30 years of experience educating motorists and, ime, the best approach is to let people know that they could have killed you. for the non-sociopaths this tends to cut through the dehumanizing "those cyclists feel they are superior to me" bull crap.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 02:59 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
because many of them don't, we are marginalized by the "get out of their way or they'll hate us all" crowd. I think the gutter-huggers are putting me in danger by making their dangerous riding appear to be the norm so that when cyclists take the lane where necessary for safety, we are demonized and attacked by self-righteous motorists.
bizarrely i've had several negative interactions with cyclists who are upset that i am not using cycling facilities. in one incident i avoided a truly dangerous blind corner on a cycletrack on the hawthorne bridge ramp. this facility was recently highlighted in this bike portland article:

Collision raises questions about changes on Hawthorne Bridge | BikePortland.org

a female cyclist chased after me angrily shouting at me to use the bike lane [sic]. when i shouted "no way" she literally cut across three lanes of traffic forcing motorists to hard stop and buzzed me. i experienced a strange mixture of frustration and admiration. (it takes a very strong cyclist to keep up with me and cut me off.)
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 04:17 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by walrus1
Ok, for my first point I know I'm going to take some flak but I'm sure since this is A&S we can all stay civil. I'm not sure why he the cyclist was out of the bike lane.
I wouldn't use that dangerous path because the stop bars for cars are on the main roadway side of the bike lane which will lead to drivers crashing into cyclists that don't stop at every intersection. Note the silver car ahead.




If that wasn't the case I'd still avoid it because it has rougher pavement and goes up and down for less pleasant riding than the adjacent flat road surface. Both issues are visible in my frame grab.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
bike-path.jpg (26.8 KB, 152 views)

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 03-27-14 at 04:28 PM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 04:50 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Astrozombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: East L.A.
Posts: 903

Bikes: Diamondback Insight, Motobecane Mirage

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
The other side of the coin for gesturing, people take it the wrong way (The jerk in me says not to bother)
Astrozombie is offline  
Old 03-27-14, 10:29 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
i personally find it very satisfying to use a particular hand "signal" after these types of interactions.
I've probably used that same hand signal many times, but I was using it to get the motorist to stop and get out of their vehicle. After numerous back and forth gesturing over the years, and no motorists willing to stop, I eventually took up videoing my commutes to get better info.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 03-28-14, 03:31 AM
  #42  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Sadly, there is as much cyclist hating in this thread as there is in many of the news article comments by motorist.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-28-14, 04:36 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Shoulda been in the side path.
Shouldna been in the side pah.
Shoulda taken the lane.
Shouldna taken the lane.
Shoulda ridden near the curb.
Shouldna been so close to the curb.
Shoulda used hand signals.
Shouldna used hand signals.
Shoulda pulled over and let the car go by, thrise.

But my fave, shoulda beemed off the planet for the emergency vehicles.
And shouldna posted the video of the poor embarassed prat.

-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 03-28-14, 05:05 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
The first words out of the cyclists mouth were a threat.

He was looking for trouble.

Some day he will find it.

That and looking at the hand signal in looks like he first holds the hand out then waves it forward.

As others have pointed out that path is deadly, truly treacherous, it LOOKS nice and pinches out over and over again. Rather like the road. A cyclist who instead of looking for a fight bothers to point that out to a motorist could have made a positive impact.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 03-29-14, 07:55 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
surreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
Never mind that this all took place in London...
Indeed. I don't see anything that's truly noteworthy going on in this video, but I do intend to perform an impersonation of the 'bent-rider's voice in all future confrontations with motorists, including the spine-tingling threat of putting footage on youtube.
surreal is offline  
Old 03-29-14, 08:57 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99
......A cyclist who instead of looking for a fight bothers to point that out to a motorist could have made a positive impact.
I no longer bother in attempting to have a conversation with motorists while I'm riding on my bicycle, the majority of the time, motorists are unable or unwilling to listen to what I have to say.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 03-29-14, 09:53 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
Sadly, there is as much cyclist hating in this thread as there is in many of the news article comments by motorist.
There is no "cyclist hate" here. That's just a code phrase on A&S for "Anyone who ever disagrees that the cyclist is always right".

The reality is that this guy is a hothead cyclist cruising for trouble and then whining when he finds it. That sort of thing doesn't do any good for anybody, and pointing it out is not "hate".
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-29-14, 11:48 AM
  #48  
Don from Austin Texas
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,211

Bikes: Schwinn S25 "department store crap" FS MTB, home-made CF 26" hybrid, CF road bike with straight bar, various wierd frankenbikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by genec
If we go with the issue of "backing up traffic" then we should exclude many motorists from the roadways as traffic backs up quite often simply due to the sheer number of single occupancy cars on the roadway.... and such backups occur far more often than the rare slowdown by cyclist... in fact, we have even given a name to the traffic backup caused by motorists... "rush hour;" this event generally occurs twice a day, and is largely caused by motorists.
Cement mixers should be banned from urban traffic because they are too slow to accelerate when a light turns green and they hold up everyone behind them.

Don in Austin
Don in Austin is offline  
Old 03-29-14, 12:50 PM
  #49  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
There is no "cyclist hate" here. That's just a code phrase on A&S for "Anyone who ever disagrees that the cyclist is always right".

The reality is that this guy is a hothead cyclist cruising for trouble and then whining when he finds it. That sort of thing doesn't do any good for anybody, and pointing it out is not "hate".
You sound like some whiney politician with your claims of code words.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 03-29-14, 04:29 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
You sound like some whiney politician with your claims of code words.
You must have some pretty weird politicians in Hawaii, I guess.
Six jours is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.