Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-29-14, 04:45 PM   #1
scott967
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Posts: 546
Bicycle transpopnders?

With all the buzz about self-driving / Google / etc cars, I'm thinking this will never work without some sort of transponder for cyclists. This would be in addition to whatever detection technology in in the motor vehicle (LIDAR, camera, etc). I think ideally the transponder would provide position and velocity data which would make avoidance for the motor vehicle easier. Couldn't find anything on the interwebs along these lines though.

scott s.
.
scott967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-14, 05:03 PM   #2
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Bikes:
Posts: 5,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott967 View Post
With all the buzz about self-driving / Google / etc cars, I'm thinking this will never work without some sort of transponder for cyclists.
Why do you think so? The demos I've seen of the Google self-driving software seems to show good detection and proper identification of cyclists as well as pedestrians and other road users. Special transponders could presumably make it still better but even without them I'd already trust the systems to properly identify and avoid me better than most of the drivers on the road today.
prathmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-14, 05:16 PM   #3
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,578
Volvo has already announced a system that locates cyclists for their crash avoidance system.

Volvo Introduces Cyclist Collision Avoidance System | Road Bike News, Reviews, and Photos

Quote:
The computer detected that a collision will occur as the cyclist went directly into the path of the automobile. The driver is given the chance to slow down or stop but if the computer detects no brake input from the driver, it will decide to intervene at the last possible second. Knowing how quick the car can stop and given the speed of the car and the cyclist, the car will automatically brake and stop itself to avoid hitting the cyclist. This is the true asset of the Collision Avoidance System.

A similar system is now in place in many vehicles in the form of avoiding collision with other cars. Mtbr and Carreview have driven many of these systems and they actually work.
Hopefully it works better than their media demonstration shows.

[video=youtube;-Y5qwU0hwB0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y5qwU0hwB0[/video]
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-14, 05:42 PM   #4
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 29,274
The VERY LAST thing we need in a crash avoidance system is any kind of transponder or radar reflector on the bicycle. It's the driver's job, or that of the driver's crash avoidance system to avoid bicycles, pedestrians or whatever. It's not the job of the potential hittees to somehow prompt those systems.

What happens to the cyclist if his transponder battery dies?
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-14, 07:26 AM   #5
ItsJustMe
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Posts: 12,931
From what I've seen, the existing sensors on self-driving cars are already better at spotting cyclists than humans are.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-14, 12:31 PM   #6
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott967 View Post
With all the buzz about self-driving / Google / etc cars, I'm thinking this will never work without some sort of transponder for cyclists. This would be in addition to whatever detection technology in in the motor vehicle (LIDAR, camera, etc). I think ideally the transponder would provide position and velocity data which would make avoidance for the motor vehicle easier. Couldn't find anything on the interwebs along these lines though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe View Post
From what I've seen, the existing sensors on self-driving cars are already better at spotting cyclists than humans are.
Have you, or anyone else seen videos, demonstrations, "buzz," or any documents that the promoters and media hypseters for self driving car technology did not want the public to see?

Who knows, this super-duper technological advance may even top the Segway's influence on transportation of the masses.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-14, 05:27 PM   #7
sauerwald
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
Posts: 1,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsJustMe View Post
From what I've seen, the existing sensors on self-driving cars are already better at spotting cyclists than humans are.
Not a high bar to clear......
sauerwald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-14, 03:37 AM   #8
scott967
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Posts: 546
I guess I am just a skeptic that a passive (from bike viewpoint) system alone is going to suffice. The problem I see is that if these self-driving vehicles do come about, there will be a push to make the roads "friendly" to them. I think for example some systems rely on following the painted lines so obviously they need to be maintained. Given that bicycles often seem to be tolerated rather than embraced, if it comes that bikes are seen as "holding back" progress, it won't be good for access. That's why I'm thinking maybe the industry needs to be proactive.

scott s.
.
scott967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-14, 07:25 AM   #9
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott967 View Post
I guess I am just a skeptic that a passive (from bike viewpoint) system alone is going to suffice. The problem I see is that if these self-driving vehicles do come about, there will be a push to make the roads "friendly" to them. I think for example some systems rely on following the painted lines so obviously they need to be maintained. Given that bicycles often seem to be tolerated rather than embraced, if it comes that bikes are seen as "holding back" progress, it won't be good for access. That's why I'm thinking maybe the industry needs to be proactive.

scott s.
.
Do a bit of research... the systems currently under design and test use a combination of LIDAR and vision to see the road and any potential obstacles, including humans. These systems can track multiple "targets" and compute both desired preferred paths and collision avoidance. Since pedestrian avoidance is a huge factor, humans on bikes are simply just another factor in their system. There are no requirements for pedestrians to wear transponders, so why would cyclists be required to do so. The burden for safety is on the self driving car to fit into the current environment, not to modify the environment for the self driving cars.

Yes, in the past, crude versions of the current vehicles were tested (San Diego was a test bed) and such systems required special "nails" in a specific course and markers etc... but such tests were conducted over 20 years ago and were hailed as being a stepping stone, but dismissed as impractical.
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-14, 04:08 AM   #10
scott967
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Posts: 546
I hope you are right that these systems will be able to accurately track a (possibly several) bicycle doing 20+ mph at different aspects. What prompted this was an article in May IEEE Spectrum written by a couple of GM engineers. They mention USDOT has a "Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership" which is working to develop standard communications protocols and security for vehicle to vehicle (V2V) technology. Also they cite Europe has a "Car-2Car Communication Consortium". They talk about a pilot program in Ann Arbor that started in 2012. Also vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) communications. Supposedly USDOT is pushing for a rule-making that would require V2V in all new vehicles. GM was working on a system they demoed in 2009 that worked with peds and cyclists, using Wifi Direct as the comm link.

scott s.
.
scott967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-14, 04:08 AM   #11
Schwinnhund
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.
Bikes: 1982 Schwinn Sidewinder, Sun EZ-1 Recumbent, Cannondale R-400
Posts: 215
That's what we need, alright....something to make bicycles more expensive......
Schwinnhund is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 PM.