Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-03-14, 07:20 PM   #1
FanaticMN
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Bikes: Trek Allant
Posts: 195
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Driver who killed cyclist charged with criminal vehicular homicide: cell phone use

He was trying to do banking on his cell phone and struck a woman pulling her two children in a bike trailer, killing her and injuring them.
FanaticMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-14, 08:29 PM   #2
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
The condition of bail, that the killer not use his phone while driving, is a bit much to take. How about he not be allowed to drive? He was already giving the chance to prove he was capable of doing the right thing while behind the wheel. He failed and an innocent person is dead because of his selfish behavior.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-14, 08:36 PM   #3
Rootman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW Arkansas, USA
Bikes: 2012 Giant Sedona Hybrid
Posts: 871
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ohh, this infuriates me. Not only should he of had his DL taken away he should of been forced to forfeit his dam phone too!
Rootman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-14, 09:38 PM   #4
keyven
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Singapore
Bikes: Giant Anthem X1 2009; Brompton M2R 2014; Brompton Ti M6R 2014
Posts: 1,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rootman View Post
Ohh, this infuriates me. Not only should he of had his DL taken away he should of been forced to forfeit his dam phone too!
This is really sad - for the family and the children who will now grow up without a mother.

I do feel a little for the guy because he made a terrible mistake and I'm sure he will be burdened with guilt and be sufficiently punished for his crime. That he stopped immediately and did not hide his crime showed it was a mistake, one which should never have happened in the first place.
keyven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-14, 10:47 PM   #5
yugyug
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: antipodes
Bikes:
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rootman View Post
Ohh, this infuriates me. Not only should he of had his DL taken away he should of been forced to forfeit his dam phone too!
I agree he should have had his license suspended immediately and automatically, and I can't understand why this doesn't happen to all drivers involved in serious accidents until the police investigation or court trial finishes.
yugyug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-14, 04:41 AM   #6
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,889
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
An interesting article and discussion on it: Steen MN vs Drenthe NL | streets.mn

How practical is it to run a bike path along roads like she was on?
CrankyOne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-14, 05:04 AM   #7
Mvcrash 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Bikes: Trek 4900, Cannondale Cx-4
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
The condition of bail, that the killer not use his phone while driving, is a bit much to take. How about he not be allowed to drive? He was already giving the chance to prove he was capable of doing the right thing while behind the wheel. He failed and an innocent person is dead because of his selfish behavior.
Innocent until proven guilty becomes the issue. I'm not sure about where this took place, but here in NJ you have no right to operate a motor vehicle. We routinely had the drivers license of a person suspended. If the facts were such that the suspension was not warranted, we would call and ask for the reinstatement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rootman View Post
Ohh, this infuriates me. Not only should he of had his DL taken away he should of been forced to forfeit his dam phone too!
We would have taken it as evidence. He could have easily gone and purchased another, but we tried.
__________________
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the former."
― Albert Einstein
Mvcrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-14, 05:07 AM   #8
Mvcrash 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Bikes: Trek 4900, Cannondale Cx-4
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanaticMN View Post
He was trying to do banking on his cell phone and struck a woman pulling her two children in a bike trailer, killing her and injuring them.
I cannot fathom their loss.
__________________
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the former."
― Albert Einstein
Mvcrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-14, 01:51 PM   #9
exile
Senior Member
 
exile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes: 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 1999 Jamis Exile
Posts: 2,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
How practical is it to run a bike path along roads like she was on?
I think its a nice idea, but probably not cost effective considering the route where this took place had a shoulder where the woman was riding.


The issue is the driver not paying attention to driving.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MN270_Steen_.jpg (52.2 KB, 57 views)
exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-14, 09:23 PM   #10
rydabent
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
Posts: 5,744
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Nothing but pure irresponsibility.
rydabent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-14, 10:39 AM   #11
Feldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Police should be empowered to sieze and destroy not every cell phone that they see a driver using, but any cell phone in a car that is within reach of a driver. Cops should be equipped with a modified version of Vise Grip Locking C Clamp #20 , refitted with diamond-treaded, meat tenderizer type jaw pads. That'd crush any cell phone in existence with pretty minimal hand effort I should think.
Feldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-14, 10:57 AM   #12
RoadTire 
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just looked at the map and 270 is perfectly straight. That guy should lose his DL. Hey, I lost mine for 30 days when I was 16, going home from work, no drinking, and was t-boned by a 20-something that actually saw me coming.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-14, 11:12 AM   #13
RoadTire 
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldman View Post
Police should be empowered to sieze and destroy not every cell phone that they see a driver using, but any cell phone in a car that is within reach of a driver. Cops should be equipped with a modified version of Vise Grip Locking C Clamp #20 , refitted with diamond-treaded, meat tenderizer type jaw pads. That'd crush any cell phone in existence with pretty minimal hand effort I should think.
Either you are over reacting emotionally or you're a trolling idiot. (I can't believe I actually called someone here the "i" word.) There goes the battery in flames from instant short circuit and sharp fragments of plastic and glass all over the place. What kind of police state do you want to live in that gives anyone the right to destroy personal property at a whim. Can you imagine a cop destroying or confiscating some ladies makeup case because she has it in her purse? How about your water bottle or coffee from Mcdonalds. LOL. Give me a break.

We have made huge advances dealing with drunken driving, no open bottles, almost going overboard with the "W" plates, and even that won't stop the addicted drunks from getting behind the wheel. Extremely sever court ordered penalties, hiked insurance rates, etc are the only real deterrent and that gets out of control also.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-14, 01:02 PM   #14
Mvcrash 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Bikes: Trek 4900, Cannondale Cx-4
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoadTire View Post
Either you are over reacting emotionally or you're a trolling idiot. (I can't believe I actually called someone here the "i" word.)

We have made huge advances dealing with drunken driving, no open bottles, almost going overboard with the "W" plates, and even that won't stop the addicted drunks from getting behind the wheel. Extremely sever court ordered penalties, hiked insurance rates, etc are the only real deterrent and that gets out of control also.

Your first statement made me laugh, your second is directly on point.
__________________
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the former."
― Albert Einstein
Mvcrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-14, 05:32 PM   #15
HawkOwl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,635
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyven View Post
This is really sad - for the family and the children who will now grow up without a mother.

I do feel a little for the guy because he made a terrible mistake and I'm sure he will be burdened with guilt and be sufficiently punished for his crime. That he stopped immediately and did not hide his crime showed it was a mistake, one which should never have happened in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yugyug View Post
I agree he should have had his license suspended immediately and automatically, and I can't understand why this doesn't happen to all drivers involved in serious accidents until the police investigation or court trial finishes.

Give you two some slack because from your online statements you aren't in North America. Here most people like this one don't feel guilt for what they have done. They are upset because they got caught. "Gee, I've been doing this forever. If that cyclist and her kids hadn't been there none of this would have happened. I mean, who tows kids behind a bike along a street anyway?"

And, no we don't want any cop seizing property or denying freedom to anyone except under very specific and limited rules. That is one of the reasons we are here instead of in the old countries where individual people not of the ruling class had essentially no rights. We want due process that involves a third party. Even then we operate under the innocent until proven guilty rule; or we are supposed to. As the Innocence Project is discovering there are many actually innocent people who are punished for crimes they did not commit.
HawkOwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-14, 07:24 PM   #16
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkOwl View Post
Here most people like this one don't feel guilt for what they have done. They are upset because they got caught. "Gee, I've been doing this forever. If that cyclist and her kids hadn't been there none of this would have happened. I mean, who tows kids behind a bike along a street anyway?"
We don't find ourselves in full agreement often, but I think you've just nailed it here.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-14, 07:37 AM   #17
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,889
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by exile View Post
I think its a nice idea, but probably not cost effective considering the route where this took place had a shoulder where the woman was riding. The issue is the driver not paying attention to driving.
Is the shoulder paved or gravel? And what difference does having a shoulder make with regard to a segregated path?
CrankyOne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-14, 08:14 AM   #18
RoadTire 
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
Is the shoulder paved or gravel? And what difference does having a shoulder make with regard to a segregated path?
Two lane, small towns, wide paved shoulders, straight as an arrow. The difference would be physically isolated from traffic or nothing but a painted white line. Or did I misunderstand you?

Can you imagine putting segregated bike paths, let's say in South Dakota, so we can get from Minnesota to Montana without being on the highway? The issue not clearly understood by those in smaller countries is we have a lot of space and low population areas.

Maybe our cell phones should be off when in the car, and the proof being if we get stopped, the officer can call our phone. If it doesn't light up, then it's off. More proof? Turn it on and repeat. The officer does not even have to touch the phone. Of course that completely blows most of our navigation apps our the door, so never mind. Bad idea. We would not even be able to have a regular GPS in our car then.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.

Last edited by RoadTire; 07-06-14 at 08:21 AM.
RoadTire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-14, 08:22 AM   #19
yugyug
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: antipodes
Bikes:
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkOwl View Post

And, no we don't want any cop seizing property or denying freedom to anyone except under very specific and limited rules. That is one of the reasons we are here instead of in the old countries where individual people not of the ruling class had essentially no rights.
Having a driver's license is not a right, its a privilege. And they are cancelled and suspended all the time without a court process.

Well maybe its a little different in the US, but in Australia we have a demerit points system and if you lose all your points your license is suspended automatically. Police can issue demerit point-taking fines automatically, even if more serious offences get charged later. You also get such fines for speed/red light camera infringements etc. Yes, you can challenge the fine that caused the final loss of points and thus the suspension in court - that would be your due process - but nonetheless your license is suspended until the case is resolved in your favour or your suspension period is up (guess which would commonly occur first?)

What I am proposing is little different to that.
yugyug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-14, 05:34 PM   #20
exile
Senior Member
 
exile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Bikes: 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker, 1999 Jamis Exile
Posts: 2,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
Is the shoulder paved or gravel? And what difference does having a shoulder make with regard to a segregated path?
According to the original article cited: "When police examined the scene, they found the bike stroller wheels as far over to the right side of the road as possible, half onto the gravel, as if Boeve had tried to squeeze out of the way of the flatbed pickup."

So to answer your 1st question the shoulder was gravel. However to answer the second question I would have to say it depends. When you mention "segregated" are you referring to a paved shoulder with a bike designation thus making it a bike lane or are you referencing the paths in the article you posted?

Either way I don't think it would be cost effective for a town like Steen Minnesota (Population 180) to have paved bike shoulder (or "segregated path") between their and Luverne Minnesota (Population 4680) which is approximately 13 miles away. This is the information I found for the approximate cost for a bike lane. If you could provide a link to the costs the for the "segregated path" you have in mind it would be helpful.

The problem with a bike lane is it would not prevent a tragedy like this from happening. However once your provide more information regarding the "segregated" bike path you have in mind It can be compared to the cost effectiveness of the bike lane.

Regardless of the cost the woman was killed by a distracted driver. Even if your "segregated" path idea goes through someone's cornfield it still may not prevent something like this from happening.
exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-14, 10:35 AM   #21
Feldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm responding in sadder-but-wiser mode. So, tell me why a cell phone within reach of a driver should be any different from an open bottle of liquor. IMHO, all of the distractions you mention are an extreme example of someone swinging their automotive fist and having no concern for whatever nose gets in the way. What could possibly be a difference between two items (bottle of booze, cell phone) that have a similar ability to reduce the ability of the driver to control their vehicle. Call me an idiot, I don't care, but I've ridden bikes and driven both for over forty years and can tell you driver behavior has changed. The law needs to treat drivers as less than human--and piss on the Constitution if need be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoadTire View Post
Either you are over reacting emotionally or you're a trolling idiot. (I can't believe I actually called someone here the "i" word.) There goes the battery in flames from instant short circuit and sharp fragments of plastic and glass all over the place. What kind of police state do you want to live in that gives anyone the right to destroy personal property at a whim. Can you imagine a cop destroying or confiscating some ladies makeup case because she has it in her purse? How about your water bottle or coffee from Mcdonalds. LOL. Give me a break.

We have made huge advances dealing with drunken driving, no open bottles, almost going overboard with the "W" plates, and even that won't stop the addicted drunks from getting behind the wheel. Extremely sever court ordered penalties, hiked insurance rates, etc are the only real deterrent and that gets out of control also.
Feldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-14, 10:57 AM   #22
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldman View Post
I'm responding in sadder-but-wiser mode.
[Skip]
The law needs to treat drivers as less than human--and piss on the Constitution if need be.
Sadder? - True;
Wiser? - Hardly.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-14, 11:11 AM   #23
kickstart 
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Posts: 4,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
I don't use my phone while driving, it's a $1000 fine if you have a CDL, but I do use it as my GPS which is far safer than a map, written directions, of fumbling around lost.
kickstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-14, 11:19 AM   #24
rydabent
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
Posts: 5,744
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
In any "accident" which this does not seem to be, if some one is killed, their DL should be removed until the trial. No exceptions!!!!

Further the law need to be changed so that if it can be proved that a driver that injures or kills someone while on a cell phone, the penality should be doubled.
rydabent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 06:22 PM   #25
dperreno 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Beverly Hills, MI
Bikes: '72 Fuji Finest, '80 Austro-Daimler Inter 10, '06 Fuji Team Issue, '06 Salsa Las Cruces, Nashbar Frame single speed
Posts: 566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkOwl View Post
Here most people like this one don't feel guilt for what they have done. They are upset because they got caught. "Gee, I've been doing this forever. If that cyclist and her kids hadn't been there none of this would have happened. I mean, who tows kids behind a bike along a street anyway?"
What struck me about this event was that the pickup driver didn't try and defend himself or deny anything. To the contrary, he clearly stated that he was looking at and listening to his phone instead of paying attention to the road. He is taking responsibility for what he did - and we see far to little of that today.
__________________
Doug

'72 Fuji Finest
'80 Austro-Daimler Inter10
'06 Fuji Team Issue
'06 Salsa Las Cruces
Nashbar Single Speed
dperreno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 PM.