Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-20-14, 02:04 PM   #26
katsrevenge
covered in cat fur
 
katsrevenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Willkes-Barre, PA
Bikes: Papillionaire Sommer, '85 Schwinn World Tourist, 2014 Windsor Kensington 8, SixThreeZero SS Cruiser
Posts: 614
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rootman View Post

How many drivers are going to tear out their undercarriages on those protective islands?
I bet they only do it once!
But I know when I drive I don't generally jump the curb..... I stay in the road, like I'm supposed to.

Quote:

Looks like it severely hampers auto traffic by effectively reducing the lane count.
Slower traffic brings more business and more life into an area. All in all, slowing it down is good for a city.
Quote:

Overall it LOOKS like a good idea, but will the features provide any benefit in the real world?
As others have already said... it apparently works well.
katsrevenge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 02:59 PM   #27
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,790
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
that's not saying much.
Yeah, it's like I have no experience what so ever... Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the 10s of thousands of miles of bike commuting.

But hey, like all those years and miles mean anything... right.

And hey all those armchair quarterbacks responding early to the OP, that have never even ridden a mile outside of the US... like their experiences mean a thing either, right?
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 03:19 PM   #28
CommuteCommando
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium
Posts: 3,010
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am a huge advocate with keeping things simple, and this flies in the face of that. It would be so expensive that you could install hundreds of miles of bike lane for the cost of a mile of that stuff. That an they would turn into sidewalks, unused by cyclists, as they have here. http://Goo.Gl/maps/WhG4u
CommuteCommando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 03:22 PM   #29
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
40 years developing this type of infrastructure has resulted in The Netherlands having the highest modal share and safest bicycling in the world. 40 years of promoting vehicular cycling has resulted in the U.S. having one of the lowest modal shares and most dangerous bicycling in the developed world. Which is the more succesful?

Oh, the U.S. also has higher obesity, more general health problems, and a bit shorter life expectancy. Something like 17% of our education budgets are spent on transporting kids in buses instead of their riding bicycles to school (and the Netherlands scores considerably higher on every aspect of child well-being than the U.S). Promoting vehicular cycling sure has worked well for us.

Why would someone prefer a safer and more efficient infrastructure like in The Netherlands to battling with 4000 cagers?
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 03:45 PM   #30
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
This intersection design is not used in Amsterdam. Islands, set backs, and channelization are common but not *this* design (which promotes unnecessary conflict between peds and cyclists).
This design is used quite extensively. I'll try to find some photos. How does this promote conflict?
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 03:51 PM   #31
curbtender
Senior Member
 
curbtender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Bikes: Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Schwinn Speedster, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina
Posts: 3,912
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Only works if everyone is on the same page. Recently found out that riding in the green lane means don't venture beyond the borders unless you are inviting share the lane...
curbtender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 04:50 PM   #32
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
This design is used quite extensively. I'll try to find some photos. How does this promote conflict?
i disagree. falbo's design does not have good separation between cyclists and pedestrians. the bikeway and the sidewalk are flush with each other creating a conflict zone. in holland there are typically curbs that separate pedestrians from cyclists except for the crosswalk. moreover, the crosswalk is typically angled so that cyclists can clearly see peds as they cross. and last but not least dutch designs are *never* walled in by a cars prior to an intersection. the dutch rejected cycle paths with barriers blocking sight lines decades ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HDN9fUlqU8

Last edited by spare_wheel; 06-20-14 at 05:39 PM.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 04:55 PM   #33
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by daihard View Post
I'm not a fan of those "barriers," either. How do they deal with the demand for parking spots on the road in Denmark?
LOL! They deal with them by getting rid of them. Cycling infrastructure without parking removal, traffic calming, and road dieting is a half measure.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 05:12 PM   #34
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
i disagree. falbo's design does not have good separation between cyclists and pedestrians. the bikeway and the sidewalk are flush with each other creating a conflict zone. in holland there are typically curbs that separate pedestrians from cyclists except for the crosswalk crossing the bikeway. moreover, the crosswalk is typically angled so that cyclists can clearly see peds as they cross. and last but not least dutch designs are *never* walled in by a cars prior to an intersection. the dutch rejected cycle paths with barriers blocking sight lines decades ago.
I'm not seeing any of the problems that you are. Maybe I'm getting to old and senile. There is no less separation between bicycles and peds on Falbo as in NL. While curb separation between bicycles and peds is desired it is not mandated nor critical and there are many instances of cycletracks being nothing more than different colored pavers on the same level as peds.

The parked cars are not a problem and do not interfere with any sightlines that I can see. This is an issue in Copenhagen where cycletracks lead in to right turn lanes and there is a need for bicycles and cars to see each other prior to this mixing, but that is not happening here or in reality in NL.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 06:11 PM   #35
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Bikes:
Posts: 3,731
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
That's FINE, if you aren't an American businessman. We've already gone through some of this in Boise. It got howled over so badly it wasn't funny, even if it didn't supposedly back up traffic much at all.

Honestly, it's getting so dead on our streets here in Ontario, Oregon that you have to be even more careful-it lulls you and you start to forget where you are without the constant traffic to keep you focused.
__________________
Don't let some well-meaning person write an uplifting story in your obituary. YOU ARE DEAD.
Rollfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 08:18 PM   #36
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 6,955
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
I'm not seeing any of the problems that you are. Maybe I'm getting to old and senile. There is no less separation between bicycles and peds on Falbo as in NL. While curb separation between bicycles and peds is desired it is not mandated nor critical and there are many instances of cycletracks being nothing more than different colored pavers on the same level as peds
How is it safe to ride 20 mph right next to pedestrians and their kids and dogs, separated by just different colored pavement?

This design and many others seem to assume we all ride slowly and sedately.
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-14, 08:44 PM   #37
daihard 
Senior Member
 
daihard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes: Trek, Cannondale
Posts: 1,878
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
LOL! They deal with them by getting rid of them. Cycling infrastructure without parking removal, traffic calming, and road dieting is a half measure.
That'd be a great solution.
__________________

The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
daihard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 06:40 AM   #38
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyl View Post
How is it safe to ride 20 mph right next to pedestrians and their kids and dogs, separated by just different colored pavement?

This design and many others seem to assume we all ride slowly and sedately.
In the U.S. we seem to think it's safe to drive 30-50 mph right next to pedestrians without even any color separation.

Most people in NL average about 13 mph (prob 11 - 16 range). If you need or want to go faster you almost always can. When I've been in a hurry there've only been a few times when I needed to slow.

From a time from A to B standpoint a bicycle nearly always beats a car. This is largely due to a bicycle network not needing stop lights or signs (except where crossing cars) since bicycle riders can negotiate with each other, so less junction delay. Bicycle riders take up less space so can pass each other far more easily than cars (a 10' lane (cycletrack or motor lane) can handle about 15-20 times as many bicycle riders as cars). Cycletracks and paths function like multi-lane interstates or motorways (except bicycle riders do stay right except to pass, unlike in the U.S.).

Cycletracks can go where roads cannot providing for shorter routes such as through construction areas or being two-way where motor traffic is one-way or being allowed to make turns where motor traffic is prohibited.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 06:51 AM   #39
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
LOL! They deal with them by getting rid of them. Cycling infrastructure without parking removal, traffic calming, and road dieting is a half measure.
Not necessarily. First you have to think about parking removal not in terms of total spaces, but availability. If people are riding bicycles rather than driving there is need for fewer parking spaces.

Road dieting is somewhat similar (more bicycles = less cars = less need for 60' wide stroads) but there are also many roads that were overbuilt with an expectation of continually increasing traffic that never materialized (and now people are driving less each year). Also, the chaos that many predict with road diets hasn't seemed to materialize.

Traffic calming is only necessary on streets where bicycle riders and motor traffic share space. In NL these streets are usually 18 mph max speed and are sometimes fietstraats (bicycle streets) where bicycles have ROW and cars may not pass. These are always very short distance local access only. They are NEVER through streets of any sort. On major through streets there is no need of traffic calming as bicycle riders have their own cycletrack or path.

Here's a discussion on this in St Paul: http://streets.mn/2014/04/08/st-paul...he-local-mile/

Last edited by CrankyOne; 06-21-14 at 07:00 AM.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 07:57 AM   #40
work4bike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
work4bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Bikes:
Posts: 813
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 181 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by work4bike View Post
Color me skeptical. Besides I don't like the idea of taking bikelanes past the basic concept of just giving us a little more real estate, but maybe that's just me set in my old ways of cycling.

Curious on everyone's opinion. I don't really see anything here that unique, but then again I don't spend much time looking at various bike infrastructure designs. There's also a 5-minute video on the link.

BTW, this seems to be something, for now, only in Portland, Or.

A New Bike Lane That Could Save Lives and Make Cycling More Popular | Autopia | WIRED
Ok, I finally read the entire article and watched the video and I also watched/read all the links provided.

When I posted this I just skimmed over it because I came across it by accident. However, after looking at it more in-depth, I see this is really about separated cycling tracks, which I don't want. But no problem, because there is pretty much zero chance of them coming here to my area. However, I'd love to see them established in some areas just to see how it works. And I agree, you cannot just establish separate cycling tracks, period. You got to incorporate all the other features, especially the special traffic light system.

I have seen cycling first hand in Holland and it's just not for me; I guess you really can't teach an old dog new tricks Sharing the road is just part of me. I've been commuting for over 25 years and my longest commute was a 50-mile roundtrip and when you do long trips it turns you into a sort of speeddemon. I can't ride around at 11-16 mph pace, even if I have the time; my body is just conditioned to riding faster, it just feels natural.

BTW, you all notice that there is no such thing as a bike path in the U.S. They all become MUPs. Wouldn't separated cycling tracks be the same?
work4bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 01:11 PM   #41
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by work4bike View Post
BTW, you all notice that there is no such thing as a bike path in the U.S. They all become MUPs. Wouldn't separated cycling tracks be the same?
It seems if you'd ridden around The Netherlands you'd know the answer to this.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 04:47 PM   #42
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
Not necessarily. First you have to think about parking removal not in terms of total spaces, but availability. If people are riding bicycles rather than driving there is need for fewer parking spaces.
i'd be more supportive of north american copenhagenistas if they (generally) had even a smidgeon of the anti-car passion that is at the core of cycling advocacy in continental europe.

Quote:
Traffic calming is only necessary on streets where bicycle riders and motor traffic share space.
intersection timing and intersection design are widely used to calm traffic. no one wants to cycle next to 60 kmh traffic protected only by a miniscule curb.

Last edited by spare_wheel; 06-21-14 at 04:56 PM.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 04:53 PM   #43
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
It seems if you'd ridden around The Netherlands you'd know the answer to this.

i agree. criticisms of dutch infrastructure as being generally slow are definitely off target. it's possible to bike very fast on cyclepaths in the netherlands -- especially outside of crowded centers. separation between peds and cyclists is the key!
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 07:49 PM   #44
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
I'd be more supportive of North American copenhagenistas if they (generally) had even a smidgeon of the anti-car passion that is at the core of cycling advocacy in continental Europe.
Prepare to be unsupportive. There is extremely little anti-car passion in Europe. Cars are a very useful and appropriate tool for many purposes. Just not perhaps for 1 or 2 or 4 mile trips to the local cafe or school or whatever.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-14, 09:56 PM   #45
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
Prepare to be unsupportive. There is extremely little anti-car passion in Europe. Cars are a very useful and appropriate tool for many purposes. Just not perhaps for 1 or 2 or 4 mile trips to the local cafe or school or whatever.
seriously??? everything about social policy in denmark, holland, and germany has been about discouraging motoring. it's only in the usa that both the VCers and the separation folk are enamored with preserving the car-centric status quo.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-14, 07:01 AM   #46
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,898
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
seriously??? everything about social policy in denmark, holland, and germany has been about discouraging motoring. it's only in the usa that both the VCers and the separation folk are enamored with preserving the car-centric status quo.
First, Holland is a region in The Netherlands, not a country. The Netherlands is not at all anti-car nor are many (or any?) of her citizens. Their focus is right tool for the job. Short trips always by bicycle, moderately long trips (5 miles each way) often by bicycle, longer trips (10-50 miles) by bicycle when you have time.

Denmark is similar though not quite as bicycle friendly.

Germany, Sweden, some cities in Spain, and elsewhere are implementing some form of the Dutch (Netherlands) model, to a greater or lessor degree, of segregated bicycle infrastructure and encouraging people to ride for short trips rather than drive, and sometimes for other trips. They want to decrease motor use (to lessen the costs, congestion, etc.) and increase bicycle use (they fear becoming obese Americans). They are not, except for an extreme minority, anti-car in any way.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-14, 10:04 AM   #47
kickstart 
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Posts: 4,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by work4bike View Post
I have seen cycling first hand in Holland and it's just not for me; I guess you really can't teach an old dog new tricks Sharing the road is just part of me. I've been commuting for over 25 years and my longest commute was a 50-mile roundtrip and when you do long trips it turns you into a sort of speeddemon. I can't ride around at 11-16 mph pace, even if I have the time; my body is just conditioned to riding faster, it just feels natural.
But isn't the intent of urban cycling infrastructure, like any other public facility, to serve the average person?
kickstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-14, 10:55 AM   #48
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,790
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyl View Post
How is it safe to ride 20 mph right next to pedestrians and their kids and dogs, separated by just different colored pavement?

This design and many others seem to assume we all ride slowly and sedately.
This design and many others "assume" that you can bike responsibly and sanely... at speeds appropriate for the conditions... the very same demands many cyclists put upon motorists. If you can't bike in a responsible and safe manner for the conditions, why do you expect motorists to drive in a responsible and safe manner?

ALL SHARED TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRES SAFE AND RESPONSIBLE USE BY ALL USERS.

It really IS that simple.
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-14, 11:17 AM   #49
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Posts: 6,955
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
This design and many others "assume" that you can bike responsibly and sanely... at speeds appropriate for the conditions... the very same demands many cyclists put upon motorists. If you can't bike in a responsible and safe manner for the conditions, why do you expect motorists to drive in a responsible and safe manner?

ALL SHARED TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRES SAFE AND RESPONSIBLE USE BY ALL USERS.

It really IS that simple.
Your reply reinforces my suspicion that this sort of cycletrack is designed to SLOW cyclists to someone else's idea of "sane" speeds appropriate for riding in a narrow space between, and always at risk of being encroached by, pedestrians, children, dogs, and people loading/unloading from cars.

No thanks! I ride to get where I'm going and I enjoy the freedom and joy of riding at whatever speed I can and want to, in whatever lane for which my speed is appropriate. Where I have the legs, lungs and sometimes gravity assist, I'll ride 20-25-30 with the cars; other places I'm comfortable riding on the shoulder or in a conventional bike lane.

I'm not going to be forced to ride like an "interested but concerned" 8-to-80'er on a sensible city bike. If that is the implication of this sort of bike infrastructure, then I'll become an active opponent.

Last edited by jyl; 06-22-14 at 01:34 PM.
jyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-14, 11:20 AM   #50
jputnam
Senior Member
 
jputnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Posts: 1,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just for technical accuracy, in much of the U.S., this isn't a type of bike "lane" at all -- once the bicycle facility is curb separated from the street, it's a "path" instead of a "lane." The difference? You're no longer traffic in the street.

At each intersection, instead of being a vehicle subject to the usual right-of-way rules, you're a path user entering the street, with an entirely different set of right-of-way rules.

You can't simply transplant Dutch infrastructure designs to the U.S. without the legal infrastructure that supports those designs -- a far more complicated traffic code, far more rigorous licensing requirements for those who want to operate motor vehicles, and meaningful enforcement of those rules when an accident occurs.

Putting a typical American driver through this intersection is like dropping them in the seat of a semi and asking them to operate it without any training on the additional complexities of the design.
jputnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.